From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>, Roy Luo <royluo@google.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mt76x2e hardware restart
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 18:31:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <96f43a2103a9f2be152c53f867f5805c@natalenko.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7695bc79d40bbc96744a639b1243027@natalenko.name>
Hello.
On 15.10.2019 18:52, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> Thanks for the answer and the IRC discussion. As agreed I've applied
> [1] and [2], and have just swapped the card to try it again. So far,
> it works fine in 5 GHz band in 802.11ac mode as an AP.
>
> I'll give it more load with my phone over evening, and we can discuss
> what to do next (if needed) tomorrow again. Or feel free to drop me an
> email today.
>
> Thanks for your efforts.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/LorenzoBianconi/wireless-drivers-next/commit/cf3436c42a297967235a9c9778620c585100529e.patch
> [2]
> https://github.com/LorenzoBianconi/wireless-drivers-next/commit/aad256eb62620f9646d39c1aa69234f50c89eed8.patch
As agreed, here are iperf3 results, AP to STA distance is 2 meters.
Client sends, TCP:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 70.4 MBytes 59.0 Mbits/sec 3800
sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.03 sec 70.0 MBytes 58.6 Mbits/sec
receiver
Client receives, TCP:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.06 sec 196 MBytes 163 Mbits/sec 3081
sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 191 MBytes 160 Mbits/sec
receiver
Client sends, UDP, 128 streams:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter
Lost/Total Datagrams
[SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 160 MBytes 134 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/115894
(0%) sender
[SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 160 MBytes 134 Mbits/sec 0.347 ms 0/115892
(0%) receiver
Client receives, UDP, 128 streams:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter
Lost/Total Datagrams
[SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 119 MBytes 99.4 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/85888
(0%) sender
[SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 119 MBytes 99.5 Mbits/sec 0.877 ms 0/85888
(0%) receiver
Given the HW is not the most powerful, the key point here is that
nothing crashed after doing these tests.
--
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Roy Luo <royluo@google.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Subject: Re: mt76x2e hardware restart
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 18:31:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <96f43a2103a9f2be152c53f867f5805c@natalenko.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7695bc79d40bbc96744a639b1243027@natalenko.name>
Hello.
On 15.10.2019 18:52, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> Thanks for the answer and the IRC discussion. As agreed I've applied
> [1] and [2], and have just swapped the card to try it again. So far,
> it works fine in 5 GHz band in 802.11ac mode as an AP.
>
> I'll give it more load with my phone over evening, and we can discuss
> what to do next (if needed) tomorrow again. Or feel free to drop me an
> email today.
>
> Thanks for your efforts.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/LorenzoBianconi/wireless-drivers-next/commit/cf3436c42a297967235a9c9778620c585100529e.patch
> [2]
> https://github.com/LorenzoBianconi/wireless-drivers-next/commit/aad256eb62620f9646d39c1aa69234f50c89eed8.patch
As agreed, here are iperf3 results, AP to STA distance is 2 meters.
Client sends, TCP:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 70.4 MBytes 59.0 Mbits/sec 3800
sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.03 sec 70.0 MBytes 58.6 Mbits/sec
receiver
Client receives, TCP:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.06 sec 196 MBytes 163 Mbits/sec 3081
sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 191 MBytes 160 Mbits/sec
receiver
Client sends, UDP, 128 streams:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter
Lost/Total Datagrams
[SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 160 MBytes 134 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/115894
(0%) sender
[SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 160 MBytes 134 Mbits/sec 0.347 ms 0/115892
(0%) receiver
Client receives, UDP, 128 streams:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter
Lost/Total Datagrams
[SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 119 MBytes 99.4 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/85888
(0%) sender
[SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 119 MBytes 99.5 Mbits/sec 0.877 ms 0/85888
(0%) receiver
Given the HW is not the most powerful, the key point here is that
nothing crashed after doing these tests.
--
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-16 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-19 16:24 mt76x2e hardware restart Oleksandr Natalenko
2019-09-19 16:24 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2019-09-19 21:22 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2019-09-19 21:22 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2019-09-20 6:07 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2019-09-20 6:07 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2019-10-12 16:50 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-10-12 16:50 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-10-13 3:30 ` [PATCH] mt76: mt76x2: disable pcie_aspm by default kbuild test robot
2019-10-13 3:30 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-13 3:30 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-15 16:52 ` mt76x2e hardware restart Oleksandr Natalenko
2019-10-15 16:52 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2019-10-15 16:52 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2019-10-16 16:31 ` Oleksandr Natalenko [this message]
2019-10-16 16:31 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2019-10-16 16:38 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-10-16 16:38 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-10-23 8:50 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-10-23 8:50 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-10-23 8:50 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2019-10-23 16:25 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2019-10-23 16:25 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2019-10-23 16:25 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2019-10-24 9:43 ` Daniel Golle
2019-10-24 9:43 ` Daniel Golle
2019-10-24 9:43 ` Daniel Golle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=96f43a2103a9f2be152c53f867f5805c@natalenko.name \
--to=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=royluo@google.com \
--cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.