* [GIT PULL] ata changes for 5.17-rc1
@ 2022-01-14 6:59 Damien Le Moal
2022-01-14 13:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-18 8:29 ` pr-tracker-bot
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2022-01-14 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds, linux-ide
Linus,
The following changes since commit c9e6606c7fe92b50a02ce51dda82586ebdf99b48:
Linux 5.16-rc8 (2022-01-02 14:23:25 -0800)
are available in the Git repository at:
ssh://git@gitolite.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dlemoal/libata tags/ata-5.17-rc1
for you to fetch changes up to 237fe8885a3fdab169bf670790c9f40046af45d3:
ata: pata_ali: remove redundant return statement (2022-01-14 15:17:17 +0900)
----------------------------------------------------------------
ATA changes for 5.17-rc1
A larger than usual set of changes for this cycle. The bulk of the changes are
part of a rework of libata messages and debugging features from Hannes. In more
details, the changes are as follows.
* Small code cleanups in the pata_ali driver (unnecessary variable
initialization and simplified return statement, from Jason and Colin.
* Switch to using struct_group() in the sata_fsl driver, from Kees.
* Convert many sysfs attribute show functions to use sysfs_emit() instead of
snprintf(), from me.
* sata_dwc_460ex driver code cleanups, from Andy.
* Improve DMA setup and remove superfluous error message in libahci_platform,
from Andy
* A small code cleanup in libata to use min() instead of open coding test,
from Changcheng.
* Rework of libata messages from Hannes. This is especially focused on
replacing compile time defined debugging messages (DPRINTK() and VPRINTK())
with regular dynamic debugging messages (pr_debug()) and traceipoint events.
Both libata-core and many drivers are updated to have a consistent debugging
level control for all drivers.
* Extend compile test support to as many drivers as possible in ATA Kconfig to
improve compile test coverage, from me.
* Fixes to avoid compile time warnings (W=1) and sparse warnings in sata_fsl
and ahci_xgene drivers, from me.
* Fix the interface of the read_id() port operation method to clarify that the
data buffer passed as an argument is little endian. This avoids sparse
warnings in the pata_netcell, pata_it821x, ahci_xgene, ahci_cevaxi and
ahci_brcm drivers. From me.
* Small code cleanup in the pata_octeon_cf driver, from Minghao.
* Improved IRQ configuration code in pata_of_platform, from Lad.
* Simplified implementation of __ata_scsi_queuecmd(), from Wenchao.
* Debounce delay flag renaming, from Paul.
* Add support for AMD A85 FCH (Hudson D4) AHCI adapters, from Paul
----------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Shevchenko (5):
ata: sata_dwc_460ex: Use devm_platform_*ioremap_resource() APIs
ata: sata_dwc_460ex: Use temporary variable for struct device
ata: sata_dwc_460ex: Remove unused forward declaration
ata: libahci_platform: Remove bogus 32-bit DMA mask attempt
ata: libahci_platform: Get rid of dup message when IRQ can't be retrieved
Changcheng Deng (1):
ata: libata: use min() to make code cleaner
Colin Ian King (1):
ata: pata_ali: remove redundant return statement
Damien Le Moal (24):
ata: libata-sata: use sysfs_emit()
ata: libata-scsi: use sysfs_emit()
ata: ahci: use sysfs_emit()
ata: sata_fsl: use sysfs_emit()
ata: sata_fsl: add compile test support
ata: ahci_brcm: add compile test support
ata: ahci_da850: add compile test support
ata: ahci_dm816: add compile test support
ata: ahci_mtk: add compile test support
ata: ahci_mvebu: add compile test support
ata: ahci_sunxi: add compile test support
ata: ahci_tegra: add compile test support
ata: ahci_xgene: add compile test support
ata: ahci_seattle: add compile test support
ata: pata_bk3710: add compile test support
ata: sata_fsl: fix scsi host initialization
ata: sata_fsl: fix cmdhdr_tbl_entry and prde struct definitions
ata: ahci_xgene: use correct type for port mmio address
ata: fix read_id() ata port operation interface
ata: pata_cs5535: add compile test support
ata: pata_ftide010: add compile test support
ata: pata_imx: add compile test support
ata: pata_pxa: add compile test support
ata: pata_samsung_cf: add compile test support
Hannes Reinecke (68):
ata: libata: remove pointless debugging messages
ata: libata: whitespace cleanup
ata: libata: Add ata_port_classify() helper
ata: libata: move ata_dump_id() to dynamic debugging
ata: libata: sanitize ATA_HORKAGE_DUMP_ID
ata: libata: add reset tracepoints
ata: libata: add qc_prep tracepoint
ata: libata: tracepoints for bus-master DMA
ata: libata-sff: tracepoints for HSM state machine
ata: libata-scsi: drop DPRINTK calls for cdb translation
ata: libata: add tracepoints for ATA error handling
ata: libata: move ata_{port,link,dev}_dbg to standard pr_XXX() macros
ata: libata: revamp ata_get_cmd_descript()
ata: libata: move DPRINTK to ata debugging
ata: sata_mv: kill 'port' argument in mv_dump_all_regs()
ata: sata_mv: replace DPRINTK with dynamic debugging
ata: pata_octeon_cf: remove DPRINTK() macro in interrupt context
ata: pdc_adma: Remove DPRINTK call
ata: sata_fsl: move DPRINTK to ata debugging
ata: sata_rcar: replace DPRINTK() with ata_port_dbg()
ata: sata_qstor: replace DPRINTK() with dev_dbg()
ata: pata_pdc2027x: Replace PDPRINTK() with standard ata logging
ata: libata: remove pointless VPRINTK() calls
ata: ahci: Drop pointless VPRINTK() calls and convert the remaining ones
ata: pdc_adma: Drop pointless VPRINTK() calls and remove disabled NCQ debugging
ata: pata_octeon_cf: Drop pointless VPRINTK() calls and convert the remaining one
ata: pata_via: Drop pointless VPRINTK() calls
ata: sata_promise: Drop pointless VPRINTK() calls and convert the remaining ones
ata: sata_qstor: Drop pointless VPRINTK() calls
ata: sata_rcar: Drop pointless VPRINTK() calls
ata: sata_inic162x: Drop pointless VPRINTK() calls
ata: sata_mv: Drop pointless VPRINTK() call and convert the remaining one
ata: sata_nv: drop pointless VPRINTK() calls and convert remaining ones
ata: sata_fsl: convert VPRINTK() calls to ata_port_dbg()
ata: sata_sil: Drop pointless VPRINTK() calls
ata: sata_sx4: Drop pointless VPRINTK() calls and convert the remaining ones
ata: sata_sx4: add module parameter 'dimm_test'
ata: libata: drop ata_msg_error() and ata_msg_intr()
ata: libata: drop ata_msg_ctl()
ata: libata: drop ata_msg_malloc()
ata: libata: drop ata_msg_warn()
ata: libata: drop ata_msg_probe()
ata: libata: drop ata_msg_info()
ata: libata: drop ata_msg_drv()
ata: libata: remove 'new' ata message handling
ata: libata: remove debug compilation switches
ata: pata_atp867x: convert printk() calls
ata: pata_cmd640: convert printk() calls
ata: pata_cmd64x: convert printk() calls
ata: pata_cs5520: convert printk() calls
ata: pata_cs5536: convert printk() calls
ata: pata_cypress: convert printk() calls
ata: pata_it821x: convert printk() calls
ata: pata_marvell: convert printk() calls
ata: pata_rz1000: convert printk() calls
ata: pata_serverworks: convert printk() calls
ata: pata_sil680: convert printk() calls
ata: sata_sx4: convert printk() calls
ata: sata_mv: convert remaining printk() to structured logging
ata: pata_hpt37x: convert pr_XXX() calls
ata: pata_octeon_cf: Replace pr_XXX() calls with structured logging
ata: pata_hpt3x2n: convert pr_XXX() calls
ata: sata_gemini: convert pr_err() calls
ata: pata_hpt366: convert pr_warn() calls
ata: libata-scsi: rework ata_dump_status to avoid using pr_cont()
ata: sata_dwc_460ex: drop DEBUG_NCQ
ata: sata_dwc_460ex: remove 'check_status' argument
ata: sata_dwc_460ex: Remove debug compile options
Jason Wang (1):
ata: pata_ali: no need to initialise statics to 0
Kees Cook (1):
ata: sata_fsl: Use struct_group() for memcpy() region
Lad Prabhakar (1):
ata: pata_of_platform: Use platform_get_irq_optional() to get the interrupt
Minghao Chi (1):
ata: pata_octeon_cf: remove redundant val variable
Paul Menzel (2):
ata: libata: Rename link flag ATA_LFLAG_NO_DB_DELAY
