[PATCH 0/2] TPM-CRB: Remove spurious error report when used with VFIO

[PATCH 0/2] TPM-CRB: Remove spurious error report when used with VFIO

[Eric Auger]

launching a guest with a TPM-CRB device and VFIO-PCI devices.

The CRB command buffer currently is a RAM MemoryRegion and given
its base address alignment, it causes an error report on
vfio_listener_region_add(). This series proposes to use a ram-device
region instead which helps in better assessing the dma map error
failure severity on VFIO side.

Best Regards

Eric

This series can be found at:
https://github.com/eauger/qemu/tree/tpm-crb-ram-device-v1

Eric Auger (2):
  tpm: CRB: Use ram_device for "tpm-crb-cmd" region
  hw/vfio/common: Silence ram device offset alignment error traces

 hw/tpm/meson.build   |  2 +-
 hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c     | 10 ++++++++--
 hw/vfio/common.c     | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 hw/vfio/trace-events |  1 +
 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.26.3

[PATCH 1/2] tpm: CRB: Use ram_device for "tpm-crb-cmd" region

[Eric Auger]

Representing the CRB cmd/response buffer as a standard
RAM region causes some trouble when the device is used
with VFIO. Indeed VFIO attempts to DMA_MAP this region
as usual RAM but this latter does not have a valid page
size alignment causing such an error report:
"vfio_listener_region_add received unaligned region".
To allow VFIO to detect that failing dma mapping
this region is not an issue, let's use a ram_device
memory region type instead.

The change in meson.build is required to include the
cpu.h header.

Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
---
 hw/tpm/meson.build |  2 +-
 hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c   | 10 ++++++++--
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/tpm/meson.build b/hw/tpm/meson.build
index 1c68d81d6a..3e74df945b 100644
--- a/hw/tpm/meson.build
+++ b/hw/tpm/meson.build
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS', if_true: files('tpm_tis_common.c'))
 softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS_ISA', if_true: files('tpm_tis_isa.c'))
 softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS_SYSBUS', if_true: files('tpm_tis_sysbus.c'))
-softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB', if_true: files('tpm_crb.c'))
 
+specific_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB', if_true: files('tpm_crb.c'))
 specific_ss.add(when: ['CONFIG_SOFTMMU', 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS'], if_true: files('tpm_ppi.c'))
 specific_ss.add(when: ['CONFIG_SOFTMMU', 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB'], if_true: files('tpm_ppi.c'))
 specific_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_SPAPR', if_true: files('tpm_spapr.c'))
diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
index 58ebd1469c..25f8e685e4 100644
--- a/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
+++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include "sysemu/tpm_backend.h"
 #include "sysemu/tpm_util.h"
 #include "sysemu/reset.h"
+#include "cpu.h"
 #include "tpm_prop.h"
 #include "tpm_ppi.h"
 #include "trace.h"
@@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ struct CRBState {
 
     bool ppi_enabled;
     TPMPPI ppi;
+    uint8_t *crb_cmd_buf;
 };
 typedef struct CRBState CRBState;
 
@@ -291,10 +293,14 @@ static void tpm_crb_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
         return;
     }
 
+    s->crb_cmd_buf = qemu_memalign(qemu_real_host_page_size,
+                                HOST_PAGE_ALIGN(CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE));
+
     memory_region_init_io(&s->mmio, OBJECT(s), &tpm_crb_memory_ops, s,
         "tpm-crb-mmio", sizeof(s->regs));
-    memory_region_init_ram(&s->cmdmem, OBJECT(s),
-        "tpm-crb-cmd", CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE, errp);
+    memory_region_init_ram_device_ptr(&s->cmdmem, OBJECT(s), "tpm-crb-cmd",
+                                      CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE, s->crb_cmd_buf);
+    vmstate_register_ram(&s->cmdmem, DEVICE(s));
 
     memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(),
         TPM_CRB_ADDR_BASE, &s->mmio);
-- 
2.26.3

