All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com, leobras.c@gmail.com,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] rockpro64: PCI BAR reassignment broken by commit 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for 64-bit memory addresses")
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 19:16:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a496713-182a-aa8b-3e5b-e527bebc7b03@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d754c000-7eb1-a8ed-33a6-238171a68c87@arm.com>



On 2021/5/19 下午5:20, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 5/19/21 8:05 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
[...]
>>
>> Is there anything special needed to boot the kernel with that offending commit
>> reverted?
> 
> I believe this is a separate bug which is being investigated [1].
> 
> Things that I tried:
> 
> 1. Reverted the offending commit from v5.13-rc2, kernel booted.
> 
> 2. Checkout out tag v5.13-rc1, reverted the offending commit from v5.13-rc1,
> kernel hangs during boot. Didn't clean before building.
> 
> 3. Did a clean and rebuild, kernel boots correctly. This seems to point at the
> regression [1], since cleaning was one of the workarounds reported.
> 
> Another bug that I noticed is a kernel panic on shutdown, but that's unrelated to
> the offending commit (I'll try to bisect it when I have the time).
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/5/17/2284

Awesome! Thanks for your quick mention about the bug.

Indeed after a clean and offending commit reverted, now I can boot a 
v5.13-rc2 kernel from NVME without problem.

Thank you very much!
Qu

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qu
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Qu
>>>
>>>>
>>>> [..]
>>>> [    0.307381] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: host bridge /pcie@f8000000 ranges:
>>>> [    0.307445] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie:      MEM
>>>> 0x00fa000000..0x00fbdfffff ->
>>>> 0x00fa000000
>>>> [    0.307481] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie:       IO
>>>> 0x00fbe00000..0x00fbefffff ->
>>>> 0x00fbe00000
>>>> [    0.308406] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie1v8 not found, using
>>>> dummy
>>>> regulator
>>>> [    0.308534] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie0v9 not found, using
>>>> dummy
>>>> regulator
>>>> [    0.374676] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
>>>> [    0.374701] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-1f]
>>>> [    0.374723] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xfa000000-0xfbdfffff]
>>>> [    0.374746] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x0000-0xfffff] (bus
>>>> address [0xfbe00000-0xfbefffff])
>>>> [    0.374808] pci 0000:00:00.0: [1d87:0100] type 01 class 0x060400
>>>> [    0.374943] pci 0000:00:00.0: supports D1
>>>> [    0.374961] pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D3hot
>>>> [    0.379473] pci 0000:00:00.0: bridge configuration invalid ([bus 00-00]),
>>>> reconfiguring
>>>> [    0.379712] pci 0000:01:00.0: [144d:a808] type 00 class 0x010802
>>>> [    0.379815] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit]
>>>> [    0.379997] pci 0000:01:00.0: Max Payload Size set to 256 (was 128, max 256)
>>>> [    0.380607] pci 0000:01:00.0: 8.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by
>>>> 2.5 GT/s PCIe x4 link at 0000:00:00.0 (capable of 31.504 Gb/s with 8.0 GT/s PCIe
>>>> x4 link)
>>>> [    0.394239] pci_bus 0000:01: busn_res: [bus 01-1f] end is updated to 01
>>>> [    0.394285] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0xfa000000-0xfa0fffff]
>>>> [    0.394312] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xfa000000-0xfa003fff
>>>> 64bit]
>>>> [    0.394374] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
>>>> [    0.394395] pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0xfa000000-0xfa0fffff]
>>>> [    0.394569] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
>>>> [    0.394845] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: PME: Signaling with IRQ 78
>>>> [    0.395153] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER: enabled with IRQ 78
>>>> [..]
>>>>
>>>> And here is the output of lspci when BAR reassignment works:
>>>>
>>>> # lspci -v
>>>> 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3399 PCI Express Root
>>>> Port (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
>>>>       Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 78
>>>>       Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0
>>>>       I/O behind bridge: 00000000-00000fff [size=4K]
>>>>       Memory behind bridge: fa000000-fa0fffff [size=1M]
>>>>       Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 00000000-000fffff [size=1M]
>>>>       Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 3
>>>>       Capabilities: [90] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable+ 64bit+
>>>>       Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Count=1 Masked-
>>>>       Capabilities: [c0] Express Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00
>>>>       Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
>>>>       Capabilities: [274] Transaction Processing Hints
>>>>       Kernel driver in use: pcieport
>>>> lspci: Unable to load libkmod resources: error -2
>>>>
>>>> 01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD
>>>> Controller SM981/PM981/PM983 (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
>>>>       Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981/PM983
>>>>       Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 77, NUMA node 0
>>>>       Memory at fa000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
>>>>       Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
>>>>       Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
>>>>       Capabilities: [70] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
>>>>       Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=33 Masked-
>>>>       Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
>>>>       Capabilities: [148] Device Serial Number 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
>>>>       Capabilities: [158] Power Budgeting <?>
>>>>       Capabilities: [168] Secondary PCI Express
>>>>       Capabilities: [188] Latency Tolerance Reporting
>>>>       Capabilities: [190] L1 PM Substates
>>>>       Kernel driver in use: nvme
>>>>
>>>> I can provide more information if needed (the board is sitting on my desk) and I
>>>> can help with testing the fix.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com, leobras.c@gmail.com,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] rockpro64: PCI BAR reassignment broken by commit 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for 64-bit memory addresses")
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 19:16:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a496713-182a-aa8b-3e5b-e527bebc7b03@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d754c000-7eb1-a8ed-33a6-238171a68c87@arm.com>



