* [PATCH] .gitignore: include common build sub-directories @ 2020-04-13 16:29 Alex Bennée 2020-04-13 18:26 ` Eric Blake 2020-04-14 15:06 ` Richard Henderson 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Alex Bennée @ 2020-04-13 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Alex Bennée As out-of-tree builds become more common (or rather building in a subdir) we can add a lot of load to "git ls-files" as it hunts down sub-directories that are irrelevant to the source tree. This is especially annoying if you have a prompt that attempts to summarise the current git status on command completion. Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> --- .gitignore | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 0c5af83aa74..7757dc08a08 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ cscope.* tags TAGS docker-src.* +build +builds *~ *.ast_raw *.depend_raw -- 2.20.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] .gitignore: include common build sub-directories 2020-04-13 16:29 [PATCH] .gitignore: include common build sub-directories Alex Bennée @ 2020-04-13 18:26 ` Eric Blake 2020-04-13 21:32 ` Alex Bennée 2020-04-14 15:06 ` Richard Henderson 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Eric Blake @ 2020-04-13 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Bennée, qemu-devel On 4/13/20 11:29 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: > As out-of-tree builds become more common (or rather building in a > subdir) we can add a lot of load to "git ls-files" as it hunts down > sub-directories that are irrelevant to the source tree. This is > especially annoying if you have a prompt that attempts to summarise > the current git status on command completion. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> > --- > .gitignore | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore > index 0c5af83aa74..7757dc08a08 100644 > --- a/.gitignore > +++ b/.gitignore > @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ cscope.* > tags > TAGS > docker-src.* > +build > +builds Would 'build-*' be worth adding as well? The idea makes sense to me (as I've already done the same in my ./git/info/exclude locally), Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] .gitignore: include common build sub-directories 2020-04-13 18:26 ` Eric Blake @ 2020-04-13 21:32 ` Alex Bennée 2020-04-13 21:42 ` Eric Blake 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Alex Bennée @ 2020-04-13 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Blake; +Cc: qemu-devel Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes: > On 4/13/20 11:29 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >> As out-of-tree builds become more common (or rather building in a >> subdir) we can add a lot of load to "git ls-files" as it hunts down >> sub-directories that are irrelevant to the source tree. This is >> especially annoying if you have a prompt that attempts to summarise >> the current git status on command completion. >> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> >> --- >> .gitignore | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore >> index 0c5af83aa74..7757dc08a08 100644 >> --- a/.gitignore >> +++ b/.gitignore >> @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ cscope.* >> tags >> TAGS >> docker-src.* >> +build >> +builds > > Would 'build-*' be worth adding as well? Sure - I'll add it to v2. > > The idea makes sense to me (as I've already done the same in my > ./git/info/exclude locally), > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> -- Alex Bennée ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] .gitignore: include common build sub-directories 2020-04-13 21:32 ` Alex Bennée @ 2020-04-13 21:42 ` Eric Blake 2020-04-13 21:45 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2020-04-14 8:00 ` Markus Armbruster 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Eric Blake @ 2020-04-13 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Bennée; +Cc: qemu-devel On 4/13/20 4:32 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes: > >> On 4/13/20 11:29 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >>> As out-of-tree builds become more common (or rather building in a >>> subdir) we can add a lot of load to "git ls-files" as it hunts down >>> sub-directories that are irrelevant to the source tree. This is >>> especially annoying if you have a prompt that attempts to summarise >>> the current git status on command completion. >>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> .gitignore | 2 ++ >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore >>> index 0c5af83aa74..7757dc08a08 100644 >>> --- a/.gitignore >>> +++ b/.gitignore >>> @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ cscope.* >>> tags >>> TAGS >>> docker-src.* >>> +build >>> +builds >> >> Would 'build-*' be worth adding as well? > > Sure - I'll add it to v2. Or even consolidate it into a single pattern: build* (which would allow 'build', 'builds', 'build1', 'build23', 'build-fedora', 'build-bug1234', ...) -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] .gitignore: include common build sub-directories 2020-04-13 21:42 ` Eric Blake @ 2020-04-13 21:45 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2020-04-14 8:00 ` Markus Armbruster 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-04-13 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Blake, Alex Bennée; +Cc: qemu-devel On 4/13/20 11:42 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 4/13/20 4:32 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes: >> >>> On 4/13/20 11:29 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >>>> As out-of-tree builds become more common (or rather building in a >>>> subdir) we can add a lot of load to "git ls-files" as it hunts down >>>> sub-directories that are irrelevant to the source tree. This is >>>> especially annoying if you have a prompt that attempts to summarise >>>> the current git status on command completion. >>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> >>>> --- >>>> .gitignore | 2 ++ >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>>> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore >>>> index 0c5af83aa74..7757dc08a08 100644 >>>> --- a/.gitignore >>>> +++ b/.gitignore >>>> @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ cscope.