Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2

From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Michael Clark <mjc@sifive.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Bastian Koppelmann <kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Sagar Karandikar <sagark@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	RISC-V Patches <patches@groups.riscv.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission v8.2
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 15:15:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87woyljn53.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHNT7NuBjcngEesbS4XSwn=gw7S8VYVE_e6FjxKuAHfjoWowjQ@mail.gmail.com>

Michael Clark <mjc@sifive.com> writes:

<snip>
>
> BTW - I've integrated the following 3 branches into the riscv tree:
>
> - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/softfloat-snan-abort-fix
> - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/riscv-qemu-upstream-v8.2
> - https://github.com/michaeljclark/riscv-qemu/tree/qemu-devel
>
> into our `riscv-all` integration branch, and we're now passing all FPU
> tests, interestingly, including the NaN-boxing of single precision values
> into doubles. We'll need to check that the riscv-tests testsuite is
> exhastive enough... Suprised! I think Richard might have thought about
> our NaN-boxing
> issue or some other sort of magic is going on :-)
>
> - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/riscv-all

Is the SNaN patch going to get re-posted now it has had a review?

--
Alex Bennée