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: CRB: Use ram_device for "tpm-crb-cmd" region

[Stefan Berger]

On 1/13/22 05:37, Eric Auger wrote:
> Representing the CRB cmd/response buffer as a standard
> RAM region causes some trouble when the device is used
> with VFIO. Indeed VFIO attempts to DMA_MAP this region
> as usual RAM but this latter does not have a valid page
> size alignment causing such an error report:
> "vfio_listener_region_add received unaligned region".
> To allow VFIO to detect that failing dma mapping
> this region is not an issue, let's use a ram_device
> memory region type instead.
>
> The change in meson.build is required to include the
> cpu.h header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> ---
>   hw/tpm/meson.build |  2 +-
>   hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c   | 10 ++++++++--
>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/tpm/meson.build b/hw/tpm/meson.build
> index 1c68d81d6a..3e74df945b 100644
> --- a/hw/tpm/meson.build
> +++ b/hw/tpm/meson.build
> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
>   softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS', if_true: files('tpm_tis_common.c'))
>   softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS_ISA', if_true: files('tpm_tis_isa.c'))
>   softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS_SYSBUS', if_true: files('tpm_tis_sysbus.c'))
> -softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB', if_true: files('tpm_crb.c'))
>
> +specific_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB', if_true: files('tpm_crb.c'))
>   specific_ss.add(when: ['CONFIG_SOFTMMU', 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS'], if_true: files('tpm_ppi.c'))
>   specific_ss.add(when: ['CONFIG_SOFTMMU', 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB'], if_true: files('tpm_ppi.c'))
>   specific_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_SPAPR', if_true: files('tpm_spapr.c'))
> diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> index 58ebd1469c..25f8e685e4 100644
> --- a/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> +++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>   #include "sysemu/tpm_backend.h"
>   #include "sysemu/tpm_util.h"
>   #include "sysemu/reset.h"
> +#include "cpu.h"
>   #include "tpm_prop.h"
>   #include "tpm_ppi.h"
>   #include "trace.h"
> @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ struct CRBState {
>
>       bool ppi_enabled;
>       TPMPPI ppi;
> +    uint8_t *crb_cmd_buf;
>   };
>   typedef struct CRBState CRBState;
>
> @@ -291,10 +293,14 @@ static void tpm_crb_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>           return;
>       }
>
> +    s->crb_cmd_buf = qemu_memalign(qemu_real_host_page_size,
> +                                HOST_PAGE_ALIGN(CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE));
> +

Do we need an unrealize function now to qemu_vfree() this memory?


>       memory_region_init_io(&s->mmio, OBJECT(s), &tpm_crb_memory_ops, s,
>           "tpm-crb-mmio", sizeof(s->regs));
> -    memory_region_init_ram(&s->cmdmem, OBJECT(s),
> -        "tpm-crb-cmd", CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE, errp);
> +    memory_region_init_ram_device_ptr(&s->cmdmem, OBJECT(s), "tpm-crb-cmd",
> +                                      CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE, s->crb_cmd_buf);
> +    vmstate_register_ram(&s->cmdmem, DEVICE(s));
>       memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(),
>           TPM_CRB_ADDR_BASE, &s->mmio);

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: CRB: Use ram_device for "tpm-crb-cmd" region

[Eric Auger]

Hi Stefan,

On 1/13/22 3:06 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
> On 1/13/22 05:37, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Representing the CRB cmd/response buffer as a standard
>> RAM region causes some trouble when the device is used
>> with VFIO. Indeed VFIO attempts to DMA_MAP this region
>> as usual RAM but this latter does not have a valid page
>> size alignment causing such an error report:
>> "vfio_listener_region_add received unaligned region".
>> To allow VFIO to detect that failing dma mapping
>> this region is not an issue, let's use a ram_device
>> memory region type instead.
>>
>> The change in meson.build is required to include the
>> cpu.h header.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   hw/tpm/meson.build |  2 +-
>>   hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c   | 10 ++++++++--
>>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/tpm/meson.build b/hw/tpm/meson.build
>> index 1c68d81d6a..3e74df945b 100644
>> --- a/hw/tpm/meson.build
>> +++ b/hw/tpm/meson.build
>> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
>>   softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS', if_true:
>> files('tpm_tis_common.c'))
>>   softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS_ISA', if_true:
>> files('tpm_tis_isa.c'))
>>   softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS_SYSBUS', if_true:
>> files('tpm_tis_sysbus.c'))
>> -softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB', if_true: files('tpm_crb.c'))
>>
>> +specific_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB', if_true: files('tpm_crb.c'))
>>   specific_ss.add(when: ['CONFIG_SOFTMMU', 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS'],
>> if_true: files('tpm_ppi.c'))
>>   specific_ss.add(when: ['CONFIG_SOFTMMU', 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB'],
>> if_true: files('tpm_ppi.c'))
>>   specific_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_SPAPR', if_true:
>> files('tpm_spapr.c'))
>> diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
>> index 58ebd1469c..25f8e685e4 100644
>> --- a/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
>> +++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>>   #include "sysemu/tpm_backend.h"
>>   #include "sysemu/tpm_util.h"
>>   #include "sysemu/reset.h"
>> +#include "cpu.h"
>>   #include "tpm_prop.h"
>>   #include "tpm_ppi.h"
>>   #include "trace.h"
>> @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ struct CRBState {
>>
>>       bool ppi_enabled;
>>       TPMPPI ppi;
>> +    uint8_t *crb_cmd_buf;
>>   };
>>   typedef struct CRBState CRBState;
>>
>> @@ -291,10 +293,14 @@ static void tpm_crb_realize(DeviceState *dev,
>> Error **errp)
>>           return;
>>       }
>>
>> +    s->crb_cmd_buf = qemu_memalign(qemu_real_host_page_size,
>> +                                HOST_PAGE_ALIGN(CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE));
>> +
>
> Do we need an unrealize function now to qemu_vfree() this memory?
I would say it is needed if the device can be hot-unplugged.
tpmppi->buf is not freeed either.

Thanks

Eric

>
>
>>       memory_region_init_io(&s->mmio, OBJECT(s), &tpm_crb_memory_ops, s,
>>           "tpm-crb-mmio", sizeof(s->regs));
>> -    memory_region_init_ram(&s->cmdmem, OBJECT(s),
>> -        "tpm-crb-cmd", CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE, errp);
>> +    memory_region_init_ram_device_ptr(&s->cmdmem, OBJECT(s),
>> "tpm-crb-cmd",
>> +                                      CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE,
>> s->crb_cmd_buf);
>> +    vmstate_register_ram(&s->cmdmem, DEVICE(s));
>>       memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(),
>>           TPM_CRB_ADDR_BASE, &s->mmio);
>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: CRB: Use ram_device for "tpm-crb-cmd" region

[Stefan Berger]

On 1/13/22 09:40, Eric Auger wrote:

> Hi Stefan,
>
> On 1/13/22 3:06 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> On 1/13/22 05:37, Eric Auger wrote:
>>> Representing the CRB cmd/response buffer as a standard
>>> RAM region causes some trouble when the device is used
>>> with VFIO. Indeed VFIO attempts to DMA_MAP this region
>>> as usual RAM but this latter does not have a valid page
>>> size alignment causing such an error report:
>>> "vfio_listener_region_add received unaligned region".
>>> To allow VFIO to detect that failing dma mapping
>>> this region is not an issue, let's use a ram_device
>>> memory region type instead.
>>>
>>> The change in meson.build is required to include the
>>> cpu.h header.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>    hw/tpm/meson.build |  2 +-
>>>    hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c   | 10 ++++++++--
>>>    2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/tpm/meson.build b/hw/tpm/meson.build
>>> index 1c68d81d6a..3e74df945b 100644
>>> --- a/hw/tpm/meson.build
>>> +++ b/hw/tpm/meson.build
>>> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
>>>    softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS', if_true:
>>> files('tpm_tis_common.c'))
>>>    softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS_ISA', if_true:
>>> files('tpm_tis_isa.c'))
>>>    softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS_SYSBUS', if_true:
>>> files('tpm_tis_sysbus.c'))
>>> -softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB', if_true: files('tpm_crb.c'))
>>>
>>> +specific_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB', if_true: files('tpm_crb.c'))
>>>    specific_ss.add(when: ['CONFIG_SOFTMMU', 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS'],
>>> if_true: files('tpm_ppi.c'))
>>>    specific_ss.add(when: ['CONFIG_SOFTMMU', 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB'],
>>> if_true: files('tpm_ppi.c'))
>>>    specific_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_SPAPR', if_true:
>>> files('tpm_spapr.c'))
>>> diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
>>> index 58ebd1469c..25f8e685e4 100644
>>> --- a/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
>>> +++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>>>    #include "sysemu/tpm_backend.h"
>>>    #include "sysemu/tpm_util.h"
>>>    #include "sysemu/reset.h"
>>> +#include "cpu.h"
>>>    #include "tpm_prop.h"
>>>    #include "tpm_ppi.h"
>>>    #include "trace.h"
>>> @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ struct CRBState {
>>>
>>>        bool ppi_enabled;
>>>        TPMPPI ppi;
>>> +    uint8_t *crb_cmd_buf;
>>>    };
>>>    typedef struct CRBState CRBState;
>>>
>>> @@ -291,10 +293,14 @@ static void tpm_crb_realize(DeviceState *dev,
>>> Error **errp)
>>>            return;
>>>        }
>>>
>>> +    s->crb_cmd_buf = qemu_memalign(qemu_real_host_page_size,
>>> +                                HOST_PAGE_ALIGN(CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE));
>>> +
>> Do we need an unrealize function now to qemu_vfree() this memory?
> I would say it is needed if the device can be hot-unplugged.
> tpmppi->buf is not freeed either.


Correct about PPI. My main concern would be the CRB related test cases 
that likely currently run without PPI but now could complain about a 
memory leak upon shutdown. I tried to compile with --enable-sanitizers 
and run the tests but it doesn't compile when the sanitizers are enabled.


FAILED: libcommon.fa.p/disas_i386.c.o
cc -m64 -mcx16 -Ilibcommon.fa.p -I../capstone/include/capstone 
-I../dtc/libfdt -I../slirp -I../slirp/src -I/usr/include/pixman-1 
-I/usr/include/p11-kit-1 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/sysprof-4 
-I/usr/include/libmount -I/usr/include/blkid -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0 
-fdiagnostics-color=auto -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Werror -std=gnu11 -O2 -g 
-isystem /home/stefanb/dev/qemu/linux-headers -isystem linux-headers 
-iquote . -iquote /home/stefanb/dev/qemu -iquote 
/home/stefanb/dev/qemu/include -iquote 
/home/stefanb/dev/qemu/disas/libvixl -iquote 
/home/stefanb/dev/qemu/tcg/i386 -pthread -fsanitize=undefined 
-fsanitize=address -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_GNU_SOURCE 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -Wstrict-prototypes 
-Wredundant-decls -Wundef -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes 
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fwrapv -Wold-style-declaration 
-Wold-style-definition -Wtype-limits -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k 
-Winit-self -Wignored-qualifiers -Wempty-body -Wnested-externs 
-Wendif-labels -Wexpansion-to-defined -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2 
-Wno-missing-include-dirs -Wno-shift-negative-value -Wno-psabi 
-fstack-protector-strong -fPIE -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 
-DNCURSES_WIDECHAR=1 -DSTRUCT_IOVEC_DEFINED -MD -MQ 
libcommon.fa.p/disas_i386.c.o -MF libcommon.fa.p/disas_i386.c.o.d -o 
libcommon.fa.p/disas_i386.c.o -c ../disas/i386.c
In file included from /usr/include/string.h:519,
                  from /home/stefanb/dev/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:87,
                  from ../disas/i386.c:34:
In function ?strcpy?,
     inlined from ?PNI_Fixup? at ../disas/i386.c:6434:4,
     inlined from ?PNI_Fixup? at ../disas/i386.c:6400:1:
/usr/include/bits/string_fortified.h:79:10: error: ?__builtin_memcpy? 
offset [0, 7] is out of the bounds [0, 0] [-Werror=array-bounds]
    79 |   return __builtin___strcpy_chk (__dest, __src, __glibc_objsize 
(__dest));
       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In function ?strcpy?,
     inlined from ?PNI_Fixup? at ../disas/i386.c:6427:4,
     inlined from ?PNI_Fixup? at ../disas/i386.c:6400:1:
/usr/include/bits/string_fortified.h:79:10: error: ?__builtin_memcpy? 
offset [0, 5] is out of the bounds [0, 0] [-Werror=array-bounds]
    79 |   return __builtin___strcpy_chk (__dest, __src, __glibc_objsize 
(__dest));
       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

    Stefan

>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
>
>>
>>>        memory_region_init_io(&s->mmio, OBJECT(s), &tpm_crb_memory_ops, s,
>>>            "tpm-crb-mmio", sizeof(s->regs));
>>> -    memory_region_init_ram(&s->cmdmem, OBJECT(s),
>>> -        "tpm-crb-cmd", CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE, errp);
>>> +    memory_region_init_ram_device_ptr(&s->cmdmem, OBJECT(s),
>>> "tpm-crb-cmd",
>>> +                                      CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE,
>>> s->crb_cmd_buf);
>>> +    vmstate_register_ram(&s->cmdmem, DEVICE(s));
>>>        memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(),
>>>            TPM_CRB_ADDR_BASE, &s->mmio);

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: CRB: Use ram_device for "tpm-crb-cmd" region

[Eric Auger]

Hi Stefan,

On 1/13/22 4:38 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 1/13/22 09:40, Eric Auger wrote:
>
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> On 1/13/22 3:06 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>>> On 1/13/22 05:37, Eric Auger wrote:
>>>> Representing the CRB cmd/response buffer as a standard
>>>> RAM region causes some trouble when the device is used
>>>> with VFIO. Indeed VFIO attempts to DMA_MAP this region
>>>> as usual RAM but this latter does not have a valid page
>>>> size alignment causing such an error report:
>>>> "vfio_listener_region_add received unaligned region".
>>>> To allow VFIO to detect that failing dma mapping
>>>> this region is not an issue, let's use a ram_device
>>>> memory region type instead.
>>>>
>>>> The change in meson.build is required to include the
>>>> cpu.h header.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    hw/tpm/meson.build |  2 +-
>>>>    hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c   | 10 ++++++++--
>>>>    2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/hw/tpm/meson.build b/hw/tpm/meson.build
>>>> index 1c68d81d6a..3e74df945b 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/tpm/meson.build
>>>> +++ b/hw/tpm/meson.build
>>>> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
>>>>    softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS', if_true:
>>>> files('tpm_tis_common.c'))
>>>>    softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS_ISA', if_true:
>>>> files('tpm_tis_isa.c'))
>>>>    softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS_SYSBUS', if_true:
>>>> files('tpm_tis_sysbus.c'))
>>>> -softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB', if_true: files('tpm_crb.c'))
>>>>
>>>> +specific_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB', if_true: files('tpm_crb.c'))
>>>>    specific_ss.add(when: ['CONFIG_SOFTMMU', 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS'],
>>>> if_true: files('tpm_ppi.c'))
>>>>    specific_ss.add(when: ['CONFIG_SOFTMMU', 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB'],
>>>> if_true: files('tpm_ppi.c'))
>>>>    specific_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_SPAPR', if_true:
>>>> files('tpm_spapr.c'))
>>>> diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
>>>> index 58ebd1469c..25f8e685e4 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
>>>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>>>>    #include "sysemu/tpm_backend.h"
>>>>    #include "sysemu/tpm_util.h"
>>>>    #include "sysemu/reset.h"
>>>> +#include "cpu.h"
>>>>    #include "tpm_prop.h"
>>>>    #include "tpm_ppi.h"
>>>>    #include "trace.h"
>>>> @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ struct CRBState {
>>>>
>>>>        bool ppi_enabled;
>>>>        TPMPPI ppi;