* >>>> tags >>>> TAGS >>>> docker-src.* >>>> +build >>>> +builds >>> >>> Would 'build-*' be worth adding as well? >> >> Sure - I'll add it to v2. > > Or even consolidate it into a single pattern: build* (which would allow > 'build', 'builds', 'build1', 'build23', 'build-fedora', 'build-bug1234', > ...) Using 'build*': Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] .gitignore: include common build sub-directories 2020-04-13 21:42 ` Eric Blake 2020-04-13 21:45 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-04-14 8:00 ` Markus Armbruster 2020-04-14 8:47 ` Alex Bennée 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Markus Armbruster @ 2020-04-14 8:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Blake; +Cc: Alex Bennée, qemu-devel Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes: > On 4/13/20 4:32 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes: >> >>> On 4/13/20 11:29 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >>>> As out-of-tree builds become more common (or rather building in a >>>> subdir) we can add a lot of load to "git ls-files" as it hunts down >>>> sub-directories that are irrelevant to the source tree. This is >>>> especially annoying if you have a prompt that attempts to summarise >>>> the current git status on command completion. >>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> >>>> --- >>>> .gitignore | 2 ++ >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>>> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore >>>> index 0c5af83aa74..7757dc08a08 100644 >>>> --- a/.gitignore >>>> +++ b/.gitignore >>>> @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ cscope.* >>>> tags >>>> TAGS >>>> docker-src.* >>>> +build >>>> +builds >>> >>> Would 'build-*' be worth adding as well? >> >> Sure - I'll add it to v2. > > Or even consolidate it into a single pattern: build* (which would > allow 'build', 'builds', 'build1', 'build23', 'build-fedora', > 'build-bug1234', ...) The looser the pattern, the higher the risk of unwanted matches. Would be less of an issue if we had a cleaner source root directory. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] .gitignore: include common build sub-directories 2020-04-14 8:00 ` Markus Armbruster @ 2020-04-14 8:47 ` Alex Bennée 2020-04-14 9:53 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Alex Bennée @ 2020-04-14 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Markus Armbruster; +Cc: qemu-devel Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> writes: > Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes: > >> On 4/13/20 4:32 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: >>> >>> Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes: >>> >>>> On 4/13/20 11:29 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >>>>> As out-of-tree builds become more common (or rather building in a >>>>> subdir) we can add a lot of load to "git ls-files" as it hunts down >>>>> sub-directories that are irrelevant to the source tree. This is >>>>> especially annoying if you have a prompt that attempts to summarise >>>>> the current git status on command completion. >>>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> >>>>> --- >>>>> .gitignore | 2 ++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>>>> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore >>>>> index 0c5af83aa74..7757dc08a08 100644 >>>>> --- a/.gitignore >>>>> +++ b/.gitignore >>>>> @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ cscope.* >>>>> tags >>>>> TAGS >>>>> docker-src.* >>>>> +build >>>>> +builds >>>> >>>> Would 'build-*' be worth adding as well? >>> >>> Sure - I'll add it to v2. >> >> Or even consolidate it into a single pattern: build* (which would >> allow 'build', 'builds', 'build1', 'build23', 'build-fedora', >> 'build-bug1234', ...) > > The looser the pattern, the higher the risk of unwanted matches. > > Would be less of an issue if we had a cleaner source root directory. True but as of now we don't have anything matching bu* so I think build* is fairly safe. I have ran into problems with over lax .gitignore stanzas before but I don't think it's taken too long to figure out what was going on. It's not like having a build subdir isn't a common "out-of-tree" build idiom. -- Alex Bennée ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] .gitignore: include common build sub-directories 2020-04-14 8:47 ` Alex Bennée @ 2020-04-14 9:53 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-04-14 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Bennée, Markus Armbruster; +Cc: qemu-devel On 4/14/20 10:47 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> writes: > >> Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes: >> >>> On 4/13/20 4:32 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: >>>> >>>> Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> On 4/13/20 11:29 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >>>>>> As out-of-tree builds become more common (or rather building in a >>>>>> subdir) we can add a lot of load to "git ls-files" as it hunts down >>>>>> sub-directories that are irrelevant to the source tree. This is >>>>>> especially annoying if you have a prompt that attempts to summarise >>>>>> the current git status on command completion. >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> .gitignore | 2 ++ >>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>>>>> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore >>>>>> index 0c5af83aa74..7757dc08a08 100644 >>>>>> --- a/.gitignore >>>>>> +++ b/.gitignore >>>>>> @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ cscope.