From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
zohar@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ima: add a new CONFIG for loading arch-specific policies
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:21:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94fe39a9-db9e-211d-d9b7-4cfe1a270e6f@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1582744207-25969-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Nayna,
> +
> +config IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT
> + bool
> + depends on IMA
> + depends on IMA_ARCH_POLICY
> + default n
> + help
> + This option is selected by architectures to enable secure and/or
> + trusted boot based on IMA runtime policies.
>
Why is the default for this new config "n"?
Is there any reason to not turn on this config if both IMA and
IMA_ARCH_POLICY are set to y?
thanks,
-lakshmi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.ibm.com,
Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ima: add a new CONFIG for loading arch-specific policies
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:21:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94fe39a9-db9e-211d-d9b7-4cfe1a270e6f@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1582744207-25969-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Nayna,
> +
> +config IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT
> + bool
> + depends on IMA
> + depends on IMA_ARCH_POLICY
> + default n
> + help
> + This option is selected by architectures to enable secure and/or
> + trusted boot based on IMA runtime policies.
>
Why is the default for this new config "n"?
Is there any reason to not turn on this config if both IMA and
IMA_ARCH_POLICY are set to y?
thanks,
-lakshmi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-26 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-26 19:10 [PATCH] ima: add a new CONFIG for loading arch-specific policies Nayna Jain
2020-02-26 19:10 ` Nayna Jain
2020-02-26 19:21 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian [this message]
2020-02-26 19:21 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-02-26 20:36 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-02-26 20:36 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-02-27 19:38 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-02-27 19:38 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-03-02 14:48 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-03-02 14:48 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-03-02 14:52 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-02 14:52 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-02 14:56 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-03-02 14:56 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-03-02 21:21 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-03-02 21:21 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-03-02 21:21 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-03-02 23:23 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-03-02 23:23 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94fe39a9-db9e-211d-d9b7-4cfe1a270e6f@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=prudo@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.