* Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/102] 5.18.10-rc1 review
2022-07-05 11:57 Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-07-05 14:35 ` Jon Hunter
2022-07-05 17:06 ` Justin Forbes
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2022-07-05 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, slade, linux-tegra
On Tue, 05 Jul 2022 13:57:26 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.10 release.
> There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:55:56 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.18:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
130 tests: 130 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.18.10-rc1-g7622cfa48fbd
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/102] 5.18.10-rc1 review
2022-07-05 11:57 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-07-05 14:35 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2022-07-05 17:06 ` Justin Forbes
2022-07-05 17:31 ` Fenil Jain
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Justin Forbes @ 2022-07-05 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 01:57:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.10 release.
> There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:55:56 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le,
s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/102] 5.18.10-rc1 review
2022-07-05 11:57 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-07-05 14:35 ` Jon Hunter
2022-07-05 17:06 ` Justin Forbes
@ 2022-07-05 17:31 ` Fenil Jain
2022-07-05 18:55 ` Florian Fainelli
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Fenil Jain @ 2022-07-05 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: Shuah Khan, stable
Hey Greg,
Ran tests and boot tested on my system, no regression found
Tested-by: Fenil Jain <fkjainco@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/102] 5.18.10-rc1 review
2022-07-05 11:57 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-05 17:31 ` Fenil Jain
@ 2022-07-05 18:55 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-07-05 20:57 ` Ron Economos
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2022-07-05 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, slade
On 7/5/22 04:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.10 release.
> There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:55:56 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/102] 5.18.10-rc1 review
2022-07-05 11:57 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-05 18:55 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2022-07-05 20:57 ` Ron Economos
2022-07-06 6:17 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2022-07-05 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, slade
On 7/5/22 4:57 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.10 release.
> There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:55:56 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/102] 5.18.10-rc1 review
2022-07-05 11:57 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-05 20:57 ` Ron Economos
@ 2022-07-06 6:17 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-07-06 9:39 ` Rudi Heitbaum
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2022-07-06 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 17:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.10 release.
> There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:55:56 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.18.10-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.18.y
* git commit: 7622cfa48fbd5dd4e0d25abab655ab754baea9a4
* git describe: v5.18.9-103-g7622cfa48fbd
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.18.y/build/v5.18.9-103-g7622cfa48fbd
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.18.9)
No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.18.9)
No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.18.9)
No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.18.9)
No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary
total: 123504, pass: 112003, fail: 540, skip: 10283, xfail: 678
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 308 total, 308 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 62 total, 62 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 52 total, 49 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 48 total, 48 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 60 total, 54 passed, 6 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 22 passed, 5 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 56 total, 54 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* lt[
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* network-basic-tests[
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/102] 5.18.10-rc1 review
2022-07-05 11:57 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-06 6:17 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2022-07-06 9:39 ` Rudi Heitbaum
2022-07-06 10:13 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Rudi Heitbaum @ 2022-07-06 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 01:57:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.10 release.
> There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:55:56 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg,
5.18.10-rc1 tested.
Run tested on:
- Allwinner H6 (Tanix TX6)
- Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7)
In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- NXP iMX6
- NXP iMX8
- Qualcomm Dragonboard
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
- Samsung Exynos
Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
--
Rudi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/102] 5.18.10-rc1 review
2022-07-05 11:57 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-06 9:39 ` Rudi Heitbaum
@ 2022-07-06 10:13 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2022-07-06 13:45 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-07-06 23:52 ` Shuah Khan
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) @ 2022-07-06 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, slade
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 01:57:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.10 release.
> There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:55:56 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 12.1.1 20220627):
mips: 59 configs -> no failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1459
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1462
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1465
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/102] 5.18.10-rc1 review
2022-07-05 11:57 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-06 10:13 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
@ 2022-07-06 13:45 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-07-06 23:52 ` Shuah Khan
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2022-07-06 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 01:57:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.10 release.
> There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:55:56 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 489 pass: 489 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/102] 5.18.10-rc1 review
2022-07-05 11:57 Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-06 13:45 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2022-07-06 23:52 ` Shuah Khan
9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2022-07-06 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, slade,
Shuah Khan
On 7/5/22 5:57 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.10 release.
> There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:55:56 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread