From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
To: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Chao Xie <chao.xie@marvell.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: pxa27x_keypad: clear pending interrupts on keypad config
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:55:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vcduwkfa.fsf@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351439163-9575-1-git-send-email-anarsoul@gmail.com> (Vasily Khoruzhick's message of "Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:46:03 +0300")
Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com> writes:
> Bootloader can leave interrupt bit pending, and it confuses driver.
OK, looks good to me.
One question though, just to make sure everything is covered :
Suppose that the resume is the consequence of keypad press. If anybody relied
previously on "reading the keypad" to know which key was pressed to wakeup the
SoC, is it still working after your patch ?
And I suppose you can't "convince" your bootloader to behave correctly, can you ?
Cheers.
--
Robert
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: robert.jarzmik@free.fr (Robert Jarzmik)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: pxa27x_keypad: clear pending interrupts on keypad config
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:55:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vcduwkfa.fsf@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351439163-9575-1-git-send-email-anarsoul@gmail.com> (Vasily Khoruzhick's message of "Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:46:03 +0300")
Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com> writes:
> Bootloader can leave interrupt bit pending, and it confuses driver.
OK, looks good to me.
One question though, just to make sure everything is covered :
Suppose that the resume is the consequence of keypad press. If anybody relied
previously on "reading the keypad" to know which key was pressed to wakeup the
SoC, is it still working after your patch ?
And I suppose you can't "convince" your bootloader to behave correctly, can you ?
Cheers.
--
Robert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-28 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-28 15:46 [PATCH RESEND] ARM: pxa27x_keypad: clear pending interrupts on keypad config Vasily Khoruzhick
2012-10-28 15:46 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2012-10-28 17:55 ` Robert Jarzmik [this message]
2012-10-28 17:55 ` Robert Jarzmik
2012-10-28 18:09 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2012-10-28 18:09 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2012-10-28 18:34 ` Robert Jarzmik
2012-10-28 18:34 ` Robert Jarzmik
2012-11-01 9:35 ` Haojian Zhuang
2012-11-01 9:35 ` Haojian Zhuang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vcduwkfa.fsf@free.fr \
--to=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=anarsoul@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=chao.xie@marvell.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.