[PATCH 0/2] staging: lustre: lprocfs: Fix coding style issues

[PATCH 0/2] staging: lustre: lprocfs: Fix coding style issues

[Mathias Rav]

This patchset fixes two style issues in lprocfs_status.c related to
simple_strtoul and seq_printf (reported by checkpatch).

There's a slight change in lustre debugfs write semantics: Using kstrtox causes
EINVAL when the written number is followed by other (garbage) characters,
whereas previously the garbage would be ignored and such a write would succeed.

Mathias Rav (2):
      staging: lustre: lprocfs: Use kstrtouint_from_user
      staging: lustre: lprocfs: Use seq_puts

 .../lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c        | 42 ++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

[lustre-devel] [PATCH 0/2] staging: lustre: lprocfs: Fix coding style issues

[Mathias Rav]

This patchset fixes two style issues in lprocfs_status.c related to
simple_strtoul and seq_printf (reported by checkpatch).

There's a slight change in lustre debugfs write semantics: Using kstrtox causes
EINVAL when the written number is followed by other (garbage) characters,
whereas previously the garbage would be ignored and such a write would succeed.

Mathias Rav (2):
      staging: lustre: lprocfs: Use kstrtouint_from_user
      staging: lustre: lprocfs: Use seq_puts

 .../lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c        | 42 ++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

[PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: lprocfs: Use kstrtouint_from_user

[Mathias Rav]

Prefer kstrtouint_from_user to copy_from_user+simple_strtoul.

The helper function lprocfs_wr_uint() is only used to implement
"dump_granted_max" in debugfs.

Note the slight change in semantics: The previous implementation using
simple_strtoul allows garbage after the number, whereas kstrtox only allows
a trailing line break. The previous implementation allowed a write of zero
bytes whereas kstrtox will return -EINVAL. Since this only affects a single
debugfs endpoint, this should be a permissible slight change of semantics
in exchange for 18 fewer lines of code.

Signed-off-by: Mathias Rav <mathiasrav@gmail.com>
---
 .../lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c        | 22 +---------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
index 1ec6e3767d81..338ce34d6514 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
@@ -399,27 +399,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lprocfs_rd_uint);
 int lprocfs_wr_uint(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
 		    unsigned long count, void *data)
 {
-	unsigned *p = data;
-	char dummy[MAX_STRING_SIZE + 1], *end;
-	unsigned long tmp;
-
-	if (count >= sizeof(dummy))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if (count == 0)
-		return 0;
-
-	if (copy_from_user(dummy, buffer, count))
-		return -EFAULT;
-
-	dummy[count] = '\0';
-
-	tmp = simple_strtoul(dummy, &end, 0);
-	if (dummy == end)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	*p = (unsigned int)tmp;
-	return count;
+	return kstrtouint_from_user(buffer, count, 0, (unsigned int *)data);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(lprocfs_wr_uint);
 
-- 
2.12.2

[lustre-devel] [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: lprocfs: Use kstrtouint_from_user

[Mathias Rav]

Prefer kstrtouint_from_user to copy_from_user+simple_strtoul.

The helper function lprocfs_wr_uint() is only used to implement
"dump_granted_max" in debugfs.

Note the slight change in semantics: The previous implementation using
simple_strtoul allows garbage after the number, whereas kstrtox only allows
a trailing line break. The previous implementation allowed a write of zero
bytes whereas kstrtox will return -EINVAL. Since this only affects a single
debugfs endpoint, this should be a permissible slight change of semantics
in exchange for 18 fewer lines of code.

Signed-off-by: Mathias Rav <mathiasrav@gmail.com>
---
 .../lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c        | 22 +---------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
index 1ec6e3767d81..338ce34d6514 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
@@ -399,27 +399,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lprocfs_rd_uint);
 int lprocfs_wr_uint(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
 		    unsigned long count, void *data)
 {
-	unsigned *p = data;
-	char dummy[MAX_STRING_SIZE + 1], *end;
-	unsigned long tmp;
-
-	if (count >= sizeof(dummy))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if (count == 0)
-		return 0;
-
-	if (copy_from_user(dummy, buffer, count))
-		return -EFAULT;
-
-	dummy[count] = '\0';
-
-	tmp = simple_strtoul(dummy, &end, 0);
-	if (dummy == end)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	*p = (unsigned int)tmp;
-	return count;
+	return kstrtouint_from_user(buffer, count, 0, (unsigned int *)data);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(lprocfs_wr_uint);
 
-- 
2.12.2

[PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: lprocfs: Use seq_puts

[Mathias Rav]

Replace all occurrences of seq_printf with no formatting directives
in lprocfs_status.c with seq_puts.

Reported by checkpatch.pl: "WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf".

Signed-off-by: Mathias Rav <mathiasrav@gmail.com>
---
 .../staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c  | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
index 338ce34d6514..b5e0e46777ea 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
@@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static int obd_import_flags2str(struct obd_import *imp, struct seq_file *m)
 	bool first = true;
 
 	if (imp->imp_obd->obd_no_recov) {
-		seq_printf(m, "no_recov");
+		seq_puts(m, "no_recov");
 		first = false;
 	}
 
@@ -782,15 +782,15 @@ int lprocfs_rd_import(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 		   imp->imp_connect_data.ocd_instance);
 	obd_connect_seq_flags2str(m, imp->imp_connect_data.ocd_connect_flags,
 				  ", ");
-	seq_printf(m, " ]\n");
+	seq_puts(m, " ]\n");
 	obd_connect_data_seqprint(m, ocd);
-	seq_printf(m, "    import_flags: [ ");
+	seq_puts(m, "    import_flags: [ ");
 	obd_import_flags2str(imp, m);
 
-	seq_printf(m,
-		   " ]\n"
-		   "    connection:\n"
-		   "       failover_nids: [ ");
+	seq_puts(m,
+		 " ]\n"
+		 "    connection:\n"
+		 "       failover_nids: [ ");
 	spin_lock(&imp->imp_lock);
 	j = 0;
 	list_for_each_entry(conn, &imp->imp_conn_list, oic_item) {
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ int lprocfs_rd_state(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 
 	seq_printf(m, "current_state: %s\n",
 		   ptlrpc_import_state_name(imp->imp_state));
-	seq_printf(m, "state_history:\n");
+	seq_puts(m, "state_history:\n");
 	k = imp->imp_state_hist_idx;
 	for (j = 0; j < IMP_STATE_HIST_LEN; j++) {
 		struct import_state_hist *ish =
@@ -945,7 +945,7 @@ int lprocfs_at_hist_helper(struct seq_file *m, struct adaptive_timeout *at)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < AT_BINS; i++)
 		seq_printf(m, "%3u ", at->at_hist[i]);
-	seq_printf(m, "\n");
+	seq_puts(m, "\n");
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(lprocfs_at_hist_helper);
@@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ int lprocfs_rd_connect_flags(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 	flags = obd->u.cli.cl_import->imp_connect_data.ocd_connect_flags;
 	seq_printf(m, "flags=%#llx\n", flags);
 	obd_connect_seq_flags2str(m, flags, "\n");
-	seq_printf(m, "\n");
+	seq_puts(m, "\n");
 	up_read(&obd->u.cli.cl_sem);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.12.2

[lustre-devel] [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: lprocfs: Use seq_puts

[Mathias Rav]

Replace all occurrences of seq_printf with no formatting directives
in lprocfs_status.c with seq_puts.

Reported by checkpatch.pl: "WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf".

Signed-off-by: Mathias Rav <mathiasrav@gmail.com>
---
 .../staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c  | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
index 338ce34d6514..b5e0e46777ea 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
@@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static int obd_import_flags2str(struct obd_import *imp, struct seq_file *m)
 	bool first = true;
 
 	if (imp->imp_obd->obd_no_recov) {
-		seq_printf(m, "no_recov");
+		seq_puts(m, "no_recov");
 		first = false;
 	}
 
@@ -782,15 +782,15 @@ int lprocfs_rd_import(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 		   imp->imp_connect_data.ocd_instance);
 	obd_connect_seq_flags2str(m, imp->imp_connect_data.ocd_connect_flags,
 				  ", ");
-	seq_printf(m, " ]\n");
+	seq_puts(m, " ]\n");
 	obd_connect_data_seqprint(m, ocd);
-	seq_printf(m, "    import_flags: [ ");
+	seq_puts(m, "    import_flags: [ ");
 	obd_import_flags2str(imp, m);
 
-	seq_printf(m,
-		   " ]\n"
-		   "    connection:\n"
-		   "       failover_nids: [ ");
+	seq_puts(m,
+		 " ]\n"
+		 "    connection:\n"
+		 "       failover_nids: [ ");
 	spin_lock(&imp->imp_lock);
 	j = 0;
 	list_for_each_entry(conn, &imp->imp_conn_list, oic_item) {
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ int lprocfs_rd_state(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 
 	seq_printf(m, "current_state: %s\n",
 		   ptlrpc_import_state_name(imp->imp_state));
-	seq_printf(m, "state_history:\n");
+	seq_puts(m, "state_history:\n");
 	k = imp->imp_state_hist_idx;
 	for (j = 0; j < IMP_STATE_HIST_LEN; j++) {
 		struct import_state_hist *ish =
@@ -945,7 +945,7 @@ int lprocfs_at_hist_helper(struct seq_file *m, struct adaptive_timeout *at)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < AT_BINS; i++)
 		seq_printf(m, "%3u ", at->at_hist[i]);
-	seq_printf(m, "\n");
+	seq_puts(m, "\n");
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(lprocfs_at_hist_helper);
@@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ int lprocfs_rd_connect_flags(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 	flags = obd->u.cli.cl_import->imp_connect_data.ocd_connect_flags;
 	seq_printf(m, "flags=%#llx\n", flags);
 	obd_connect_seq_flags2str(m, flags, "\n");
-	seq_printf(m, "\n");
+	seq_puts(m, "\n");
 	up_read(&obd->u.cli.cl_sem);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.12.2

Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: lprocfs: Use kstrtouint_from_user

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 12:13:38PM -0400, Mathias Rav wrote:
> Prefer kstrtouint_from_user to copy_from_user+simple_strtoul.
> 
> The helper function lprocfs_wr_uint() is only used to implement
> "dump_granted_max" in debugfs.
> 
> Note the slight change in semantics: The previous implementation using
> simple_strtoul allows garbage after the number, whereas kstrtox only allows
> a trailing line break. The previous implementation allowed a write of zero
> bytes whereas kstrtox will return -EINVAL. Since this only affects a single
> debugfs endpoint, this should be a permissible slight change of semantics
> in exchange for 18 fewer lines of code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Rav <mathiasrav@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c        | 22 +---------------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
> index 1ec6e3767d81..338ce34d6514 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
> @@ -399,27 +399,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lprocfs_rd_uint);
>  int lprocfs_wr_uint(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
>  		    unsigned long count, void *data)
>  {
> -	unsigned *p = data;
> -	char dummy[MAX_STRING_SIZE + 1], *end;
> -	unsigned long tmp;
> -
> -	if (count >= sizeof(dummy))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
> -	if (count == 0)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	if (copy_from_user(dummy, buffer, count))
> -		return -EFAULT;
> -
> -	dummy[count] = '\0';
> -
> -	tmp = simple_strtoul(dummy, &end, 0);
> -	if (dummy == end)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
> -	*p = (unsigned int)tmp;
> -	return count;
> +	return kstrtouint_from_user(buffer, count, 0, (unsigned int *)data);

Why not just delete this whole function and have the callers make this
call instead?  No need for unneeded wrapper functions of core kernel
calls.

thanks,

greg k-h

[lustre-devel] [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: lprocfs: Use kstrtouint_from_user

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 12:13:38PM -0400, Mathias Rav wrote:
> Prefer kstrtouint_from_user to copy_from_user+simple_strtoul.
> 
> The helper function lprocfs_wr_uint() is only used to implement
> "dump_granted_max" in debugfs.
> 
> Note the slight change in semantics: The previous implementation using
> simple_strtoul allows garbage after the number, whereas kstrtox only allows
> a trailing line break. The previous implementation allowed a write of zero
> bytes whereas kstrtox will return -EINVAL. Since this only affects a single
> debugfs endpoint, this should be a permissible slight change of semantics
> in exchange for 18 fewer lines of code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Rav <mathiasrav@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c        | 22 +---------------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
> index 1ec6e3767d81..338ce34d6514 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
> @@ -399,27 +399,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lprocfs_rd_uint);
>  int lprocfs_wr_uint(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
>  		    unsigned long count, void *data)
>  {
> -	unsigned *p = data;
> -	char dummy[MAX_STRING_SIZE + 1], *end;
> -	unsigned long tmp;
> -
> -	if (count >= sizeof(dummy))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
> -	if (count == 0)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	if (copy_from_user(dummy, buffer, count))
> -		return -EFAULT;
> -
> -	dummy[count] = '\0';
> -
> -	tmp = simple_strtoul(dummy, &end, 0);
> -	if (dummy == end)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
> -	*p = (unsigned int)tmp;
> -	return count;
> +	return kstrtouint_from_user(buffer, count, 0, (unsigned int *)data);

