[PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings

[PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings

[Mike Travis]

[-- Attachment #1: incr-acpi-ref-cnt-warning --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1543 bytes --]

With the Intel BIOS support for 8 processor sockets with a full complement
of NVDIMMS potentially installable, and there are empty sockets without
NVDIMMS, there is an extremely large amount of the following warnings:

ACPI Warning: Large Reference Count (0x1001) in object ffff99453fc71750,
	Type=0x0A

On a 4 socket system with 4 NVDIMMs there were over 6000 of these warning
messages and it has been seem on systems from 4 to 32 sockets.

Through some guidance from the BIOS developers and testing, it appears
that simply bumping up the threshold for warnings from 0x1000 to 0x2000
eliminates these messages.  Changing them to be ACPI DEBUG messages, or
even removing them are other options, but it would then defeat the purpose
of the warnings as the problem would effectively be hidden.

Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
Tested-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
---
 include/acpi/acconfig.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-4.12.orig/include/acpi/acconfig.h
+++ linux-4.12/include/acpi/acconfig.h
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
 
 /* Maximum object reference count (detects object deletion issues) */
 
-#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x1000
+#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x2000
 
 /* Default page size for use in mapping memory for operation regions */
 

-- 

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

[PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings

[Mike Travis]

[-- Attachment #1: incr-acpi-ref-cnt-warning --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1454 bytes --]

With the Intel BIOS support for 8 processor sockets with a full complement
of NVDIMMS potentially installable, and there are empty sockets without
NVDIMMS, there is an extremely large amount of the following warnings:

ACPI Warning: Large Reference Count (0x1001) in object ffff99453fc71750,
	Type=0x0A

On a 4 socket system with 4 NVDIMMs there were over 6000 of these warning
messages and it has been seem on systems from 4 to 32 sockets.

Through some guidance from the BIOS developers and testing, it appears
that simply bumping up the threshold for warnings from 0x1000 to 0x2000
eliminates these messages.  Changing them to be ACPI DEBUG messages, or
even removing them are other options, but it would then defeat the purpose
of the warnings as the problem would effectively be hidden.

Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
Tested-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
---
 include/acpi/acconfig.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-4.12.orig/include/acpi/acconfig.h
+++ linux-4.12/include/acpi/acconfig.h
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
 
 /* Maximum object reference count (detects object deletion issues) */
 
-#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x1000
+#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x2000
 
 /* Default page size for use in mapping memory for operation regions */
 

-- 

[PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings

[Mike Travis]

[-- Attachment #1: incr-acpi-ref-cnt-warning --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1392 bytes --]

With the Intel BIOS support for 8 processor sockets with a full complement
of NVDIMMS potentially installable, and there are empty sockets without
NVDIMMS, there is an extremely large amount of the following warnings:

ACPI Warning: Large Reference Count (0x1001) in object ffff99453fc71750,
	Type=0x0A

On a 4 socket system with 4 NVDIMMs there were over 6000 of these warning
messages and it has been seem on systems from 4 to 32 sockets.

Through some guidance from the BIOS developers and testing, it appears
that simply bumping up the threshold for warnings from 0x1000 to 0x2000
eliminates these messages.  Changing them to be ACPI DEBUG messages, or
even removing them are other options, but it would then defeat the purpose
of the warnings as the problem would effectively be hidden.

Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
Tested-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
---
 include/acpi/acconfig.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-4.12.orig/include/acpi/acconfig.h
+++ linux-4.12/include/acpi/acconfig.h
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
 
 /* Maximum object reference count (detects object deletion issues) */
 
-#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x1000
+#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x2000
 
 /* Default page size for use in mapping memory for operation regions */
 

-- 

RE: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings

[Moore, Robert]

