* [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: exynos: Fix missing empty reg/ranges property regulators on Trats @ 2020-06-29 20:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2020-06-29 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sylwester Nawrocki Cc: Rob Herring, Kukjin Kim, Marek Szyprowski, Alim Akhtar, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Chanwoo Choi, Pankaj Dubey, Krzysztof Kozlowski Remove the regulators node entirely because its children do not have any unit addresses. This fixes DTC warning: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /regulators/regulator-0: missing or empty reg/ranges property Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> --- Changes since v1: 1. Remove the node, not only compatible, as pointed out by Sylwester. --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts | 98 ++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts index 3d791db6095c..5cc96f04a4fa 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts @@ -30,62 +30,58 @@ stdout-path = "serial2:115200n8"; }; - regulators { - compatible = "simple-bus"; - - vemmc_reg: regulator-0 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; - regulator-name = "VMEM_VDD_2.8V"; - regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; - regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; - gpio = <&gpk0 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; - enable-active-high; - }; + vemmc_reg: regulator-0 { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "VMEM_VDD_2.8V"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; + gpio = <&gpk0 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + enable-active-high; + }; - tsp_reg: regulator-1 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; - regulator-name = "TSP_FIXED_VOLTAGES"; - regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; - regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; - gpio = <&gpl0 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; - enable-active-high; - }; + tsp_reg: regulator-1 { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "TSP_FIXED_VOLTAGES"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; + gpio = <&gpl0 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + enable-active-high; + }; - cam_af_28v_reg: regulator-2 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; - regulator-name = "8M_AF_2.8V_EN"; - regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; - regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; - gpio = <&gpk1 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; - enable-active-high; - }; + cam_af_28v_reg: regulator-2 { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "8M_AF_2.8V_EN"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; + gpio = <&gpk1 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + enable-active-high; + }; - cam_io_en_reg: regulator-3 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; - regulator-name = "CAM_IO_EN"; - regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; - regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; - gpio = <&gpe2 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; - enable-active-high; - }; + cam_io_en_reg: regulator-3 { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "CAM_IO_EN"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; + gpio = <&gpe2 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + enable-active-high; + }; - cam_io_12v_reg: regulator-4 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; - regulator-name = "8M_1.2V_EN"; - regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>; - regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>; - gpio = <&gpe2 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; - enable-active-high; - }; + cam_io_12v_reg: regulator-4 { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "8M_1.2V_EN"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>; + gpio = <&gpe2 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + enable-active-high; + }; - vt_core_15v_reg: regulator-5 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; - regulator-name = "VT_CORE_1.5V"; - regulator-min-microvolt = <1500000>; - regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>; - gpio = <&gpe2 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; - enable-active-high; - }; + vt_core_15v_reg: regulator-5 { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "VT_CORE_1.5V"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1500000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>; + gpio = <&gpe2 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + enable-active-high; }; gpio-keys { -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: exynos: Fix missing empty reg/ranges property regulators on Trats @ 2020-06-29 20:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2020-06-29 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sylwester Nawrocki Cc: devicetree, linux-samsung-soc, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Pankaj Dubey, linux-kernel, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Chanwoo Choi, Rob Herring, Kukjin Kim, Alim Akhtar, linux-arm-kernel, Marek Szyprowski Remove the regulators node entirely because its children do not have any unit addresses. This fixes DTC warning: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /regulators/regulator-0: missing or empty reg/ranges property Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> --- Changes since v1: 1. Remove the node, not only compatible, as pointed out by Sylwester. --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts | 98 ++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts index 3d791db6095c..5cc96f04a4fa 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts @@ -30,62 +30,58 @@ stdout-path = "serial2:115200n8"; }; - regulators { - compatible = "simple-bus"; - - vemmc_reg: regulator-0 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; - regulator-name = "VMEM_VDD_2.8V"; - regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; - regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; - gpio = <&gpk0 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; - enable-active-high; - }; + vemmc_reg: regulator-0 { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "VMEM_VDD_2.8V"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; + gpio = <&gpk0 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + enable-active-high; + }; - tsp_reg: regulator-1 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; - regulator-name = "TSP_FIXED_VOLTAGES"; - regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; - regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; - gpio = <&gpl0 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; - enable-active-high; - }; + tsp_reg: regulator-1 { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "TSP_FIXED_VOLTAGES"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; + gpio = <&gpl0 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + enable-active-high; + }; - cam_af_28v_reg: regulator-2 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; - regulator-name = "8M_AF_2.8V_EN"; - regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; - regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; - gpio = <&gpk1 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; - enable-active-high; - }; + cam_af_28v_reg: regulator-2 { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "8M_AF_2.8V_EN"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; + gpio = <&gpk1 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + enable-active-high; + }; - cam_io_en_reg: regulator-3 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; - regulator-name = "CAM_IO_EN"; - regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; - regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; - gpio = <&gpe2 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; - enable-active-high; - }; + cam_io_en_reg: regulator-3 { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "CAM_IO_EN"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; + gpio = <&gpe2 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + enable-active-high; + }; - cam_io_12v_reg: regulator-4 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; - regulator-name = "8M_1.2V_EN"; - regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>; - regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>; - gpio = <&gpe2 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; - enable-active-high; - }; + cam_io_12v_reg: regulator-4 { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "8M_1.2V_EN"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>; + gpio = <&gpe2 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + enable-active-high; + }; - vt_core_15v_reg: regulator-5 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; - regulator-name = "VT_CORE_1.5V"; - regulator-min-microvolt = <1500000>; - regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>; - gpio = <&gpe2 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; - enable-active-high; - }; + vt_core_15v_reg: regulator-5 { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + regulator-name = "VT_CORE_1.5V"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1500000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>; + gpio = <&gpe2 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + enable-active-high; }; gpio-keys { -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: exynos: Fix missing empty reg/ranges property regulators on Trats 2020-06-29 20:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2020-06-30 6:27 ` Marek Szyprowski -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Marek Szyprowski @ 2020-06-30 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Sylwester Nawrocki Cc: Rob Herring, Kukjin Kim, Alim Akhtar, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Chanwoo Choi, Pankaj Dubey Hi Krzysztof, On 29.06.2020 22:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Remove the regulators node entirely because its children do not have any > unit addresses. This fixes DTC warning: > > Warning (simple_bus_reg): /regulators/regulator-0: missing or empty reg/ranges property > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> What about removing the regulators node from other boards: exynos4412-origen.dts, exynos5420-smdk5420.dts and exynos5250-arndale.dts? On the other hand, maybe it would be really easier to add missing address/size-cells properties to exynos4210-trats.dts/regulators node? Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: exynos: Fix missing empty reg/ranges property regulators on Trats @ 2020-06-30 6:27 ` Marek Szyprowski 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Marek Szyprowski @ 2020-06-30 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Sylwester Nawrocki Cc: devicetree, linux-samsung-soc, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Pankaj Dubey, linux-kernel, Chanwoo Choi, Rob Herring, Kukjin Kim, Alim Akhtar, linux-arm-kernel Hi Krzysztof, On 29.06.2020 22:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Remove the regulators node entirely because its children do not have any > unit addresses. This fixes DTC warning: > > Warning (simple_bus_reg): /regulators/regulator-0: missing or empty reg/ranges property > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> What about removing the regulators node from other boards: exynos4412-origen.dts, exynos5420-smdk5420.dts and exynos5250-arndale.dts? On the other hand, maybe it would be really easier to add missing address/size-cells properties to exynos4210-trats.dts/regulators node? Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: exynos: Fix missing empty reg/ranges property regulators on Trats 2020-06-30 6:27 ` Marek Szyprowski @ 2020-07-02 6:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2020-07-02 6:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Szyprowski Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki, Rob Herring, Kukjin Kim, Alim Akhtar, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Chanwoo Choi, Pankaj Dubey On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 08:27:01AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On 29.06.2020 22:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Remove the regulators node entirely because its children do not have any > > unit addresses. This fixes DTC warning: > > > > Warning (simple_bus_reg): /regulators/regulator-0: missing or empty reg/ranges property > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> > > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> > > What about removing the regulators node from other boards: > exynos4412-origen.dts, exynos5420-smdk5420.dts and exynos5250-arndale.dts? > > On the other hand, maybe it would be really easier to add missing > address/size-cells properties to exynos4210-trats.dts/regulators node? Indeed let's keep it consistent so in such case better to add here proper address/size-cells. Thanks for feedback! Best regards, Krzysztof ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: exynos: Fix missing empty reg/ranges property regulators on Trats @ 2020-07-02 6:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2020-07-02 6:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Szyprowski Cc: devicetree, linux-samsung-soc, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Sylwester Nawrocki, Pankaj Dubey, linux-kernel, Chanwoo Choi, Rob Herring, Kukjin Kim, Alim Akhtar, linux-arm-kernel On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 08:27:01AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On 29.06.2020 22:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Remove the regulators node entirely because its children do not have any > > unit addresses. This fixes DTC warning: > > > > Warning (simple_bus_reg): /regulators/regulator-0: missing or empty reg/ranges property > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> > > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> > > What about removing the regulators node from other boards: > exynos4412-origen.dts, exynos5420-smdk5420.dts and exynos5250-arndale.dts? > > On the other hand, maybe it would be really easier to add missing > address/size-cells properties to exynos4210-trats.dts/regulators node? Indeed let's keep it consistent so in such case better to add here proper address/size-cells. Thanks for feedback! Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: exynos: Fix missing empty reg/ranges property regulators on Trats 2020-07-02 6:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2020-07-02 7:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2020-07-02 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Szyprowski Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki, Rob Herring, Kukjin Kim, Alim Akhtar, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Chanwoo Choi, Pankaj Dubey On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 08:16:11AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 08:27:01AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > On 29.06.2020 22:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > Remove the regulators node entirely because its children do not have any > > > unit addresses. This fixes DTC warning: > > > > > > Warning (simple_bus_reg): /regulators/regulator-0: missing or empty reg/ranges property > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> > > > > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> > > > > What about removing the regulators node from other boards: > > exynos4412-origen.dts, exynos5420-smdk5420.dts and exynos5250-arndale.dts? > > > > On the other hand, maybe it would be really easier to add missing > > address/size-cells properties to exynos4210-trats.dts/regulators node? > > Indeed let's keep it consistent so in such case better to add here > proper address/size-cells. Actually more of DTSes put fixed regulators directly in root node, not under "regulators" node: exynos3250-monk.dts exynos4210-i9100.dts exynos4210-origen.dts exynos4210-universal_c210.dts exynos4412-galaxy-s3.dtsi exynos4412-midas.dtsi exynos4412-n710x.dts exynos4412-odroidx.dts exynos5250-smdk5250.dts exynos5250-snow-common.dtsi exynos5420-peach-pit.dts exynos5800-peach-pi.dts If we want it to be consistent, it's easier to remove the regulator nodes from exynos4412-origen.dts, exynos5420-smdk5420.dts and exynos5250-arndale.dts. Best regards, Krzysztof ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: exynos: Fix missing empty reg/ranges property regulators on Trats @ 2020-07-02 7:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2020-07-02 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Szyprowski Cc: devicetree, linux-samsung-soc, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Sylwester Nawrocki, Pankaj Dubey, linux-kernel, Chanwoo Choi, Rob Herring, Kukjin Kim, Alim Akhtar, linux-arm-kernel On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 08:16:11AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 08:27:01AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > On 29.06.2020 22:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > Remove the regulators node entirely because its children do not have any > > > unit addresses. This fixes DTC warning: > > > > > > Warning (simple_bus_reg): /regulators/regulator-0: missing or empty reg/ranges property > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> > > > > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> > > > > What about removing the regulators node from other boards: > > exynos4412-origen.dts, exynos5420-smdk5420.dts and exynos5250-arndale.dts? > > > > On the other hand, maybe it would be really easier to add missing > > address/size-cells properties to exynos4210-trats.dts/regulators node? > > Indeed let's keep it consistent so in such case better to add here > proper address/size-cells. Actually more of DTSes put fixed regulators directly in root node, not under "regulators" node: exynos3250-monk.dts exynos4210-i9100.dts exynos4210-origen.dts exynos4210-universal_c210.dts exynos4412-galaxy-s3.dtsi exynos4412-midas.dtsi exynos4412-n710x.dts exynos4412-odroidx.dts exynos5250-smdk5250.dts exynos5250-snow-common.dtsi exynos5420-peach-pit.dts exynos5800-peach-pi.dts If we want it to be consistent, it's easier to remove the regulator nodes from exynos4412-origen.dts, exynos5420-smdk5420.dts and exynos5250-arndale.dts. Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: exynos: Fix missing empty reg/ranges property regulators on Trats 2020-07-02 7:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2020-07-02 7:48 ` Marek Szyprowski -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Marek Szyprowski @ 2020-07-02 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki, Rob Herring, Kukjin Kim, Alim Akhtar, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Chanwoo Choi, Pankaj Dubey On 02.07.2020 09:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 08:16:11AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 08:27:01AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: >>> On 29.06.2020 22:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> Remove the regulators node entirely because its children do not have any >>>> unit addresses. This fixes DTC warning: >>>> >>>> Warning (simple_bus_reg): /regulators/regulator-0: missing or empty reg/ranges property >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> >>> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> >>> >>> What about removing the regulators node from other boards: >>> exynos4412-origen.dts, exynos5420-smdk5420.dts and exynos5250-arndale.dts? >>> >>> On the other hand, maybe it would be really easier to add missing >>> address/size-cells properties to exynos4210-trats.dts/regulators node? >> Indeed let's keep it consistent so in such case better to add here >> proper address/size-cells. > Actually more of DTSes put fixed regulators directly in root node, not > under "regulators" node: > exynos3250-monk.dts > exynos4210-i9100.dts > exynos4210-origen.dts > exynos4210-universal_c210.dts > exynos4412-galaxy-s3.dtsi > exynos4412-midas.dtsi > exynos4412-n710x.dts > exynos4412-odroidx.dts > exynos5250-smdk5250.dts > exynos5250-snow-common.dtsi > exynos5420-peach-pit.dts > exynos5800-peach-pi.dts > > If we want it to be consistent, it's easier to remove the regulator > nodes from exynos4412-origen.dts, exynos5420-smdk5420.dts and > exynos5250-arndale.dts. Feel free, I'm fine with both approaches. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: exynos: Fix missing empty reg/ranges property regulators on Trats @ 2020-07-02 7:48 ` Marek Szyprowski 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Marek Szyprowski @ 2020-07-02 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: devicetree, linux-samsung-soc, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Sylwester Nawrocki, Pankaj Dubey, linux-kernel, Chanwoo Choi, Rob Herring, Kukjin Kim, Alim Akhtar, linux-arm-kernel On 02.07.2020 09:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 08:16:11AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 08:27:01AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: >>> On 29.06.2020 22:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> Remove the regulators node entirely because its children do not have any >>>> unit addresses. This fixes DTC warning: >>>> >>>> Warning (simple_bus_reg): /regulators/regulator-0: missing or empty reg/ranges property >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> >>> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> >>> >>> What about removing the regulators node from other boards: >>> exynos4412-origen.dts, exynos5420-smdk5420.dts and exynos5250-arndale.dts? >>> >>> On the other hand, maybe it would be really easier to add missing >>> address/size-cells properties to exynos4210-trats.dts/regulators node? >> Indeed let's keep it consistent so in such case better to add here >> proper address/size-cells. > Actually more of DTSes put fixed regulators directly in root node, not > under "regulators" node: > exynos3250-monk.dts > exynos4210-i9100.dts > exynos4210-origen.dts > exynos4210-universal_c210.dts > exynos4412-galaxy-s3.dtsi > exynos4412-midas.dtsi > exynos4412-n710x.dts > exynos4412-odroidx.dts > exynos5250-smdk5250.dts > exynos5250-snow-common.dtsi > exynos5420-peach-pit.dts > exynos5800-peach-pi.dts > > If we want it to be consistent, it's easier to remove the regulator > nodes from exynos4412-origen.dts, exynos5420-smdk5420.dts and > exynos5250-arndale.dts. Feel free, I'm fine with both approaches. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-02 7:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CGME20200629210025eucas1p219a52e75ecce9e813aa80f0126780189@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2020-06-29 20:59 ` [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: exynos: Fix missing empty reg/ranges property regulators on Trats Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-06-29 20:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-06-30 6:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-06-30 6:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-07-02 6:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-07-02 6:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-07-02 7:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-07-02 7:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-07-02 7:48 ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-07-02 7:48 ` Marek Szyprowski
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.