From: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> To: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, <linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, <marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>, <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Cc: <linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>, <f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, <bcm-kernel-feedback-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] mtd: m25p80: Check if the spi flash device has pm support Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:01:27 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <9108d13d-0f06-172f-5e8d-91ff80fdd510@atmel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1486164676-12912-5-git-send-email-kdasu.kdev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Hi Kamal, Le 04/02/2017 à 00:31, Kamal Dasu a écrit : > Call the spi_nor_rescan() only if the controller driver needs this > support. This way SoCs that need this feature can use it. > > Signed-off-by: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > --- > drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c > index 4528e33..ffdec60 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c > @@ -328,8 +328,13 @@ static int m25p_suspend(struct device *dev) > static int m25p_resume(struct device *dev) > { > struct m25p *flash = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + struct spi_device *spi = flash->spi; > + int ret = 0; > + > + if (spi_flash_pm_supported(spi)) > + ret = spi_nor_pm_rescan(&flash->spi_nor, NULL); > Why don't you squash patch 2 into this one? Patch 2 suggests that spi_nor_pm_rescan() could safely be called in any case but now this patch suggests that calling that function is not so safe. I see two cases: 1/ either calling spi_nor_pm_rescan() is safe in any case, then patches 3, 4 and 5 are needless. 2/ or calling spi_nor_pm_rescan() has unwanted side effects in some cases, then patch 2 should be squashed into this patch: patch 2 will never be taken alone in the spi-nor tree if it may introduce bugs or regressions. If something has to be done in the SPI sub-system, I guess it should be done first: for sure applying patches 3 and 5 would not create any issue. Then patches 2 and 4 squashed into a single patch may be safely applied after. However, patches 3 and 5 still need to be discussed first. Best regards, Cyrille > - return spi_nor_pm_rescan(&flash->spi-nor, NULL); > + return ret; > } > #endif > static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(m25p_pm_ops, m25p_suspend, m25p_resume); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com> To: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>, <marex@denx.de>, <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] mtd: m25p80: Check if the spi flash device has pm support Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:01:27 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <9108d13d-0f06-172f-5e8d-91ff80fdd510@atmel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1486164676-12912-5-git-send-email-kdasu.kdev@gmail.com> Hi Kamal, Le 04/02/2017 à 00:31, Kamal Dasu a écrit : > Call the spi_nor_rescan() only if the controller driver needs this > support. This way SoCs that need this feature can use it. > > Signed-off-by: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c > index 4528e33..ffdec60 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c > @@ -328,8 +328,13 @@ static int m25p_suspend(struct device *dev) > static int m25p_resume(struct device *dev) > { > struct m25p *flash = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + struct spi_device *spi = flash->spi; > + int ret = 0; > + > + if (spi_flash_pm_supported(spi)) > + ret = spi_nor_pm_rescan(&flash->spi_nor, NULL); > Why don't you squash patch 2 into this one? Patch 2 suggests that spi_nor_pm_rescan() could safely be called in any case but now this patch suggests that calling that function is not so safe. I see two cases: 1/ either calling spi_nor_pm_rescan() is safe in any case, then patches 3, 4 and 5 are needless. 2/ or calling spi_nor_pm_rescan() has unwanted side effects in some cases, then patch 2 should be squashed into this patch: patch 2 will never be taken alone in the spi-nor tree if it may introduce bugs or regressions. If something has to be done in the SPI sub-system, I guess it should be done first: for sure applying patches 3 and 5 would not create any issue. Then patches 2 and 4 squashed into a single patch may be safely applied after. However, patches 3 and 5 still need to be discussed first. Best regards, Cyrille > - return spi_nor_pm_rescan(&flash->spi-nor, NULL); > + return ret; > } > #endif > static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(m25p_pm_ops, m25p_suspend, m25p_resume); >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-06 11:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-02-03 23:31 [PATCH v1 0/5] Added support for spi-nor device pm in m25p80 Kamal Dasu 2017-02-03 23:31 ` Kamal Dasu [not found] ` <1486164676-12912-1-git-send-email-kdasu.kdev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2017-02-03 23:31 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] mtd: spi-nor: Added way to rescan spi-nor device Kamal Dasu 2017-02-03 23:31 ` Kamal Dasu [not found] ` <1486164676-12912-2-git-send-email-kdasu.kdev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2017-02-06 11:46 ` Cyrille Pitchen 2017-02-06 11:46 ` Cyrille Pitchen [not found] ` <05a60f60-f404-7761-4079-c6e7d1d08aed-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2017-02-06 20:32 ` Kamal Dasu 2017-02-06 20:32 ` Kamal Dasu 2017-02-03 23:31 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] mtd: m25p80: Added pm ops support Kamal Dasu 2017-02-03 23:31 ` Kamal Dasu 2017-02-03 23:31 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] spi: Added way to check for pm support for flash devices Kamal Dasu 2017-02-03 23:31 ` Kamal Dasu [not found] ` <1486164676-12912-4-git-send-email-kdasu.kdev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2017-02-04 11:25 ` Mark Brown 2017-02-04 11:25 ` Mark Brown [not found] ` <20170204112555.p77votp5m7klygbe-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> 2017-02-04 20:47 ` Kamal Dasu 2017-02-04 20:47 ` Kamal Dasu [not found] ` <CAC=U0a0o21taio6jYzTCx1ix85aFNtikXHs=O99OW1pChbG4TA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2017-02-06 10:44 ` Cyrille Pitchen 2017-02-06 10:44 ` Cyrille Pitchen [not found] ` <11cfd6da-c537-eca9-5c50-7789d5b672dd-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2017-02-06 16:46 ` Mark Brown 2017-02-06 16:46 ` Mark Brown [not found] ` <20170206164634.awi4oe5e4o4w2kmj-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> 2017-02-06 19:32 ` Kamal Dasu 2017-02-06 19:32 ` Kamal Dasu 2017-02-03 23:31 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] mtd: m25p80: Check if the spi flash device has pm support Kamal Dasu 2017-02-03 23:31 ` Kamal Dasu [not found] ` <1486164676-12912-5-git-send-email-kdasu.kdev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2017-02-06 11:01 ` Cyrille Pitchen [this message] 2017-02-06 11:01 ` Cyrille Pitchen [not found] ` <9108d13d-0f06-172f-5e8d-91ff80fdd510-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2017-02-06 19:35 ` Kamal Dasu 2017-02-06 19:35 ` Kamal Dasu 2017-02-03 23:31 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] spi: bcm-qspi: Implement the master flash_pm_supported() call Kamal Dasu 2017-02-03 23:31 ` Kamal Dasu
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=9108d13d-0f06-172f-5e8d-91ff80fdd510@atmel.com \ --to=cyrille.pitchen-aife0yeh4naavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \ --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \ --cc=broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \ --cc=f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \ --cc=kdasu.kdev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.