* [PATCH i-g-t v4 01/13] lib/sw_sync: Add helper functions for managing synchronization primitives
2016-09-14 15:04 [PATCH i-g-t v4 00/13] Implement sw_sync test robert.foss
@ 2016-09-14 15:04 ` robert.foss
2016-09-15 6:46 ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 02/13] tests/sw_sync: Add sw_sync test robert.foss
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: robert.foss @ 2016-09-14 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Gustavo Padovan, Daniel Stone, Daniel Vetter,
Marius Vlad, Eric Engestrom, Chris Wilson
Cc: Gustavo Padovan
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Base functions to help testing the Sync File Framework (explicit fencing
mechanism ported from Android).
These functions allow you to create, use and destroy timelines and fences.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
---
lib/Makefile.sources | 2 +
lib/sw_sync.c | 190 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/sw_sync.h | 48 +++++++++++++
3 files changed, 240 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 lib/sw_sync.c
create mode 100644 lib/sw_sync.h
diff --git a/lib/Makefile.sources b/lib/Makefile.sources
index bac9a7f..3dc7c3c 100644
--- a/lib/Makefile.sources
+++ b/lib/Makefile.sources
@@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ lib_source_list = \
rendercopy_gen8.c \
rendercopy_gen9.c \
rendercopy.h \
+ sw_sync.c \
+ sw_sync.h \
intel_reg_map.c \
intel_iosf.c \
igt_kms.c \
diff --git a/lib/sw_sync.c b/lib/sw_sync.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4e64837
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/sw_sync.c
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2012 Google, Inc
+ * Copyright © 2016 Collabora, Ltd.
+ *
+ * Based on the implementation from the Android Open Source Project
+ *
+ * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
+ * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
+ * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
+ * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
+ * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
+ * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+ *
+ * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
+ * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
+ * Software.
+ *
+ * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+ * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
+ * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+ * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
+ * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
+ * IN THE SOFTWARE.
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ * Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
+ */
+
+#ifndef ANDROID
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#else
+#include <libgen.h>
+#endif
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <poll.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <linux/sync_file.h>
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+
+#include "sw_sync.h"
+#include "drmtest.h"
+#include "ioctl_wrappers.h"
+
+#ifndef SW_SYNC_IOC_INC
+struct sw_sync_create_fence_data {
+ __u32 value;
+ char name[32];
+ __s32 fence;
+};
+
+#define SW_SYNC_IOC_MAGIC 'W'
+#define SW_SYNC_IOC_CREATE_FENCE _IOWR(SW_SYNC_IOC_MAGIC, 0,\
+ struct sw_sync_create_fence_data)
+#define SW_SYNC_IOC_INC _IOW(SW_SYNC_IOC_MAGIC, 1, __u32)
+#endif
+
+#define DEVFS_SW_SYNC "/dev/sw_sync"
+#define DEBUGFS_SW_SYNC "/sys/kernel/debug/sync/sw_sync"
+
+
+int sw_sync_fd_is_valid(int fd)
+{
+ int status;
+
+ if (fd < 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ status = fcntl(fd, F_GETFD, 0);
+ return status >= 0;
+}
+
+int sw_sync_timeline_create(void)
+{
+ int fd = open(DEVFS_SW_SYNC, O_RDWR);
+
+ if (fd < 0)
+ fd = open(DEBUGFS_SW_SYNC, O_RDWR);
+
+ igt_assert(sw_sync_fd_is_valid(fd));
+
+ return fd;
+}
+
+int __sw_sync_fence_create(int fd, uint32_t seqno)
+{
+
+ struct sw_sync_create_fence_data data;
+
+ memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data));
+ data.value = seqno;
+
+ if (igt_ioctl(fd, SW_SYNC_IOC_CREATE_FENCE, &data))
+ return -errno;
+
+ return data.fence;
+}
+
+int sw_sync_fence_create(int fd, uint32_t seqno)
+{
+ int fence = __sw_sync_fence_create(fd, seqno);
+ igt_assert(fence >= 0);
+ return fence;
+}
+
+void sw_sync_timeline_inc(int fd, uint32_t count)
+{
+ uint32_t arg = count;
+
+ if (fd == 0)
+ return;
+
+ do_ioctl(fd, SW_SYNC_IOC_INC, &arg);
+}
+
+int sw_sync_merge(int fd1, int fd2)
+{
+ struct sync_merge_data data = {};
+ int err;
+
+ data.fd2 = fd2;
+
+ err = ioctl(fd1, SYNC_IOC_MERGE, &data);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return -errno;
+
+ sw_sync_fd_is_valid(data.fence);
+
+ return data.fence;
+}
+
+int sw_sync_wait(int fence, int timeout)
+{
+ struct pollfd fds;
+ int ret;
+
+ fds.fd = fence;
+ fds.events = POLLIN | POLLERR;
+
+ ret = poll(&fds, 1, timeout);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+int sw_sync_fence_count(int fd)
+{
+ struct sync_file_info info;
+
+ memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
+ if (ioctl(fd, SYNC_IOC_FILE_INFO, &info))
+ return -errno;
+
+ return info.num_fences;
+}
+
+static int __sw_sync_fence_count_status(int fd, int status)
+{
+ struct sync_file_info info;
+ struct sync_fence_info *fence_info;
+ int count;
+ int i;
+
+ memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
+ if (ioctl(fd, SYNC_IOC_FILE_INFO, &info))
+ return -errno;
+
+ fence_info = calloc(info.num_fences, sizeof(*fence_info));
+ if (!fence_info)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ info.sync_fence_info = (uintptr_t)fence_info;
+ if (ioctl(fd, SYNC_IOC_FILE_INFO, &info)) {
+ count = -errno;
+ } else {
+ count = 0;
+ for (i = 0 ; i < info.num_fences ; i++)
+ count += fence_info[i].status == status;
+ }
+
+ free(fence_info);
+
+ return count;
+}
+
+int sw_sync_fence_count_status(int fd, int status)
+{
+ int count = __sw_sync_fence_count_status(fd, status);
+ igt_assert(count >= 0);
+ return count;
+}
diff --git a/lib/sw_sync.h b/lib/sw_sync.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fee9249
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/sw_sync.h
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2012 Google, Inc
+ * Copyright © 2016 Collabora, Ltd.
+ *
+ * Based on the implementation from the Android Open Source Project
+ *
+ * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
+ * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
+ * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
+ * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
+ * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
+ * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+ *
+ * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
+ * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
+ * Software.
+ *
+ * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+ * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
+ * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+ * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
+ * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
+ * IN THE SOFTWARE.
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ * Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
+ */
+
+#ifndef SW_SYNC_H
+#define SW_SYNC_H
+
+#define SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ERROR (-1)
+#define SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE (0)
+#define SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED (1)
+
+int sw_sync_fd_is_valid(int fd);
+int sw_sync_timeline_create(void);
+int __sw_sync_fence_create(int fd, uint32_t seqno);
+int sw_sync_fence_create(int fd, uint32_t seqno);
+void sw_sync_timeline_inc(int fd, uint32_t count);
+int sw_sync_merge(int fd1, int fd2);
+int sw_sync_wait(int fence, int timeout);
+int sw_sync_fence_count(int fd);
+int sw_sync_fence_count_status(int fd, int status);
+
+#endif
+
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH i-g-t v4 01/13] lib/sw_sync: Add helper functions for managing synchronization primitives
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 01/13] lib/sw_sync: Add helper functions for managing synchronization primitives robert.foss
@ 2016-09-15 6:46 ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-15 18:35 ` Robert Foss
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2016-09-15 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robert.foss
Cc: Daniel Stone, intel-gfx, Eric Engestrom, Gustavo Padovan,
Gustavo Padovan
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:04:30AM -0400, robert.foss@collabora.com wrote:
> +void sw_sync_timeline_inc(int fd, uint32_t count)
> +{
> + uint32_t arg = count;
> +
> + if (fd == 0)
> + return;
But fd = 0 is a valid fd, and might be a timeline somewhere.
Did you mean count == 0 ?
And even then (unless it is defined as an error condition in the kernel
ABI, and it should not be...) we should pass it through to the kernel.
> + do_ioctl(fd, SW_SYNC_IOC_INC, &arg);
> +}
> +
> +int sw_sync_wait(int fence, int timeout)
> +{
> + struct pollfd fds;
> + int ret;
> +
> + fds.fd = fence;
> + fds.events = POLLIN | POLLERR;
POLLERR is always implied and doesn't need to be specified (it is
meaningless in .events).
int sw_sync_wait(int fence, int timeout)
{
#if BEING_FANCY
return poll(&(struct pollfd){fd, POLLIN}, 1, timeout);
#else
struct pollfd pfd = { fd, POLLIN };
return poll(&pfd, 1, timeout);
#endif
}
Indentation has gone wrong, double check the whitespace.
How do fences operate after their timeline is closed? (Are they
automatically signaled, or do they persist and are signaled normally?) Is
there a test for using fences from a closed timeline (I was looking but
didn't notice one).
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH i-g-t v4 01/13] lib/sw_sync: Add helper functions for managing synchronization primitives
2016-09-15 6:46 ` Chris Wilson
@ 2016-09-15 18:35 ` Robert Foss
2016-09-15 19:28 ` Robert Foss
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Robert Foss @ 2016-09-15 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx, Gustavo Padovan, Daniel Stone,
Daniel Vetter, Marius Vlad, Eric Engestrom, Gustavo Padovan
On 2016-09-15 02:46 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:04:30AM -0400, robert.foss@collabora.com wrote:
>> +void sw_sync_timeline_inc(int fd, uint32_t count)
>> +{
>> + uint32_t arg = count;
>> +
>> + if (fd == 0)
>> + return;
>
> But fd = 0 is a valid fd, and might be a timeline somewhere.
>
> Did you mean count == 0 ?
>
> And even then (unless it is defined as an error condition in the kernel
> ABI, and it should not be...) we should pass it through to the kernel.
You're right, I'll change it in v5.
>
>> + do_ioctl(fd, SW_SYNC_IOC_INC, &arg);
>> +}
>> +
>
>> +int sw_sync_wait(int fence, int timeout)
>> +{
>> + struct pollfd fds;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + fds.fd = fence;
>> + fds.events = POLLIN | POLLERR;
>
> POLLERR is always implied and doesn't need to be specified (it is
> meaningless in .events).
>
> int sw_sync_wait(int fence, int timeout)
> {
> #if BEING_FANCY
> return poll(&(struct pollfd){fd, POLLIN}, 1, timeout);
> #else
> struct pollfd pfd = { fd, POLLIN };
> return poll(&pfd, 1, timeout);
> #endif
> }
>
> Indentation has gone wrong, double check the whitespace.
That is definitely nicer looking. I'll drop it in for v5.
>
>
> How do fences operate after their timeline is closed? (Are they
> automatically signaled, or do they persist and are signaled normally?) Is
> there a test for using fences from a closed timeline (I was looking but
> didn't notice one).
I did some quick tests just to confirm, closing the timeline signals all
of its fences.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH i-g-t v4 01/13] lib/sw_sync: Add helper functions for managing synchronization primitives
2016-09-15 18:35 ` Robert Foss
@ 2016-09-15 19:28 ` Robert Foss
2016-09-15 19:36 ` Gustavo Padovan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Robert Foss @ 2016-09-15 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx, Gustavo Padovan, Daniel Stone,
Daniel Vetter, Marius Vlad, Eric Engestrom, Gustavo Padovan
On 2016-09-15 02:35 PM, Robert Foss wrote:
>
>
> On 2016-09-15 02:46 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:04:30AM -0400, robert.foss@collabora.com
>> wrote:
>>> +void sw_sync_timeline_inc(int fd, uint32_t count)
>>> +{
>>> + uint32_t arg = count;
>>> +
>>> + if (fd == 0)
>>> + return;
>>
>> But fd = 0 is a valid fd, and might be a timeline somewhere.
>>
>> Did you mean count == 0 ?
>>
>> And even then (unless it is defined as an error condition in the kernel
>> ABI, and it should not be...) we should pass it through to the kernel.