>>>> +    uint8_t *crb_cmd_buf;
>>>>    };
>>>>    typedef struct CRBState CRBState;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -291,10 +293,14 @@ static void tpm_crb_realize(DeviceState *dev,
>>>> Error **errp)
>>>>            return;
>>>>        }
>>>>
>>>> +    s->crb_cmd_buf = qemu_memalign(qemu_real_host_page_size,
>>>> +                                HOST_PAGE_ALIGN(CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE));
>>>> +
>>> Do we need an unrealize function now to qemu_vfree() this memory?
>> I would say it is needed if the device can be hot-unplugged.
>> tpmppi->buf is not freeed either.
>
>
> Correct about PPI. My main concern would be the CRB related test cases
> that likely currently run without PPI but now could complain about a
> memory leak upon shutdown. I tried to compile with --enable-sanitizers
> and run the tests but it doesn't compile when the sanitizers are enabled.
>
>
> FAILED: libcommon.fa.p/disas_i386.c.o
> cc -m64 -mcx16 -Ilibcommon.fa.p -I../capstone/include/capstone
> -I../dtc/libfdt -I../slirp -I../slirp/src -I/usr/include/pixman-1
> -I/usr/include/p11-kit-1 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
> -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/sysprof-4
> -I/usr/include/libmount -I/usr/include/blkid
> -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0 -fdiagnostics-color=auto -Wall
> -Winvalid-pch -Werror -std=gnu11 -O2 -g -isystem
> /home/stefanb/dev/qemu/linux-headers -isystem linux-headers -iquote .
> -iquote /home/stefanb/dev/qemu -iquote /home/stefanb/dev/qemu/include
> -iquote /home/stefanb/dev/qemu/disas/libvixl -iquote
> /home/stefanb/dev/qemu/tcg/i386 -pthread -fsanitize=undefined
> -fsanitize=address -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_GNU_SOURCE
> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wredundant-decls -Wundef -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes
> -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fwrapv -Wold-style-declaration
> -Wold-style-definition -Wtype-limits -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k
> -Winit-self -Wignored-qualifiers -Wempty-body -Wnested-externs
> -Wendif-labels -Wexpansion-to-defined -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2
> -Wno-missing-include-dirs -Wno-shift-negative-value -Wno-psabi
> -fstack-protector-strong -fPIE -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600
> -DNCURSES_WIDECHAR=1 -DSTRUCT_IOVEC_DEFINED -MD -MQ
> libcommon.fa.p/disas_i386.c.o -MF libcommon.fa.p/disas_i386.c.o.d -o
> libcommon.fa.p/disas_i386.c.o -c ../disas/i386.c
> In file included from /usr/include/string.h:519,
>                  from /home/stefanb/dev/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:87,
>                  from ../disas/i386.c:34:
> In function ?strcpy?,
>     inlined from ?PNI_Fixup? at ../disas/i386.c:6434:4,
>     inlined from ?PNI_Fixup? at ../disas/i386.c:6400:1:
> /usr/include/bits/string_fortified.h:79:10: error: ?__builtin_memcpy?
> offset [0, 7] is out of the bounds [0, 0] [-Werror=array-bounds]
>    79 |   return __builtin___strcpy_chk (__dest, __src,
> __glibc_objsize (__dest));
>       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In function ?strcpy?,
>     inlined from ?PNI_Fixup? at ../disas/i386.c:6427:4,
>     inlined from ?PNI_Fixup? at ../disas/i386.c:6400:1:
> /usr/include/bits/string_fortified.h:79:10: error: ?__builtin_memcpy?
> offset [0, 5] is out of the bounds [0, 0] [-Werror=array-bounds]
>    79 |   return __builtin___strcpy_chk (__dest, __src,
> __glibc_objsize (__dest));
>       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

