* 5.15-dovetail or mainline regression?
@ 2022-06-21 6:10 Jan Kiszka
2022-06-21 6:47 ` Jan Kiszka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2022-06-21 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Gerum, Xenomai
https://source.denx.de/Xenomai/xenomai-images/-/jobs/452968 (qemu-arm64)
2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.337643] printk: console [ttyAMA0] enabled
2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.349807] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80003675c000
...
2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359334] Call trace:
2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359508] locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list+0x60/0x180
2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359577] __mark_inode_dirty+0x2e0/0x430
2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359603] simple_setattr+0x50/0x80
2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359617] notify_change+0x37c/0x3f0
2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359636] handle_create+0x1b0/0x21c
2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359669] devtmpfsd+0x80/0xd0
2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359688] kthread+0x150/0x160
2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359707] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.360029] Code: 11000421 b90012a1 d538d081 8b010000 (c85f7c03)
2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.369411] ---[ end trace 91ca49b5035e8050 ]---
Hitting retry now to see if it sticks. The real arm64 target was stuck
in u-boot (tftp), so I cannot tell yet if it is only a side-effect of
emulation.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Technology
Competence Center Embedded Linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 5.15-dovetail or mainline regression?
2022-06-21 6:10 5.15-dovetail or mainline regression? Jan Kiszka
@ 2022-06-21 6:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-06-21 7:19 ` Bezdeka, Florian
2022-06-29 16:56 ` Jan Kiszka
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2022-06-21 6:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Gerum, Xenomai
On 21.06.22 08:10, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> https://source.denx.de/Xenomai/xenomai-images/-/jobs/452968 (qemu-arm64)
>
> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.337643] printk: console [ttyAMA0] enabled
> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.349807] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80003675c000
> ...
> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359334] Call trace:
> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359508] locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list+0x60/0x180
> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359577] __mark_inode_dirty+0x2e0/0x430
> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359603] simple_setattr+0x50/0x80
> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359617] notify_change+0x37c/0x3f0
> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359636] handle_create+0x1b0/0x21c
> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359669] devtmpfsd+0x80/0xd0
> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359688] kthread+0x150/0x160
> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359707] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.360029] Code: 11000421 b90012a1 d538d081 8b010000 (c85f7c03)
> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.369411] ---[ end trace 91ca49b5035e8050 ]---
>
> Hitting retry now to see if it sticks. The real arm64 target was stuck
> in u-boot (tftp), so I cannot tell yet if it is only a side-effect of
> emulation.
>
The issue with QEMU sticks:
https://source.denx.de/Xenomai/xenomai-images/-/jobs/453115
But now CI is failing in the infrastructure, so I can't retest on hikey.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Technology
Competence Center Embedded Linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 5.15-dovetail or mainline regression?
2022-06-21 6:47 ` Jan Kiszka
@ 2022-06-21 7:19 ` Bezdeka, Florian
2022-06-21 7:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-06-29 16:56 ` Jan Kiszka
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bezdeka, Florian @ 2022-06-21 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rpm, jan.kiszka, xenomai
On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 08:47 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 21.06.22 08:10, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > https://source.denx.de/Xenomai/xenomai-images/-/jobs/452968 (qemu-arm64)
> >
> > 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.337643] printk: console [ttyAMA0] enabled
> > 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.349807] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80003675c000
> > ...
> > 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359334] Call trace:
> > 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359508] locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list+0x60/0x180
> > 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359577] __mark_inode_dirty+0x2e0/0x430
> > 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359603] simple_setattr+0x50/0x80
> > 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359617] notify_change+0x37c/0x3f0
> > 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359636] handle_create+0x1b0/0x21c
> > 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359669] devtmpfsd+0x80/0xd0
> > 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359688] kthread+0x150/0x160
> > 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359707] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> > 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.360029] Code: 11000421 b90012a1 d538d081 8b010000 (c85f7c03)
> > 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.369411] ---[ end trace 91ca49b5035e8050 ]---
> >
> > Hitting retry now to see if it sticks. The real arm64 target was stuck
> > in u-boot (tftp), so I cannot tell yet if it is only a side-effect of
> > emulation.
> >
>
> The issue with QEMU sticks:
> https://source.denx.de/Xenomai/xenomai-images/-/jobs/453115
>
> But now CI is failing in the infrastructure, so I can't retest on hikey.
Gitlab.com is fighting against connectivity issues. See
https://status.gitlab.com/. The hikey job failed because the runner was
not able to download the container image.
PS: Can we use xenomai@xenomai.org again? There was a test message
yesterday which looks promising.
>
> Jan
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 5.15-dovetail or mainline regression?