Are there any actual memory leaks, or this a consequence of the number of sockets?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Travis [mailto:mike.travis@hpe.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 12:56 PM
> To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore@intel.com>; Schmauss, Erik
> <erik.schmauss@intel.com>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>; Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>; Dimitri Sivanich
> <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>; Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>;
> Williams, Dan J <dan.j.williams@intel.com>; Verma, Vishal L
> <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>; Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang@intel.com>; linux-
> acpi@vger.kernel.org; devel@acpica.org; linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large
> Reference Count warnings
> 
> With the Intel BIOS support for 8 processor sockets with a full
> complement of NVDIMMS potentially installable, and there are empty
> sockets without NVDIMMS, there is an extremely large amount of the
> following warnings:
> 
> ACPI Warning: Large Reference Count (0x1001) in object ffff99453fc71750,
> 	Type=0x0A
> 
> On a 4 socket system with 4 NVDIMMs there were over 6000 of these
> warning messages and it has been seem on systems from 4 to 32 sockets.
> 
> Through some guidance from the BIOS developers and testing, it appears
> that simply bumping up the threshold for warnings from 0x1000 to 0x2000
> eliminates these messages.  Changing them to be ACPI DEBUG messages, or
> even removing them are other options, but it would then defeat the
> purpose of the warnings as the problem would effectively be hidden.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
> Tested-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
> ---
>  include/acpi/acconfig.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- linux-4.12.orig/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> +++ linux-4.12/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
> 
>  /* Maximum object reference count (detects object deletion issues) */
> 
> -#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x1000
> +#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x2000
> 
>  /* Default page size for use in mapping memory for operation regions */
> 
> 
> --

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

RE: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings

[Moore, Robert]

Are there any actual memory leaks, or this a consequence of the number of sockets?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Travis [mailto:mike.travis-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 12:56 PM
> To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Schmauss, Erik
> <erik.schmauss-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> <rafael.j.wysocki-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>; Dimitri Sivanich
> <dimitri.sivanich-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>; Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>;
> Williams, Dan J <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Verma, Vishal L
> <vishal.l.verma-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; linux-
> acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; devel-E0kO6a4B6psdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org; linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org;
> linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large
> Reference Count warnings
> 
> With the Intel BIOS support for 8 processor sockets with a full
> complement of NVDIMMS potentially installable, and there are empty
> sockets without NVDIMMS, there is an extremely large amount of the
> following warnings:
> 
> ACPI Warning: Large Reference Count (0x1001) in object ffff99453fc71750,
> 	Type=0x0A
> 
> On a 4 socket system with 4 NVDIMMs there were over 6000 of these
> warning messages and it has been seem on systems from 4 to 32 sockets.
> 
> Through some guidance from the BIOS developers and testing, it appears
> that simply bumping up the threshold for warnings from 0x1000 to 0x2000
> eliminates these messages.  Changing them to be ACPI DEBUG messages, or
> even removing them are other options, but it would then defeat the
> purpose of the warnings as the problem would effectively be hidden.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
> Tested-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  include/acpi/acconfig.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- linux-4.12.orig/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> +++ linux-4.12/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
> 
>  /* Maximum object reference count (detects object deletion issues) */
> 
> -#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x1000
> +#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x2000
> 
>  /* Default page size for use in mapping memory for operation regions */
> 
> 
> --

RE: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings

[Moore, Robert]

Are there any actual memory leaks, or this a consequence of the number of sockets?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Travis [mailto:mike.travis@hpe.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 12:56 PM
> To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore@intel.com>; Schmauss, Erik
> <erik.schmauss@intel.com>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>; Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>; Dimitri Sivanich
> <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>; Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>;
> Williams, Dan J <dan.j.williams@intel.com>; Verma, Vishal L
> <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>; Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang@intel.com>; linux-
> acpi@vger.kernel.org; devel@acpica.org; linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large
> Reference Count warnings
> 
> With the Intel BIOS support for 8 processor sockets with a full
> complement of NVDIMMS potentially installable, and there are empty
> sockets without NVDIMMS, there is an extremely large amount of the
> following warnings:
> 
> ACPI Warning: Large Reference Count (0x1001) in object ffff99453fc71750,
> 	Type=0x0A
> 
> On a 4 socket system with 4 NVDIMMs there were over 6000 of these
> warning messages and it has been seem on systems from 4 to 32 sockets.
> 
> Through some guidance from the BIOS developers and testing, it appears
> that simply bumping up the threshold for warnings from 0x1000 to 0x2000
> eliminates these messages.  Changing them to be ACPI DEBUG messages, or
> even removing them are other options, but it would then defeat the
> purpose of the warnings as the problem would effectively be hidden.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
> Tested-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
> ---
>  include/acpi/acconfig.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- linux-4.12.orig/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> +++ linux-4.12/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
> 
>  /* Maximum object reference count (detects object deletion issues) */
> 
> -#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x1000
> +#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x2000
> 
>  /* Default page size for use in mapping memory for operation regions */
> 
> 
> --

