All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Qemu-devel] fix incorrect identify implementation in nvme
@ 2016-08-04 19:42 Christoph Hellwig
  2016-08-04 19:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] nvme: fix identify to be NVMe 1.1 compliant Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2016-08-04 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-block; +Cc: keith.busch, qemu-devel

Third resent of this series after this didn't get picked up the
previous times.  The Qemu NVMe implementation mistakes the cns
field in the Identify command as a boolean.  This was never
true, and is actively harmful since NVMe1.1 (which the Qemu
device claims to support) supports more than two Identify variants.

We had to add a quirk in Linux to work around this behavior.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] nvme: fix identify to be NVMe 1.1 compliant
  2016-08-04 19:42 [Qemu-devel] fix incorrect identify implementation in nvme Christoph Hellwig
@ 2016-08-04 19:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2016-08-04 19:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] nvme: bump PCI revision Christoph Hellwig
  2016-08-04 20:14 ` [Qemu-devel] fix incorrect identify implementation in nvme Keith Busch
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2016-08-04 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-block; +Cc: keith.busch, qemu-devel

NVMe 1.1 requires devices to implement a Namespace List subcommand of
the identify command.  Qemu not only not implements this features, but
also misinterprets it as an Identify Controller request.  Due to this
any OS trying to use the Namespace List will fail the probe.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 hw/block/nvme.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c
index 2ded247..a0655a3 100644
--- a/hw/block/nvme.c
+++ b/hw/block/nvme.c
@@ -469,19 +469,22 @@ static uint16_t nvme_create_cq(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeCmd *cmd)
     return NVME_SUCCESS;
 }
 
-static uint16_t nvme_identify(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeCmd *cmd)
+static uint16_t nvme_identify_ctrl(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeIdentify *c)
+{
+    uint64_t prp1 = le64_to_cpu(c->prp1);
+    uint64_t prp2 = le64_to_cpu(c->prp2);
+
+    return nvme_dma_read_prp(n, (uint8_t *)&n->id_ctrl, sizeof(n->id_ctrl),
+        prp1, prp2);
+}
+
+static uint16_t nvme_identify_ns(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeIdentify *c)
 {
     NvmeNamespace *ns;
-    NvmeIdentify *c = (NvmeIdentify *)cmd;
-    uint32_t cns  = le32_to_cpu(c->cns);
     uint32_t nsid = le32_to_cpu(c->nsid);
     uint64_t prp1 = le64_to_cpu(c->prp1);
     uint64_t prp2 = le64_to_cpu(c->prp2);
 
-    if (cns) {
-        return nvme_dma_read_prp(n, (uint8_t *)&n->id_ctrl, sizeof(n->id_ctrl),
-            prp1, prp2);
-    }
     if (nsid == 0 || nsid > n->num_namespaces) {
         return NVME_INVALID_NSID | NVME_DNR;
     }
@@ -491,6 +494,48 @@ static uint16_t nvme_identify(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeCmd *cmd)
         prp1, prp2);
 }
 
+static uint16_t nvme_identify_nslist(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeIdentify *c)
+{
+    static const int data_len = 4096;
+    uint32_t min_nsid = le32_to_cpu(c->nsid);
+    uint64_t prp1 = le64_to_cpu(c->prp1);
+    uint64_t prp2 = le64_to_cpu(c->prp2);
+    uint32_t *list;
+    uint16_t ret;
+    int i, j = 0;
+
+    list = g_malloc0(data_len);
+    for (i = 0; i < n->num_namespaces; i++) {
+        if (i < min_nsid) {
+            continue;
+        }
+        list[j++] = cpu_to_le32(i + 1);
+        if (j == data_len / sizeof(uint32_t)) {
+            break;
+        }
+    }
+    ret = nvme_dma_read_prp(n, (uint8_t *)list, data_len, prp1, prp2);
+    g_free(list);
+    return ret;
+}
+
+
+static uint16_t nvme_identify(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeCmd *cmd)
+{
+    NvmeIdentify *c = (NvmeIdentify *)cmd;
+
+    switch (le32_to_cpu(c->cns)) {
+    case 0x00:
+        return nvme_identify_ns(n, c);
+    case 0x01:
+        return nvme_identify_ctrl(n, c);
+    case 0x02:
+        return nvme_identify_nslist(n, c);
+    default:
+        return NVME_INVALID_FIELD | NVME_DNR;
+    }
+}
+
 static uint16_t nvme_get_feature(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeCmd *cmd, NvmeRequest *req)
 {
     uint32_t dw10 = le32_to_cpu(cmd->cdw10);
-- 
2.1.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] nvme: bump PCI revision
  2016-08-04 19:42 [Qemu-devel] fix incorrect identify implementation in nvme Christoph Hellwig
  2016-08-04 19:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] nvme: fix identify to be NVMe 1.1 compliant Christoph Hellwig
@ 2016-08-04 19:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2016-08-04 20:14 ` [Qemu-devel] fix incorrect identify implementation in nvme Keith Busch
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2016-08-04 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-block; +Cc: keith.busch, qemu-devel

