All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kgunda@codeaurora.org
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>,
	Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaram@codeaurora.org>,
	Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	adharmap@quicinc.com, aghayal@qti.qualcomm.com,
	linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 05/15] spmi: pmic-arb: cleanup unrequested irqs
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:34:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95e116f247ecf298d4c84665372b7845@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170613021134.GT20170@codeaurora.org>

On 2017-06-13 07:41, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 06/06, kgunda@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> On 2017-05-31 07:27, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> >On 05/30, Kiran Gunda wrote:
>> >>From: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>
>> >>
>> >>We see a unmapped irqs trigger right around bootup. This could
>> >>likely be because the bootloader exited leaving the interrupts
>> >>in an unknown or unhandled state.  Ack and mask the interrupt
>> >>if one is found. A request_irq later will unmask it and also
>> >>setup proper mapping structures.
>> >
>> >Do we have systems where this is causing an interrupt storm due
>> >to a level high interrupt or something? Just plain acking and
>> >masking irqs at boot if we don't have an irq descriptor created
>> >yet doesn't sound like a good idea, because we'll lose all
>> >interrupts that happen before this driver probes?
>> >
>> Yes. There were instances of an interrupt storm without this patch.
>> There is an RT_STATUS register in the  peripheral address space which
>> maintains the real time state and can be read by the client driver
>> before it registers for the irq. Few client drivers such as charger
>> already doing this.
> 
> So you're saying that drivers need to read RT_STATUS to know if
> they have a pending interrupt before requesting it? That sounds
> bogus.
In  many cases a PMIC module driver does need to know the initial state 
of
the hardware during driver initialization and the RT_STATUS register 
indicates
this (irrespective of the IRQ_EN status).  The  reset value of IRQ_EN = 
0 and if
an event occurs before we request an IRQ, there is no way to know the 
initial state
even after we request this irq as there will be no pending interrupt 
because the
HW default value of IRQ_EN = 0. This can be known only through reading 
the RT_STATUS.

I understand your concern of clearing the IRQ before we request it does 
not seem
a clean way, do you have any other recommendation of this could be 
handled ?

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-14 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-30 12:38 [PATCH V1 00/15]: support for spmi_pmic_arb v3/v5 and bug fixes Kiran Gunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` Kiran Gunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 01/15] spmi: pmic_arb: block access of invalid read and writes Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31  0:33   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-12 11:26     ` kgunda
2017-06-13  2:09       ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-14 15:09         ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 02/15] spmi: pmic-arb: rename spmi_pmic_arb_dev to spmi_pmic_arb Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31  0:46   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-01 16:11     ` kgunda
2017-06-02 18:29       ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-05  6:28         ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 03/15] spmi: pmic-arb: fix inconsistent use of apid and chan Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31  1:31   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-01 16:37     ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 04/15] spmi: pmic-arb: optimize table lookups Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31  1:44   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-01 16:53     ` kgunda
2017-06-02 18:31       ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-05  6:33         ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 05/15] spmi: pmic-arb: cleanup unrequested irqs Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31  1:57   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-06 10:50     ` kgunda
2017-06-13  2:11       ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-14 15:04         ` kgunda [this message]
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 06/15] spmi: pmic-arb: fix missing interrupts Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31  2:00   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-01 17:06     ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 07/15] spmi: pmic-arb: clear the latched status of the interrupt Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 22:03   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-06 10:55     ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 08/15] spmi: pmic_arb: use appropriate flow handler Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 19:03   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-06 10:57     ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 09/15] spmi: pmic-arb: check apid enabled before calling the handler Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 20:39   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-14 15:38     ` kgunda
2017-06-16 21:11       ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-21  5:02         ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 10/15] spmi: pmic_arb: add support for PMIC bus arbiter v3 Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 22:18   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-06 11:10     ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:38 ` [PATCH V1 11/15] spmi: spmi-pmic-arb: enable the SPMI interrupt as a wakeup source Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 17:13   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-08 11:30     ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:39 ` [PATCH V1 12/15] spmi-pmic-arb: fix a possible null pointer dereference Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 17:29   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-02  7:13     ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:39 ` [PATCH V1 13/15] spmi: pmic-arb: add support for HW version 5 Kiran Gunda
2017-06-01  6:08   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-08 11:28     ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:39 ` [PATCH V1 14/15] spmi: pmic-arb: do not ack and clear peripheral interrupts in cleanup_irq Kiran Gunda
2017-05-30 22:23   ` kbuild test robot
2017-05-30 22:23     ` kbuild test robot
2017-05-31 17:53   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-02  7:26     ` kgunda
2017-06-06 11:27       ` kgunda
2017-06-13  2:10         ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-18 11:53           ` kgunda
2017-05-30 12:39 ` [PATCH V1 15/15] spmi: pmic-arb: instantiate spmi_devices at arch_initcall Kiran Gunda
2017-05-31 22:07   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-18 11:49     ` kgunda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95e116f247ecf298d4c84665372b7845@codeaurora.org \
    --to=kgunda@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=adharmap@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=adharmap@quicinc.com \
    --cc=aghayal@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=collinsd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=subbaram@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.