>
> You're right, I'll change it in v5.
>
>>
>>> + do_ioctl(fd, SW_SYNC_IOC_INC, &arg);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>
>>> +int sw_sync_wait(int fence, int timeout)
>>> +{
>>> + struct pollfd fds;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + fds.fd = fence;
>>> + fds.events = POLLIN | POLLERR;
>>
>> POLLERR is always implied and doesn't need to be specified (it is
>> meaningless in .events).
>>
>> int sw_sync_wait(int fence, int timeout)
>> {
>> #if BEING_FANCY
>> return poll(&(struct pollfd){fd, POLLIN}, 1, timeout);
>> #else
>> struct pollfd pfd = { fd, POLLIN };
>> return poll(&pfd, 1, timeout);
>> #endif
>> }
>>
>> Indentation has gone wrong, double check the whitespace.
>
> That is definitely nicer looking. I'll drop it in for v5.
>
>>
>>
>> How do fences operate after their timeline is closed? (Are they
>> automatically signaled, or do they persist and are signaled normally?) Is
>> there a test for using fences from a closed timeline (I was looking but
>> didn't notice one).
>
> I did some quick tests just to confirm, closing the timeline signals all
> of its fences.
Actually, my quick test was wrong. A fence is _not_ signaled on when its
timeline has been closed.
So you would like to see a test that confirms that a fence on closed
timeline is not signaled?
Rob.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH i-g-t v4 01/13] lib/sw_sync: Add helper functions for managing synchronization primitives
2016-09-15 19:28 ` Robert Foss
@ 2016-09-15 19:36 ` Gustavo Padovan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo Padovan @ 2016-09-15 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Foss; +Cc: Daniel Stone, intel-gfx, Eric Engestrom, Gustavo Padovan
2016-09-15 Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>:
>
>
> On 2016-09-15 02:35 PM, Robert Foss wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2016-09-15 02:46 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:04:30AM -0400, robert.foss@collabora.com
> > > wrote:
> > > > +void sw_sync_timeline_inc(int fd, uint32_t count)
> > > > +{
> > > > + uint32_t arg = count;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (fd == 0)
> > > > + return;
> > >
> > > But fd = 0 is a valid fd, and might be a timeline somewhere.
> > >
> > > Did you mean count == 0 ?
> > >
> > > And even then (unless it is defined as an error condition in the kernel
> > > ABI, and it should not be...) we should pass it through to the kernel.
> >
> > You're right, I'll change it in v5.
> >
> > >
> > > > + do_ioctl(fd, SW_SYNC_IOC_INC, &arg);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > >
> > > > +int sw_sync_wait(int fence, int timeout)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct pollfd fds;
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + fds.fd = fence;
> > > > + fds.events = POLLIN | POLLERR;
> > >
> > > POLLERR is always implied and doesn't need to be specified (it is
> > > meaningless in .events).
> > >
> > > int sw_sync_wait(int fence, int timeout)
> > > {
> > > #if BEING_FANCY
> > > return poll(&(struct pollfd){fd, POLLIN}, 1, timeout);
> > > #else
> > > struct pollfd pfd = { fd, POLLIN };
> > > return poll(&pfd, 1, timeout);
> > > #endif
> > > }
> > >
> > > Indentation has gone wrong, double check the whitespace.
> >
> > That is definitely nicer looking. I'll drop it in for v5.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > How do fences operate after their timeline is closed? (Are they
> > > automatically signaled, or do they persist and are signaled normally?) Is
> > > there a test for using fences from a closed timeline (I was looking but
> > > didn't notice one).
> >
> > I did some quick tests just to confirm, closing the timeline signals all
> > of its fences.
>
> Actually, my quick test was wrong. A fence is _not_ signaled on when its
> timeline has been closed.
>
> So you would like to see a test that confirms that a fence on closed
> timeline is not signaled?
Yes, please. Add this test and maybe another the signals the fence
before closing the timeline and the check if the fence is indeed
signaled.
Gustavo
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH i-g-t v4 02/13] tests/sw_sync: Add sw_sync test
2016-09-14 15:04 [PATCH i-g-t v4 00/13] Implement sw_sync test robert.foss
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 01/13] lib/sw_sync: Add helper functions for managing synchronization primitives robert.foss
@ 2016-09-14 15:04 ` robert.foss
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 03/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_alloc_fence robert.foss
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: robert.foss @ 2016-09-14 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Gustavo Padovan, Daniel Stone, Daniel Vetter,
Marius Vlad, Eric Engestrom, Chris Wilson
Cc: Gustavo Padovan
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Add initial tests for sw_sync.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
---
tests/Makefile.sources | 1 +
tests/sw_sync.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tests/sw_sync.c
diff --git a/tests/Makefile.sources b/tests/Makefile.sources
index 72a58ad..0ba769f 100644
--- a/tests/Makefile.sources
+++ b/tests/Makefile.sources
@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ TESTS_progs_M = \
prime_mmap_kms \
prime_self_import \
prime_vgem \
+ sw_sync \
template \
vgem_basic \
vgem_slow \
diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..47e2dfa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2012 Google, Inc
+ * Copyright © 2016 Collabora, Ltd.
+ *
+ * Based on the implementation from the Android Open Source Project
+ *
+ * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
+ * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
+ * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
+ * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
+ * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
+ * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+ *
+ * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
+ * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
+ * Software.
+ *
+ * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+ * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
+ * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+ * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
+ * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
+ * IN THE SOFTWARE.
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ * Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
+ */
+
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+#include "sw_sync.h"
+#include "igt.h"
+#include "igt_aux.h"
+
+IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test SW Sync Framework");
+
+static void test_alloc_timeline(void)
+{
+ int timeline;
+
+ timeline = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+ close(timeline);
+}
+
+igt_main
+{
+ igt_subtest("alloc_timeline")
+ test_alloc_timeline();
+}
+
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH i-g-t v4 03/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_alloc_fence
2016-09-14 15:04 [PATCH i-g-t v4 00/13] Implement sw_sync test robert.foss
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 01/13] lib/sw_sync: Add helper functions for managing synchronization primitives robert.foss
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 02/13] tests/sw_sync: Add sw_sync test robert.foss
@ 2016-09-14 15:04 ` robert.foss
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 04/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_alloc_fence_invalid_timeline robert.foss
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: robert.foss @ 2016-09-14 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Gustavo Padovan, Daniel Stone, Daniel Vetter,
Marius Vlad, Eric Engestrom, Chris Wilson
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Add subtest alloc_fence that verifies that it's possible to allocate a fence
on a timeline.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
---
tests/sw_sync.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
index 47e2dfa..8f6208b 100644
--- a/tests/sw_sync.c
+++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
@@ -44,9 +44,25 @@ static void test_alloc_timeline(void)
close(timeline);
}
+static void test_alloc_fence(void)
+{
+ int in_fence;
+ int timeline;
+
+ timeline = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+ in_fence = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, 0);
+
+ close(in_fence);
+ close(timeline);
+}
+
+
igt_main
{
igt_subtest("alloc_timeline")
test_alloc_timeline();
+
+ igt_subtest("alloc_fence")
+ test_alloc_fence();
}
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH i-g-t v4 04/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_alloc_fence_invalid_timeline
2016-09-14 15:04 [PATCH i-g-t v4 00/13] Implement sw_sync test robert.foss
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 03/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_alloc_fence robert.foss
@ 2016-09-14 15:04 ` robert.foss
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 05/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_alloc_merge_fence robert.foss
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: robert.foss @ 2016-09-14 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Gustavo Padovan, Daniel Stone, Daniel Vetter,
Marius Vlad, Eric Engestrom, Chris Wilson
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
This subtests tests that creating fences on negative timelines fail.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
---
tests/sw_sync.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
index 8f6208b..75bd471 100644
--- a/tests/sw_sync.c
+++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
@@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ static void test_alloc_fence(void)
close(timeline);
}
+static void test_alloc_fence_invalid_timeline(void)
+{
+ igt_assert(__sw_sync_fence_create(-1, 0) < 0);
+}
igt_main
{
@@ -64,5 +68,8 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("alloc_fence")
test_alloc_fence();
+
+ igt_subtest("alloc_fence_invalid_timeline")
+ test_alloc_fence_invalid_timeline();
}
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH i-g-t v4 05/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_alloc_merge_fence
2016-09-14 15:04 [PATCH i-g-t v4 00/13] Implement sw_sync test robert.foss
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 04/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_alloc_fence_invalid_timeline robert.foss
@ 2016-09-14 15:04 ` robert.foss
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 06/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_wait robert.foss
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: robert.foss @ 2016-09-14 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Gustavo Padovan, Daniel Stone, Daniel Vetter,
Marius Vlad, Eric Engestrom, Chris Wilson
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
This subtest verifies that merging two fences works in the simples possible
case.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
---
tests/sw_sync.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
index 75bd471..fcb2f57 100644
--- a/tests/sw_sync.c
+++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
@@ -61,6 +61,26 @@ static void test_alloc_fence_invalid_timeline(void)
igt_assert(__sw_sync_fence_create(-1, 0) < 0);
}
+static void test_alloc_merge_fence(void)
+{
+ int in_fence[2];
+ int fence_merge;
+ int timeline[2];
+
+ timeline[0] = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+ timeline[1] = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+
+ in_fence[0] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline[0], 1);
+ in_fence[1] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline[1], 1);
+ fence_merge = sw_sync_merge(in_fence[1], in_fence[0]);
+
+ close(in_fence[0]);
+ close(in_fence[1]);
+ close(fence_merge);
+ close(timeline[0]);
+ close(timeline[1]);
+}
+
igt_main
{
igt_subtest("alloc_timeline")
@@ -71,5 +91,8 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("alloc_fence_invalid_timeline")
test_alloc_fence_invalid_timeline();
+
+ igt_subtest("alloc_merge_fence")
+ test_alloc_merge_fence();
}
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH i-g-t v4 06/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_wait
2016-09-14 15:04 [PATCH i-g-t v4 00/13] Implement sw_sync test robert.foss
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 05/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_alloc_merge_fence robert.foss
@ 2016-09-14 15:04 ` robert.foss
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 07/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_merge robert.foss
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: robert.foss @ 2016-09-14 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Gustavo Padovan, Daniel Stone, Daniel Vetter,
Marius Vlad, Eric Engestrom, Chris Wilson
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
This subtest verifies that waiting on fences works properly.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
---
tests/sw_sync.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
index fcb2f57..3061279 100644
--- a/tests/sw_sync.c
+++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
@@ -81,6 +81,41 @@ static void test_alloc_merge_fence(void)
close(timeline[1]);
}
+static void test_sync_wait(void)
+{
+ int fence, ret;
+ int timeline;
+
+ timeline = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+ fence = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, 5);
+
+ /* Wait on fence until timeout */
+ ret = sw_sync_wait(fence, 0);
+ igt_assert_f(ret == 0, "Failure waiting on fence until timeout\n");
+
+ /* Advance timeline from 0 -> 1 */
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline, 1);
+
+ /* Wait on fence until timeout */
+ ret = sw_sync_wait(fence, 0);
+ igt_assert_f(ret == 0, "Failure waiting on fence until timeout\n");
+
+ /* Signal the fence */
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline, 4);
+
+ /* Wait successfully */
+ ret = sw_sync_wait(fence, 0);
