From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] KVM: arm64: perf: Replace '0xf' instances with ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 10:56:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tujw9ufg.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1628652427-24695-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 04:27:06 +0100,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
>
> ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF which indicate implementation defined PMU, never
> actually gets used although there are '0xf' instances scattered all around.
> Just do the macro replacement to improve readability.
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
For some reason I don't understand, b4 doesn't want to cherry-pick
this patch from the list. I've applied it manually to
kvm-arm64/misc-5.15.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] KVM: arm64: perf: Replace '0xf' instances with ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 10:56:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tujw9ufg.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1628652427-24695-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 04:27:06 +0100,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
>
> ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF which indicate implementation defined PMU, never
> actually gets used although there are '0xf' instances scattered all around.
> Just do the macro replacement to improve readability.
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
For some reason I don't understand, b4 doesn't want to cherry-pick
this patch from the list. I've applied it manually to
kvm-arm64/misc-5.15.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] KVM: arm64: perf: Replace '0xf' instances with ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 10:56:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tujw9ufg.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1628652427-24695-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 04:27:06 +0100,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
>
> ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF which indicate implementation defined PMU, never
> actually gets used although there are '0xf' instances scattered all around.
> Just do the macro replacement to improve readability.
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
For some reason I don't understand, b4 doesn't want to cherry-pick
this patch from the list. I've applied it manually to
kvm-arm64/misc-5.15.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-11 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-11 3:27 [PATCH V2] KVM: arm64: perf: Replace '0xf' instances with ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF Anshuman Khandual
2021-08-11 3:27 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-08-11 3:27 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-08-11 3:27 ` [PATCH V2] arm64/perf: " Anshuman Khandual
2021-08-11 3:27 ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-08-11 10:44 ` Will Deacon
2021-08-11 10:44 ` Will Deacon
2021-08-11 9:56 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-08-11 9:56 ` [PATCH V2] KVM: arm64: perf: " Marc Zyngier
2021-08-11 9:56 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tujw9ufg.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.