From: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: Realtek RTL: select NO_EXCEPT_FILL
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 17:07:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bc77a68-ec04-863e-0c46-1ea442e392ee@schinagl.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230219103112.GA4095@alpha.franken.de>
Hey Thomas,
On 19-02-2023 11:31, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 10:27:17AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
>> It's still odd though; as we do not have _anything_ PCI, but it
>> SWAP_IO_SPACE causes the crash.
>
> but something uses readX/write() calls. If you aren't using any driver
> existing driver but only newly written dedicated for that SOC
> you could use raw_read/raw_writeX() instead. These type of functions
> are always using native endianess.
Ok that is valueable information. I think currently the only driver
(that I can think of right now) that we use 'off the shelf' is the uart
driver, so I hope that's written cleanly :)
As for readX/writeX, for sure that is being used, and I intended to
refactor that while going to proper and clean drivers (the realtek
support in openwrt is a big mess right now).
So you say raw_readX, but what about ioread32 which I thought was preferred?
I'll meanwhile read into what readX vs raw_readX to learn more with
regards to endianess.
Thank you so mcuh so far!
>
>> What makes SWAP_IO_SPACE generic then? :)
>
> als long as hardware presents memory used with readX/writeX is
> seen as little endian independant from CPU endianess it's generic.
'little endian independent'? What does that mean, that the register maps
follow the CPU endianess?
>
> Thomas.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-19 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-15 12:19 [PATCH] mips: Realtek RTL: select NO_EXCEPT_FILL Sander Vanheule
2023-01-27 16:27 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2023-01-28 14:39 ` Olliver Schinagl
2023-02-05 16:19 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2023-02-05 18:33 ` Olliver Schinagl
2023-02-17 17:37 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2023-02-17 19:27 ` Olliver Schinagl
2023-02-19 9:02 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2023-02-19 9:27 ` Olliver Schinagl
2023-02-19 10:31 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2023-02-19 16:07 ` Olliver Schinagl [this message]
2023-02-22 15:23 ` Olliver Schinagl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8bc77a68-ec04-863e-0c46-1ea442e392ee@schinagl.nl \
--to=oliver@schinagl.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sander@svanheule.net \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.