All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen: optimize xenbus driver for multiple concurrent xenstore accesses
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:46:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a7695a9-a1cf-fc1a-cfa9-718a379a40af__922.28011130846$1484066885$gmane$org@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eadfa82a-d7b2-9f90-8046-2559c4bc93f6@oracle.com>

On 10/01/17 17:36, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> 
>>>> +static int process_msg(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	static struct xs_thread_state_read state;
>>>> +	struct xb_req_data *req;
>>>> +	int err;
>>>> +	unsigned int len;
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (!state.in_msg) {
>>>> +		state.in_msg = true;
>>>> +		state.in_hdr = true;
>>>> +		state.used = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +		/*
>>>> +		 * We must disallow save/restore while reading a message.
>>>> +		 * A partial read across s/r leaves us out of sync with
>>>> +		 * xenstored.
>>>> +		 */
>>>> +		mutex_lock(&xs_response_mutex);
>>>> +
>>>> +		if (!xb_data_to_read()) {
>>>> +			/* We raced with save/restore: pending data 'gone'. */
>>>> +			mutex_unlock(&xs_response_mutex);
>>>> +			state.in_msg = false;
> 
> Just noticed: should in_hdr be set to false here as well?

Doesn't matter: It is valid only if in_msg is true.

> 
>>>> +			return 0;
>>>> +		}
> 
> Or set it to true here.
> 
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (state.in_hdr) {
>>>> +		if (state.used != sizeof(state.msg)) {
>>>> +			err = xb_read((void *)&state.msg + state.used,
>>>> +				      sizeof(state.msg) - state.used);
>>>> +			if (err < 0)
>>>> +				goto out;
>>>> +			state.used += err;
>>>> +			if (state.used != sizeof(state.msg))
>>>> +				return 0;
>>> Would it be possible to do locking at the caller? I understand that you
>>> are trying to hold the lock across multiple invocations of this function
>>> but it feels somewhat counter-intuitive and bug-prone.
>> I think that would be difficult.
>>
>>> If it's not possible then at least please add a comment explaining
>>> locking algorithm.
>> Okay. Something like:
>>
>> /*
>>  * xs_response_mutex is locked as long as we are processing one
>>  * message. state.in_msg will be true as long as we are holding the
>>  * lock in process_msg().
> 
> 
> Then in_msg is the same as mutex_is_locked(&xs_response_mutex). And if
> so, do we really need it?

Yes. xs_response_mutex is used in suspend path, too.


Juergen


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-10 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-06 15:05 [PATCH 0/3] xen: optimize xenbus performance Juergen Gross
2017-01-06 15:05 ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-06 15:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] xen: clean up xenbus internal headers Juergen Gross
2017-01-06 15:05   ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-06 20:52   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-06 20:52     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-09  7:07     ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-09  7:07     ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-06 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] xen: modify xenstore watch event interface Juergen Gross
2017-01-06 15:05   ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-06 15:38   ` Paul Durrant
2017-01-06 15:38   ` Paul Durrant
2017-01-06 16:29   ` Wei Liu
2017-01-06 16:29   ` Wei Liu
2017-01-06 16:37   ` Roger Pau Monné
2017-01-06 16:37   ` Roger Pau Monné
2017-01-06 21:57   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-06 21:57     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-09  7:12     ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-09  7:12     ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-06 15:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] xen: optimize xenbus driver for multiple concurrent xenstore accesses Juergen Gross
2017-01-06 15:05   ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-09 21:17   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-10  6:18     ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-10  6:18     ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-10 16:36       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-10 16:38         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-10 16:38         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-10 16:46         ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2017-01-10 16:46         ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-10 16:36       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-09 21:17   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-10 19:17   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-10 19:17   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-10 22:56   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-10 22:56   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-11  5:26     ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-11  5:26     ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-11 15:29       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-11 15:29         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-11 16:50         ` Juergen Gross
2017-01-11 16:50         ` Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='8a7695a9-a1cf-fc1a-cfa9-718a379a40af__922.28011130846$1484066885$gmane$org@suse.com' \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.