[U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: Enable fitImage support on OrangePi Zero

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: Enable fitImage support on OrangePi Zero

[Marek Vasut]

Enable modern fitImage format on OrangePi Zero.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
---
 configs/orangepi_zero_defconfig | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/configs/orangepi_zero_defconfig b/configs/orangepi_zero_defconfig
index 6afd4a3bfa..b3860659d6 100644
--- a/configs/orangepi_zero_defconfig
+++ b/configs/orangepi_zero_defconfig
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ CONFIG_DRAM_ODT_EN=y
 CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUNXI=y
 CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="sun8i-h2-plus-orangepi-zero"
 # CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_CLEAR_ON_INIT is not set
+CONFIG_FIT=y
+CONFIG_FIT_VERBOSE=y
 CONFIG_CONSOLE_MUX=y
 # CONFIG_CMD_FLASH is not set
 CONFIG_SUN8I_EMAC=y
-- 
2.16.2

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: Enable fitImage support on OrangePi Zero

[Maxime Ripard]

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:13:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Enable modern fitImage format on OrangePi Zero.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

What's the point of enabling it on one board out of the ~120 we have?

You'd be better off selecting/implying it at the arch level.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180518/ac2e297e/attachment.sig>

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: Enable fitImage support on OrangePi Zero

[Marek Vasut]

On 05/18/2018 01:52 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:13:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Enable modern fitImage format on OrangePi Zero.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
>> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> 
> What's the point of enabling it on one board out of the ~120 we have?
> 
> You'd be better off selecting/implying it at the arch level.

I'd better select/imply it everywhere :-)
Let's see what Tom has to say about it.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: Enable fitImage support on OrangePi Zero

[Maxime Ripard]

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 01:54:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 05/18/2018 01:52 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:13:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> Enable modern fitImage format on OrangePi Zero.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> >> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
> >> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> > 
> > What's the point of enabling it on one board out of the ~120 we have?
> > 
> > You'd be better off selecting/implying it at the arch level.
> 
> I'd better select/imply it everywhere :-)
> Let's see what Tom has to say about it.

We're already selecting it for a handful of platforms (all our arm64
ones, basically), so it's easy to expand.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180518/3c0667d0/attachment.sig>

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: Enable fitImage support on OrangePi Zero

[Marek Vasut]

On 05/18/2018 05:29 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 01:54:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 05/18/2018 01:52 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:13:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> Enable modern fitImage format on OrangePi Zero.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
>>>> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
>>>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
>>>
>>> What's the point of enabling it on one board out of the ~120 we have?
>>>
>>> You'd be better off selecting/implying it at the arch level.
>>
>> I'd better select/imply it everywhere :-)
>> Let's see what Tom has to say about it.
> 
> We're already selecting it for a handful of platforms (all our arm64
> ones, basically), so it's easy to expand.

Submit a patch please ? :)

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: Enable fitImage support on OrangePi Zero

[Maxime Ripard]

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 06:22:25PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 05/18/2018 05:29 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 01:54:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 05/18/2018 01:52 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:13:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>> Enable modern fitImage format on OrangePi Zero.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> >>>> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
> >>>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> >>>
> >>> What's the point of enabling it on one board out of the ~120 we have?
> >>>
> >>> You'd be better off selecting/implying it at the arch level.
> >>
> >> I'd better select/imply it everywhere :-)
> >> Let's see what Tom has to say about it.
> > 
> > We're already selecting it for a handful of platforms (all our arm64
> > ones, basically), so it's easy to expand.
> 
> Submit a patch please ? :)

I'm not that interested in the FIT images in general, so I guess it
would be done in a more timely manner if you did it :)

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180522/0279ef39/attachment.sig>

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: Enable fitImage support on OrangePi Zero

[Marek Vasut]

On 05/22/2018 04:22 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 06:22:25PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 05/18/2018 05:29 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 01:54:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On 05/18/2018 01:52 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:13:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>> Enable modern fitImage format on OrangePi Zero.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
>>>>>> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the point of enabling it on one board out of the ~120 we have?
>>>>>
>>>>> You'd be better off selecting/implying it at the arch level.
>>>>
>>>> I'd better select/imply it everywhere :-)
>>>> Let's see what Tom has to say about it.
>>>
>>> We're already selecting it for a handful of platforms (all our arm64
>>> ones, basically), so it's easy to expand.
>>
>> Submit a patch please ? :)
> 
> I'm not that interested in the FIT images in general, so I guess it
> would be done in a more timely manner if you did it :)

Don't tell me you use zImage/uImage in production systems ? :-)
btw done

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: Enable fitImage support on OrangePi Zero

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi,

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:50:53AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 04:22 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 06:22:25PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 05/18/2018 05:29 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 01:54:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>> On 05/18/2018 01:52 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:13:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>>> Enable modern fitImage format on OrangePi Zero.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> >>>>>> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
> >>>>>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What's the point of enabling it on one board out of the ~120 we have?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You'd be better off selecting/implying it at the arch level.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd better select/imply it everywhere :-)
> >>>> Let's see what Tom has to say about it.
> >>>
> >>> We're already selecting it for a handful of platforms (all our arm64
> >>> ones, basically), so it's easy to expand.
> >>
> >> Submit a patch please ? :)
> > 
> > I'm not that interested in the FIT images in general, so I guess it
> > would be done in a more timely manner if you did it :)
> 
> Don't tell me you use zImage/uImage in production systems ? :-)

Well, none of the distros are able to package FIT images, while zImage
are the standard. Most of the features are actually pretty useful, but
fit images are specific to one particular bootloader, which violates a
bunch of abstraction layers in the process.

So, yeah, I'm using zImage because that's what everyone else supports
and packages.

> btw done

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180523/a5a31473/attachment.sig>