All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: unsharing tcp connections from different NFS mounts
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:45:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ED5511E-25DE-4C06-9E26-A1947383C86A@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5B5CF80C-494A-42D3-8D3F-51C0277D9E1B@redhat.com>



> On Oct 7, 2020, at 8:55 AM, Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On 7 Oct 2020, at 7:27, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> 
>> On 6 Oct 2020, at 20:18, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 05:46:11PM -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 3:38 PM Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 6 Oct 2020, at 11:13, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> 
>>> Looks like nfs4_init_{non}uniform_client_string() stores it in
>>> cl_owner_id, and I was thinking that meant cl_owner_id would be used
>>> from then on....
>>> 
>>> But actually, I think it may run that again on recovery, yes, so I bet
>>> changing the nfs4_unique_id parameter midway like this could cause bugs
>>> on recovery.
>> 
>> Ah, that's what I thought as well.  Thanks for looking closer Olga!
> 
> Well, no -- it does indeed continue to use the original cl_owner_id.  We
> only jump through nfs4_init_uniquifier_client_string() if cl_owner_id is
> NULL:
> 
> 6087 static int
> 6088 nfs4_init_uniform_client_string(struct nfs_client *clp)
> 6089 {
> 6090     size_t len;
> 6091     char *str;
> 6092
> 6093     if (clp->cl_owner_id != NULL)
> 6094         return 0;
> 6095
> 6096     if (nfs4_client_id_uniquifier[0] != '\0')
> 6097         return nfs4_init_uniquifier_client_string(clp);
> 6098
> 
> 
> Testing proves this out as well for both EXCHANGE_ID and SETCLIENTID.
> 
> Is there any precedent for stabilizing module parameters as part of a
> supported interface?  Maybe this ought to be a mount option, so client can
> set a uniquifier per-mount.

The protocol is designed as one client-ID per client. FreeBSD is
the only client I know of that uses one client-ID per mount, fwiw.

You are suggesting each mount point would have its own lease. There
would likely be deeper implementation changes needed than just
specifying a unique client-ID for each mount point.

--
Chuck Lever




  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-07 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-06 15:13 unsharing tcp connections from different NFS mounts J. Bruce Fields
2020-10-06 15:20 ` Chuck Lever
2020-10-06 15:22   ` Bruce Fields
2020-10-06 17:07     ` Tom Talpey
2020-10-06 19:30       ` Bruce Fields
     [not found]         ` <CAGrwUG5_KeRVR8chcA8=3FSeii2+4c8FbuE=CSGAtYVYqV4kLg@mail.gmail.com>
2020-10-07 14:08           ` Tom Talpey
2020-10-06 19:36 ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-10-06 21:46   ` Olga Kornievskaia
2020-10-07  0:18     ` J. Bruce Fields
2020-10-07 11:27       ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-10-07 12:55         ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-10-07 13:45           ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2020-10-07 14:05             ` Bruce Fields
2020-10-07 14:15               ` Chuck Lever
2020-10-07 16:05                 ` Bruce Fields
2020-10-07 16:44                   ` Trond Myklebust
2020-10-07 17:15                     ` Bruce Fields
2020-10-07 17:29                       ` Trond Myklebust
2020-10-07 18:05                         ` bfields
2020-10-07 19:11                           ` Trond Myklebust
2020-10-07 20:29                             ` bfields
2020-10-07 18:04                     ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-10-07 18:19                       ` Trond Myklebust
2020-10-07 16:50                   ` Trond Myklebust
2021-01-19 22:22                     ` bfields
2021-01-19 23:09                       ` Trond Myklebust
2021-01-20 15:07                         ` bfields
2021-05-03 20:09                           ` bfields
2021-05-04  2:08                             ` NeilBrown
2021-05-04 13:27                               ` Tom Talpey
2021-05-04 14:27                               ` Trond Myklebust
2021-05-04 16:51                                 ` bfields
2021-05-04 21:32                                   ` Daire Byrne
2021-05-04 21:48                                     ` Trond Myklebust
2021-05-05 12:53                                       ` Daire Byrne
2021-01-20 15:58                       ` Chuck Lever
2020-10-07 13:56 ` Patrick Goetz
2020-10-07 16:28   ` Igor Ostrovsky
2020-10-07 16:30   ` Benjamin Coddington

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ED5511E-25DE-4C06-9E26-A1947383C86A@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=aglo@umich.edu \
    --cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.