[PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: use DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()

[PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: use DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()

[Deepak R Varma]

Using DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE macro with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()
function in place of the debugfs_create_file() function will make the
file operation struct "reset" aware of the file's lifetime. Additional
details here: https://lists.archive.carbon60.com/linux/kernel/2369498

Issue reported by Coccinelle script:
scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci

Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com>
---
Please Note: This is a Outreachy project task patch.

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
index 62e6a14ad58e..18adfa2d5f5b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
@@ -147,9 +147,8 @@ vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set(void *data, u64 val)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops,
-			vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_get, vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set,
-			"0x%llx\n");
+DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops, vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_get,
+			 vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set, "0x%llx\n");
 
 /**
  * intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu - register debugfs entries for a vGPU
@@ -165,8 +164,8 @@ void intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
 	debugfs_create_bool("active", 0444, vgpu->debugfs, &vgpu->active);
 	debugfs_create_file("mmio_diff", 0444, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
 			    &vgpu_mmio_diff_fops);
-	debugfs_create_file("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
-			    &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
+	debugfs_create_file_unsafe("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
+				   &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: use DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()

[Deepak R Varma]

Using DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE macro with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()
function in place of the debugfs_create_file() function will make the
file operation struct "reset" aware of the file's lifetime. Additional
details here: https://lists.archive.carbon60.com/linux/kernel/2369498

Issue reported by Coccinelle script:
scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci

Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com>
---
Please Note: This is a Outreachy project task patch.

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
index 62e6a14ad58e..18adfa2d5f5b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
@@ -147,9 +147,8 @@ vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set(void *data, u64 val)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops,
-			vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_get, vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set,
-			"0x%llx\n");
+DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops, vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_get,
+			 vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set, "0x%llx\n");
 
 /**
  * intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu - register debugfs entries for a vGPU
@@ -165,8 +164,8 @@ void intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
 	debugfs_create_bool("active", 0444, vgpu->debugfs, &vgpu->active);
 	debugfs_create_file("mmio_diff", 0444, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
 			    &vgpu_mmio_diff_fops);
-	debugfs_create_file("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
-			    &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
+	debugfs_create_file_unsafe("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
+				   &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: use DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()

[Deepak R Varma]

Using DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE macro with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()
function in place of the debugfs_create_file() function will make the
file operation struct "reset" aware of the file's lifetime. Additional
details here: https://lists.archive.carbon60.com/linux/kernel/2369498

Issue reported by Coccinelle script:
scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci

Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com>
---
Please Note: This is a Outreachy project task patch.

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
index 62e6a14ad58e..18adfa2d5f5b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
@@ -147,9 +147,8 @@ vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set(void *data, u64 val)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops,
-			vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_get, vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set,
-			"0x%llx\n");
+DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops, vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_get,
+			 vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set, "0x%llx\n");
 
 /**
  * intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu - register debugfs entries for a vGPU
@@ -165,8 +164,8 @@ void intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
 	debugfs_create_bool("active", 0444, vgpu->debugfs, &vgpu->active);
 	debugfs_create_file("mmio_diff", 0444, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
 			    &vgpu_mmio_diff_fops);
-	debugfs_create_file("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
-			    &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
+	debugfs_create_file_unsafe("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
+				   &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: use DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()

[Jani Nikula]

On Fri, 30 Oct 2020, Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com> wrote:
> Using DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE macro with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()
> function in place of the debugfs_create_file() function will make the
> file operation struct "reset" aware of the file's lifetime. Additional
> details here: https://lists.archive.carbon60.com/linux/kernel/2369498

Please describe what the functional impact is in the commit message. I
don't understand what 'make the file operation struct "reset" aware of
the file's lifetime' means here.

For referencing LKML posts, please prefer https://lore.kernel.org/.

For referencing commits already in the kernel, please prefer the format
c64688081490 ("debugfs: add support for self-protecting attribute file
fops").


BR,
Jani.

>
> Issue reported by Coccinelle script:
> scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com>
> ---
> Please Note: This is a Outreachy project task patch.
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
> index 62e6a14ad58e..18adfa2d5f5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
> @@ -147,9 +147,8 @@ vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set(void *data, u64 val)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops,
> -			vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_get, vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set,
> -			"0x%llx\n");
> +DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops, vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_get,
> +			 vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set, "0x%llx\n");
>  
>  /**
>   * intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu - register debugfs entries for a vGPU
> @@ -165,8 +164,8 @@ void intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
>  	debugfs_create_bool("active", 0444, vgpu->debugfs, &vgpu->active);
>  	debugfs_create_file("mmio_diff", 0444, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
>  			    &vgpu_mmio_diff_fops);
> -	debugfs_create_file("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
> -			    &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
> +	debugfs_create_file_unsafe("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
> +				   &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
>  }
>  
>  /**

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: use DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()

[Jani Nikula]

On Fri, 30 Oct 2020, Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com> wrote:
> Using DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE macro with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()
> function in place of the debugfs_create_file() function will make the
> file operation struct "reset" aware of the file's lifetime. Additional
> details here: https://lists.archive.carbon60.com/linux/kernel/2369498

Please describe what the functional impact is in the commit message. I
don't understand what 'make the file operation struct "reset" aware of
the file's lifetime' means here.

For referencing LKML posts, please prefer https://lore.kernel.org/.

For referencing commits already in the kernel, please prefer the format
c64688081490 ("debugfs: add support for self-protecting attribute file
fops").


BR,
Jani.

>
> Issue reported by Coccinelle script:
> scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com>
> ---
> Please Note: This is a Outreachy project task patch.
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
> index 62e6a14ad58e..18adfa2d5f5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
> @@ -147,9 +147,8 @@ vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set(void *data, u64 val)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops,
> -			vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_get, vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set,
> -			"0x%llx\n");
> +DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops, vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_get,
> +			 vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set, "0x%llx\n");
>  
>  /**
>   * intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu - register debugfs entries for a vGPU
> @@ -165,8 +164,8 @@ void intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
>  	debugfs_create_bool("active", 0444, vgpu->debugfs, &vgpu->active);
>  	debugfs_create_file("mmio_diff", 0444, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
>  			    &vgpu_mmio_diff_fops);
> -	debugfs_create_file("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
> -			    &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
> +	debugfs_create_file_unsafe("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
> +				   &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
>  }
>  
>  /**

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: use DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()

[Jani Nikula]

On Fri, 30 Oct 2020, Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com> wrote:
> Using DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE macro with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()
> function in place of the debugfs_create_file() function will make the
> file operation struct "reset" aware of the file's lifetime. Additional
> details here: https://lists.archive.carbon60.com/linux/kernel/2369498

Please describe what the functional impact is in the commit message. I
don't understand what 'make the file operation struct "reset" aware of
the file's lifetime' means here.

For referencing LKML posts, please prefer https://lore.kernel.org/.

For referencing commits already in the kernel, please prefer the format
c64688081490 ("debugfs: add support for self-protecting attribute file
fops").


BR,
Jani.

>
> Issue reported by Coccinelle script:
> scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com>
> ---
> Please Note: This is a Outreachy project task patch.
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
> index 62e6a14ad58e..18adfa2d5f5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
> @@ -147,9 +147,8 @@ vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set(void *data, u64 val)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops,
> -			vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_get, vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set,
> -			"0x%llx\n");
> +DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops, vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_get,
> +			 vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set, "0x%llx\n");
>  
>  /**
>   * intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu - register debugfs entries for a vGPU
> @@ -165,8 +164,8 @@ void intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
>  	debugfs_create_bool("active", 0444, vgpu->debugfs, &vgpu->active);
>  	debugfs_create_file("mmio_diff", 0444, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
>  			    &vgpu_mmio_diff_fops);
> -	debugfs_create_file("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
> -			    &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
> +	debugfs_create_file_unsafe("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
> +				   &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
>  }
>  
>  /**

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/gvt: use DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()

[Patchwork]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6542 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/gvt: use DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/83291/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9229 -> Patchwork_18818
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_18818 absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_18818, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18818/index.html

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_18818:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * igt@i915_module_load@reload:
    - fi-skl-lmem:        [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9229/fi-skl-lmem/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18818/fi-skl-lmem/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html

  
New tests
---------

  New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_9229 and Patchwork_18818:

### New CI tests (1) ###

  * boot:
    - Statuses : 40 pass(s)
    - Exec time: [0.0] s

  

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_18818 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@kms_chamelium@dp-crc-fast:
    - fi-kbl-7500u:       [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#1982])
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9229/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@dp-crc-fast.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18818/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@dp-crc-fast.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-flip-after-cursor-legacy:
    - fi-icl-u2:          [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-WARN][6] ([i915#1982])
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9229/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-flip-after-cursor-legacy.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18818/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-flip-after-cursor-legacy.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-b:
    - fi-cfl-8109u:       [PASS][7] -> [DMESG-WARN][8] ([i915#165]) +15 similar issues
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9229/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-b.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18818/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-b.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
    - fi-skl-6700k2:      [PASS][9] -> [INCOMPLETE][10] ([i915#146] / [i915#198])
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9229/fi-skl-6700k2/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18818/fi-skl-6700k2/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@i915_module_load@reload:
    - fi-tgl-u2:          [DMESG-WARN][11] ([i915#1982] / [k.org#205379]) -> [PASS][12]
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9229/fi-tgl-u2/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18818/fi-tgl-u2/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-pci-d3-state:
    - fi-byt-j1900:       [DMESG-WARN][13] ([i915#1982]) -> [PASS][14]
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9229/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-pci-d3-state.html
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18818/fi-byt-j1900/igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-pci-d3-state.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@active:
    - {fi-ehl-1}:         [INCOMPLETE][15] -> [PASS][16]
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9229/fi-ehl-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@active.html
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18818/fi-ehl-1/igt@i915_selftest@live@active.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists:
    - fi-kbl-x1275:       [INCOMPLETE][17] ([i915#794]) -> [PASS][18]
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9229/fi-kbl-x1275/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18818/fi-kbl-x1275/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html

  * igt@kms_busy@basic@flip:
    - {fi-kbl-7560u}:     [DMESG-WARN][19] ([i915#1982]) -> [PASS][20]
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9229/fi-kbl-7560u/igt@kms_busy@basic@flip.html
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18818/fi-kbl-7560u/igt@kms_busy@basic@flip.html

  
#### Warnings ####

  * igt@i915_module_load@reload:
    - fi-icl-u2:          [DMESG-WARN][21] ([i915#289]) -> [DMESG-WARN][22] ([i915#1982] / [i915#289])
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9229/fi-icl-u2/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18818/fi-icl-u2/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [i915#146]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/146
  [i915#165]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/165
  [i915#198]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/198
  [i915#1982]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1982
  [i915#289]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/289
  [i915#794]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/794
  [k.org#205379]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205379


Participating hosts (45 -> 40)
------------------------------

  Missing    (5): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan fi-ctg-p8600 fi-bdw-samus 


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_9229 -> Patchwork_18818

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_9229: 4abde8e3625d7249799c3e1cdeac1b2aa3ad3edb @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_5830: 12d370cb57e0cfcb781c87ad9e15e68b17a1f41f @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_18818: cdbe2ba385edb0f652187e7c53224e3f23f2b4d0 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

cdbe2ba385ed drm/i915/gvt: use DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE with debugfs_create_file_unsafe()

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18818/index.html

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 7862 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx