[RFT] glibc 2.23

[RFT] glibc 2.23

[Khem Raj]

Hi All,

I have put together patchset for upcoming glibc 2.23 release here

https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/tree/kraj/glibc-2.23

There are two patches that you would need to cherry-pick

https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/commit/8f6392f59c83117da07a1ebe25b9cbbdf79a6df5
https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/commit/5f89cddb83a2682dc17b115940cc519dde83e4ae

This has kconfig and options-group support dropped.

I have done OE-Core only clean world builds for all Qemu machines
without a single build failure and
runtime boot tested.

Let me know if you see issues in your environments and machines
especially when bringing in other layers.

Thanks
-Khem

Re: [oe] [RFT] glibc 2.23

[Burton, Ross]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 348 bytes --]

On 4 January 2016 at 19:00, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have done OE-Core only clean world builds for all Qemu machines
> without a single build failure and
> runtime boot tested.
>

I threw this at the autobuilder and glibc failed to build on one of the
runs:

http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/26057/

Ross

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 946 bytes --]

Re: [RFT] glibc 2.23

[Burton, Ross]

On 4 January 2016 at 19:00, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have done OE-Core only clean world builds for all Qemu machines
> without a single build failure and
> runtime boot tested.
>

I threw this at the autobuilder and glibc failed to build on one of the
runs:

http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/26057/

Ross

Re: [oe] [RFT] glibc 2.23

[Khem Raj]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 923 bytes --]


> On Jan 5, 2016, at 8:17 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> On 4 January 2016 at 19:00, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I have done OE-Core only clean world builds for all Qemu machines
>> without a single build failure and
>> runtime boot tested.
>> 
> 
> I threw this at the autobuilder and glibc failed to build on one of the
> runs:
> 
> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/26057/


Thanks Ross, what MACHINE did you build for ?

rtld.c:1:0: error: SSE instruction set disabled, using 387 arithmetics

I think I have an idea whats going on. It was fixed in glibc 2.23 but maybe
not in all cases. I will take a look at it later today.

> 
> Ross
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --]

Re: [RFT] glibc 2.23

[Khem Raj]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 923 bytes --]


> On Jan 5, 2016, at 8:17 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> On 4 January 2016 at 19:00, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I have done OE-Core only clean world builds for all Qemu machines
>> without a single build failure and
>> runtime boot tested.
>> 
> 
> I threw this at the autobuilder and glibc failed to build on one of the
> runs:
> 
> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/26057/


Thanks Ross, what MACHINE did you build for ?

rtld.c:1:0: error: SSE instruction set disabled, using 387 arithmetics

I think I have an idea whats going on. It was fixed in glibc 2.23 but maybe
not in all cases. I will take a look at it later today.

> 
> Ross
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --]

Re: [oe] [RFT] glibc 2.23

[Paul Eggleton]

On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 13:08:31 Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Jan 5, 2016, at 8:17 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On 4 January 2016 at 19:00, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I have done OE-Core only clean world builds for all Qemu machines
> >> without a single build failure and
> >> runtime boot tested.
> > 
> > I threw this at the autobuilder and glibc failed to build on one of the
> > runs:
> > 
> > http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/26057/
> 
> Thanks Ross, what MACHINE did you build for ?

It's right there in the error report on the right hand side - genericx86.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] glibc 2.23

[Paul Eggleton]

On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 13:08:31 Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Jan 5, 2016, at 8:17 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On 4 January 2016 at 19:00, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I have done OE-Core only clean world builds for all Qemu machines
> >> without a single build failure and
> >> runtime boot tested.
> > 
> > I threw this at the autobuilder and glibc failed to build on one of the
> > runs:
> > 
> > http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/26057/
> 
> Thanks Ross, what MACHINE did you build for ?

It's right there in the error report on the right hand side - genericx86.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Re: [oe] [RFT] glibc 2.23

[Khem Raj]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1039 bytes --]


> On Jan 5, 2016, at 4:01 PM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 13:08:31 Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Jan 5, 2016, at 8:17 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 4 January 2016 at 19:00, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I have done OE-Core only clean world builds for all Qemu machines
>>>> without a single build failure and
>>>> runtime boot tested.
>>> 
>>> I threw this at the autobuilder and glibc failed to build on one of the
>>> runs:
>>> 
>>> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/26057/
>> 
>> Thanks Ross, what MACHINE did you build for ?
> 
> It's right there in the error report on the right hand side - genericx86.

Right, noticed it soon after. I have updated the patchset to fix the genericx86
and submitted it for glibc upstream as well.

Same branch now has updated glibc patchset, if you have cycles please try once more.

> 
> Cheers,
> Paul
> 
> --
> 
> Paul Eggleton
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --]

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] glibc 2.23

[Khem Raj]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1039 bytes --]


> On Jan 5, 2016, at 4:01 PM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 13:08:31 Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Jan 5, 2016, at 8:17 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 4 January 2016 at 19:00, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I have done OE-Core only clean world builds for all Qemu machines
>>>> without a single build failure and
>>>> runtime boot tested.
>>> 
>>> I threw this at the autobuilder and glibc failed to build on one of the
>>> runs:
>>> 
>>> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/26057/
>> 
>> Thanks Ross, what MACHINE did you build for ?
> 
> It's right there in the error report on the right hand side - genericx86.

Right, noticed it soon after. I have updated the patchset to fix the genericx86
and submitted it for glibc upstream as well.

Same branch now has updated glibc patchset, if you have cycles please try once more.

> 
> Cheers,
> Paul
> 
> --
> 
> Paul Eggleton
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --]

Re: [oe] [RFT] glibc 2.23

[Burton, Ross]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 309 bytes --]

On 6 January 2016 at 03:16, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:

> Same branch now has updated glibc patchset, if you have cycles please try
> once more.
>

Thanks Khem.  When meta-fsl-ppc doesn't cause several failures in every run
I'll re-fire it so we can actually get an all-green build!

Ross

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 747 bytes --]

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] glibc 2.23

[Burton, Ross]

On 6 January 2016 at 03:16, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:

> Same branch now has updated glibc patchset, if you have cycles please try
> once more.
>

Thanks Khem.  When meta-fsl-ppc doesn't cause several failures in every run
I'll re-fire it so we can actually get an all-green build!

Ross

Re: [oe] [RFT] glibc 2.23

[Khem Raj]

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 6 January 2016 at 03:16, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Same branch now has updated glibc patchset, if you have cycles please try
>> once more.
>
>
> Thanks Khem.  When meta-fsl-ppc doesn't cause several failures in every run
> I'll re-fire it so we can actually get an all-green build!

fsl ppc build fails are due to glibc or some other reason

>
> Ross

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] glibc 2.23

[Khem Raj]

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 6 January 2016 at 03:16, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Same branch now has updated glibc patchset, if you have cycles please try
>> once more.
>
>
> Thanks Khem.  When meta-fsl-ppc doesn't cause several failures in every run
> I'll re-fire it so we can actually get an all-green build!

fsl ppc build fails are due to glibc or some other reason

>
> Ross

Re: [oe] [RFT] glibc 2.23

[Burton, Ross]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 213 bytes --]

On 6 January 2016 at 15:40, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:

> fsl ppc build fails are due to glibc or some other reason
>

They're entirely down the their layer (broken fetch, broken recipes).

Ross

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 622 bytes --]

Re: [OE-core] [RFT] glibc 2.23

[Burton, Ross]

On 6 January 2016 at 15:40, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:

> fsl ppc build fails are due to glibc or some other reason
>

They're entirely down the their layer (broken fetch, broken recipes).

Ross