On 2021/5/19 下午5:20, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 5/19/21 8:05 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
[...]
>>
>> Is there anything special needed to boot the kernel with that offending commit
>> reverted?
> 
> I believe this is a separate bug which is being investigated [1].
> 
> Things that I tried:
> 
> 1. Reverted the offending commit from v5.13-rc2, kernel booted.
> 
> 2. Checkout out tag v5.13-rc1, reverted the offending commit from v5.13-rc1,
> kernel hangs during boot. Didn't clean before building.
> 
> 3. Did a clean and rebuild, kernel boots correctly. This seems to point at the
> regression [1], since cleaning was one of the workarounds reported.
> 
> Another bug that I noticed is a kernel panic on shutdown, but that's unrelated to
> the offending commit (I'll try to bisect it when I have the time).
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/5/17/2284

Awesome! Thanks for your quick mention about the bug.

Indeed after a clean and offending commit reverted, now I can boot a 
v5.13-rc2 kernel from NVME without problem.

Thank you very much!
Qu

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qu
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Qu
>>>
>>>>
>>>> [..]
>>>> [    0.307381] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: host bridge /pcie@f8000000 ranges:
>>>> [    0.307445] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie:      MEM
>>>> 0x00fa000000..0x00fbdfffff ->
>>>> 0x00fa000000
>>>> [    0.307481] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie:       IO
>>>> 0x00fbe00000..0x00fbefffff ->
>>>> 0x00fbe00000
>>>> [    0.308406] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie1v8 not found, using
>>>> dummy
>>>> regulator
>>>> [    0.308534] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie0v9 not found, using
>>>> dummy
>>>> regulator
>>>> [    0.374676] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
>>>> [    0.374701] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-1f]
>>>> [    0.374723] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xfa000000-0xfbdfffff]
>>>> [    0.374746] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x0000-0xfffff] (bus
>>>> address [0xfbe00000-0xfbefffff])
>>>> [    0.374808] pci 0000:00:00.0: [1d87:0100] type 01 class 0x060400
>>>> [    0.374943] pci 0000:00:00.0: supports D1
>>>> [    0.374961] pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D3hot
>>>> [    0.379473] pci 0000:00:00.0: bridge configuration invalid ([bus 00-00]),
>>>> reconfiguring
>>>> [    0.379712] pci 0000:01:00.0: [144d:a808] type 00 class 0x010802
>>>> [    0.379815] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit]
>>>> [    0.379997] pci 0000:01:00.0: Max Payload Size set to 256 (was 128, max 256)
>>>> [    0.380607] pci 0000:01:00.0: 8.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by
>>>> 2.5 GT/s PCIe x4 link at 0000:00:00.0 (capable of 31.504 Gb/s with 8.0 GT/s PCIe
>>>> x4 link)
>>>> [    0.394239] pci_bus 0000:01: busn_res: [bus 01-1f] end is updated to 01
>>>> [    0.394285] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0xfa000000-0xfa0fffff]
>>>> [    0.394312] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xfa000000-0xfa003fff
>>>> 64bit]
>>>> [    0.394374] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
>>>> [    0.394395] pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0xfa000000-0xfa0fffff]
>>>> [    0.394569] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
>>>> [    0.394845] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: PME: Signaling with IRQ 78
>>>> [    0.395153] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER: enabled with IRQ 78
>>>> [..]
>>>>
>>>> And here is the output of lspci when BAR reassignment works:
>>>>
>>>> # lspci -v
>>>> 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3399 PCI Express Root
>>>> Port (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
>>>>       Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 78
>>>>       Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0
>>>>       I/O behind bridge: 00000000-00000fff [size=4K]
>>>>       Memory behind bridge: fa000000-fa0fffff [size=1M]
>>>>       Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 00000000-000fffff [size=1M]
>>>>       Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 3
>>>>       Capabilities: [90] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable+ 64bit+
>>>>       Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Count=1 Masked-
>>>>       Capabilities: [c0] Express Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00
>>>>       Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
>>>>       Capabilities: [274] Transaction Processing Hints
>>>>       Kernel driver in use: pcieport
>>>> lspci: Unable to load libkmod resources: error -2
>>>>
>>>> 01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD
>>>> Controller SM981/PM981/PM983 (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
>>>>       Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981/PM983
>>>>       Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 77, NUMA node 0
>>>>       Memory at fa000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
>>>>       Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
>>>>       Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
>>>>       Capabilities: [70] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
>>>>       Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=33 Masked-
>>>>       Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
>>>>       Capabilities: [148] Device Serial Number 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
>>>>       Capabilities: [158] Power Budgeting <?>
>>>>       Capabilities: [168] Secondary PCI Express
>>>>       Capabilities: [188] Latency Tolerance Reporting
>>>>       Capabilities: [190] L1 PM Substates
>>>>       Kernel driver in use: nvme
>>>>
>>>> I can provide more information if needed (the board is sitting on my desk) and I
>>>> can help with testing the fix.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>
> 