Re: [Devel] [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings

[Moore, Robert]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2393 bytes --]

Are there any actual memory leaks, or this a consequence of the number of sockets?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Travis [mailto:mike.travis(a)hpe.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 12:56 PM
> To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore(a)intel.com>; Schmauss, Erik
> <erik.schmauss(a)intel.com>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com>; Len Brown <lenb(a)kernel.org>
> Cc: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson(a)hpe.com>; Dimitri Sivanich
> <dimitri.sivanich(a)hpe.com>; Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler(a)linux.intel.com>;
> Williams, Dan J <dan.j.williams(a)intel.com>; Verma, Vishal L
> <vishal.l.verma(a)intel.com>; Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang(a)intel.com>; linux-
> acpi(a)vger.kernel.org; devel(a)acpica.org; linux-nvdimm(a)lists.01.org;
> linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large
> Reference Count warnings
> 
> With the Intel BIOS support for 8 processor sockets with a full
> complement of NVDIMMS potentially installable, and there are empty
> sockets without NVDIMMS, there is an extremely large amount of the
> following warnings:
> 
> ACPI Warning: Large Reference Count (0x1001) in object ffff99453fc71750,
> 	Type=0x0A
> 
> On a 4 socket system with 4 NVDIMMs there were over 6000 of these
> warning messages and it has been seem on systems from 4 to 32 sockets.
> 
> Through some guidance from the BIOS developers and testing, it appears
> that simply bumping up the threshold for warnings from 0x1000 to 0x2000
> eliminates these messages.  Changing them to be ACPI DEBUG messages, or
> even removing them are other options, but it would then defeat the
> purpose of the warnings as the problem would effectively be hidden.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich(a)hpe.com>
> Tested-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson(a)hpe.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis(a)hpe.com>
> ---
>  include/acpi/acconfig.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- linux-4.12.orig/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> +++ linux-4.12/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
> 
>  /* Maximum object reference count (detects object deletion issues) */
> 
> -#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x1000
> +#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x2000
> 
>  /* Default page size for use in mapping memory for operation regions */
> 
> 
> --

Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings

[Russ Anderson]

On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 07:49:14PM +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> Are there any actual memory leaks, or this a consequence of the number of sockets?

It is a consequence of the number of sockets.
It is not an actual memory leak.

Thanks.

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Travis [mailto:mike.travis@hpe.com]
> > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 12:56 PM
> > To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore@intel.com>; Schmauss, Erik
> > <erik.schmauss@intel.com>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> > <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>; Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>; Dimitri Sivanich
> > <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>; Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>;
> > Williams, Dan J <dan.j.williams@intel.com>; Verma, Vishal L
> > <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>; Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang@intel.com>; linux-
> > acpi@vger.kernel.org; devel@acpica.org; linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large
> > Reference Count warnings
> > 
> > With the Intel BIOS support for 8 processor sockets with a full
> > complement of NVDIMMS potentially installable, and there are empty
> > sockets without NVDIMMS, there is an extremely large amount of the
> > following warnings:
> > 
> > ACPI Warning: Large Reference Count (0x1001) in object ffff99453fc71750,
> > 	Type=0x0A
> > 
> > On a 4 socket system with 4 NVDIMMs there were over 6000 of these
> > warning messages and it has been seem on systems from 4 to 32 sockets.
> > 
> > Through some guidance from the BIOS developers and testing, it appears
> > that simply bumping up the threshold for warnings from 0x1000 to 0x2000
> > eliminates these messages.  Changing them to be ACPI DEBUG messages, or
> > even removing them are other options, but it would then defeat the
> > purpose of the warnings as the problem would effectively be hidden.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
> > Tested-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
> > ---
> >  include/acpi/acconfig.h |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > --- linux-4.12.orig/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> > +++ linux-4.12/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
> > 
> >  /* Maximum object reference count (detects object deletion issues) */
> > 
> > -#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x1000
> > +#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x2000
> > 
> >  /* Default page size for use in mapping memory for operation regions */
> > 
> > 
> > --
> 

-- 
Russ Anderson,  SuperDome Flex Linux Kernel Group Manager
HPE - Hewlett Packard Enterprise (formerly SGI)  rja@hpe.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings

[Russ Anderson]

On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 07:49:14PM +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> Are there any actual memory leaks, or this a consequence of the number of sockets?

