All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net, "Vasily Khoruzhick" <anarsoul@gmail.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Juha-Pekka Heikkila" <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Sean Paul" <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] drm/i915/dp: Allow forcing specific interfaces through enable_dpcd_backlight
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 21:07:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0sjwavr.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210107225207.28091-4-lyude@redhat.com>

On Thu, 07 Jan 2021, Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote:
> Since we now support controlling panel backlights through DPCD using
> both the standard VESA interface, and Intel's proprietary HDR backlight
> interface, we should allow the user to be able to explicitly choose
> between one or the other in the event that we're wrong about panels
> reliably reporting support for the Intel HDR interface.
>
> So, this commit adds support for this by introducing two new
> enable_dpcd_backlight options: 2 which forces i915 to only probe for the
> VESA interface, and 3 which forces i915 to only probe for the Intel
> backlight interface (might be useful if we find panels in the wild that
> report the VESA interface in their VBT, but actually only support the
> Intel backlight interface).
>
> v3:
> * Rebase
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Yup. Feels maybe a bit convoluted, but I'll trust your judgement as
you've been playing with these.

BR,
Jani.

> Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net
> Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c            |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> index 5e761fb49a14..4b2cb20b1f94 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> @@ -613,15 +613,54 @@ static const struct intel_panel_bl_funcs intel_dp_vesa_bl_funcs = {
>  	.get = intel_dp_aux_vesa_get_backlight,
>  };
>  
> +enum intel_dp_aux_backlight_modparam {
> +	INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_AUTO = -1,
> +	INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_OFF = 0,
> +	INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_ON = 1,
> +	INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_VESA = 2,
> +	INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_INTEL = 3,
> +};
> +
>  int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
>  	struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(connector->encoder);
>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> +	bool try_intel_interface = false, try_vesa_interface = false;
>  
> -	if (i915->params.enable_dpcd_backlight == 0)
> +	/* Check the VBT and user's module parameters to figure out which
> +	 * interfaces to probe
> +	 */
> +	switch (i915->params.enable_dpcd_backlight) {
> +	case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_OFF:
>  		return -ENODEV;
> +	case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_AUTO:
> +		switch (i915->vbt.backlight.type) {
> +		case INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE:
> +			try_vesa_interface = true;
> +			break;
> +		case INTEL_BACKLIGHT_DISPLAY_DDI:
> +			try_intel_interface = true;
> +			try_vesa_interface = true;
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +		}
> +		break;
> +	case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_ON:
> +		if (i915->vbt.backlight.type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE)
> +			try_intel_interface = true;
> +
> +		try_vesa_interface = true;
> +		break;
> +	case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_VESA:
> +		try_vesa_interface = true;
> +		break;
> +	case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_INTEL:
> +		try_intel_interface = true;
> +		break;
> +	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * A lot of eDP panels in the wild will report supporting both the
> @@ -630,13 +669,13 @@ int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  	 * and will only work with the Intel interface. So, always probe for
>  	 * that first.
>  	 */
> -	if (intel_dp_aux_supports_hdr_backlight(connector)) {
> +	if (try_intel_interface && intel_dp_aux_supports_hdr_backlight(connector)) {
>  		drm_dbg_kms(dev, "Using Intel proprietary eDP backlight controls\n");
>  		panel->backlight.funcs = &intel_dp_hdr_bl_funcs;
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (intel_dp_aux_supports_vesa_backlight(connector)) {
> +	if (try_vesa_interface && intel_dp_aux_supports_vesa_backlight(connector)) {
>  		drm_dbg_kms(dev, "Using VESA eDP backlight controls\n");
>  		panel->backlight.funcs = &intel_dp_vesa_bl_funcs;
>  		return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> index 7f139ea4a90b..6939634e56ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ i915_param_named_unsafe(inject_probe_failure, uint, 0400,
>  
>  i915_param_named(enable_dpcd_backlight, int, 0400,
>  	"Enable support for DPCD backlight control"
> -	"(-1=use per-VBT LFP backlight type setting [default], 0=disabled, 1=enabled)");
> +	"(-1=use per-VBT LFP backlight type setting [default], 0=disabled, 1=enable, 2=force VESA interface, 3=force Intel interface)");
>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_GVT)
>  i915_param_named(enable_gvt, bool, 0400,

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net,
	Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] drm/i915/dp: Allow forcing specific interfaces through enable_dpcd_backlight
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 21:07:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0sjwavr.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210107225207.28091-4-lyude@redhat.com>

On Thu, 07 Jan 2021, Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote:
> Since we now support controlling panel backlights through DPCD using
> both the standard VESA interface, and Intel's proprietary HDR backlight
> interface, we should allow the user to be able to explicitly choose
> between one or the other in the event that we're wrong about panels
> reliably reporting support for the Intel HDR interface.
>
> So, this commit adds support for this by introducing two new
> enable_dpcd_backlight options: 2 which forces i915 to only probe for the
> VESA interface, and 3 which forces i915 to only probe for the Intel
> backlight interface (might be useful if we find panels in the wild that
> report the VESA interface in their VBT, but actually only support the
> Intel backlight interface).
>
> v3:
> * Rebase
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Yup. Feels maybe a bit convoluted, but I'll trust your judgement as
you've been playing with these.

BR,
Jani.

> Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net
> Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c            |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> index 5e761fb49a14..4b2cb20b1f94 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> @@ -613,15 +613,54 @@ static const struct intel_panel_bl_funcs intel_dp_vesa_bl_funcs = {
>  	.get = intel_dp_aux_vesa_get_backlight,
>  };
>  
> +enum intel_dp_aux_backlight_modparam {
> +	INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_AUTO = -1,
> +	INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_OFF = 0,
> +	INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_ON = 1,
> +	INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_VESA = 2,
> +	INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_INTEL = 3,
> +};
> +
>  int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
>  	struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(connector->encoder);
>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> +	bool try_intel_interface = false, try_vesa_interface = false;
>  
> -	if (i915->params.enable_dpcd_backlight == 0)
> +	/* Check the VBT and user's module parameters to figure out which
> +	 * interfaces to probe
> +	 */
> +	switch (i915->params.enable_dpcd_backlight) {
> +	case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_OFF:
>  		return -ENODEV;
> +	case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_AUTO:
> +		switch (i915->vbt.backlight.type) {
> +		case INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE:
> +			try_vesa_interface = true;
> +			break;
> +		case INTEL_BACKLIGHT_DISPLAY_DDI:
> +			try_intel_interface = true;
> +			try_vesa_interface = true;
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +		}
> +		break;
> +	case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_ON:
> +		if (i915->vbt.backlight.type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE)
> +			try_intel_interface = true;
> +
> +		try_vesa_interface = true;
> +		break;
> +	case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_VESA:
> +		try_vesa_interface = true;
> +		break;
> +	case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_INTEL:
> +		try_intel_interface = true;
> +		break;
> +	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * A lot of eDP panels in the wild will report supporting both the
> @@ -630,13 +669,13 @@ int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  	 * and will only work with the Intel interface. So, always probe for
>  	 * that first.
>  	 */
> -	if (intel_dp_aux_supports_hdr_backlight(connector)) {
> +	if (try_intel_interface && intel_dp_aux_supports_hdr_backlight(connector)) {
>  		drm_dbg_kms(dev, "Using Intel proprietary eDP backlight controls\n");
>  		panel->backlight.funcs = &intel_dp_hdr_bl_funcs;
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (intel_dp_aux_supports_vesa_backlight(connector)) {
> +	if (try_vesa_interface && intel_dp_aux_supports_vesa_backlight(connector)) {
>  		drm_dbg_kms(dev, "Using VESA eDP backlight controls\n");
>  		panel->backlight.funcs = &intel_dp_vesa_bl_funcs;
>  		return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> index 7f139ea4a90b..6939634e56ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ i915_param_named_unsafe(inject_probe_failure, uint, 0400,
>  
>  i915_param_named(enable_dpcd_backlight, int, 0400,
>  	"Enable support for DPCD backlight control"
> -	"(-1=use per-VBT LFP backlight type setting [default], 0=disabled, 1=enabled)");
> +	"(-1=use per-VBT LFP backlight type setting [default], 0=disabled, 1=enable, 2=force VESA interface, 3=force Intel interface)");
>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_GVT)
>  i915_param_named(enable_gvt, bool, 0400,

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 3/4] drm/i915/dp: Allow forcing specific interfaces through enable_dpcd_backlight
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 21:07:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0sjwavr.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210107225207.28091-4-lyude@redhat.com>

On Thu, 07 Jan 2021, Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote:
> Since we now support controlling panel backlights through DPCD using
> both the standard VESA interface, and Intel's proprietary HDR backlight
> interface, we should allow the user to be able to explicitly choose
> between one or the other in the event that we're wrong about panels
> reliably reporting support for the Intel HDR interface.
>
> So, this commit adds support for this by introducing two new
> enable_dpcd_backlight options: 2 which forces i915 to only probe for the
> VESA interface, and 3 which forces i915 to only probe for the Intel
> backlight interface (might be useful if we find panels in the wild that
> report the VESA interface in their VBT, but actually only support the
> Intel backlight interface).
>
> v3:
> * Rebase
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Yup. Feels maybe a bit convoluted, but I'll trust your judgement as
you've been playing with these.

BR,
Jani.

> Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net
> Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c            |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> index 5e761fb49a14..4b2cb20b1f94 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> @@ -613,15 +613,54 @@ static const struct intel_panel_bl_funcs intel_dp_vesa_bl_funcs = {
>  	.get = intel_dp_aux_vesa_get_backlight,
>  };
>  
> +enum intel_dp_aux_backlight_modparam {
> +	INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_AUTO = -1,
> +	INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_OFF = 0,
> +	INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_ON = 1,
> +	INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_VESA = 2,
> +	INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_INTEL = 3,
> +};
> +
>  int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
>  	struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
>  	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(connector->encoder);
>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> +	bool try_intel_interface = false, try_vesa_interface = false;
>  
> -	if (i915->params.enable_dpcd_backlight == 0)
> +	/* Check the VBT and user's module parameters to figure out which
> +	 * interfaces to probe
> +	 */
> +	switch (i915->params.enable_dpcd_backlight) {
> +	case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_OFF:
>  		return -ENODEV;
> +	case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_AUTO:
> +		switch (i915->vbt.backlight.type) {
> +		case INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE:
> +			try_vesa_interface = true;
> +			break;
> +		case INTEL_BACKLIGHT_DISPLAY_DDI:
> +			try_intel_interface = true;
> +			try_vesa_interface = true;
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +		}
> +		break;
> +	case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_ON:
> +		if (i915->vbt.backlight.type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE)
> +			try_intel_interface = true;
> +
> +		try_vesa_interface = true;
> +		break;
> +	case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_VESA:
> +		try_vesa_interface = true;
> +		break;
> +	case INTEL_DP_AUX_BACKLIGHT_FORCE_INTEL:
> +		try_intel_interface = true;
> +		break;
> +	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * A lot of eDP panels in the wild will report supporting both the
> @@ -630,13 +669,13 @@ int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  	 * and will only work with the Intel interface. So, always probe for
>  	 * that first.
>  	 */
> -	if (intel_dp_aux_supports_hdr_backlight(connector)) {
> +	if (try_intel_interface && intel_dp_aux_supports_hdr_backlight(connector)) {
>  		drm_dbg_kms(dev, "Using Intel proprietary eDP backlight controls\n");
>  		panel->backlight.funcs = &intel_dp_hdr_bl_funcs;
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (intel_dp_aux_supports_vesa_backlight(connector)) {
> +	if (try_vesa_interface && intel_dp_aux_supports_vesa_backlight(connector)) {
>  		drm_dbg_kms(dev, "Using VESA eDP backlight controls\n");
>  		panel->backlight.funcs = &intel_dp_vesa_bl_funcs;
>  		return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> index 7f139ea4a90b..6939634e56ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ i915_param_named_unsafe(inject_probe_failure, uint, 0400,
>  
>  i915_param_named(enable_dpcd_backlight, int, 0400,
>  	"Enable support for DPCD backlight control"
> -	"(-1=use per-VBT LFP backlight type setting [default], 0=disabled, 1=enabled)");
> +	"(-1=use per-VBT LFP backlight type setting [default], 0=disabled, 1=enable, 2=force VESA interface, 3=force Intel interface)");
>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_GVT)
>  i915_param_named(enable_gvt, bool, 0400,

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-11 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-07 22:52 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/4] drm/i915: Add support for Intel's eDP backlight controls Lyude Paul
2021-01-07 22:52 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] drm/i915: Keep track of pwm-related backlight hooks separately Lyude Paul
2021-01-07 22:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lyude Paul
2021-01-07 22:52   ` Lyude Paul
2021-01-08 15:05   ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 15:05     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2021-01-08 15:05     ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-11 19:02   ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-11 19:02     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2021-01-11 19:02     ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-12  8:11   ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2021-01-12  8:11     ` [Intel-gfx] " Vasily Khoruzhick
2021-01-12  8:11     ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2021-01-07 22:52 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] drm/i915/dp: Enable Intel's HDR backlight interface (only SDR for now) Lyude Paul
2021-01-07 22:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lyude Paul
2021-01-07 22:52   ` Lyude Paul
2021-01-11 19:06   ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-11 19:06     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2021-01-11 19:06     ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-07 22:52 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] drm/i915/dp: Allow forcing specific interfaces through enable_dpcd_backlight Lyude Paul
2021-01-07 22:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lyude Paul
2021-01-07 22:52   ` Lyude Paul
2021-01-11 19:07   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-01-11 19:07     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2021-01-11 19:07     ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-07 22:52 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] drm/dp: Revert "drm/dp: Introduce EDID-based quirks" Lyude Paul
2021-01-07 22:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lyude Paul
2021-01-07 22:52   ` Lyude Paul
2021-01-11 19:07   ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-11 19:07     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2021-01-11 19:07     ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-11 19:08     ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-11 19:08       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2021-01-11 19:08       ` Jani Nikula
2021-01-08  0:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Add support for Intel's eDP backlight controls (rev8) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k0sjwavr.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=anarsoul@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    --cc=thaytan@noraisin.net \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.