The broken Identify implementation in earlier Qemu versions means we
need to blacklist it from issueing the NVMe 1.1 Identify Namespace List
command.  As we want to be able to use it in newer Qemu versions we need
a way to identify those.  Bump the PCI revision as a guest visible
indicator of this bug fix.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 hw/block/nvme.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c
index a0655a3..cef3bb4 100644
--- a/hw/block/nvme.c
+++ b/hw/block/nvme.c
@@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ static void nvme_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
     pc->class_id = PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_EXPRESS;
     pc->vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL;
     pc->device_id = 0x5845;
-    pc->revision = 1;
+    pc->revision = 2;
     pc->is_express = 1;
 
     set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_STORAGE, dc->categories);
-- 
2.1.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] fix incorrect identify implementation in nvme
  2016-08-04 19:42 [Qemu-devel] fix incorrect identify implementation in nvme Christoph Hellwig
  2016-08-04 19:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] nvme: fix identify to be NVMe 1.1 compliant Christoph Hellwig
  2016-08-04 19:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] nvme: bump PCI revision Christoph Hellwig
@ 2016-08-04 20:14 ` Keith Busch
  2016-08-05  6:48   ` Markus Armbruster
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Keith Busch @ 2016-08-04 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: qemu-block, qemu-devel

On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 09:42:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Third resent of this series after this didn't get picked up the
> previous times.  The Qemu NVMe implementation mistakes the cns
> field in the Identify command as a boolean.  This was never
> true, and is actively harmful since NVMe1.1 (which the Qemu
> device claims to support) supports more than two Identify variants.
> 
> We had to add a quirk in Linux to work around this behavior.

Yes, these are great. Do we need to ping a maintainer to go through
their tree, or can this be applied immediately? If need be, I can apply
and send a pull request.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] fix incorrect identify implementation in nvme
  2016-08-04 20:14 ` [Qemu-devel] fix incorrect identify implementation in nvme Keith Busch
@ 2016-08-05  6:48   ` Markus Armbruster
  2016-08-05  8:54     ` Kevin Wolf
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Markus Armbruster @ 2016-08-05  6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Keith Busch
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, qemu-devel, qemu-block, Kevin Wolf, Max Reitz

Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> writes:

> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 09:42:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Third resent of this series after this didn't get picked up the
>> previous times.  The Qemu NVMe implementation mistakes the cns
>> field in the Identify command as a boolean.  This was never
>> true, and is actively harmful since NVMe1.1 (which the Qemu
>> device claims to support) supports more than two Identify variants.
>> 
>> We had to add a quirk in Linux to work around this behavior.
>
> Yes, these are great. Do we need to ping a maintainer to go through
> their tree, or can this be applied immediately? If need be, I can apply
> and send a pull request.

$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f hw/block/nvme.c 
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> (supporter:nvme)
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> (supporter:Block layer core)
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> (supporter:Block layer core)
qemu-block@nongnu.org (open list:nvme)
qemu-devel@nongnu.org (open list:All patches CC here)

Send a pull request (assuming you have a properly signed PGP key).

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] fix incorrect identify implementation in nvme
  2016-08-05  6:48   ` Markus Armbruster
@ 2016-08-05  8:54     ` Kevin Wolf
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Wolf @ 2016-08-05  8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Markus Armbruster
  Cc: Keith Busch, Christoph Hellwig, qemu-devel, qemu-block, Max Reitz

Am 05.08.2016 um 08:48 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 09:42:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> Third resent of this series after this didn't get picked up the
> >> previous times.  The Qemu NVMe implementation mistakes the cns
> >> field in the Identify command as a boolean.  This was never
> >> true, and is actively harmful since NVMe1.1 (which the Qemu
> >> device claims to support) supports more than two Identify variants.
> >> 
> >> We had to add a quirk in Linux to work around this behavior.
> >
> > Yes, these are great. Do we need to ping a maintainer to go through
> > their tree, or can this be applied immediately? If need be, I can apply
> > and send a pull request.
> 
> $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f hw/block/nvme.c 
> Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> (supporter:nvme)
> Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> (supporter:Block layer core)
> Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> (supporter:Block layer core)
> qemu-block@nongnu.org (open list:nvme)
> qemu-devel@nongnu.org (open list:All patches CC here)
> 
> Send a pull request (assuming you have a properly signed PGP key).

Keith, I'll take the patches through my tree with your Acked-by,
assuming that this makes the process easier for you.

Sorry for forgetting about the previous version, I had intended to give
others a chance to comment before I apply them, but then it fell through
the cracks. Next time someone just send a quick "ping" reply after a week
or so, please.

Kevin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-05  8:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-04 19:42 [Qemu-devel] fix incorrect identify implementation in nvme Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-04 19:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] nvme: fix identify to be NVMe 1.1 compliant Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-04 19:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] nvme: bump PCI revision Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-04 20:14 ` [Qemu-devel] fix incorrect identify implementation in nvme Keith Busch
2016-08-05  6:48   ` Markus Armbruster
2016-08-05  8:54     ` Kevin Wolf

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.