+ igt_assert_f(ret > 0, "Failure waiting on fence\n");
+
+ /* Go even further, and confirm wait still succeeds */
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline, 10);
+ ret = sw_sync_wait(fence, 0);
+ igt_assert_f(ret > 0, "Failure waiting ahead\n");
+
+ close(fence);
+ close(timeline);
+}
+
igt_main
{
igt_subtest("alloc_timeline")
@@ -94,5 +129,8 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("alloc_merge_fence")
test_alloc_merge_fence();
+
+ igt_subtest("sync_wait")
+ test_sync_wait();
}
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH i-g-t v4 07/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_merge
2016-09-14 15:04 [PATCH i-g-t v4 00/13] Implement sw_sync test robert.foss
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 06/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_wait robert.foss
@ 2016-09-14 15:04 ` robert.foss
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 08/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_merge_same robert.foss
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: robert.foss @ 2016-09-14 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Gustavo Padovan, Daniel Stone, Daniel Vetter,
Marius Vlad, Eric Engestrom, Chris Wilson
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Add subtest test_sync_merge that tests merging fences and the validity of the
resulting merged fence.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
---
tests/sw_sync.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
index 3061279..26226bd 100644
--- a/tests/sw_sync.c
+++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
@@ -116,6 +116,70 @@ static void test_sync_wait(void)
close(timeline);
}
+static void test_sync_merge(void)
+{
+ int in_fence[3];
+ int fence_merge;
+ int timeline;
+ int active, signaled;
+
+ timeline = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+ in_fence[0] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, 1);
+ in_fence[1] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, 2);
+ in_fence[2] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, 3);
+
+ fence_merge = sw_sync_merge(in_fence[0], in_fence[1]);
+ fence_merge = sw_sync_merge(in_fence[2], fence_merge);
+
+ /* confirm all fences have one active point (even d) */
+ active = sw_sync_fence_count_status(in_fence[0],
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
+ igt_assert_f(active == 1, "in_fence[0] has too many active fences\n");
+ active = sw_sync_fence_count_status(in_fence[1],
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
+ igt_assert_f(active == 1, "in_fence[1] has too many active fences\n");
+ active = sw_sync_fence_count_status(in_fence[2],
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
+ igt_assert_f(active == 1, "in_fence[2] has too many active fences\n");
+ active = sw_sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
+ igt_assert_f(active == 1, "fence_merge has too many active fences\n");
+
+ /* confirm that fence_merge is not signaled until the max of fence 0,1,2 */
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline, 1);
+ signaled = sw_sync_fence_count_status(in_fence[0],
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED);
+ active = sw_sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
+ igt_assert_f(signaled == 1, "in_fence[0] did not signal\n");
+ igt_assert_f(active == 1, "fence_merge signaled too early\n");
+
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline, 1);
+ signaled = sw_sync_fence_count_status(in_fence[1],
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED);
+ active = sw_sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
+ igt_assert_f(signaled == 1, "in_fence[1] did not signal\n");
+ igt_assert_f(active == 1, "fence_merge signaled too early\n");
+
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline, 1);
+ signaled = sw_sync_fence_count_status(in_fence[2],
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED);
+ igt_assert_f(signaled == 1, "in_fence[2] did not signal\n");
+ signaled = sw_sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED);
+ active = sw_sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
+ igt_assert_f(active == 0 && signaled == 1,
+ "fence_merge did not signal\n");
+
+ sw_sync_fence_destroy(in_fence[0]);
+ sw_sync_fence_destroy(in_fence[1]);
+ sw_sync_fence_destroy(in_fence[2]);
+ sw_sync_fence_destroy(fence_merge);
+ sw_sync_timeline_destroy(timeline);
+}
+
igt_main
{
igt_subtest("alloc_timeline")
@@ -132,5 +196,8 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("sync_wait")
test_sync_wait();
+
+ igt_subtest("sync_merge")
+ test_sync_merge();
}
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH i-g-t v4 08/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_merge_same
2016-09-14 15:04 [PATCH i-g-t v4 00/13] Implement sw_sync test robert.foss
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 07/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_merge robert.foss
@ 2016-09-14 15:04 ` robert.foss
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 09/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_consumer robert.foss
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: robert.foss @ 2016-09-14 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Gustavo Padovan, Daniel Stone, Daniel Vetter,
Marius Vlad, Eric Engestrom, Chris Wilson
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
This subtest verifies merging a fence with itself does not fail.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
---
tests/sw_sync.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
index 26226bd..ff87cfe 100644
--- a/tests/sw_sync.c
+++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
@@ -173,11 +173,35 @@ static void test_sync_merge(void)
igt_assert_f(active == 0 && signaled == 1,
"fence_merge did not signal\n");
- sw_sync_fence_destroy(in_fence[0]);
- sw_sync_fence_destroy(in_fence[1]);
- sw_sync_fence_destroy(in_fence[2]);
- sw_sync_fence_destroy(fence_merge);
- sw_sync_timeline_destroy(timeline);
+ close(in_fence[0]);
+ close(in_fence[1]);
+ close(in_fence[2]);
+ close(fence_merge);
+ close(timeline);
+}
+
+static void test_sync_merge_same(void)
+{
+ int in_fence[2];
+ int timeline;
+ int signaled;
+
+ timeline = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+ in_fence[0] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, 1);
+ in_fence[1] = sw_sync_merge(in_fence[0], in_fence[0]);
+
+ signaled = sw_sync_fence_count_status(in_fence[0],
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED);
+ igt_assert_f(signaled == 0, "fence signaled too early\n");
+
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline, 1);
+ signaled = sw_sync_fence_count_status(in_fence[0],
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED);
+ igt_assert_f(signaled == 1, "fence did not signal\n");
+
+ close(in_fence[0]);
+ close(in_fence[1]);
+ close(timeline);
}
igt_main
@@ -199,5 +223,8 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("sync_merge")
test_sync_merge();
+
+ igt_subtest("sync_merge_same")
+ test_sync_merge_same();
}
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH i-g-t v4 09/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_consumer
2016-09-14 15:04 [PATCH i-g-t v4 00/13] Implement sw_sync test robert.foss
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 08/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_merge_same robert.foss
@ 2016-09-14 15:04 ` robert.foss
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 10/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_consumer_producer robert.foss
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: robert.foss @ 2016-09-14 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Gustavo Padovan, Daniel Stone, Daniel Vetter,
