* SUN6I a31 OPP table clock issue @ 2018-04-07 19:53 Sergey Suloev 2018-04-09 8:53 ` Maxime Ripard 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Sergey Suloev @ 2018-04-07 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi, I was able to catch oops coming from OPP table on BananaPi M2. https://pastebin.com/ZRaXTtEx Let me know if need more detail. Thank you ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* SUN6I a31 OPP table clock issue 2018-04-07 19:53 SUN6I a31 OPP table clock issue Sergey Suloev @ 2018-04-09 8:53 ` Maxime Ripard 2018-04-09 10:35 ` Sergey Suloev 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Maxime Ripard @ 2018-04-09 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 10:53:10PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote: > I was able to catch oops coming from OPP table on BananaPi M2. > > https://pastebin.com/ZRaXTtEx > > Let me know if need more detail. Of course we do. Which kernel version was this for? With which configuration? What makes you say it's related to the OPP table, is it a regression or something you just noticed? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180409/cd58ac63/attachment.sig> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* SUN6I a31 OPP table clock issue 2018-04-09 8:53 ` Maxime Ripard @ 2018-04-09 10:35 ` Sergey Suloev 2018-04-09 11:28 ` Maxime Ripard 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Sergey Suloev @ 2018-04-09 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 04/09/2018 11:53 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 10:53:10PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote: >> I was able to catch oops coming from OPP table on BananaPi M2. >> >> https://pastebin.com/ZRaXTtEx >> >> Let me know if need more detail. > Of course we do. > > Which kernel version was this for? With which configuration? What > makes you say it's related to the OPP table, is it a regression or > something you just noticed? Ok, first of all, I am having the problem using linus tree, 4.16 as it is, with no extra patches. My config file is here [1]. The problem is easily avoided by just commenting all freqs out of the OPP table except for 1008 MHz, i.e. things work well when there is no freq switch at all. It makes me think that there might be an issue in A31 clocks driver as it is the only important component used by cpufreq-dt. As of cpufreq-dt driver it seems ok because works fine on other boards. > > Maxime > > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel [1] https://pastebin.com/eZxbra2f ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* SUN6I a31 OPP table clock issue 2018-04-09 10:35 ` Sergey Suloev @ 2018-04-09 11:28 ` Maxime Ripard 2018-04-09 11:49 ` Sergey Suloev 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Maxime Ripard @ 2018-04-09 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 01:35:42PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote: > On 04/09/2018 11:53 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 10:53:10PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote: > > > I was able to catch oops coming from OPP table on BananaPi M2. > > > > > > https://pastebin.com/ZRaXTtEx > > > > > > Let me know if need more detail. > > Of course we do. > > > > Which kernel version was this for? With which configuration? What > > makes you say it's related to the OPP table, is it a regression or > > something you just noticed? > > Ok, first of all, I am having the problem using linus tree, 4.16 as it is, > with no extra patches. Your kernel version is marked as dirty in your logs, which means you have local changes. So it doesn't really qualify as "as is". > My config file is here [1]. > The problem is easily avoided by just commenting all freqs out of the OPP > table except for 1008 MHz, i.e. things work well when there is no freq > switch at all. > It makes me think that there might be an issue in A31 clocks driver as it is > the only important component used by cpufreq-dt. > As of cpufreq-dt driver it seems ok because works fine on other boards. Could you add some printk's to ccu_mux_notifier_nb to see which pointer is NULL? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180409/8f93bff4/attachment.sig> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* SUN6I a31 OPP table clock issue 2018-04-09 11:28 ` Maxime Ripard @ 2018-04-09 11:49 ` Sergey Suloev 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Sergey Suloev @ 2018-04-09 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 04/09/2018 02:28 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 01:35:42PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote: >> On 04/09/2018 11:53 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 10:53:10PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote: >>>> I was able to catch oops coming from OPP table on BananaPi M2. >>>> >>>> https://pastebin.com/ZRaXTtEx >>>> >>>> Let me know if need more detail. >>> Of course we do. >>> >>> Which kernel version was this for? With which configuration? What >>> makes you say it's related to the OPP table, is it a regression or >>> something you just noticed? >> Ok, first of all, I am having the problem using linus tree, 4.16 as it is, >> with no extra patches. > Your kernel version is marked as dirty in your logs, which means you > have local changes. So it doesn't really qualify as "as is". well, yeah, there is a small change but in? absolutely different area > >> My config file is here [1]. >> The problem is easily avoided by just commenting all freqs out of the OPP >> table except for 1008 MHz, i.e. things work well when there is no freq >> switch at all. >> It makes me think that there might be an issue in A31 clocks driver as it is >> the only important component used by cpufreq-dt. >> As of cpufreq-dt driver it seems ok because works fine on other boards. > Could you add some printk's to ccu_mux_notifier_nb to see which > pointer is NULL? ok > Maxime > > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-09 11:49 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-04-07 19:53 SUN6I a31 OPP table clock issue Sergey Suloev 2018-04-09 8:53 ` Maxime Ripard 2018-04-09 10:35 ` Sergey Suloev 2018-04-09 11:28 ` Maxime Ripard 2018-04-09 11:49 ` Sergey Suloev
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.