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com, leobras.c@gmail.com,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] rockpro64: PCI BAR reassignment broken by commit 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for 64-bit memory addresses")
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 19:16:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a496713-182a-aa8b-3e5b-e527bebc7b03@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d754c000-7eb1-a8ed-33a6-238171a68c87@arm.com>



On 2021/5/19 下午5:20, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 5/19/21 8:05 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
[...]
>>
>> Is there anything special needed to boot the kernel with that offending commit
>> reverted?
> 
> I believe this is a separate bug which is being investigated [1].
> 
> Things that I tried:
> 
> 1. Reverted the offending commit from v5.13-rc2, kernel booted.
> 
> 2. Checkout out tag v5.13-rc1, reverted the offending commit from v5.13-rc1,
> kernel hangs during boot. Didn't clean before building.
> 
> 3. Did a clean and rebuild, kernel boots correctly. This seems to point at the
> regression [1], since cleaning was one of the workarounds reported.
> 
> Another bug that I noticed is a kernel panic on shutdown, but that's unrelated to
> the offending commit (I'll try to bisect it when I have the time).
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/5/17/2284

Awesome! Thanks for your quick mention about the bug.

Indeed after a clean and offending commit reverted, now I can boot a 
v5.13-rc2 kernel from NVME without problem.

Thank you very much!
Qu

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qu
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Qu
>>>
>>>>
>>>> [..]
>>>> [    0.307381] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: host bridge /pcie@f8000000 ranges:
>>>> [    0.307445] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie:      MEM
>>>> 0x00fa000000..0x00fbdfffff ->
>>>> 0x00fa000000
>>>> [    0.307481] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie:       IO
>>>> 0x00fbe00000..0x00fbefffff ->
>>>> 0x00fbe00000
>>>> [    0.308406] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie1v8 not found, using
>>>> dummy
>>>> regulator
>>>> [    0.308534] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: supply vpcie0v9 not found, using
>>>> dummy
>>>> regulator
>>>> [    0.374676] rockchip-pcie f8000000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
>>>> [    0.374701] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-1f]
>>>> [    0.374723] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xfa000000-0xfbdfffff]
>>>> [    0.374746] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x0000-0xfffff] (bus
>>>> address [0xfbe00000-0xfbefffff])
>>>> [    0.374808] pci 0000:00:00.0: [1d87:0100] type 01 class 0x060400
>>>> [    0.374943] pci 0000:00:00.0: supports D1
>>>> [    0.374961] pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D3hot
>>>> [    0.379473] pci 0000:00:00.0: bridge configuration invalid ([bus 00-00]),
>>>> reconfiguring
>>>> [    0.379712] pci 0000:01:00.0: [144d:a808] type 00 class 0x010802
>>>> [    0.379815] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit]
>>>> [    0.379997] pci 0000:01:00.0: Max Payload Size set to 256 (was 128, max 256)
>>>> [    0.380607] pci 0000:01:00.0: 8.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by
>>>> 2.5 GT/s PCIe x4 link at 0000:00:00.0 (capable of 31.504 Gb/s with 8.0 GT/s PCIe
>>>> x4 link)
>>>> [    0.394239] pci_bus 0000:01: busn_res: [bus 01-1f] end is updated to 01
>>>> [    0.394285] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0xfa000000-0xfa0fffff]
>>>> [    0.394312] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xfa000000-0xfa003fff
>>>> 64bit]
>>>> [    0.394374] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
>>>> [    0.394395] pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0xfa000000-0xfa0fffff]
>>>> [    0.394569] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
>>>> [    0.394845] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: PME: Signaling with IRQ 78
>>>> [    0.395153] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER: enabled with IRQ 78
>>>> [..]
>>>>
>>>> And here is the output of lspci when BAR reassignment works:
>>>>
>>>> # lspci -v
>>>> 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd RK3399 PCI Express Root
>>>> Port (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
>>>>       Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 78
>>>>       Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0
>>>>       I/O behind bridge: 00000000-00000fff [size=4K]
>>>>       Memory behind bridge: fa000000-fa0fffff [size=1M]
>>>>       Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 00000000-000fffff [size=1M]
>>>>       Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 3
>>>>       Capabilities: [90] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable+ 64bit+
>>>>       Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Count=1 Masked-
>>>>       Capabilities: [c0] Express Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00
>>>>       Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
>>>>       Capabilities: [274] Transaction Processing Hints
>>>>       Kernel driver in use: pcieport
>>>> lspci: Unable to load libkmod resources: error -2
>>>>
>>>> 01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD
>>>> Controller SM981/PM981/PM983 (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
>>>>       Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981/PM983
>>>>       Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 77, NUMA node 0
>>>>       Memory at fa000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
>>>>       Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
>>>>       Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
>>>>       Capabilities: [70] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
>>>>       Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=33 Masked-
>>>>       Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
>>>>       Capabilities: [148] Device Serial Number 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
>>>>       Capabilities: [158] Power Budgeting <?>
>>>>       Capabilities: [168] Secondary PCI Express
>>>>       Capabilities: [188] Latency Tolerance Reporting
>>>>       Capabilities: [190] L1 PM Substates
>>>>       Kernel driver in use: nvme
>>>>
>>>> I can provide more information if needed (the board is sitting on my desk) and I
>>>> can help with testing the fix.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-19 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-18  9:09 [BUG] rockpro64: PCI BAR reassignment broken by commit 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for 64-bit memory addresses") Alexandru Elisei
2021-05-18  9:09 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-05-18  9:09 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-05-19  6:28 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-05-19  6:28   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-05-19  6:28   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-05-19  7:05   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-05-19  7:05     ` Qu Wenruo
2021-05-19  7:05     ` Qu Wenruo
2021-05-19  9:20     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-05-19  9:20       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-05-19  9:20       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-05-19 11:16       ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2021-05-19 11:16         ` Qu Wenruo
2021-05-19 11:16         ` Qu Wenruo
2021-05-19 11:27 ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-19 11:27   ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-19 11:27   ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-19 13:17   ` Peter Geis
2021-05-19 13:17     ` Peter Geis
2021-05-19 13:17     ` Peter Geis
2021-05-23 11:03   ` Punit Agrawal
2021-05-23 11:03     ` Punit Agrawal
2021-05-23 11:03     ` Punit Agrawal
2021-05-23 12:10     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-23 12:10       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-23 12:10       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 13:42       ` Punit Agrawal
2021-05-25 13:42         ` Punit Agrawal
2021-05-25 13:42         ` Punit Agrawal
2021-05-25 13:54         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 13:54           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 13:54           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 15:34           ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 15:34             ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 15:34             ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 15:54             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 15:54               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 15:54               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 16:23               ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 16:23                 ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 16:23                 ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 16:44                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 16:44                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 16:44                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 17:01                   ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 17:01                     ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 17:01                     ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 17:18                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 17:18                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 17:18                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 17:37                       ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 17:37                         ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 17:37                         ` Peter Geis
2021-05-26 13:55                       ` Christian König
2021-05-26 13:55                         ` Christian König
2021-05-26 13:55                         ` Christian König
2021-05-26 14:15                         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-26 14:15                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-26 14:15                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 17:25                     ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-25 17:25                       ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-25 17:25                       ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-25 17:34                       ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 17:34                         ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 17:34                         ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 18:55                         ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-25 18:55                           ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-25 18:55                           ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-25 19:15               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-05-25 19:15                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-05-25 19:15                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-05-25 19:43                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 19:43                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 19:43                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 20:03                   ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 20:03                     ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 20:03                     ` Peter Geis
2021-05-26 14:18                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-26 14:18                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-26 14:18                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-25 16:59           ` Anand Moon
2021-05-25 16:59             ` Anand Moon
2021-05-25 16:59             ` Anand Moon
2021-05-25 17:14             ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-25 17:14               ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-25 17:14               ` Robin Murphy
2021-05-25 17:42               ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 17:42                 ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 17:42                 ` Peter Geis
2021-05-25 22:36           ` Punit Agrawal
2021-05-25 22:36             ` Punit Agrawal
2021-05-25 22:36             ` Punit Agrawal
2021-05-26 15:37           ` Rob Herring
2021-05-26 15:37             ` Rob Herring
2021-05-26 15:37             ` Rob Herring
2021-05-26 16:35             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-26 16:35               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-26 16:35               ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8a496713-182a-aa8b-3e5b-e527bebc7b03@suse.com \
    --to=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com \
    --cc=leobras.c@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.