Marius Vlad, Eric Engestrom, Chris Wilson
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
This subtest verifies the access ordering of multiple consumer threads.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
---
tests/sw_sync.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 103 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
index ff87cfe..e607b75 100644
--- a/tests/sw_sync.c
+++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
* Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
*/
+#include <pthread.h>
+#include <semaphore.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <unistd.h>
@@ -36,6 +38,15 @@
IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test SW Sync Framework");
+typedef struct {
+ int timeline;
+ uint32_t thread_id;
+ uint32_t nbr_threads;
+ uint32_t nbr_iterations;
+ volatile uint32_t * volatile counter;
+ sem_t *sem;
+} data_t;
+
static void test_alloc_timeline(void)
{
int timeline;
@@ -204,6 +215,95 @@ static void test_sync_merge_same(void)
close(timeline);
}
+static void * test_sync_multi_consumer_thread(void *arg)
+{
+ data_t *data = arg;
+ int thread_id = data->thread_id;
+ int nbr_threads = data->nbr_threads;
+ int timeline = data->timeline;
+ int iterations = data->nbr_iterations;
+ int ret, i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
+ int next_point = i * nbr_threads + thread_id;
+ int fence = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, next_point);
+
+ ret = sw_sync_wait(fence, 1000);
+ if (ret <= 0)
+ {
+ return (void *) 1;
+ }
+
+ if (*(data->counter) != next_point)
+ {
+ return (void *) 1;
+ }
+
+ sem_post(data->sem);
+ close(fence);
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void test_sync_multi_consumer(void)
+{
+ const uint32_t nbr_threads = 8;
+ const uint32_t nbr_iterations = 1 << 14;
+ data_t data_arr[nbr_threads];
+ pthread_t thread_arr[nbr_threads];
+ sem_t sem;
+ int timeline;
+ volatile uint32_t counter = 0;
+ uintptr_t thread_ret = 0;
+ data_t data;
+ int i, ret;
+
+ sem_init(&sem, 0, 0);
+ timeline = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+
+ data.nbr_iterations = nbr_iterations;
+ data.nbr_threads = nbr_threads;
+ data.counter = &counter;
+ data.timeline = timeline;
+ data.sem = &sem;
+
+ /* Start sync threads. */
+ for (i = 0; i < nbr_threads; i++)
+ {
+ data_arr[i] = data;
+ data_arr[i].thread_id = i;
+ ret = pthread_create(&thread_arr[i], NULL,
+ test_sync_multi_consumer_thread,
+ (void *) &(data_arr[i]));
+ igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
+ }
+
+ /* Produce 'content'. */
+ for (i = 0; i < nbr_threads * nbr_iterations; i++)
+ {
+ sem_wait(&sem);
+
+ counter++;
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline, 1);
+ }
+
+ /* Wait for threads to complete. */
+ for (i = 0; i < nbr_threads; i++)
+ {
+ uintptr_t local_thread_ret;
+ pthread_join(thread_arr[i], (void **)&local_thread_ret);
+ thread_ret |= local_thread_ret;
+ }
+
+ close(timeline);
+ sem_destroy(&sem);
+
+ igt_assert_f(counter == nbr_threads * nbr_iterations,
+ "Counter has unexpected value.\n");
+
+ igt_assert_f(thread_ret == 0, "A sync thread reported failure.\n");
+}
+
igt_main
{
igt_subtest("alloc_timeline")
@@ -226,5 +326,8 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("sync_merge_same")
test_sync_merge_same();
+
+ igt_subtest("sync_multi_consumer")
+ test_sync_multi_consumer();
}
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH i-g-t v4 10/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_consumer_producer
2016-09-14 15:04 [PATCH i-g-t v4 00/13] Implement sw_sync test robert.foss
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 09/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_consumer robert.foss
@ 2016-09-14 15:04 ` robert.foss
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 11/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_random_merge robert.foss
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: robert.foss @ 2016-09-14 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Gustavo Padovan, Daniel Stone, Daniel Vetter,
Marius Vlad, Eric Engestrom, Chris Wilson
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
This test verifies that stressing the kernel by creating multiple
consumer/producer threads that wait on a single timeline to be incremented
by another conumer/producer thread does not fail.
And that the order amongst the threads is maintained.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
---
tests/sw_sync.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 83 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
index e607b75..13a5643 100644
--- a/tests/sw_sync.c
+++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
@@ -304,6 +304,86 @@ static void test_sync_multi_consumer(void)
igt_assert_f(thread_ret == 0, "A sync thread reported failure.\n");
}
+static void * test_sync_multi_consumer_producer_thread(void *arg)
+{
+ data_t *data = arg;
+ int thread_id = data->thread_id;
+ int nbr_threads = data->nbr_threads;
+ int timeline = data->timeline;
+ int iterations = data->nbr_iterations;
+ int ret, i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
+ int next_point = i * nbr_threads + thread_id;
+ int fence = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, next_point);
+
+ ret = sw_sync_wait(fence, 1000);
+ if (ret <= 0)
+ {
+ return (void *) 1;
+ }
+
+ if (*(data->counter) != next_point)
+ {
+ return (void *) 1;
+ }
+
+ (*data->counter)++;
+
+ /* Kick off the next thread. */
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline, 1);
+
+ close(fence);
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void test_sync_multi_consumer_producer(void)
+{
+ const uint32_t nbr_threads = 8;
+ const uint32_t nbr_iterations = 1 << 14;
+ data_t data_arr[nbr_threads];
+ pthread_t thread_arr[nbr_threads];
+ int timeline;
+ volatile uint32_t counter = 0;
+ uintptr_t thread_ret = 0;
+ data_t data;
+ int i, ret;
+
+ timeline = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+
+ data.nbr_iterations = nbr_iterations;
+ data.nbr_threads = nbr_threads;
+ data.counter = &counter;
+ data.timeline = timeline;
+
+ /* Start consumer threads. */
+ for (i = 0; i < nbr_threads; i++)
+ {
+ data_arr[i] = data;
+ data_arr[i].thread_id = i;
+ ret = pthread_create(&thread_arr[i], NULL,
+ test_sync_multi_consumer_producer_thread,
+ (void *) &(data_arr[i]));
+ igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
+ }
+
+ /* Wait for threads to complete. */
+ for (i = 0; i < nbr_threads; i++)
+ {
+ uintptr_t local_thread_ret;
+ pthread_join(thread_arr[i], (void **)&local_thread_ret);
+ thread_ret |= local_thread_ret;
+ }
+
+ close(timeline);
+
+ igt_assert_f(counter == nbr_threads * nbr_iterations,
+ "Counter has unexpected value.\n");
+
+ igt_assert_f(thread_ret == 0, "A sync thread reported failure.\n");
+}
+
igt_main
{
igt_subtest("alloc_timeline")
@@ -329,5 +409,8 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("sync_multi_consumer")
test_sync_multi_consumer();
+
+ igt_subtest("sync_multi_consumer_producer")
+ test_sync_multi_consumer_producer();
}
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH i-g-t v4 11/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_random_merge
2016-09-14 15:04 [PATCH i-g-t v4 00/13] Implement sw_sync test robert.foss
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 10/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_consumer_producer robert.foss
@ 2016-09-14 15:04 ` robert.foss
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 12/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_timeline_wait robert.foss
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 13/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_producer_single_consumer robert.foss
12 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: robert.foss @ 2016-09-14 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Gustavo Padovan, Daniel Stone, Daniel Vetter,
Marius Vlad, Eric Engestrom, Chris Wilson
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
This subtest verifies that creating many timelines and merging random fences
from each timeline with eachother results in merged fences that are fully
functional.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
---
tests/sw_sync.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
index 13a5643..bd86111 100644
--- a/tests/sw_sync.c
+++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
@@ -384,6 +384,76 @@ static void test_sync_multi_consumer_producer(void)
igt_assert_f(thread_ret == 0, "A sync thread reported failure.\n");
}
+static void test_sync_random_merge(void)
+{
+ int i, size, ret;
+ const int nbr_timeline = 32;
+ const int nbr_merge = 1024;
+ int fence_map[nbr_timeline];
+ int timeline_arr[nbr_timeline];
+ int fence, tmpfence, merged;
+ int timeline, timeline_offset, sync_pt;
+
+ srand(time(NULL));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nbr_timeline; i++) {
+ timeline_arr[i] = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+ fence_map[i] = -1;
+ }
+
+ sync_pt = rand();
+ fence = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline_arr[0], sync_pt);
+
+ fence_map[0] = sync_pt;
+
+ /* Randomly create syncpoints out of a fixed set of timelines,
+ * and merge them together.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < nbr_merge; i++) {
+ /* Generate syncpoint. */
+ timeline_offset = rand() % nbr_timeline;
+ timeline = timeline_arr[timeline_offset];
+ sync_pt = rand();
+
+ /* Keep track of the latest sync_pt in each timeline. */
+ if (fence_map[timeline_offset] == -1)
+ fence_map[timeline_offset] = sync_pt;
+ else if (fence_map[timeline_offset] < sync_pt)
+ fence_map[timeline_offset] = sync_pt;
+
+ /* Merge. */
+ tmpfence = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, sync_pt);
+ merged = sw_sync_merge(tmpfence, fence);
+ close(tmpfence);
+ close(fence);
+ fence = merged;
+ }
+
+ size = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < nbr_timeline; i++)
+ if (fence_map[i] != -1)
+ size++;
+
+ /* Trigger the merged fence. */
+ for (i = 0; i < nbr_timeline; i++) {
+ if (fence_map[i] != -1) {
+ ret = sw_sync_wait(fence, 0);
+ igt_assert_f(ret == 0,
+ "Failure waiting on fence until timeout\n");
+ /* Increment the timeline to the last sync_pt */
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline_arr[i], fence_map[i]);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Check that the fence is triggered. */
+ ret = sw_sync_wait(fence, 0);
+ igt_assert_f(ret > 0, "Failure triggering fence\n");
+
+ close(fence);
+ for (i = 0; i < nbr_timeline; i++)
+ close(timeline_arr[i]);
+}
+
igt_main
{
igt_subtest("alloc_timeline")
@@ -412,5 +482,8 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("sync_multi_consumer_producer")
test_sync_multi_consumer_producer();
+
+ igt_subtest("sync_random_merge")
+ test_sync_random_merge();
}
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH i-g-t v4 12/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_timeline_wait
2016-09-14 15:04 [PATCH i-g-t v4 00/13] Implement sw_sync test robert.foss
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 11/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_random_merge robert.foss
@ 2016-09-14 15:04 ` robert.foss
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 13/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_producer_single_consumer robert.foss
12 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: robert.foss @ 2016-09-14 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Gustavo Padovan, Daniel Stone, Daniel Vetter,
Marius Vlad, Eric Engestrom, Chris Wilson
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
This subtest verifies that waiting, timing out on a wait and that counting
fences in various states works.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
---
tests/sw_sync.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
index bd86111..9ec2dc2 100644
--- a/tests/sw_sync.c
+++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
@@ -215,6 +215,69 @@ static void test_sync_merge_same(void)
close(timeline);
}
+static void test_sync_multi_timeline_wait(void)
+{
+ int timeline[3];
+ int in_fence[3];
+ int fence_merge;
+ int active, signaled, ret;
+
+ timeline[0] = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+ timeline[1] = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+ timeline[2] = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+
+ in_fence[0] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline[0], 5);
+ in_fence[1] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline[1], 5);
+ in_fence[2] = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline[2], 5);
+
+ fence_merge = sw_sync_merge(in_fence[0], in_fence[1]);
+ fence_merge = sw_sync_merge(in_fence[2], fence_merge);
+
+ /* Confirm fence isn't signaled */
+ active = sw_sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
+ igt_assert_f(active == 3, "Fence signaled too early\n");
+
+ ret = sw_sync_wait(fence_merge, 0);
+ igt_assert_f(ret == 0, "Failure waiting on fence until timeout\n");
+
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline[0], 5);
+ active = sw_sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
+ signaled = sw_sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED);
+ igt_assert_f(active == 2 && signaled == 1,
+ "Fence did not signal properly\n");
+
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline[1], 5);
+ active = sw_sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
+ signaled = sw_sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED);
+ igt_assert_f(active == 1 && signaled == 2,
+ "Fence did not signal properly\n");
+
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline[2], 5);
+ active = sw_sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
+ signaled = sw_sync_fence_count_status(fence_merge,
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_SIGNALED);
+ igt_assert_f(active == 0 && signaled == 3,
+ "Fence did not signal properly\n");
+
+ /* confirm you can successfully wait */
+ ret = sw_sync_wait(fence_merge, 100);
+ igt_assert_f(ret > 0, "Failure waiting on signaled fence\n");
+
+ close(in_fence[0]);
+ close(in_fence[1]);
+ close(in_fence[2]);
+ close(fence_merge);
+ close(timeline[0]);
+ close(timeline[1]);
+ close(timeline[2]);
+}
+
static void * test_sync_multi_consumer_thread(void *arg)
{
data_t *data = arg;
@@ -477,6 +540,9 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("sync_merge_same")
test_sync_merge_same();
+ igt_subtest("sync_multi_timeline_wait")
+ test_sync_multi_timeline_wait();
+
igt_subtest("sync_multi_consumer")
test_sync_multi_consumer();
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH i-g-t v4 13/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_producer_single_consumer
2016-09-14 15:04 [PATCH i-g-t v4 00/13] Implement sw_sync test robert.foss
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2016-09-14 15:04 ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 12/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_timeline_wait robert.foss
@ 2016-09-14 15:04 ` robert.foss
12 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: robert.foss @ 2016-09-14 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Gustavo Padovan, Daniel Stone, Daniel Vetter,
Marius Vlad, Eric Engestrom, Chris Wilson
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
This subtest runs a single consumer thread and multiple producer thread that
are synchronized using multiple timelines.
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch>
---
tests/sw_sync.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 139 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
index 9ec2dc2..1af9a6b 100644
--- a/tests/sw_sync.c
+++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
@@ -447,6 +447,142 @@ static void test_sync_multi_consumer_producer(void)
igt_assert_f(thread_ret == 0, "A sync thread reported failure.\n");
}
+static int test_mspc_wait_on_fence(int fence)
+{
+ int error, active;
+
+ do {
+ error = sw_sync_fence_count_status(fence,
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ERROR);
+ igt_assert_f(error == 0, "Error occurred on fence\n");
+ active = sw_sync_fence_count_status(fence,
+ SW_SYNC_FENCE_STATUS_ACTIVE);
+ } while (active);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct {
+ int iterations;
+ int threads;
+ int counter;
+ int cons_timeline;
+ int *prod_timeline;
+ pthread_mutex_t lock;
+} test_mpsc_data;
+
+static int mpsc_producer_thread(void *d)
+{
+ int id = (long)d;
+ int fence, i;
+ int *prod_timeline = test_mpsc_data.prod_timeline;
+ int cons_timeline = test_mpsc_data.cons_timeline;
+ int iterations = test_mpsc_data.iterations;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
+ fence = sw_sync_fence_create(cons_timeline, i);
+
+ /* Wait for the consumer to finish. Use alternate
+ * means of waiting on the fence
+ */
+ if ((iterations + id) % 8 != 0) {
+ igt_assert_f(sw_sync_wait(fence, -1) > 0,
+ "Failure waiting on fence\n");
+ } else {
+ igt_assert_f(test_mspc_wait_on_fence(fence) == 0,
+ "Failure waiting on fence\n");
+ }
+
+ /* Every producer increments the counter, the consumer
+ * checks and erases it
+ */
+ pthread_mutex_lock(&test_mpsc_data.lock);
+ test_mpsc_data.counter++;
+ pthread_mutex_unlock(&test_mpsc_data.lock);
+
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(prod_timeline[id], 1);
+ close(fence);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mpsc_consumer_thread(void)
+{
+ int fence, merged, tmp, it, i;
+ int *prod_timeline = test_mpsc_data.prod_timeline;
+ int cons_timeline = test_mpsc_data.cons_timeline;
+ int iterations = test_mpsc_data.iterations;
+ int n = test_mpsc_data.threads;
+
+ for (it = 1; it <= iterations; it++) {
+ fence = sw_sync_fence_create(prod_timeline[0], it);
+ for (i = 1; i < n; i++) {
+ tmp = sw_sync_fence_create(prod_timeline[i], it);
+ merged = sw_sync_merge(tmp, fence);
+ close(tmp);
+ close(fence);
+ fence = merged;
+ }
+
+ /* Make sure we see an increment from every producer thread.
+ * Vary the means by which we wait.
+ */
+ if (iterations % 8 != 0) {
+ igt_assert_f(sw_sync_wait(fence, -1) == 0,
+ "Producers did not increment as expected\n");
+ } else {
+ igt_assert_f(test_mspc_wait_on_fence(fence) == 0,
+ "Failure waiting on fence\n");
+ }
+
+ igt_assert_f(test_mpsc_data.counter == n * it,
+ "Counter value mismatch\n");
+
+ /* Release the producer threads */
+ sw_sync_timeline_inc(cons_timeline, 1);
+ close(fence);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* IMPORTANT NOTE: if you see this test failing on your system, it may be
+ * due to a shortage of file descriptors. Please ensure your system has
+ * a sensible limit for this test to finish correctly.
+ */
+static void test_sync_multi_producer_single_consumer(void)
+{
+ int iterations = 1 << 12;
+ int n = 5;
+ int prod_timeline[n];
+ int cons_timeline;
+ pthread_t threads[n];
+ long i;
+
+ cons_timeline = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
+ prod_timeline[i] = sw_sync_timeline_create();
+
+ test_mpsc_data.prod_timeline = prod_timeline;
+ test_mpsc_data.cons_timeline = cons_timeline;
+ test_mpsc_data.iterations = iterations;
+ test_mpsc_data.threads = n;
+ test_mpsc_data.counter = 0;
+ pthread_mutex_init(&test_mpsc_data.lock, NULL);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+ pthread_create(&threads[i], NULL, (void * (*)(void *))
+ mpsc_producer_thread,
+ (void *)i);
+ }
+
+ mpsc_consumer_thread();
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
+ pthread_join(threads[i], NULL);
+}
+
static void test_sync_random_merge(void)
{
int i, size, ret;
@@ -549,6 +685,9 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("sync_multi_consumer_producer")
test_sync_multi_consumer_producer();
+ igt_subtest("sync_multi_producer_single_consumer")
+ test_sync_multi_producer_single_consumer();
+
igt_subtest("sync_random_merge")
test_sync_random_merge();
}
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread