All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/3] fanotify10: Add support for multiple event files
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 14:24:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r0xwfk0m.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221121095345.2m7aze7xtlmxb4hy@quack3>

Hello,

Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:

> On Mon 21-11-22 10:33:13, Petr Vorel wrote:
>> Hi Jan, all,
>> 
>> > On Thu 17-11-22 16:58:50, Petr Vorel wrote:
>> > > Hi Jan, all,
>> 
>> > > > +#define foreach_path(tc, buf, pname) \
>> > > > +	for (int piter = 0; format_path_check((buf), (tc)->pname##_fmt,	\
>> > > Unfortunately we still support C99 due old compiler on CentOS 7,
>> > > therefore int piter needs to be defined outside of for loop.
>> 
>> > Hum, but variable declaration in the for loop is part of C99 standard (as
>> > the error message also says). So did you want to say you are compiling
>> > against C89 standard? And CentOS 7 ships with GCC 4.8.5 AFAICS which should
>> > be fully C99 compliant BTW. So what's the situation here?
>> I'm sorry, I didn't express clearly myself. Yes, 4.8.5 supports C99,
>> but the default is C90 [1].
>
> OK, thanks for explanation.
>
>> > That being said I can workaround the problem in the macro, it will just be
>> > somewhat uglier. So before doing that I'd like to understand whether
>> > following C89 is really required...
>> 
>> I'm don't remember why we have just not specified -std=... already, Cyril had
>> some objections, thus Cc him.
>> 
>> Cent0S EOL in 2024-06, we might reconsider to add -std=... to endup this agony
>> (errors like this often need to be fixed).
>> 
>> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.5/gcc/Standards.html
>
> Given Cyril's reply, should I rework my patch or are we fine with using
> C99?

Well -std=c99 doesn't work, but we can use -std=gnu99. If that doesn't
fix it then we should drop centos07 now IMO.

>
> 								Honza
>
>> > > fanotify10.c:470:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
>> > >   for (int piter = 0; format_path_check((buf), (tc)->pname##_fmt, \
>> > >   ^
>> 
>> > > fanotify10.c:470:11: error: redefinition of ‘piter’
>> > >   for (int piter = 0; format_path_check((buf), (tc)->pname##_fmt, \
>> > >            ^
>> > > Kind regards,
>> > > Petr


-- 
Thank you,
Richard.

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-21 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-15 12:47 [LTP] [PATCH 0/3] Make fanotify10 test yet more reliable Jan Kara
2022-11-15 12:47 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/3] fanotify10: Use named initializers Jan Kara
2022-11-15 12:47 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/3] fanotify10: Add support for multiple event files Jan Kara
2022-11-17 15:58   ` Petr Vorel
2022-11-21  9:14     ` Jan Kara
2022-11-21  9:33       ` Petr Vorel
2022-11-21  9:39         ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-11-22  8:19           ` Petr Vorel
2022-11-22 10:10             ` Petr Vorel
2022-11-21  9:53         ` Jan Kara
2022-11-21 14:24           ` Richard Palethorpe [this message]
2022-11-22  8:17             ` Petr Vorel
2022-11-22  8:57               ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-11-21 15:04   ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-11-22 12:10     ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-11-22 12:56       ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-11-15 12:47 ` [LTP] [PATCH 3/3] fanotify10: Make evictable marks tests more reliable Jan Kara
2022-11-16  2:17   ` Pengfei Xu
2022-11-16 10:58     ` Jan Kara
2022-11-16 16:32       ` Amir Goldstein
2022-11-17 15:50         ` Petr Vorel
2022-11-21 15:09   ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-11-22 10:30     ` Petr Vorel
2022-11-22 12:42       ` Cyril Hrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r0xwfk0m.fsf@suse.de \
    --to=rpalethorpe@suse.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.