* >>>>>> tags >>>>>> TAGS >>>>>> docker-src.* >>>>>> +build >>>>>> +builds >>>>> >>>>> Would 'build-*' be worth adding as well? >>>> >>>> Sure - I'll add it to v2. >>> >>> Or even consolidate it into a single pattern: build* (which would >>> allow 'build', 'builds', 'build1', 'build23', 'build-fedora', >>> 'build-bug1234', ...) >> >> The looser the pattern, the higher the risk of unwanted matches. >> >> Would be less of an issue if we had a cleaner source root directory. > > True but as of now we don't have anything matching bu* so I think build* > is fairly safe. I have ran into problems with over lax .gitignore > stanzas before but I don't think it's taken too long to figure out what > was going on. It's not like having a build subdir isn't a common > "out-of-tree" build idiom. We can restrict to directories using "build*/": GITIGNORE(5) · If the pattern ends with a slash, it is removed for the purpose of the following description, but it would only find a match with a directory. In other words, foo/ will match a directory foo and paths underneath it, but will not match a regular file or a symbolic link foo (this is consistent with the way how pathspec works in general in Git). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] .gitignore: include common build sub-directories 2020-04-13 16:29 [PATCH] .gitignore: include common build sub-directories Alex Bennée 2020-04-13 18:26 ` Eric Blake @ 2020-04-14 15:06 ` Richard Henderson 2020-04-14 16:31 ` Alex Bennée 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Richard Henderson @ 2020-04-14 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Bennée, qemu-devel On 4/13/20 9:29 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: > As out-of-tree builds become more common (or rather building in a > subdir) we can add a lot of load to "git ls-files" as it hunts down > sub-directories that are irrelevant to the source tree. This is > especially annoying if you have a prompt that attempts to summarise > the current git status on command completion. Not a fan. Why do we encourage putting the build directory in tree anyway? IMO any out-of-tree build really should be OUT of tree. My build directories are always siblings of the source directory in the parent directory. r~ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] .gitignore: include common build sub-directories 2020-04-14 15:06 ` Richard Henderson @ 2020-04-14 16:31 ` Alex Bennée 2020-04-14 16:39 ` Richard Henderson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Alex Bennée @ 2020-04-14 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Henderson; +Cc: qemu-devel Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> writes: > On 4/13/20 9:29 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >> As out-of-tree builds become more common (or rather building in a >> subdir) we can add a lot of load to "git ls-files" as it hunts down >> sub-directories that are irrelevant to the source tree. This is >> especially annoying if you have a prompt that attempts to summarise >> the current git status on command completion. > > Not a fan. Why do we encourage putting the build directory in tree anyway? > IMO any out-of-tree build really should be OUT of tree. > > My build directories are always siblings of the source directory in the parent > directory. It's not exactly an un-common pattern - especially if you have a lot of build variants. Keeping them under builds makes it easier to blow the whole lot away rather than having a messy parent directory which you have to clean manually. Personally it also works better with my tooling which can slurp up all the build directories and present me with a menu of make commands to build from. That's not a good argument for accepting the patch though. > > > r~ -- Alex Bennée ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] .gitignore: include common build sub-directories 2020-04-14 16:31 ` Alex Bennée @ 2020-04-14 16:39 ` Richard Henderson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Richard Henderson @ 2020-04-14 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Bennée; +Cc: qemu-devel On 4/14/20 9:31 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: > Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> writes: >> My build directories are always siblings of the source directory in the parent >> directory. > > > It's not exactly an un-common pattern - especially if you have a lot of > build variants. Keeping them under builds makes it easier to blow the > whole lot away rather than having a messy parent directory which you > have to clean manually. "Manual" is a bit of an overstatement. In the end there's no difference at all: it's rm -rf build* no matter the $PWD where you perform it. As for "messy", you're the one that put stuff that doesn't belong into the source directory. Mine is nice and clean. ;-) > Personally it also works better with my tooling which can slurp up all > the build directories and present me with a menu of make commands to > build from. That's not a good argument for accepting the patch though. Hah. r~ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-14 16:55 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-04-13 16:29 [PATCH] .gitignore: include common build sub-directories Alex Bennée 2020-04-13 18:26 ` Eric Blake 2020-04-13 21:32 ` Alex Bennée 2020-04-13 21:42 ` Eric Blake 2020-04-13 21:45 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2020-04-14 8:00 ` Markus Armbruster 2020-04-14 8:47 ` Alex Bennée 2020-04-14 9:53 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2020-04-14 15:06 ` Richard Henderson 2020-04-14 16:31 ` Alex Bennée 2020-04-14 16:39 ` Richard Henderson
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.