* [RFC] Getting rid of INFLIGHT_VICTIM
@ 2018-06-05 13:31 Tetsuo Handa
2018-06-05 14:10 ` Tetsuo Handa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tetsuo Handa @ 2018-06-05 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Hocko, David Rientjes, Roman Gushchin
Cc: Vladimir Davydov, Johannes Weiner, Andrew Morton, Tejun Heo, linux-mm
The "mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer" patchset is about to introduce
INFLIGHT_VICTIM in order to replace open-coded ((void *)-1UL). But
(regarding CONFIG_MMU=y case) we have a list of inflight OOM victim
threads which are connected to oom_reaper_list. Then, I think that we
can check whether there are inflight OOM victims before starting
process/memcg list traversal. Since it is likely that only few threads
are linked to oom_reaper_list, checking MMF_OOM_SKIP should not be heavy.
Then, I think that checking whether there are inflight OOM victims before
starting process/memcg list traversal can eliminate the "abort" path (like
shown below) and simplify "abort" path handling at out_of_memory().
What do you think?
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 4 -
mm/memcontrol.c | 14 +----
mm/oom_kill.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index d99b71b..73d3094 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -355,8 +355,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_iter(struct mem_cgroup *,
struct mem_cgroup *,
struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie *);
void mem_cgroup_iter_break(struct mem_cgroup *, struct mem_cgroup *);
-int mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *,
- int (*)(struct task_struct *, void *), void *);
+void mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ void (*fn)(struct task_struct *, void *), void *arg);
static inline unsigned short mem_cgroup_id(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 1695f38..188ffbc 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -890,11 +890,10 @@ static void invalidate_reclaim_iterators(struct mem_cgroup *dead_memcg)
*
* This function must not be called for the root memory cgroup.
*/
-int mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
- int (*fn)(struct task_struct *, void *), void *arg)
+void mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ void (*fn)(struct task_struct *, void *), void *arg)
{
struct mem_cgroup *iter;
- int ret = 0;
BUG_ON(memcg == root_mem_cgroup);
@@ -903,15 +902,10 @@ int mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
struct task_struct *task;
css_task_iter_start(&iter->css, 0, &it);
- while (!ret && (task = css_task_iter_next(&it)))
- ret = fn(task, arg);
+ while ((task = css_task_iter_next(&it)))
+ fn(task, arg);
css_task_iter_end(&it);
- if (ret) {
- mem_cgroup_iter_break(memcg, iter);
- break;
- }
}
- return ret;
}
/**
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 8ba6cb8..3b3b8ff 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -304,25 +304,13 @@ static enum oom_constraint constrained_alloc(struct oom_control *oc)
return CONSTRAINT_NONE;
}
-static int oom_evaluate_task(struct task_struct *task, void *arg)
+static void oom_evaluate_task(struct task_struct *task, void *arg)
{
struct oom_control *oc = arg;
unsigned long points;
if (oom_unkillable_task(task, NULL, oc->nodemask))
- goto next;
-
- /*
- * This task already has access to memory reserves and is being killed.
- * Don't allow any other task to have access to the reserves unless
- * the task has MMF_OOM_SKIP because chances that it would release
- * any memory is quite low.
- */
- if (!is_sysrq_oom(oc) && tsk_is_oom_victim(task)) {
- if (test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &task->signal->oom_mm->flags))
- goto next;
- goto abort;
- }
+ return;
/*
* If task is allocating a lot of memory and has been marked to be
@@ -335,29 +323,22 @@ static int oom_evaluate_task(struct task_struct *task, void *arg)
points = oom_badness(task, NULL, oc->nodemask, oc->totalpages);
if (!points || points < oc->chosen_points)
- goto next;
+ return;
/* Prefer thread group leaders for display purposes */
if (points == oc->chosen_points && thread_group_leader(oc->chosen))
- goto next;
+ return;
select:
if (oc->chosen)
put_task_struct(oc->chosen);
get_task_struct(task);
oc->chosen = task;
oc->chosen_points = points;
-next:
- return 0;
-abort:
- if (oc->chosen)
- put_task_struct(oc->chosen);
- oc->chosen = (void *)-1UL;
- return 1;
}
/*
* Simple selection loop. We choose the process with the highest number of
- * 'points'. In case scan was aborted, oc->chosen is set to -1.
+ * 'points'.
*/
static void select_bad_process(struct oom_control *oc)
{
@@ -368,8 +349,7 @@ static void select_bad_process(struct oom_control *oc)
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_process(p)
- if (oom_evaluate_task(p, oc))
- break;
+ oom_evaluate_task(p, oc);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -476,7 +456,6 @@ bool process_shares_mm(struct task_struct *p, struct mm_struct *mm)
*/
static struct task_struct *oom_reaper_th;
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(oom_reaper_wait);
-static struct task_struct *oom_reaper_list;
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(oom_reaper_lock);
void __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
@@ -605,14 +584,16 @@ static void oom_reap_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
debug_show_all_locks();
done:
- tsk->oom_reaper_list = NULL;
-
/*
* Hide this mm from OOM killer because it has been either reaped or
* somebody can't call up_write(mmap_sem).
*/
set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
+ spin_lock(&oom_reaper_lock);
+ oom_reaper_th->oom_reaper_list = tsk->oom_reaper_list;
+ spin_unlock(&oom_reaper_lock);
+
/* Drop a reference taken by wake_oom_reaper */
put_task_struct(tsk);
}
@@ -620,14 +601,12 @@ static void oom_reap_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
static int oom_reaper(void *unused)
{
while (true) {
- struct task_struct *tsk = NULL;
+ struct task_struct *tsk;
- wait_event_freezable(oom_reaper_wait, oom_reaper_list != NULL);
+ wait_event_freezable(oom_reaper_wait,
+ oom_reaper_th->oom_reaper_list != NULL);
spin_lock(&oom_reaper_lock);
- if (oom_reaper_list != NULL) {
- tsk = oom_reaper_list;
- oom_reaper_list = tsk->oom_reaper_list;
- }
+ tsk = oom_reaper_th->oom_reaper_list;
spin_unlock(&oom_reaper_lock);
if (tsk)
@@ -639,15 +618,18 @@ static int oom_reaper(void *unused)
static void wake_oom_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
- /* tsk is already queued? */
- if (tsk == oom_reaper_list || tsk->oom_reaper_list)
- return;
-
- get_task_struct(tsk);
+ struct task_struct *p = oom_reaper_th;
spin_lock(&oom_reaper_lock);
- tsk->oom_reaper_list = oom_reaper_list;
- oom_reaper_list = tsk;
+ while (p != tsk && p->oom_reaper_list)
+ p = p->oom_reaper_list;
+ if (p != tsk) {
+ spin_unlock(&oom_reaper_lock);
+ return;
+ }
+ p->oom_reaper_list = tsk;
+ tsk->oom_reaper_list = NULL;
+ get_task_struct(tsk);
spin_unlock(&oom_reaper_lock);
trace_wake_reaper(tsk->pid);
wake_up(&oom_reaper_wait);
@@ -1009,6 +991,23 @@ int unregister_oom_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_oom_notifier);
+static bool oom_has_pending_victims(struct oom_control *oc)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
+ struct task_struct *p;
+
+ spin_lock(&oom_reaper_lock);
+ for (p = oom_reaper_th; p; p = p->oom_reaper_list)
+ if (!oom_unkillable_task(p, oc->memcg, oc->nodemask) &&
+ !test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &p->signal->oom_mm->flags))
+ break;
+ spin_unlock(&oom_reaper_lock);
+ return p != NULL;
+#else
+ return false;
+#endif
+}
+
/**
* out_of_memory - kill the "best" process when we run out of memory
* @oc: pointer to struct oom_control
@@ -1062,6 +1061,9 @@ bool out_of_memory(struct oom_control *oc)
oc->nodemask = NULL;
check_panic_on_oom(oc, constraint);
+ if (oom_has_pending_victims(oc))
+ return true;
+
if (!is_memcg_oom(oc) && sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task &&
current->mm && !oom_unkillable_task(current, NULL, oc->nodemask) &&
current->signal->oom_score_adj != OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN) {
@@ -1073,20 +1075,20 @@ bool out_of_memory(struct oom_control *oc)
select_bad_process(oc);
/* Found nothing?!?! Either we hang forever, or we panic. */
- if (!oc->chosen && !is_sysrq_oom(oc) && !is_memcg_oom(oc)) {
+ if (!oc->chosen) {
+ if (is_sysrq_oom(oc) || is_memcg_oom(oc))
+ return false;
dump_header(oc, NULL);
panic("Out of memory and no killable processes...\n");
}
- if (oc->chosen && oc->chosen != (void *)-1UL) {
- oom_kill_process(oc, !is_memcg_oom(oc) ? "Out of memory" :
- "Memory cgroup out of memory");
- /*
- * Give the killed process a good chance to exit before trying
- * to allocate memory again.
- */
- schedule_timeout_killable(1);
- }
- return !!oc->chosen;
+ oom_kill_process(oc, !is_memcg_oom(oc) ? "Out of memory" :
+ "Memory cgroup out of memory");
+ /*
+ * Give the killed process a good chance to exit before trying
+ * to allocate memory again.
+ */
+ schedule_timeout_killable(1);
+ return true;
}
/*
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] Getting rid of INFLIGHT_VICTIM
2018-06-05 13:31 [RFC] Getting rid of INFLIGHT_VICTIM Tetsuo Handa
@ 2018-06-05 14:10 ` Tetsuo Handa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tetsuo Handa @ 2018-06-05 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Hocko, David Rientjes, Roman Gushchin
Cc: Vladimir Davydov, Johannes Weiner, Andrew Morton, Tejun Heo, linux-mm
On 2018/06/05 22:31, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> @@ -639,15 +618,18 @@ static int oom_reaper(void *unused)
>
> static void wake_oom_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> - /* tsk is already queued? */
> - if (tsk == oom_reaper_list || tsk->oom_reaper_list)
> - return;
> -
> - get_task_struct(tsk);
> + struct task_struct *p = oom_reaper_th;
>
> spin_lock(&oom_reaper_lock);
> - tsk->oom_reaper_list = oom_reaper_list;
> - oom_reaper_list = tsk;
> + while (p != tsk && p->oom_reaper_list)
> + p = p->oom_reaper_list;
> + if (p != tsk) {
Oops. This is "if (p == tsk) {".
> + spin_unlock(&oom_reaper_lock);
> + return;
> + }
> + p->oom_reaper_list = tsk;
> + tsk->oom_reaper_list = NULL;
> + get_task_struct(tsk);
> spin_unlock(&oom_reaper_lock);
> trace_wake_reaper(tsk->pid);
> wake_up(&oom_reaper_wait);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-06-05 14:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-06-05 13:31 [RFC] Getting rid of INFLIGHT_VICTIM Tetsuo Handa
2018-06-05 14:10 ` Tetsuo Handa
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.