ata: ahci: Add support for AMD A85 FCH (Hudson D4)
Wenchao Hao (1):
ata: libata-scsi: simplify __ata_scsi_queuecmd()
drivers/ata/Kconfig | 44 ++---
drivers/ata/acard-ahci.c | 4 -
drivers/ata/ahci.c | 24 ++-
drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c | 4 +-
drivers/ata/ahci_ceva.c | 5 +-
drivers/ata/ahci_qoriq.c | 4 -
drivers/ata/ahci_xgene.c | 12 +-
drivers/ata/ata_piix.c | 11 +-
drivers/ata/libahci.c | 33 +---
drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c | 14 +-
drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 69 +++----
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 231 +++++-----------------
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 72 ++++---
drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c | 8 -
drivers/ata/libata-sata.c | 11 +-
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 170 +++++-----------
drivers/ata/libata-sff.c | 88 +++------
drivers/ata/libata-trace.c | 47 +++++
drivers/ata/libata-transport.c | 48 ++++-
drivers/ata/libata.h | 5 +-
drivers/ata/pata_ali.c | 4 +-
drivers/ata/pata_arasan_cf.c | 3 +
drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c | 105 +++++-----
drivers/ata/pata_cmd640.c | 2 +-
drivers/ata/pata_cmd64x.c | 4 +-
drivers/ata/pata_cs5520.c | 4 +-
drivers/ata/pata_cs5536.c | 4 +-
drivers/ata/pata_cypress.c | 2 +-
drivers/ata/pata_ep93xx.c | 1 -
drivers/ata/pata_hpt366.c | 5 +-
drivers/ata/pata_hpt37x.c | 20 +-
drivers/ata/pata_hpt3x2n.c | 12 +-
drivers/ata/pata_it821x.c | 66 ++++---
drivers/ata/pata_ixp4xx_cf.c | 6 +-
drivers/ata/pata_marvell.c | 9 +-
drivers/ata/pata_netcell.c | 5 +-
drivers/ata/pata_octeon_cf.c | 54 ++----
drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c | 15 +-
drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c | 71 +++----
drivers/ata/pata_pdc202xx_old.c | 2 -
drivers/ata/pata_rz1000.c | 4 +-
drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c | 4 +-
drivers/ata/pata_sil680.c | 9 +-
drivers/ata/pata_via.c | 12 --
drivers/ata/pdc_adma.c | 33 +---
drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c | 165 ++++------------
drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c | 212 +++++++++-----------
drivers/ata/sata_gemini.c | 4 +-
drivers/ata/sata_inic162x.c | 4 +-
drivers/ata/sata_mv.c | 132 ++++++-------
drivers/ata/sata_nv.c | 54 ++----
drivers/ata/sata_promise.c | 31 +--
drivers/ata/sata_qstor.c | 15 +-
drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c | 26 +--
drivers/ata/sata_sil.c | 1 -
drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c | 5 +-
drivers/ata/sata_sx4.c | 148 +++++---------
include/linux/libata.h | 138 ++++++-------
include/trace/events/libata.h | 416 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
59 files changed, 1272 insertions(+), 1439 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] ata changes for 5.17-rc1
2022-01-14 6:59 [GIT PULL] ata changes for 5.17-rc1 Damien Le Moal
@ 2022-01-14 13:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-14 23:27 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-01-18 0:06 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-01-18 8:29 ` pr-tracker-bot
1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2022-01-14 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Damien Le Moal; +Cc: linux-ide
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:59 AM Damien Le Moal
<damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> wrote:
>
> ATA changes for 5.17-rc1
A number of these commits are not in linux-next. Why?
It looks like you have rebased things very recently (and looks like
you did it a week ago too). Or maybe some patch-queue system, or
whatever. Why? If it hasn't been in linux-next, you should explain
what's up.
As it is, I'm traveling, and I'm just throwing this away because I
don't want things that haven't seen the build testing that linux-next
does, since on my laptop I cannot do as much build testing as I
normally do.
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] ata changes for 5.17-rc1
2022-01-14 13:54 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2022-01-14 23:27 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-01-14 23:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-18 0:06 ` Damien Le Moal
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2022-01-14 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds, Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-ide
On 1/14/22 22:54, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:59 AM Damien Le Moal
> <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> wrote:
>>
>> ATA changes for 5.17-rc1
>
> A number of these commits are not in linux-next. Why?
That is strange. I have kept my for-next branch in sync with for-5.17
all the time and got several built-bot warnings that I addressed.
> It looks like you have rebased things very recently (and looks like
> you did it a week ago too). Or maybe some patch-queue system, or
> whatever. Why? If it hasn't been in linux-next, you should explain
> what's up.
The last intentional rebase on 5.16-rc8 of the for-5.17 branch was to
check that there were no conflicts nor any problems with the fixes in
5.16. I did that because Hannes series touched a lot of drivers (if not
most of them).
I am not sure why the patches do not show up in linux-next. As mentioned
above, since I got several build-bot warnings, I am confident that this
went through build tests and passes. Or am I missing something in the
workflow ?
Stephen,
I am almost certain that you are pulling patches from libata for-next
branch since I got build bot reports and you also pinged me directly
about these. Is there something I am missing about linux-next ? Is there
some other request I need to send to someone to get patches pulled there
too ? I was under the assumption that your pulls end up creating
linux-next...
> As it is, I'm traveling, and I'm just throwing this away because I
> don't want things that haven't seen the build testing that linux-next
> does, since on my laptop I cannot do as much build testing as I
> normally do.
Understood. I will get this sorted.
>
> Linus
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] ata changes for 5.17-rc1
2022-01-14 23:27 ` Damien Le Moal
@ 2022-01-14 23:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-15 1:39 ` Damien Le Moal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2022-01-14 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Damien Le Moal; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, linux-ide
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4057 bytes --]
Hi Damien,
On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 08:27:12 +0900 Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/14/22 22:54, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:59 AM Damien Le Moal
> > <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> ATA changes for 5.17-rc1
> >
> > A number of these commits are not in linux-next. Why?
>
> That is strange. I have kept my for-next branch in sync with for-5.17
> all the time and got several built-bot warnings that I addressed.
>
> > It looks like you have rebased things very recently (and looks like
> > you did it a week ago too). Or maybe some patch-queue system, or
> > whatever. Why? If it hasn't been in linux-next, you should explain
> > what's up.
>
> The last intentional rebase on 5.16-rc8 of the for-5.17 branch was to
> check that there were no conflicts nor any problems with the fixes in
> 5.16. I did that because Hannes series touched a lot of drivers (if not
> most of them).
That check van be done by doing a test merge and if there is nothing
major, then don't bother doing the rebase.
> I am not sure why the patches do not show up in linux-next. As mentioned
> above, since I got several build-bot warnings, I am confident that this
> went through build tests and passes. Or am I missing something in the
> workflow ?
>
> Stephen,
>
> I am almost certain that you are pulling patches from libata for-next
> branch since I got build bot reports and you also pinged me directly
> about these. Is there something I am missing about linux-next ? Is there
> some other request I need to send to someone to get patches pulled there
> too ? I was under the assumption that your pulls end up creating
> linux-next...