Why not just delete this whole function and have the callers make this
call instead?  No need for unneeded wrapper functions of core kernel
calls.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: lprocfs: Use kstrtouint_from_user

[Dilger, Andreas]

On May 18, 2017, at 15:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 12:13:38PM -0400, Mathias Rav wrote:
>> Prefer kstrtouint_from_user to copy_from_user+simple_strtoul.
>> 
>> The helper function lprocfs_wr_uint() is only used to implement
>> "dump_granted_max" in debugfs.
>> 
>> Note the slight change in semantics: The previous implementation using
>> simple_strtoul allows garbage after the number, whereas kstrtox only allows
>> a trailing line break. The previous implementation allowed a write of zero
>> bytes whereas kstrtox will return -EINVAL. Since this only affects a single
>> debugfs endpoint, this should be a permissible slight change of semantics
>> in exchange for 18 fewer lines of code.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Mathias Rav <mathiasrav@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> .../lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c        | 22 +---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
>> index 1ec6e3767d81..338ce34d6514 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
>> @@ -399,27 +399,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lprocfs_rd_uint);
>> int lprocfs_wr_uint(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
>> 		    unsigned long count, void *data)
>> {
>> -	unsigned *p = data;
>> -	char dummy[MAX_STRING_SIZE + 1], *end;
>> -	unsigned long tmp;
>> -
>> -	if (count >= sizeof(dummy))
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>> -
>> -	if (count == 0)
>> -		return 0;
>> -
>> -	if (copy_from_user(dummy, buffer, count))
>> -		return -EFAULT;
>> -
>> -	dummy[count] = '\0';
>> -
>> -	tmp = simple_strtoul(dummy, &end, 0);
>> -	if (dummy == end)
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>> -
>> -	*p = (unsigned int)tmp;
>> -	return count;
>> +	return kstrtouint_from_user(buffer, count, 0, (unsigned int *)data);
> 
> Why not just delete this whole function and have the callers make this
> call instead?  No need for unneeded wrapper functions of core kernel
> calls.

Even better, it looks like this function has no callers on the client and could just
be deleted entirely.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation

[lustre-devel] [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: lprocfs: Use kstrtouint_from_user

[Dilger, Andreas]

On May 18, 2017, at 15:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 12:13:38PM -0400, Mathias Rav wrote:
>> Prefer kstrtouint_from_user to copy_from_user+simple_strtoul.
>> 
>> The helper function lprocfs_wr_uint() is only used to implement
>> "dump_granted_max" in debugfs.
>> 
>> Note the slight change in semantics: The previous implementation using
>> simple_strtoul allows garbage after the number, whereas kstrtox only allows
>> a trailing line break. The previous implementation allowed a write of zero
>> bytes whereas kstrtox will return -EINVAL. Since this only affects a single
>> debugfs endpoint, this should be a permissible slight change of semantics
>> in exchange for 18 fewer lines of code.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Mathias Rav <mathiasrav@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> .../lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c        | 22 +---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
>> index 1ec6e3767d81..338ce34d6514 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
>> @@ -399,27 +399,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lprocfs_rd_uint);
>> int lprocfs_wr_uint(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
>> 		    unsigned long count, void *data)
>> {
>> -	unsigned *p = data;
>> -	char dummy[MAX_STRING_SIZE + 1], *end;
>> -	unsigned long tmp;
>> -
>> -	if (count >= sizeof(dummy))
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>> -
>> -	if (count == 0)
>> -		return 0;
>> -
>> -	if (copy_from_user(dummy, buffer, count))
>> -		return -EFAULT;
>> -
>> -	dummy[count] = '\0';
>> -
>> -	tmp = simple_strtoul(dummy, &end, 0);
>> -	if (dummy == end)
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>> -
>> -	*p = (unsigned int)tmp;
>> -	return count;
>> +	return kstrtouint_from_user(buffer, count, 0, (unsigned int *)data);
> 
> Why not just delete this whole function and have the callers make this
> call instead?  No need for unneeded wrapper functions of core kernel
> calls.

Even better, it looks like this function has no callers on the client and could just
be deleted entirely.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation

Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: lprocfs: Use kstrtouint_from_user

[Mathias Rav]

On Thu, 18 May 2017 14:48:25 +0000
"Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com> wrote:

> On May 18, 2017, at 15:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 12:13:38PM -0400, Mathias Rav wrote:  
> >> Prefer kstrtouint_from_user to copy_from_user+simple_strtoul.
> >> 
> >> The helper function lprocfs_wr_uint() is only used to implement
> >> "dump_granted_max" in debugfs.
> >> 
> >> Note the slight change in semantics: The previous implementation using
> >> simple_strtoul allows garbage after the number, whereas kstrtox only allows
> >> a trailing line break. The previous implementation allowed a write of zero
> >> bytes whereas kstrtox will return -EINVAL. Since this only affects a single
> >> debugfs endpoint, this should be a permissible slight change of semantics
> >> in exchange for 18 fewer lines of code.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Mathias Rav <mathiasrav@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c        | 22 +---------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
> >> index 1ec6e3767d81..338ce34d6514 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
> >> @@ -399,27 +399,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lprocfs_rd_uint);
> >> int lprocfs_wr_uint(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
> >> 		    unsigned long count, void *data)
> >> {
> >> -	unsigned *p = data;
> >> -	char dummy[MAX_STRING_SIZE + 1], *end;
> >> -	unsigned long tmp;
> >> -
> >> -	if (count >= sizeof(dummy))
> >> -		return -EINVAL;
> >> -
> >> -	if (count == 0)
> >> -		return 0;
> >> -
> >> -	if (copy_from_user(dummy, buffer, count))
> >> -		return -EFAULT;
> >> -
> >> -	dummy[count] = '\0';
> >> -
> >> -	tmp = simple_strtoul(dummy, &end, 0);
> >> -	if (dummy == end)
> >> -		return -EINVAL;
> >> -
> >> -	*p = (unsigned int)tmp;
> >> -	return count;
> >> +	return kstrtouint_from_user(buffer, count, 0, (unsigned int *)data);  
> > 
> > Why not just delete this whole function and have the callers make this
> > call instead?  No need for unneeded wrapper functions of core kernel
> > calls.  
> 
> Even better, it looks like this function has no callers on the client and could just
> be deleted entirely.

No, the functions lprocfs_{rd,wr}_uint are used once through a macro:
ldlm/ldlm_resource.c calls LPROC_SEQ_FOPS_RW_TYPE(ldlm_rw, uint)
to define ldlm_rw_uint_seq_{show,write}, which then calls
lprocfs_{rd,wr}_uint which in turn call seq_printf/kstrtouint_from_user.

It seems like much indirection for almost no gain besides hiding
access to ((seq_file *) file->private_data)->private in a macro.

If you agree, I will prepare a patch that switches ldlm_resource to
using the LPROC_SEQ_FOPS macro directly, which allows us to remove two
trivial wrappers.

/Mathias

[lustre-devel] [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: lprocfs: Use kstrtouint_from_user

[Mathias Rav]

On Thu, 18 May 2017 14:48:25 +0000
"Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com> wrote:

> On May 18, 2017, at 15:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 12:13:38PM -0400, Mathias Rav wrote:  
> >> Prefer kstrtouint_from_user to copy_from_user+simple_strtoul.
> >> 
> >> The helper function lprocfs_wr_uint() is only used to implement
> >> "dump_granted_max" in debugfs.
> >> 
> >> Note the slight change in semantics: The previous implementation using
> >> simple_strtoul allows garbage after the number, whereas kstrtox only allows
> >> a trailing line break. The previous implementation allowed a write of zero
> >> bytes whereas kstrtox will return -EINVAL. Since this only affects a single
> >> debugfs endpoint, this should be a permissible slight change of semantics
> >> in exchange for 18 fewer lines of code.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Mathias Rav <mathiasrav@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c        | 22 +---------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
> >> index 1ec6e3767d81..338ce34d6514 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
> >> @@ -399,27 +399,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lprocfs_rd_uint);
> >> int lprocfs_wr_uint(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
> >> 		    unsigned long count, void *data)
> >> {
> >> -	unsigned *p = data;
> >> -	char dummy[MAX_STRING_SIZE + 1], *end;
> >> -	unsigned long tmp;
> >> -
> >> -	if (count >= sizeof(dummy))
> >> -		return -EINVAL;
> >> -
> >> -	if (count == 0)
> >> -		return 0;
> >> -
> >> -	if (copy_from_user(dummy, buffer, count))
> >> -		return -EFAULT;
> >> -
> >> -	dummy[count] = '\0';
> >> -
> >> -	tmp = simple_strtoul(dummy, &end, 0);
> >> -	if (dummy == end)
> >> -		return -EINVAL;
> >> -
> >> -	*p = (unsigned int)tmp;
> >> -	return count;
> >> +	return kstrtouint_from_user(buffer, count, 0, (unsigned int *)data);  
> > 
> > Why not just delete this whole function and have the callers make this
> > call instead?  No need for unneeded wrapper functions of core kernel
> > calls.  
> 
> Even better, it looks like this function has no callers on the client and could just
> be deleted entirely.

No, the functions lprocfs_{rd,wr}_uint are used once through a macro:
ldlm/ldlm_resource.c calls LPROC_SEQ_FOPS_RW_TYPE(ldlm_rw, uint)
to define ldlm_rw_uint_seq_{show,write}, which then calls
lprocfs_{rd,wr}_uint which in turn call seq_printf/kstrtouint_from_user.

It seems like much indirection for almost no gain besides hiding
access to ((seq_file *) file->private_data)->private in a macro.

If you agree, I will prepare a patch that switches ldlm_resource to
using the LPROC_SEQ_FOPS macro directly, which allows us to remove two
trivial wrappers.

/Mathias

Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: lprocfs: Use kstrtouint_from_user

[Dilger, Andreas]

On May 18, 2017, at 17:13, Mathias Rav <mathiasrav@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 18 May 2017 14:48:25 +0000
> "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> On May 18, 2017, at 15:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 12:13:38PM -0400, Mathias Rav wrote:  
>>>> Prefer kstrtouint_from_user to copy_from_user+simple_strtoul.
>>>> 
>>>> The helper function lprocfs_wr_uint() is only used to implement
>>>> "dump_granted_max" in debugfs.
>>>> 
>>>> Note the slight change in semantics: The previous implementation using
>>>> simple_strtoul allows garbage after the number, whereas kstrtox only allows
>>>> a trailing line break. The previous implementation allowed a write of zero
>>>> bytes whereas kstrtox will return -EINVAL. Since this only affects a single
>>>> debugfs endpoint, this should be a permissible slight change of semantics
>>>> in exchange for 18 fewer lines of code.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mathias Rav <mathiasrav@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c        | 22 +---------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
>>>> index 1ec6e3767d81..338ce34d6514 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
>>>> @@ -399,27 +399,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lprocfs_rd_uint);
>>>> int lprocfs_wr_uint(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
>>>> 		    unsigned long count, void *data)
>>>> {
>>>> -	unsigned *p = data;
>>>> -	char dummy[MAX_STRING_SIZE + 1], *end;
>>>> -	unsigned long tmp;
>>>> -
>>>> -	if (count >= sizeof(dummy))
>>>> -		return -EINVAL;
>>>> -
>>>> -	if (count == 0)
>>>> -		return 0;
>>>> -
>>>> -	if (copy_from_user(dummy, buffer, count))
>>>> -		return -EFAULT;
>>>> -
>>>> -	dummy[count] = '\0';
>>>> -
>>>> -	tmp = simple_strtoul(dummy, &end, 0);
>>>> -	if (dummy == end)
>>>> -		return -EINVAL;
>>>> -
>>>> -	*p = (unsigned int)tmp;
>>>> -	return count;
>>>> +	return kstrtouint_from_user(buffer, count, 0, (unsigned int *)data);  
>>> 
>>> Why not just delete this whole function and have the callers make this
>>> call instead?  No need for unneeded wrapper functions of core kernel
>>> calls.  
>> 
>> Even better, it looks like this function has no callers on the client and could just
>> be deleted entirely.
> 
> No, the functions lprocfs_{rd,wr}_uint are used once through a macro:
> ldlm/ldlm_resource.c calls LPROC_SEQ_FOPS_RW_TYPE(ldlm_rw, uint)
> to define ldlm_rw_uint_seq_{show,write}, which then calls
> lprocfs_{rd,wr}_uint which in turn call seq_printf/kstrtouint_from_user.
> 
> It seems like much indirection for almost no gain besides hiding
> access to ((seq_file *) file->private_data)->private in a macro.
> 
> If you agree, I will prepare a patch that switches ldlm_resource to
> using the LPROC_SEQ_FOPS macro directly, which allows us to remove two
> trivial wrappers.

Please do.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation

[lustre-devel] [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: lprocfs: Use kstrtouint_from_user

[Dilger, Andreas]

On May 18, 2017, at 17:13, Mathias Rav <mathiasrav@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 18 May 2017 14:48:25 +0000
> "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> On May 18, 2017, at 15:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 12:13:38PM -0400, Mathias Rav wrote:  
>>>> Prefer kstrtouint_from_user to copy_from_user+simple_strtoul.
>>>> 
>>>> The helper function lprocfs_wr_uint() is only used to implement
>>>> "dump_granted_max" in debugfs.
>>>> 
>>>> Note the slight change in semantics: The previous implementation using
>>>> simple_strtoul allows garbage after the number, whereas kstrtox only allows
>>>> a trailing line break. The previous implementation allowed a write of zero
>>>> bytes whereas kstrtox will return -EINVAL. Since this only affects a single
>>>> debugfs endpoint, this should be a permissible slight change of semantics
>>>> in exchange for 18 fewer lines of code.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mathias Rav <mathiasrav@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c        | 22 +---------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
>>>> index 1ec6e3767d81..338ce34d6514 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
>>>> @@ -399,27 +399,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lprocfs_rd_uint);
>>>> int lprocfs_wr_uint(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
>>>> 		    unsigned long count, void *data)
>>>> {
>>>> -	unsigned *p = data;
>>>> -	char dummy[MAX_STRING_SIZE + 1], *end;
>>>> -	unsigned long tmp;
>>>> -
>>>> -	if (count >= sizeof(dummy))
>>>> -		return -EINVAL;
>>>> -
>>>> -	if (count == 0)
>>>> -		return 0;
>>>> -
>>>> -	if (copy_from_user(dummy, buffer, count))
>>>> -		return -EFAULT;
>>>> -
>>>> -	dummy[count] = '\0';
>>>> -
>>>> -	tmp = simple_strtoul(dummy, &end, 0);
>>>> -	if (dummy == end)
>>>> -		return -EINVAL;
>>>> -
>>>> -	*p = (unsigned int)tmp;
>>>> -	return count;
>>>> +	return kstrtouint_from_user(buffer, count, 0, (unsigned int *)data);  
>>> 
>>> Why not just delete this whole function and have the callers make this
>>> call instead?  No need for unneeded wrapper functions of core kernel
>>> calls.  
>> 
>> Even better, it looks like this function has no callers on the client and could just
>> be deleted entirely.
> 
> No, the functions lprocfs_{rd,wr}_uint are used once through a macro:
> ldlm/ldlm_resource.c calls LPROC_SEQ_FOPS_RW_TYPE(ldlm_rw, uint)
> to define ldlm_rw_uint_seq_{show,write}, which then calls
> lprocfs_{rd,wr}_uint which in turn call seq_printf/kstrtouint_from_user.
> 
> It seems like much indirection for almost no gain besides hiding
> access to ((seq_file *) file->private_data)->private in a macro.
> 
> If you agree, I will prepare a patch that switches ldlm_resource to
> using the LPROC_SEQ_FOPS macro directly, which allows us to remove two
> trivial wrappers.

Please do.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation