All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dsterba@suse.com, l@damenly.su
Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/3] btrfs: consolidate device_list_mutex in prepare_sprout to its parent
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 02:18:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b8e72c87d0ee97da1b2e243a24b68d84d0ac3b9.1629396187.git.anand.jain@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1629396187.git.anand.jain@oracle.com>

btrfs_prepare_sprout() moves seed devices into its own struct fs_devices,
so that its parent function btrfs_init_new_device() can add the new sprout
device to fs_info->fs_devices.

Both btrfs_prepare_sprout() and btrfs_init_new_device() needs
device_list_mutex. But they are holding it sequentially, thus creates a
small window to an opportunity to race. Close this opportunity and hold
device_list_mutex common to both btrfs_init_new_device() and
btrfs_prepare_sprout().

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
RFC because I haven't identified the other thread which could race with
this, but still does this cleanup makes sense?

 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 91b8422b3f67..f490d1897c56 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -2366,6 +2366,8 @@ static int btrfs_prepare_sprout(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 	u64 super_flags;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
+
 	if (!fs_devices->seeding)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -2397,7 +2399,6 @@ static int btrfs_prepare_sprout(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&seed_devices->alloc_list);
 	mutex_init(&seed_devices->device_list_mutex);
 
-	mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
 	list_splice_init_rcu(&fs_devices->devices, &seed_devices->devices,
 			      synchronize_rcu);
 	list_for_each_entry(device, &seed_devices->devices, dev_list)
@@ -2413,7 +2414,6 @@ static int btrfs_prepare_sprout(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 	generate_random_uuid(fs_devices->fsid);
 	memcpy(fs_devices->metadata_uuid, fs_devices->fsid, BTRFS_FSID_SIZE);
 	memcpy(disk_super->fsid, fs_devices->fsid, BTRFS_FSID_SIZE);
-	mutex_unlock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
 
 	super_flags = btrfs_super_flags(disk_super) &
 		      ~BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_SEEDING;
@@ -2588,6 +2588,7 @@ int btrfs_init_new_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *device_path
 	device->dev_stats_valid = 1;
 	set_blocksize(device->bdev, BTRFS_BDEV_BLOCKSIZE);
 
+	mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
 	if (seeding_dev) {
 		btrfs_clear_sb_rdonly(sb);
 		ret = btrfs_prepare_sprout(fs_info);
@@ -2599,7 +2600,6 @@ int btrfs_init_new_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *device_path
 
 	device->fs_devices = fs_devices;
 
-	mutex_lock(&fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
 	mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
 	list_add_rcu(&device->dev_list, &fs_devices->devices);
 	list_add(&device->dev_alloc_list, &fs_devices->alloc_list);
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-19 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-19 18:18 [PATCH 0/3] btrf_show_devname related fixes Anand Jain
2021-08-19 18:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: fix comment about the btrfs_show_devname Anand Jain
2021-08-19 18:18 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2021-08-20  7:51   ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] btrfs: consolidate device_list_mutex in prepare_sprout to its parent Su Yue
2021-08-20  8:53     ` Anand Jain
2021-08-21 14:57       ` Su Yue
2021-08-21 15:00         ` Su Yue
2021-08-23 10:34           ` Anand Jain
2021-08-23 10:54             ` Anand Jain
2021-08-23 12:20               ` David Sterba
2021-08-19 18:18 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] btrfs: use latest_bdev in btrfs_show_devname Anand Jain
2021-08-20  7:31   ` Su Yue
2021-08-20  9:13     ` Anand Jain
2021-08-20 10:57   ` David Sterba
2021-08-20 11:03     ` Anand Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8b8e72c87d0ee97da1b2e243a24b68d84d0ac3b9.1629396187.git.anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=l@damenly.su \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.