I do fetch your for-next branch every day, but here is the "git
range-diff" between your branch in yesterday's linux-next and the
branch I fetched today:
$ git range-diff e928da321f0bd51f9cf211eab0a7b2fc089685a7...libata/for-next
1: bd7300988b26 < -: ------------ ata: ahci_st: add compile test support
2: e3e44274998d = 1: 28a53d3160ac ata: ahci_mtk: add compile test support
3: eec6634ee717 = 2: 368c7edc15e5 ata: ahci_mvebu: add compile test support
4: 003785331487 = 3: c05b911afffa ata: ahci_sunxi: add compile test support
5: a4dd1e0f6542 = 4: 3d98cbf7096e ata: ahci_tegra: add compile test support
6: 9ec8eadac3a4 = 5: b7c9b00fb050 ata: ahci_xgene: add compile test support
7: 9fc38794e9b2 = 6: a33a348d0aca ata: ahci_seattle: add compile test support
8: e9123b1cef47 = 7: a3d11c275b64 ata: pata_bk3710: add compile test support
9: 4c8bbbba007c = 8: e5b48ee30aec ata: sata_fsl: fix scsi host initialization
10: 04ed3c17408e = 9: f8bc938ee6c6 ata: sata_fsl: fix cmdhdr_tbl_entry and prde struct definitions
11: d64f9dbf0ae5 = 10: 2bce69072a0d ata: ahci_xgene: use correct type for port mmio address
12: 75d7ef1d0409 = 11: 0561e514c944 ata: fix read_id() ata port operation interface
13: 953e5fc04f30 = 12: 9c2fd3fb43bd ata: pata_octeon_cf: remove redundant val variable
14: b76fc153e3d4 = 13: dc5d7b3cfd78 ata: pata_cs5535: add compile test support
15: 148f7ed51e8f = 14: 2aa566716f43 ata: pata_ftide010: add compile test support
16: 6aef8c23f268 = 15: 7dc3c053bddf ata: pata_imx: add compile test support
17: 017253b5a7fa = 16: 7767c73a3565 ata: pata_pxa: add compile test support
18: f4c8787686a4 = 17: b6a64a860e13 ata: pata_samsung_cf: add compile test support
19: e790a4f79933 = 18: db6a3f47cecc ata: pata_of_platform: Use platform_get_irq_optional() to get the interrupt
20: cadac042d432 = 19: 84eac327af54 ata: libata-scsi: simplify __ata_scsi_queuecmd()
21: a49c0c3fc253 = 20: b9ba367c513d ata: libata: Rename link flag ATA_LFLAG_NO_DB_DELAY
22: 6977409c421b = 21: a17ab7aba5df ata: ahci: Add support for AMD A85 FCH (Hudson D4)
23: e928da321f0b = 22: 237fe8885a3f ata: pata_ali: remove redundant return statement
So, you removed a commit and the rest is the same.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] ata changes for 5.17-rc1
2022-01-14 23:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2022-01-15 1:39 ` Damien Le Moal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2022-01-15 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, linux-ide
On 1/15/22 08:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Damien,
>
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 08:27:12 +0900 Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/14/22 22:54, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:59 AM Damien Le Moal
>>> <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ATA changes for 5.17-rc1
>>>
>>> A number of these commits are not in linux-next. Why?
>>
>> That is strange. I have kept my for-next branch in sync with for-5.17
>> all the time and got several built-bot warnings that I addressed.
>>
>>> It looks like you have rebased things very recently (and looks like
>>> you did it a week ago too). Or maybe some patch-queue system, or
>>> whatever. Why? If it hasn't been in linux-next, you should explain
>>> what's up.
>>
>> The last intentional rebase on 5.16-rc8 of the for-5.17 branch was to
>> check that there were no conflicts nor any problems with the fixes in
>> 5.16. I did that because Hannes series touched a lot of drivers (if not
>> most of them).
>
> That check van be done by doing a test merge and if there is nothing
> major, then don't bother doing the rebase.
Understood. I will do that in the future, and not push the rebase.
>
>> I am not sure why the patches do not show up in linux-next. As mentioned
>> above, since I got several build-bot warnings, I am confident that this
>> went through build tests and passes. Or am I missing something in the
>> workflow ?
>>
>> Stephen,
>>
>> I am almost certain that you are pulling patches from libata for-next
>> branch since I got build bot reports and you also pinged me directly
>> about these. Is there something I am missing about linux-next ? Is there
>> some other request I need to send to someone to get patches pulled there
>> too ? I was under the assumption that your pulls end up creating
>> linux-next...
>
> I do fetch your for-next branch every day, but here is the "git
> range-diff" between your branch in yesterday's linux-next and the
> branch I fetched today:
>
> $ git range-diff e928da321f0bd51f9cf211eab0a7b2fc089685a7...libata/for-next
> 1: bd7300988b26 < -: ------------ ata: ahci_st: add compile test support
> 2: e3e44274998d = 1: 28a53d3160ac ata: ahci_mtk: add compile test support
> 3: eec6634ee717 = 2: 368c7edc15e5 ata: ahci_mvebu: add compile test support
> 4: 003785331487 = 3: c05b911afffa ata: ahci_sunxi: add compile test support
> 5: a4dd1e0f6542 = 4: 3d98cbf7096e ata: ahci_tegra: add compile test support
> 6: 9ec8eadac3a4 = 5: b7c9b00fb050 ata: ahci_xgene: add compile test support
> 7: 9fc38794e9b2 = 6: a33a348d0aca ata: ahci_seattle: add compile test support
> 8: e9123b1cef47 = 7: a3d11c275b64 ata: pata_bk3710: add compile test support
> 9: 4c8bbbba007c = 8: e5b48ee30aec ata: sata_fsl: fix scsi host initialization
> 10: 04ed3c17408e = 9: f8bc938ee6c6 ata: sata_fsl: fix cmdhdr_tbl_entry and prde struct definitions
> 11: d64f9dbf0ae5 = 10: 2bce69072a0d ata: ahci_xgene: use correct type for port mmio address
> 12: 75d7ef1d0409 = 11: 0561e514c944 ata: fix read_id() ata port operation interface
> 13: 953e5fc04f30 = 12: 9c2fd3fb43bd ata: pata_octeon_cf: remove redundant val variable
> 14: b76fc153e3d4 = 13: dc5d7b3cfd78 ata: pata_cs5535: add compile test support
> 15: 148f7ed51e8f = 14: 2aa566716f43 ata: pata_ftide010: add compile test support
> 16: 6aef8c23f268 = 15: 7dc3c053bddf ata: pata_imx: add compile test support
> 17: 017253b5a7fa = 16: 7767c73a3565 ata: pata_pxa: add compile test support
> 18: f4c8787686a4 = 17: b6a64a860e13 ata: pata_samsung_cf: add compile test support
> 19: e790a4f79933 = 18: db6a3f47cecc ata: pata_of_platform: Use platform_get_irq_optional() to get the interrupt
> 20: cadac042d432 = 19: 84eac327af54 ata: libata-scsi: simplify __ata_scsi_queuecmd()
> 21: a49c0c3fc253 = 20: b9ba367c513d ata: libata: Rename link flag ATA_LFLAG_NO_DB_DELAY
> 22: 6977409c421b = 21: a17ab7aba5df ata: ahci: Add support for AMD A85 FCH (Hudson D4)
> 23: e928da321f0b = 22: 237fe8885a3f ata: pata_ali: remove redundant return statement
>
> So, you removed a commit and the rest is the same.
Yes, I did remove the patch that added compile test for the ahci_st
driver as it was generating a warning with an hexagon randconfig (see
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202201122335.B7ADTynl-lkp@intel.com/). I
removed the patch as I did not see a clean way to avoid the warning.
Linus,
With the difference noted by Stephen above, I can see all patches of the
PR I sent in linux-next. Does that address your concerns ? Please let me
know if there is anything I need to do to fix the PR. Thanks !
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] ata changes for 5.17-rc1
2022-01-14 13:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-14 23:27 ` Damien Le Moal
@ 2022-01-18 0:06 ` Damien Le Moal
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2022-01-18 0:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: linux-ide
On 1/14/22 22:54, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:59 AM Damien Le Moal
> <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> wrote:
>>
>> ATA changes for 5.17-rc1
>
> A number of these commits are not in linux-next. Why?
>
> It looks like you have rebased things very recently (and looks like
> you did it a week ago too). Or maybe some patch-queue system, or
> whatever. Why? If it hasn't been in linux-next, you should explain
> what's up.
>
> As it is, I'm traveling, and I'm just throwing this away because I
> don't want things that haven't seen the build testing that linux-next
> does, since on my laptop I cannot do as much build testing as I
> normally do.
>
> Linus
Hi Linus,
Any more concerns about this pull request ? Is there anything I need to
do to get it merged ?
All patches are in linux-next and I did not get any build-bot complaints.
Thanks.
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] ata changes for 5.17-rc1
2022-01-14 6:59 [GIT PULL] ata changes for 5.17-rc1 Damien Le Moal
2022-01-14 13:54 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2022-01-18 8:29 ` pr-tracker-bot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pr-tracker-bot @ 2022-01-18 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Damien Le Moal; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, linux-ide
The pull request you sent on Fri, 14 Jan 2022 15:59:06 +0900:
> ssh://git@gitolite.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dlemoal/libata tags/ata-5.17-rc1
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/fe81ba137ebcc7f236780996a0b375732c07e85c
Thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/prtracker.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-18 8:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-14 6:59 [GIT PULL] ata changes for 5.17-rc1 Damien Le Moal
2022-01-14 13:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-14 23:27 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-01-14 23:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-15 1:39 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-01-18 0:06 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-01-18 8:29 ` pr-tracker-bot
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.