[Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2-test result on 4.14.0-rc7-1.gdbf3e9b-vanilla kernel

[Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2-test result on 4.14.0-rc7-1.gdbf3e9b-vanilla kernel

[Eric Ren]

Hi,

The testing result against the recent kernel looks good. The attachments are
overall results. If the detailed logs are needed, please let me know.

Pattern				Failed	Passed	Skipped	Total
DiscontigBgMultiNode 		0 	4 	0 	4
DiscontigBgSingleNode 		0 	5 	0 	5
MultipleNodes 			0 	9 	1 	10
SingleNode 			0 	18 	1 	19

Notes:
- This testing only use blocksize=4096 and clustersize=32768 to reduce the time;
- The 2 skipped cases are on purpose: filecheck and lvb_torture.

Cheers,
Eric

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: single_run.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6372 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/attachments/20171107/6c136d1a/attachment.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: multiple-run-x86_64-2017-11-06-19-57-44.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1072 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/attachments/20171107/6c136d1a/attachment-0001.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2017-11-06-21-24-07-discontig-bg-single-run.log
Type: text/x-log
Size: 527 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/attachments/20171107/6c136d1a/attachment.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2017-11-07-01-35-34-discontig-bg-multiple-run.log
Type: text/x-log
Size: 539 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/attachments/20171107/6c136d1a/attachment-0001.bin 

[Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2-test result on 4.14.0-rc7-1.gdbf3e9b-vanilla kernel

[Changwei Ge]

Hi Eric,

On 2017/11/7 10:33, Eric Ren wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The testing result against the recent kernel looks good. The attachments are
> overall results. If the detailed logs are needed, please let me know.
> 
> Pattern				Failed	Passed	Skipped	Total
> DiscontigBgMultiNode 		0 	4 	0 	4
> DiscontigBgSingleNode 		0 	5 	0 	5
> MultipleNodes 			0 	9 	1 	10
> SingleNode 			0 	18 	1 	19

18 SingleNode cases were failed. Is that normal?

> 
> Notes:
> - This testing only use blocksize=4096 and clustersize=32768 to reduce the time;
> - The 2 skipped cases are on purpose: filecheck and lvb_torture.
> 

I wonder why case - 'lvb_torture' is skipped on purpose?

Thanks,
Changwei

> Cheers,
> Eric
> 

[Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2-test result on 4.14.0-rc7-1.gdbf3e9b-vanilla kernel

[Eric Ren]

Hi,

On 11/07/2017 10:43 AM, Changwei Ge wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 2017/11/7 10:33, Eric Ren wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The testing result against the recent kernel looks good. The attachments are
>> overall results. If the detailed logs are needed, please let me know.
>>
>> Pattern				Failed	Passed	Skipped	Total
>> DiscontigBgMultiNode 		0 	4 	0 	4
>> DiscontigBgSingleNode 		0 	5 	0 	5
>> MultipleNodes 			0 	9 	1 	10
>> SingleNode 			0 	18 	1 	19
> 18 SingleNode cases were failed. Is that normal?

It's 18 passed. Sorry, the format is little messy, please see the 
attachment.

>
>> Notes:
>> - This testing only use blocksize=4096 and clustersize=32768 to reduce the time;
>> - The 2 skipped cases are on purpose: filecheck and lvb_torture.
>>
> I wonder why case - 'lvb_torture' is skipped on purpose?
We are using fsdlm, unfortunately this test case uses some user space 
API that fsdlm plugin doesn't implement :)

Thanks,
Eric