[PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

There is no need to keep around the dentry pointers for the debugfs
files as they will all be automatically removed when the subdir is
removed.  So save the space and logic involved in keeping them around by
just getting rid of them entirely.

By doing this change, we remove one of the last in-kernel user that was
storing the result of debugfs_create_bool(), so that api can be cleaned
up.

Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.c | 34 +++------------------
 drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.h |  3 --
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

Note, I can take this through my debugfs tree if wanted, that way I can
clean up the debugfs_create_bool() api at the same time.  Otherwise it's
fine, I can wait until next -rc1 for that to happen.

v2: remove X/N from subject, it is a stand-alone patch.


diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.c
index 89a25aefb327..efa98444e3fb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.c
@@ -643,24 +643,14 @@ bool b43_debug(struct b43_wldev *dev, enum b43_dyndbg feature)
 	return enabled;
 }
 
-static void b43_remove_dynamic_debug(struct b43_wldev *dev)
-{
-	struct b43_dfsentry *e = dev->dfsentry;
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < __B43_NR_DYNDBG; i++)
-		debugfs_remove(e->dyn_debug_dentries[i]);
-}
-
 static void b43_add_dynamic_debug(struct b43_wldev *dev)
 {
 	struct b43_dfsentry *e = dev->dfsentry;
 
 #define add_dyn_dbg(name, id, initstate) do {			\
 	e->dyn_debug[id] = (initstate);				\
-	e->dyn_debug_dentries[id] =				\
-		debugfs_create_bool(name, 0600, e->subdir,	\
-				&(e->dyn_debug[id]));		\
+	debugfs_create_bool(name, 0600, e->subdir,		\
+			    &(e->dyn_debug[id]));		\
 	} while (0)
 
 	add_dyn_dbg("debug_xmitpower", B43_DBG_XMITPOWER, false);
@@ -713,10 +703,9 @@ void b43_debugfs_add_device(struct b43_wldev *dev)
 
 #define ADD_FILE(name, mode)	\
 	do {							\
-		e->file_##name.dentry =				\
-			debugfs_create_file(__stringify(name),	\
-					mode, e->subdir, dev,	\
-					&fops_##name.fops);	\
+		debugfs_create_file(__stringify(name),		\
+				mode, e->subdir, dev,		\
+				&fops_##name.fops);		\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -746,19 +735,6 @@ void b43_debugfs_remove_device(struct b43_wldev *dev)
 	e = dev->dfsentry;
 	if (!e)
 		return;
-	b43_remove_dynamic_debug(dev);
-
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_shm16read.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_shm16write.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_shm32read.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_shm32write.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_mmio16read.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_mmio16write.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_mmio32read.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_mmio32write.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_txstat.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_restart.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_loctls.dentry);
 
 	debugfs_remove(e->subdir);
 	kfree(e->txstatlog.log);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.h b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.h
index 0bf437c86c67..6f6b500b8881 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.h
@@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ struct b43_txstatus_log {
 };
 
 struct b43_dfs_file {
-	struct dentry *dentry;
 	char *buffer;
 	size_t data_len;
 };
@@ -70,8 +69,6 @@ struct b43_dfsentry {
 
 	/* Enabled/Disabled list for the dynamic debugging features. */
 	bool dyn_debug[__B43_NR_DYNDBG];
-	/* Dentries for the dynamic debugging entries. */
-	struct dentry *dyn_debug_dentries[__B43_NR_DYNDBG];
 };
 
 bool b43_debug(struct b43_wldev *dev, enum b43_dyndbg feature);
-- 
2.31.1

[PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

There is no need to keep around the dentry pointers for the debugfs
files as they will all be automatically removed when the subdir is
removed.  So save the space and logic involved in keeping them around by
just getting rid of them entirely.

By doing this change, we remove one of the last in-kernel user that was
storing the result of debugfs_create_bool(), so that api can be cleaned
up.

Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.c | 34 +++------------------
 drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.h |  3 --
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

Note, I can take this through my debugfs tree if wanted, that way I can
clean up the debugfs_create_bool() api at the same time.  Otherwise it's
fine, I can wait until next -rc1 for that to happen.

v2: remove X/N from subject, it is a stand-alone patch.


diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.c
index 89a25aefb327..efa98444e3fb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.c
@@ -643,24 +643,14 @@ bool b43_debug(struct b43_wldev *dev, enum b43_dyndbg feature)
 	return enabled;
 }
 
-static void b43_remove_dynamic_debug(struct b43_wldev *dev)
-{
-	struct b43_dfsentry *e = dev->dfsentry;
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < __B43_NR_DYNDBG; i++)
-		debugfs_remove(e->dyn_debug_dentries[i]);
-}
-
 static void b43_add_dynamic_debug(struct b43_wldev *dev)
 {
 	struct b43_dfsentry *e = dev->dfsentry;
 
 #define add_dyn_dbg(name, id, initstate) do {			\
 	e->dyn_debug[id] = (initstate);				\
-	e->dyn_debug_dentries[id] =				\
-		debugfs_create_bool(name, 0600, e->subdir,	\
-				&(e->dyn_debug[id]));		\
+	debugfs_create_bool(name, 0600, e->subdir,		\
+			    &(e->dyn_debug[id]));		\
 	} while (0)
 
 	add_dyn_dbg("debug_xmitpower", B43_DBG_XMITPOWER, false);
@@ -713,10 +703,9 @@ void b43_debugfs_add_device(struct b43_wldev *dev)
 
 #define ADD_FILE(name, mode)	\
 	do {							\
-		e->file_##name.dentry =				\
-			debugfs_create_file(__stringify(name),	\
-					mode, e->subdir, dev,	\
-					&fops_##name.fops);	\
+		debugfs_create_file(__stringify(name),		\
+				mode, e->subdir, dev,		\
+				&fops_##name.fops);		\
 	} while (0)
 
 
@@ -746,19 +735,6 @@ void b43_debugfs_remove_device(struct b43_wldev *dev)
 	e = dev->dfsentry;
 	if (!e)
 		return;
-	b43_remove_dynamic_debug(dev);
-
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_shm16read.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_shm16write.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_shm32read.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_shm32write.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_mmio16read.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_mmio16write.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_mmio32read.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_mmio32write.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_txstat.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_restart.dentry);
-	debugfs_remove(e->file_loctls.dentry);
 
 	debugfs_remove(e->subdir);
 	kfree(e->txstatlog.log);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.h b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.h
index 0bf437c86c67..6f6b500b8881 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.h
@@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ struct b43_txstatus_log {
 };
 
 struct b43_dfs_file {
-	struct dentry *dentry;
 	char *buffer;
 	size_t data_len;
 };
@@ -70,8 +69,6 @@ struct b43_dfsentry {
 
 	/* Enabled/Disabled list for the dynamic debugging features. */
 	bool dyn_debug[__B43_NR_DYNDBG];
-	/* Dentries for the dynamic debugging entries. */
-	struct dentry *dyn_debug_dentries[__B43_NR_DYNDBG];
 };
 
 bool b43_debug(struct b43_wldev *dev, enum b43_dyndbg feature);
-- 
2.31.1


_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Kalle Valo]

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:

> There is no need to keep around the dentry pointers for the debugfs
> files as they will all be automatically removed when the subdir is
> removed.  So save the space and logic involved in keeping them around by
> just getting rid of them entirely.
>
> By doing this change, we remove one of the last in-kernel user that was
> storing the result of debugfs_create_bool(), so that api can be cleaned
> up.
>
> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.c | 34 +++------------------
>  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.h |  3 --
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> Note, I can take this through my debugfs tree if wanted, that way I can
> clean up the debugfs_create_bool() api at the same time.  Otherwise it's
> fine, I can wait until next -rc1 for that to happen.

Yeah, it's best that you take this via your tree.

Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Kalle Valo]

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:

> There is no need to keep around the dentry pointers for the debugfs
> files as they will all be automatically removed when the subdir is
> removed.  So save the space and logic involved in keeping them around by
> just getting rid of them entirely.
>
> By doing this change, we remove one of the last in-kernel user that was
> storing the result of debugfs_create_bool(), so that api can be cleaned
> up.
>
> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.c | 34 +++------------------
>  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.h |  3 --
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> Note, I can take this through my debugfs tree if wanted, that way I can
> clean up the debugfs_create_bool() api at the same time.  Otherwise it's
> fine, I can wait until next -rc1 for that to happen.

Yeah, it's best that you take this via your tree.

Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:47:58PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> 
> > There is no need to keep around the dentry pointers for the debugfs
> > files as they will all be automatically removed when the subdir is
> > removed.  So save the space and logic involved in keeping them around by
> > just getting rid of them entirely.
> >
> > By doing this change, we remove one of the last in-kernel user that was
> > storing the result of debugfs_create_bool(), so that api can be cleaned
> > up.
> >
> > Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> > Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
> > Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.c | 34 +++------------------
> >  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.h |  3 --
> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >
> > Note, I can take this through my debugfs tree if wanted, that way I can
> > clean up the debugfs_create_bool() api at the same time.  Otherwise it's
> > fine, I can wait until next -rc1 for that to happen.
> 
> Yeah, it's best that you take this via your tree.
> 
> Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>

Thanks, will do!

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:47:58PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> 
> > There is no need to keep around the dentry pointers for the debugfs
> > files as they will all be automatically removed when the subdir is
> > removed.  So save the space and logic involved in keeping them around by
> > just getting rid of them entirely.
> >
> > By doing this change, we remove one of the last in-kernel user that was
> > storing the result of debugfs_create_bool(), so that api can be cleaned
> > up.
> >
> > Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> > Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
> > Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.c | 34 +++------------------
> >  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/debugfs.h |  3 --
> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >
> > Note, I can take this through my debugfs tree if wanted, that way I can
> > clean up the debugfs_create_bool() api at the same time.  Otherwise it's
> > fine, I can wait until next -rc1 for that to happen.
> 
> Yeah, it's best that you take this via your tree.
> 
> Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>

Thanks, will do!

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Jeff Johnson]

On 2021-05-18 09:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> There is no need to keep around the dentry pointers for the debugfs
> files as they will all be automatically removed when the subdir is
> removed.  So save the space and logic involved in keeping them around 
> by
> just getting rid of them entirely.
> 
> By doing this change, we remove one of the last in-kernel user that was
> storing the result of debugfs_create_bool(), so that api can be cleaned
> up.

Question not about this specific change, but the general concept
of keeping (or not keeping) dentry pointers. In the ath drivers,
as well as in an out-of-tree driver for Android, we keep a
debugfs dentry pointer to use as a param to relay_open().

Will we still be able to have a dentry pointer for this purpose?
Or better, is there a recommended way to get a dentry pointer
NOT associated with debugfs at all (which would be ideal for
Android where debugfs is disabled).

Thanks,
Jeff

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Jeff Johnson]

On 2021-05-18 09:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> There is no need to keep around the dentry pointers for the debugfs
> files as they will all be automatically removed when the subdir is
> removed.  So save the space and logic involved in keeping them around 
> by
> just getting rid of them entirely.
> 
> By doing this change, we remove one of the last in-kernel user that was
> storing the result of debugfs_create_bool(), so that api can be cleaned
> up.

Question not about this specific change, but the general concept
of keeping (or not keeping) dentry pointers. In the ath drivers,
as well as in an out-of-tree driver for Android, we keep a
debugfs dentry pointer to use as a param to relay_open().

Will we still be able to have a dentry pointer for this purpose?
Or better, is there a recommended way to get a dentry pointer
NOT associated with debugfs at all (which would be ideal for
Android where debugfs is disabled).

Thanks,
Jeff

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Jeff Johnson]

On 2021-05-18 12:29, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 2021-05-18 09:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> There is no need to keep around the dentry pointers for the debugfs
>> files as they will all be automatically removed when the subdir is
>> removed.  So save the space and logic involved in keeping them around 
>> by
>> just getting rid of them entirely.
>> 
>> By doing this change, we remove one of the last in-kernel user that 
>> was
>> storing the result of debugfs_create_bool(), so that api can be 
>> cleaned
>> up.
> 
> Question not about this specific change, but the general concept
> of keeping (or not keeping) dentry pointers. In the ath drivers,
> as well as in an out-of-tree driver for Android, we keep a
> debugfs dentry pointer to use as a param to relay_open().
> 
> Will we still be able to have a dentry pointer for this purpose?
> Or better, is there a recommended way to get a dentry pointer
> NOT associated with debugfs at all (which would be ideal for
> Android where debugfs is disabled).

Answering one of my questions: The dentry passed to relay_open() comes
from debugfs_create_dir() which is expected to return a dentry.

Would still like guidance on if there is a recommended way to get a
dentry not associated with debugfs.

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Jeff Johnson]

On 2021-05-18 12:29, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 2021-05-18 09:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> There is no need to keep around the dentry pointers for the debugfs
>> files as they will all be automatically removed when the subdir is
>> removed.  So save the space and logic involved in keeping them around 
>> by
>> just getting rid of them entirely.
>> 
>> By doing this change, we remove one of the last in-kernel user that 
>> was
>> storing the result of debugfs_create_bool(), so that api can be 
>> cleaned
>> up.
> 
> Question not about this specific change, but the general concept
> of keeping (or not keeping) dentry pointers. In the ath drivers,
> as well as in an out-of-tree driver for Android, we keep a
> debugfs dentry pointer to use as a param to relay_open().
> 
> Will we still be able to have a dentry pointer for this purpose?
> Or better, is there a recommended way to get a dentry pointer
> NOT associated with debugfs at all (which would be ideal for
> Android where debugfs is disabled).

Answering one of my questions: The dentry passed to relay_open() comes
from debugfs_create_dir() which is expected to return a dentry.

Would still like guidance on if there is a recommended way to get a
dentry not associated with debugfs.

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:00:44PM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 2021-05-18 12:29, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > On 2021-05-18 09:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > There is no need to keep around the dentry pointers for the debugfs
> > > files as they will all be automatically removed when the subdir is
> > > removed.  So save the space and logic involved in keeping them
> > > around by
> > > just getting rid of them entirely.
> > > 
> > > By doing this change, we remove one of the last in-kernel user that
> > > was
> > > storing the result of debugfs_create_bool(), so that api can be
> > > cleaned
> > > up.
> > 
> > Question not about this specific change, but the general concept
> > of keeping (or not keeping) dentry pointers. In the ath drivers,
> > as well as in an out-of-tree driver for Android, we keep a
> > debugfs dentry pointer to use as a param to relay_open().
> > 
> > Will we still be able to have a dentry pointer for this purpose?
> > Or better, is there a recommended way to get a dentry pointer
> > NOT associated with debugfs at all (which would be ideal for
> > Android where debugfs is disabled).
> 
> Answering one of my questions: The dentry passed to relay_open() comes
> from debugfs_create_dir() which is expected to return a dentry.
> 
> Would still like guidance on if there is a recommended way to get a
> dentry not associated with debugfs.

What do you exactly mean by "not associated with debugfs"?

And why are you passing a debugfs dentry to relay_open()?  That feels
really wrong and fragile.

Ideally I want to get rid of the "raw" dentry that debugfs returns to
callers, as it has caused odd problems in the past, but that's a very
long-term project...

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:00:44PM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 2021-05-18 12:29, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > On 2021-05-18 09:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > There is no need to keep around the dentry pointers for the debugfs
> > > files as they will all be automatically removed when the subdir is
> > > removed.  So save the space and logic involved in keeping them
> > > around by
> > > just getting rid of them entirely.
> > > 
> > > By doing this change, we remove one of the last in-kernel user that
> > > was
> > > storing the result of debugfs_create_bool(), so that api can be
> > > cleaned
> > > up.
> > 
> > Question not about this specific change, but the general concept
> > of keeping (or not keeping) dentry pointers. In the ath drivers,
> > as well as in an out-of-tree driver for Android, we keep a
> > debugfs dentry pointer to use as a param to relay_open().
> > 
> > Will we still be able to have a dentry pointer for this purpose?
> > Or better, is there a recommended way to get a dentry pointer
> > NOT associated with debugfs at all (which would be ideal for
> > Android where debugfs is disabled).
> 
> Answering one of my questions: The dentry passed to relay_open() comes
> from debugfs_create_dir() which is expected to return a dentry.
> 
> Would still like guidance on if there is a recommended way to get a
> dentry not associated with debugfs.

What do you exactly mean by "not associated with debugfs"?

And why are you passing a debugfs dentry to relay_open()?  That feels
really wrong and fragile.

Ideally I want to get rid of the "raw" dentry that debugfs returns to
callers, as it has caused odd problems in the past, but that's a very
long-term project...

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Jeff Johnson]

On 2021-05-18 22:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:00:44PM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> On 2021-05-18 12:29, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> Would still like guidance on if there is a recommended way to get a
>> dentry not associated with debugfs.
> 
> What do you exactly mean by "not associated with debugfs"?
> 
> And why are you passing a debugfs dentry to relay_open()?  That feels
> really wrong and fragile.

I don't know the history but the relay documentation tells us:
"If you want a directory structure to contain your relay files,
you should create it using the host filesystem’s directory
creation function, e.g. debugfs_create_dir()..."

So my guess is that the original implementation followed that
advice.  I see 5 clients of this functionality, and all 5 pass a
dentry returned from debugfs_create_dir():

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_log.c, line 384
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/spectral.c, line 534
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c, line 902
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/common-spectral.c, line 1077
kernel/trace/blktrace.c, line 549

Jeff
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Jeff Johnson]

On 2021-05-18 22:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:00:44PM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> On 2021-05-18 12:29, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> Would still like guidance on if there is a recommended way to get a
>> dentry not associated with debugfs.
> 
> What do you exactly mean by "not associated with debugfs"?
> 
> And why are you passing a debugfs dentry to relay_open()?  That feels
> really wrong and fragile.

I don't know the history but the relay documentation tells us:
"If you want a directory structure to contain your relay files,
you should create it using the host filesystem’s directory
creation function, e.g. debugfs_create_dir()..."

So my guess is that the original implementation followed that
advice.  I see 5 clients of this functionality, and all 5 pass a
dentry returned from debugfs_create_dir():

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_log.c, line 384
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/spectral.c, line 534
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c, line 902
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/common-spectral.c, line 1077
kernel/trace/blktrace.c, line 549

Jeff
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 08:04:59AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 2021-05-18 22:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:00:44PM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > > On 2021-05-18 12:29, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > > Would still like guidance on if there is a recommended way to get a
> > > dentry not associated with debugfs.
> > 
> > What do you exactly mean by "not associated with debugfs"?
> > 
> > And why are you passing a debugfs dentry to relay_open()?  That feels
> > really wrong and fragile.
> 
> I don't know the history but the relay documentation tells us:
> "If you want a directory structure to contain your relay files,
> you should create it using the host filesystem’s directory
> creation function, e.g. debugfs_create_dir()..."
> 
> So my guess is that the original implementation followed that
> advice.  I see 5 clients of this functionality, and all 5 pass a
> dentry returned from debugfs_create_dir():
> 
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_log.c, line 384
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/spectral.c, line 534
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c, line 902
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/common-spectral.c, line 1077
> kernel/trace/blktrace.c, line 549

Ah, that's just the "parent" dentry for the relayfs file.  That's fine,
not a big deal, debugfs will always provide a way for you to get that if
needed.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 08:04:59AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 2021-05-18 22:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:00:44PM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > > On 2021-05-18 12:29, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > > Would still like guidance on if there is a recommended way to get a
> > > dentry not associated with debugfs.
> > 
> > What do you exactly mean by "not associated with debugfs"?
> > 
> > And why are you passing a debugfs dentry to relay_open()?  That feels
> > really wrong and fragile.
> 
> I don't know the history but the relay documentation tells us:
> "If you want a directory structure to contain your relay files,
> you should create it using the host filesystem’s directory
> creation function, e.g. debugfs_create_dir()..."
> 
> So my guess is that the original implementation followed that
> advice.  I see 5 clients of this functionality, and all 5 pass a
> dentry returned from debugfs_create_dir():
> 
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_log.c, line 384
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/spectral.c, line 534
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c, line 902
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/common-spectral.c, line 1077
> kernel/trace/blktrace.c, line 549

Ah, that's just the "parent" dentry for the relayfs file.  That's fine,
not a big deal, debugfs will always provide a way for you to get that if
needed.

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Jeff Johnson]

On 2021-05-19 08:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 08:04:59AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> On 2021-05-18 22:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:00:44PM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> > > On 2021-05-18 12:29, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> > > Would still like guidance on if there is a recommended way to get a
>> > > dentry not associated with debugfs.
>> >
>> > What do you exactly mean by "not associated with debugfs"?
>> >
>> > And why are you passing a debugfs dentry to relay_open()?  That feels
>> > really wrong and fragile.
>> 
>> I don't know the history but the relay documentation tells us:
>> "If you want a directory structure to contain your relay files,
>> you should create it using the host filesystem’s directory
>> creation function, e.g. debugfs_create_dir()..."
>> 
>> So my guess is that the original implementation followed that
>> advice.  I see 5 clients of this functionality, and all 5 pass a
>> dentry returned from debugfs_create_dir():
>> 
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_log.c, line 384
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/spectral.c, line 534
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c, line 902
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/common-spectral.c, line 1077
>> kernel/trace/blktrace.c, line 549
> 
> Ah, that's just the "parent" dentry for the relayfs file.  That's fine,
> not a big deal, debugfs will always provide a way for you to get that 
> if
> needed.

Unless debugfs is disabled, like on Android, which is the real problem 
I'm
trying to solve.

Jeff
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Jeff Johnson]

On 2021-05-19 08:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 08:04:59AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> On 2021-05-18 22:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:00:44PM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> > > On 2021-05-18 12:29, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> > > Would still like guidance on if there is a recommended way to get a
>> > > dentry not associated with debugfs.
>> >
>> > What do you exactly mean by "not associated with debugfs"?
>> >
>> > And why are you passing a debugfs dentry to relay_open()?  That feels
>> > really wrong and fragile.
>> 
>> I don't know the history but the relay documentation tells us:
>> "If you want a directory structure to contain your relay files,
>> you should create it using the host filesystem’s directory
>> creation function, e.g. debugfs_create_dir()..."
>> 
>> So my guess is that the original implementation followed that
>> advice.  I see 5 clients of this functionality, and all 5 pass a
>> dentry returned from debugfs_create_dir():
>> 
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_log.c, line 384
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/spectral.c, line 534
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c, line 902
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/common-spectral.c, line 1077
>> kernel/trace/blktrace.c, line 549
> 
> Ah, that's just the "parent" dentry for the relayfs file.  That's fine,
> not a big deal, debugfs will always provide a way for you to get that 
> if
> needed.

Unless debugfs is disabled, like on Android, which is the real problem 
I'm
trying to solve.

Jeff
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 08:57:00AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 2021-05-19 08:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 08:04:59AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > > On 2021-05-18 22:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:00:44PM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > > > > On 2021-05-18 12:29, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > > > > Would still like guidance on if there is a recommended way to get a
> > > > > dentry not associated with debugfs.
> > > >
> > > > What do you exactly mean by "not associated with debugfs"?
> > > >
> > > > And why are you passing a debugfs dentry to relay_open()?  That feels
> > > > really wrong and fragile.
> > > 
> > > I don't know the history but the relay documentation tells us:
> > > "If you want a directory structure to contain your relay files,
> > > you should create it using the host filesystem’s directory
> > > creation function, e.g. debugfs_create_dir()..."
> > > 
> > > So my guess is that the original implementation followed that
> > > advice.  I see 5 clients of this functionality, and all 5 pass a
> > > dentry returned from debugfs_create_dir():
> > > 
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_log.c, line 384
> > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/spectral.c, line 534
> > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c, line 902
> > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/common-spectral.c, line 1077
> > > kernel/trace/blktrace.c, line 549
> > 
> > Ah, that's just the "parent" dentry for the relayfs file.  That's fine,
> > not a big deal, debugfs will always provide a way for you to get that if
> > needed.
> 
> Unless debugfs is disabled, like on Android, which is the real problem I'm
> trying to solve.

Then use some other filesystem to place your relay file in.  A relay
file is not a file that userspace should rely on for normal operation,
so why do you need it at all?

What tools/operation requires access to this file that systems without
debugfs support is causing problems on?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 08:57:00AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 2021-05-19 08:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 08:04:59AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > > On 2021-05-18 22:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:00:44PM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > > > > On 2021-05-18 12:29, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > > > > Would still like guidance on if there is a recommended way to get a
> > > > > dentry not associated with debugfs.
> > > >
> > > > What do you exactly mean by "not associated with debugfs"?
> > > >
> > > > And why are you passing a debugfs dentry to relay_open()?  That feels
> > > > really wrong and fragile.
> > > 
> > > I don't know the history but the relay documentation tells us:
> > > "If you want a directory structure to contain your relay files,
> > > you should create it using the host filesystem’s directory
> > > creation function, e.g. debugfs_create_dir()..."
> > > 
> > > So my guess is that the original implementation followed that
> > > advice.  I see 5 clients of this functionality, and all 5 pass a
> > > dentry returned from debugfs_create_dir():
> > > 
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_log.c, line 384
> > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/spectral.c, line 534
> > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/spectral.c, line 902
> > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/common-spectral.c, line 1077
> > > kernel/trace/blktrace.c, line 549
> > 
> > Ah, that's just the "parent" dentry for the relayfs file.  That's fine,
> > not a big deal, debugfs will always provide a way for you to get that if
> > needed.
> 
> Unless debugfs is disabled, like on Android, which is the real problem I'm
> trying to solve.

Then use some other filesystem to place your relay file in.  A relay
file is not a file that userspace should rely on for normal operation,
so why do you need it at all?

What tools/operation requires access to this file that systems without
debugfs support is causing problems on?

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
b43-dev mailing list
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Jeff Johnson]

On 2021-05-19 09:03, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 08:57:00AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> Unless debugfs is disabled, like on Android, which is the real problem 
>> I'm
>> trying to solve.
> 
> Then use some other filesystem to place your relay file in.  A relay
> file is not a file that userspace should rely on for normal operation,
> so why do you need it at all?
> 
> What tools/operation requires access to this file that systems without
> debugfs support is causing problems on?

(trimmed some lists)

For the ath drivers (as well as the out-of-tree Android driver) it is 
being used for RF spectral scan which produces a large amount of data 
that is processed by a userspace analysis application.

I've been looking for an alternate filesystem to use, but am not finding 
anything where it appears easy to get a parent dentry, so any clues for 
the clueless (me) would be appreciated.

Jeff

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v2] b43: don't save dentries for debugfs

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:16:35PM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 2021-05-19 09:03, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 08:57:00AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > > Unless debugfs is disabled, like on Android, which is the real
> > > problem I'm
> > > trying to solve.
> > 
> > Then use some other filesystem to place your relay file in.  A relay
> > file is not a file that userspace should rely on for normal operation,
> > so why do you need it at all?
> > 
> > What tools/operation requires access to this file that systems without
> > debugfs support is causing problems on?
> 
> (trimmed some lists)
> 
> For the ath drivers (as well as the out-of-tree Android driver) it is being
> used for RF spectral scan which produces a large amount of data that is
> processed by a userspace analysis application.

And that application requires root access in order to be able to read
from the debugfs file today?  That feels risky.  And doesn't work for
Android systems today, right?

So what's wrong with just leaving it as-is, debugfs isn't going away on
debug Android kernels, which is when you need to run this type of thing,
only on the "user builds".

And if it's really an issue, take that up with Google, it's their
security policy that is driving this, not the community's requirements :)

And note, moving files out of debugfs to elsewhere in the system
circumvents the reasons that Google is not allowing debugfs anymore,
which defeats the purpose entirely of that decision.  Are you _sure_
that's a good idea for your users?

> I've been looking for an alternate filesystem to use, but am not finding
> anything where it appears easy to get a parent dentry, so any clues for the
> clueless (me) would be appreciated.

I'm not going to tell you how to abuse other filesystems in the kernel,
but it shouldn't be all that hard if you really want to do it...

good luck!

greg k-h