2022-06-21 7:19 ` Bezdeka, Florian
@ 2022-06-21 7:25 ` Jan Kiszka
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2022-06-21 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bezdeka, Florian (T CED SES-DE), rpm, xenomai
On 21.06.22 09:19, Bezdeka, Florian (T CED SES-DE) wrote:
> PS: Can we use xenomai@xenomai.org again? There was a test message
> yesterday which looks promising.
Yes, it got resolved. But I would still recommend migrating to the new
address.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Technology
Competence Center Embedded Linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 5.15-dovetail or mainline regression?
2022-06-21 6:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-06-21 7:19 ` Bezdeka, Florian
@ 2022-06-29 16:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-07-03 14:05 ` Philippe Gerum
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2022-06-29 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Gerum, Xenomai
On 21.06.22 08:47, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 21.06.22 08:10, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> https://source.denx.de/Xenomai/xenomai-images/-/jobs/452968 (qemu-arm64)
>>
>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.337643] printk: console [ttyAMA0] enabled
>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.349807] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80003675c000
>> ...
>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359334] Call trace:
>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359508] locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list+0x60/0x180
>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359577] __mark_inode_dirty+0x2e0/0x430
>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359603] simple_setattr+0x50/0x80
>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359617] notify_change+0x37c/0x3f0
>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359636] handle_create+0x1b0/0x21c
>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359669] devtmpfsd+0x80/0xd0
>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359688] kthread+0x150/0x160
>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359707] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.360029] Code: 11000421 b90012a1 d538d081 8b010000 (c85f7c03)
>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.369411] ---[ end trace 91ca49b5035e8050 ]---
>>
>> Hitting retry now to see if it sticks. The real arm64 target was stuck
>> in u-boot (tftp), so I cannot tell yet if it is only a side-effect of
>> emulation.
>>
>
> The issue with QEMU sticks:
> https://source.denx.de/Xenomai/xenomai-images/-/jobs/453115
>
> But now CI is failing in the infrastructure, so I can't retest on hikey.
>
Mainline stable regression of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=bafbc134f5b0948aa1ca015a0dff70b02c0152b7
(5.15.47), fixed by
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=ca67881dcef04c5b586a3b122307b183babd62dc
(5.15.49).
Philippe, could you refresh v5.15.y-dovetail-rebase to consume this and
fix our CI again?
Thanks,
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Technology
Competence Center Embedded Linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 5.15-dovetail or mainline regression?
2022-06-29 16:56 ` Jan Kiszka
@ 2022-07-03 14:05 ` Philippe Gerum
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Gerum @ 2022-07-03 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kiszka; +Cc: Xenomai
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> writes:
> On 21.06.22 08:47, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 21.06.22 08:10, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> https://source.denx.de/Xenomai/xenomai-images/-/jobs/452968 (qemu-arm64)
>>>
>>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.337643] printk: console [ttyAMA0] enabled
>>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.349807] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80003675c000
>>> ...
>>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359334] Call trace:
>>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359508] locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list+0x60/0x180
>>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359577] __mark_inode_dirty+0x2e0/0x430
>>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359603] simple_setattr+0x50/0x80
>>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359617] notify_change+0x37c/0x3f0
>>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359636] handle_create+0x1b0/0x21c
>>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359669] devtmpfsd+0x80/0xd0
>>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359688] kthread+0x150/0x160
>>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.359707] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.360029] Code: 11000421 b90012a1 d538d081 8b010000 (c85f7c03)
>>> 2022-06-20T23:57:39 [ 0.369411] ---[ end trace 91ca49b5035e8050 ]---
>>>
>>> Hitting retry now to see if it sticks. The real arm64 target was stuck
>>> in u-boot (tftp), so I cannot tell yet if it is only a side-effect of
>>> emulation.
>>>
>>
>> The issue with QEMU sticks:
>> https://source.denx.de/Xenomai/xenomai-images/-/jobs/453115
>>
>> But now CI is failing in the infrastructure, so I can't retest on hikey.
>>
>
> Mainline stable regression of
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=bafbc134f5b0948aa1ca015a0dff70b02c0152b7
> (5.15.47), fixed by
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=ca67881dcef04c5b586a3b122307b183babd62dc
> (5.15.49).
>
> Philippe, could you refresh v5.15.y-dovetail-rebase to consume this and
> fix our CI again?
>
Should be ok by now.
--
Philippe.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-07-03 14:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-21 6:10 5.15-dovetail or mainline regression? Jan Kiszka
2022-06-21 6:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-06-21 7:19 ` Bezdeka, Florian
2022-06-21 7:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-06-29 16:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-07-03 14:05 ` Philippe Gerum
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.