It is a consequence of the number of sockets.
It is not an actual memory leak.

Thanks.

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Travis [mailto:mike.travis-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org]
> > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 12:56 PM
> > To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Schmauss, Erik
> > <erik.schmauss-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> > <rafael.j.wysocki-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>; Dimitri Sivanich
> > <dimitri.sivanich-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>; Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>;
> > Williams, Dan J <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Verma, Vishal L
> > <vishal.l.verma-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; linux-
> > acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; devel-E0kO6a4B6psdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org; linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org;
> > linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large
> > Reference Count warnings
> > 
> > With the Intel BIOS support for 8 processor sockets with a full
> > complement of NVDIMMS potentially installable, and there are empty
> > sockets without NVDIMMS, there is an extremely large amount of the
> > following warnings:
> > 
> > ACPI Warning: Large Reference Count (0x1001) in object ffff99453fc71750,
> > 	Type=0x0A
> > 
> > On a 4 socket system with 4 NVDIMMs there were over 6000 of these
> > warning messages and it has been seem on systems from 4 to 32 sockets.
> > 
> > Through some guidance from the BIOS developers and testing, it appears
> > that simply bumping up the threshold for warnings from 0x1000 to 0x2000
> > eliminates these messages.  Changing them to be ACPI DEBUG messages, or
> > even removing them are other options, but it would then defeat the
> > purpose of the warnings as the problem would effectively be hidden.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
> > Tested-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> >  include/acpi/acconfig.h |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > --- linux-4.12.orig/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> > +++ linux-4.12/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
> > 
> >  /* Maximum object reference count (detects object deletion issues) */
> > 
> > -#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x1000
> > +#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x2000
> > 
> >  /* Default page size for use in mapping memory for operation regions */
> > 
> > 
> > --
> 

-- 
Russ Anderson,  SuperDome Flex Linux Kernel Group Manager
HPE - Hewlett Packard Enterprise (formerly SGI)  rja-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org

Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings

[Russ Anderson]

On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 07:49:14PM +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> Are there any actual memory leaks, or this a consequence of the number of sockets?

It is a consequence of the number of sockets.
It is not an actual memory leak.

Thanks.

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Travis [mailto:mike.travis@hpe.com]
> > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 12:56 PM
> > To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore@intel.com>; Schmauss, Erik
> > <erik.schmauss@intel.com>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> > <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>; Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>; Dimitri Sivanich
> > <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>; Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>;
> > Williams, Dan J <dan.j.williams@intel.com>; Verma, Vishal L
> > <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>; Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang@intel.com>; linux-
> > acpi@vger.kernel.org; devel@acpica.org; linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large
> > Reference Count warnings
> > 
> > With the Intel BIOS support for 8 processor sockets with a full
> > complement of NVDIMMS potentially installable, and there are empty
> > sockets without NVDIMMS, there is an extremely large amount of the
> > following warnings:
> > 
> > ACPI Warning: Large Reference Count (0x1001) in object ffff99453fc71750,
> > 	Type=0x0A
> > 
> > On a 4 socket system with 4 NVDIMMs there were over 6000 of these
> > warning messages and it has been seem on systems from 4 to 32 sockets.
> > 
> > Through some guidance from the BIOS developers and testing, it appears
> > that simply bumping up the threshold for warnings from 0x1000 to 0x2000
> > eliminates these messages.  Changing them to be ACPI DEBUG messages, or
> > even removing them are other options, but it would then defeat the
> > purpose of the warnings as the problem would effectively be hidden.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
> > Tested-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
> > ---
> >  include/acpi/acconfig.h |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > --- linux-4.12.orig/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> > +++ linux-4.12/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
> > 
> >  /* Maximum object reference count (detects object deletion issues) */
> > 
> > -#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x1000
> > +#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x2000
> > 
> >  /* Default page size for use in mapping memory for operation regions */
> > 
> > 
> > --
> 

-- 
Russ Anderson,  SuperDome Flex Linux Kernel Group Manager
HPE - Hewlett Packard Enterprise (formerly SGI)  rja@hpe.com

RE: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings

[Moore, Robert]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Anderson [mailto:rja@hpe.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 1:38 PM
> To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore@intel.com>
> Cc: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>; Schmauss, Erik
> <erik.schmauss@intel.com>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>; Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>; Russ Anderson
> <russ.anderson@hpe.com>; Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>;
> Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>; Williams, Dan J
> <dan.j.williams@intel.com>; Verma, Vishal L <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>;
> Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang@intel.com>; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
> devel@acpica.org; linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large
> Reference Count warnings
> 
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 07:49:14PM +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> > Are there any actual memory leaks, or this a consequence of the number
> of sockets?
> 
> It is a consequence of the number of sockets.
> It is not an actual memory leak.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
[Moore, Robert] 

It does bother me a bit that there are over 4096 references to a single object, however. Could you send us the ACPI dump for the machine?

This issue sounds vaguely familiar though. Perhaps Dan remembers, it was something about large reference counts and the NFIT/NVDIMM stuff. If so, this has been fixed for some time now.

Bob


> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mike Travis [mailto:mike.travis@hpe.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 12:56 PM
> > > To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore@intel.com>; Schmauss, Erik
> > > <erik.schmauss@intel.com>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> > > <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>; Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>; Dimitri Sivanich
> > > <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>; Ross Zwisler
> > > <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>; Williams, Dan J
> > > <dan.j.williams@intel.com>; Verma, Vishal L
> > > <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>; Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang@intel.com>;
> > > linux- acpi@vger.kernel.org; devel@acpica.org;
> > > linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large
> > > Reference Count warnings
> > >
> > > With the Intel BIOS support for 8 processor sockets with a full
> > > complement of NVDIMMS potentially installable, and there are empty
> > > sockets without NVDIMMS, there is an extremely large amount of the
> > > following warnings:
> > >
> > > ACPI Warning: Large Reference Count (0x1001) in object
> ffff99453fc71750,
> > > 	Type=0x0A
> > >
> > > On a 4 socket system with 4 NVDIMMs there were over 6000 of these
> > > warning messages and it has been seem on systems from 4 to 32
> sockets.
> > >
> > > Through some guidance from the BIOS developers and testing, it
> > > appears that simply bumping up the threshold for warnings from
> > > 0x1000 to 0x2000 eliminates these messages.  Changing them to be
> > > ACPI DEBUG messages, or even removing them are other options, but it
> > > would then defeat the purpose of the warnings as the problem would
> effectively be hidden.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
> > > Tested-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
> > > ---
> > >  include/acpi/acconfig.h |    2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > --- linux-4.12.orig/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> > > +++ linux-4.12/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> > > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
> > >
> > >  /* Maximum object reference count (detects object deletion issues)
> > > */
> > >
> > > -#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x1000
> > > +#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x2000
> > >
> > >  /* Default page size for use in mapping memory for operation
> > > regions */
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> >
> 
> --
> Russ Anderson,  SuperDome Flex Linux Kernel Group Manager HPE - Hewlett
> Packard Enterprise (formerly SGI)  rja@hpe.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

RE: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings

[Moore, Robert]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Anderson [mailto:rja-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 1:38 PM
> To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Mike Travis <mike.travis-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>; Schmauss, Erik
> <erik.schmauss-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> <rafael.j.wysocki-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>; Russ Anderson
> <russ.anderson-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>; Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>;
> Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>; Williams, Dan J
> <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Verma, Vishal L <vishal.l.verma-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>;
> Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org;
> devel-E0kO6a4B6psdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org; linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org; linux-
> kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large
> Reference Count warnings
> 
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 07:49:14PM +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> > Are there any actual memory leaks, or this a consequence of the number
> of sockets?
> 
> It is a consequence of the number of sockets.
> It is not an actual memory leak.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
[Moore, Robert] 

It does bother me a bit that there are over 4096 references to a single object, however. Could you send us the ACPI dump for the machine?

This issue sounds vaguely familiar though. Perhaps Dan remembers, it was something about large reference counts and the NFIT/NVDIMM stuff. If so, this has been fixed for some time now.

Bob


> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mike Travis [mailto:mike.travis-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 12:56 PM
> > > To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Schmauss, Erik
> > > <erik.schmauss-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> > > <rafael.j.wysocki-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> > > Cc: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>; Dimitri Sivanich
> > > <dimitri.sivanich-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>; Ross Zwisler
> > > <ross.zwisler-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>; Williams, Dan J
> > > <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Verma, Vishal L
> > > <vishal.l.verma-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>; Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>;
> > > linux- acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; devel-E0kO6a4B6psdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org;
> > > linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org; linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large
> > > Reference Count warnings
> > >
> > > With the Intel BIOS support for 8 processor sockets with a full
> > > complement of NVDIMMS potentially installable, and there are empty
> > > sockets without NVDIMMS, there is an extremely large amount of the
> > > following warnings:
> > >
> > > ACPI Warning: Large Reference Count (0x1001) in object
> ffff99453fc71750,
> > > 	Type=0x0A
> > >
> > > On a 4 socket system with 4 NVDIMMs there were over 6000 of these
> > > warning messages and it has been seem on systems from 4 to 32
> sockets.
> > >
> > > Through some guidance from the BIOS developers and testing, it
> > > appears that simply bumping up the threshold for warnings from
> > > 0x1000 to 0x2000 eliminates these messages.  Changing them to be
> > > ACPI DEBUG messages, or even removing them are other options, but it
> > > would then defeat the purpose of the warnings as the problem would
> effectively be hidden.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
> > > Tested-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
> > > ---
> > >  include/acpi/acconfig.h |    2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > --- linux-4.12.orig/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> > > +++ linux-4.12/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> > > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
> > >
> > >  /* Maximum object reference count (detects object deletion issues)
> > > */
> > >
> > > -#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x1000
> > > +#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x2000
> > >
> > >  /* Default page size for use in mapping memory for operation
> > > regions */
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> >
> 
> --
> Russ Anderson,  SuperDome Flex Linux Kernel Group Manager HPE - Hewlett
> Packard Enterprise (formerly SGI)  rja-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org

RE: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings

[Moore, Robert]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Anderson [mailto:rja@hpe.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 1:38 PM
> To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore@intel.com>
> Cc: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>; Schmauss, Erik
> <erik.schmauss@intel.com>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>; Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>; Russ Anderson
> <russ.anderson@hpe.com>; Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>;
> Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>; Williams, Dan J
> <dan.j.williams@intel.com>; Verma, Vishal L <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>;
> Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang@intel.com>; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
> devel@acpica.org; linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large
> Reference Count warnings
> 
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 07:49:14PM +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> > Are there any actual memory leaks, or this a consequence of the number
> of sockets?
> 
> It is a consequence of the number of sockets.
> It is not an actual memory leak.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
[Moore, Robert] 

It does bother me a bit that there are over 4096 references to a single object, however. Could you send us the ACPI dump for the machine?

This issue sounds vaguely familiar though. Perhaps Dan remembers, it was something about large reference counts and the NFIT/NVDIMM stuff. If so, this has been fixed for some time now.

Bob


> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mike Travis [mailto:mike.travis@hpe.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 12:56 PM
> > > To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore@intel.com>; Schmauss, Erik
> > > <erik.schmauss@intel.com>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> > > <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>; Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>; Dimitri Sivanich
> > > <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>; Ross Zwisler
> > > <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>; Williams, Dan J
> > > <dan.j.williams@intel.com>; Verma, Vishal L
> > > <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>; Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang@intel.com>;
> > > linux- acpi@vger.kernel.org; devel@acpica.org;
> > > linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large
> > > Reference Count warnings
> > >
> > > With the Intel BIOS support for 8 processor sockets with a full
> > > complement of NVDIMMS potentially installable, and there are empty
> > > sockets without NVDIMMS, there is an extremely large amount of the
> > > following warnings:
> > >
> > > ACPI Warning: Large Reference Count (0x1001) in object
> ffff99453fc71750,
> > > 	Type=0x0A
> > >
> > > On a 4 socket system with 4 NVDIMMs there were over 6000 of these
> > > warning messages and it has been seem on systems from 4 to 32
> sockets.
> > >
> > > Through some guidance from the BIOS developers and testing, it
> > > appears that simply bumping up the threshold for warnings from
> > > 0x1000 to 0x2000 eliminates these messages.  Changing them to be
> > > ACPI DEBUG messages, or even removing them are other options, but it
> > > would then defeat the purpose of the warnings as the problem would
> effectively be hidden.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
> > > Tested-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
> > > ---
> > >  include/acpi/acconfig.h |    2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > --- linux-4.12.orig/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> > > +++ linux-4.12/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> > > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
> > >
> > >  /* Maximum object reference count (detects object deletion issues)
> > > */
> > >
> > > -#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x1000
> > > +#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x2000
> > >
> > >  /* Default page size for use in mapping memory for operation
> > > regions */
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> >
> 
> --
> Russ Anderson,  SuperDome Flex Linux Kernel Group Manager HPE - Hewlett
> Packard Enterprise (formerly SGI)  rja@hpe.com

Re: [Devel] [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large Reference Count warnings

[Moore, Robert]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4136 bytes --]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Anderson [mailto:rja(a)hpe.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 1:38 PM
> To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore(a)intel.com>
> Cc: Mike Travis <mike.travis(a)hpe.com>; Schmauss, Erik
> <erik.schmauss(a)intel.com>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com>; Len Brown <lenb(a)kernel.org>; Russ Anderson
> <russ.anderson(a)hpe.com>; Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich(a)hpe.com>;
> Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler(a)linux.intel.com>; Williams, Dan J
> <dan.j.williams(a)intel.com>; Verma, Vishal L <vishal.l.verma(a)intel.com>;
> Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang(a)intel.com>; linux-acpi(a)vger.kernel.org;
> devel(a)acpica.org; linux-nvdimm(a)lists.01.org; linux-
> kernel(a)vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large
> Reference Count warnings
> 
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 07:49:14PM +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> > Are there any actual memory leaks, or this a consequence of the number
> of sockets?
> 
> It is a consequence of the number of sockets.
> It is not an actual memory leak.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
[Moore, Robert] 

It does bother me a bit that there are over 4096 references to a single object, however. Could you send us the ACPI dump for the machine?

This issue sounds vaguely familiar though. Perhaps Dan remembers, it was something about large reference counts and the NFIT/NVDIMM stuff. If so, this has been fixed for some time now.

Bob


> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mike Travis [mailto:mike.travis(a)hpe.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 12:56 PM
> > > To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore(a)intel.com>; Schmauss, Erik
> > > <erik.schmauss(a)intel.com>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> > > <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com>; Len Brown <lenb(a)kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson(a)hpe.com>; Dimitri Sivanich
> > > <dimitri.sivanich(a)hpe.com>; Ross Zwisler
> > > <ross.zwisler(a)linux.intel.com>; Williams, Dan J
> > > <dan.j.williams(a)intel.com>; Verma, Vishal L
> > > <vishal.l.verma(a)intel.com>; Jiang, Dave <dave.jiang(a)intel.com>;
> > > linux- acpi(a)vger.kernel.org; devel(a)acpica.org;
> > > linux-nvdimm(a)lists.01.org; linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org
> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86, pmem, acpi: Remove excessive ACPI Large
> > > Reference Count warnings
> > >
> > > With the Intel BIOS support for 8 processor sockets with a full
> > > complement of NVDIMMS potentially installable, and there are empty
> > > sockets without NVDIMMS, there is an extremely large amount of the
> > > following warnings:
> > >
> > > ACPI Warning: Large Reference Count (0x1001) in object
> ffff99453fc71750,
> > > 	Type=0x0A
> > >
> > > On a 4 socket system with 4 NVDIMMs there were over 6000 of these
> > > warning messages and it has been seem on systems from 4 to 32
> sockets.
> > >
> > > Through some guidance from the BIOS developers and testing, it
> > > appears that simply bumping up the threshold for warnings from
> > > 0x1000 to 0x2000 eliminates these messages.  Changing them to be
> > > ACPI DEBUG messages, or even removing them are other options, but it
> > > would then defeat the purpose of the warnings as the problem would
> effectively be hidden.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich(a)hpe.com>
> > > Tested-by: Russ Anderson <russ.anderson(a)hpe.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis(a)hpe.com>
> > > ---
> > >  include/acpi/acconfig.h |    2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > --- linux-4.12.orig/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> > > +++ linux-4.12/include/acpi/acconfig.h
> > > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
> > >
> > >  /* Maximum object reference count (detects object deletion issues)
> > > */
> > >
> > > -#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x1000
> > > +#define ACPI_MAX_REFERENCE_COUNT        0x2000
> > >
> > >  /* Default page size for use in mapping memory for operation
> > > regions */
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> >
> 
> --
> Russ Anderson,  SuperDome Flex Linux Kernel Group Manager HPE - Hewlett
> Packard Enterprise (formerly SGI)  rja(a)hpe.com