thank you for the tests and above trial. Anyway I can add the unrealize
and deal with the deallocation of both buffers

Eric
>
>    Stefan
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>>
>>>>        memory_region_init_io(&s->mmio, OBJECT(s),
>>>> &tpm_crb_memory_ops, s,
>>>>            "tpm-crb-mmio", sizeof(s->regs));
>>>> -    memory_region_init_ram(&s->cmdmem, OBJECT(s),
>>>> -        "tpm-crb-cmd", CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE, errp);
>>>> +    memory_region_init_ram_device_ptr(&s->cmdmem, OBJECT(s),
>>>> "tpm-crb-cmd",
>>>> +                                      CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE,
>>>> s->crb_cmd_buf);
>>>> +    vmstate_register_ram(&s->cmdmem, DEVICE(s));
>>>>        memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(),
>>>>            TPM_CRB_ADDR_BASE, &s->mmio);
>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: CRB: Use ram_device for "tpm-crb-cmd" region

[Stefan Berger]

On 1/13/22 05:37, Eric Auger wrote:
> Representing the CRB cmd/response buffer as a standard
> RAM region causes some trouble when the device is used
> with VFIO. Indeed VFIO attempts to DMA_MAP this region
> as usual RAM but this latter does not have a valid page
> size alignment causing such an error report:
> "vfio_listener_region_add received unaligned region".
> To allow VFIO to detect that failing dma mapping
> this region is not an issue, let's use a ram_device
> memory region type instead.
>
> The change in meson.build is required to include the
> cpu.h header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Suspend/resume tested it:

Tested-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>


> ---
>   hw/tpm/meson.build |  2 +-
>   hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c   | 10 ++++++++--
>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/tpm/meson.build b/hw/tpm/meson.build
> index 1c68d81d6a..3e74df945b 100644
> --- a/hw/tpm/meson.build
> +++ b/hw/tpm/meson.build
> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
>   softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS', if_true: files('tpm_tis_common.c'))
>   softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS_ISA', if_true: files('tpm_tis_isa.c'))
>   softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS_SYSBUS', if_true: files('tpm_tis_sysbus.c'))
> -softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB', if_true: files('tpm_crb.c'))
>
> +specific_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB', if_true: files('tpm_crb.c'))
>   specific_ss.add(when: ['CONFIG_SOFTMMU', 'CONFIG_TPM_TIS'], if_true: files('tpm_ppi.c'))
>   specific_ss.add(when: ['CONFIG_SOFTMMU', 'CONFIG_TPM_CRB'], if_true: files('tpm_ppi.c'))
>   specific_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TPM_SPAPR', if_true: files('tpm_spapr.c'))
> diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> index 58ebd1469c..25f8e685e4 100644
> --- a/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> +++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>   #include "sysemu/tpm_backend.h"
>   #include "sysemu/tpm_util.h"
>   #include "sysemu/reset.h"
> +#include "cpu.h"
>   #include "tpm_prop.h"
>   #include "tpm_ppi.h"
>   #include "trace.h"
> @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ struct CRBState {
>
>       bool ppi_enabled;
>       TPMPPI ppi;
> +    uint8_t *crb_cmd_buf;
>   };
>   typedef struct CRBState CRBState;
>
> @@ -291,10 +293,14 @@ static void tpm_crb_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>           return;
>       }
>
> +    s->crb_cmd_buf = qemu_memalign(qemu_real_host_page_size,
> +                                HOST_PAGE_ALIGN(CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE));
> +
>       memory_region_init_io(&s->mmio, OBJECT(s), &tpm_crb_memory_ops, s,
>           "tpm-crb-mmio", sizeof(s->regs));
> -    memory_region_init_ram(&s->cmdmem, OBJECT(s),
> -        "tpm-crb-cmd", CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE, errp);
> +    memory_region_init_ram_device_ptr(&s->cmdmem, OBJECT(s), "tpm-crb-cmd",
> +                                      CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE, s->crb_cmd_buf);
> +    vmstate_register_ram(&s->cmdmem, DEVICE(s));
>
>       memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(),
>           TPM_CRB_ADDR_BASE, &s->mmio);

[PATCH 2/2] hw/vfio/common: Silence ram device offset alignment error traces

[Eric Auger]

Failing to DMA MAP a ram_device should not cause an error message.
This is currently happening with the TPM CRB command region and
this is causing confusion.

We may want to keep the trace for debug purpose though.

Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>

---

I am not totally clear why we do not fail on the non RAM device case
though.
---
 hw/vfio/common.c     | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 hw/vfio/trace-events |  1 +
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
index 080046e3f5..9caa560b07 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/common.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
@@ -884,7 +884,20 @@ static void vfio_listener_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
     if (unlikely((section->offset_within_address_space &
                   ~qemu_real_host_page_mask) !=
                  (section->offset_within_region & ~qemu_real_host_page_mask))) {
-        error_report("%s received unaligned region", __func__);
+        if (memory_region_is_ram_device(section->mr)) { /* just debug purpose */
+            trace_vfio_listener_region_add_bad_offset_alignment(
+                memory_region_name(section->mr),
+                section->offset_within_address_space,
+                section->offset_within_region, qemu_real_host_page_size);
+        } else { /* error case we don't want to be fatal */
+            error_report("%s received unaligned region %s iova=0x%"PRIx64
+                         " offset_within_region=0x%"PRIx64
+                         " qemu_real_host_page_mask=0x%"PRIx64,
+                         __func__, memory_region_name(section->mr),
+                         section->offset_within_address_space,
+                         section->offset_within_region,
+                         qemu_real_host_page_mask);
+        }
         return;
     }
 
diff --git a/hw/vfio/trace-events b/hw/vfio/trace-events
index 0ef1b5f4a6..ccd9d7610d 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/trace-events
+++ b/hw/vfio/trace-events
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ vfio_listener_region_add_skip(uint64_t start, uint64_t end) "SKIPPING region_add
 vfio_spapr_group_attach(int groupfd, int tablefd) "Attached groupfd %d to liobn fd %d"
 vfio_listener_region_add_iommu(uint64_t start, uint64_t end) "region_add [iommu] 0x%"PRIx64" - 0x%"PRIx64
 vfio_listener_region_add_ram(uint64_t iova_start, uint64_t iova_end, void *vaddr) "region_add [ram] 0x%"PRIx64" - 0x%"PRIx64" [%p]"
+vfio_listener_region_add_bad_offset_alignment(const char *name, uint64_t iova, uint64_t offset_within_region, uint64_t page_size) "Region \"%s\" @0x%"PRIx64", offset_within_region=0x%"PRIx64", qemu_real_host_page_mask=0x%"PRIx64 " cannot be mapped for DMA"
 vfio_listener_region_add_no_dma_map(const char *name, uint64_t iova, uint64_t size, uint64_t page_size) "Region \"%s\" 0x%"PRIx64" size=0x%"PRIx64" is not aligned to 0x%"PRIx64" and cannot be mapped for DMA"
 vfio_listener_region_del_skip(uint64_t start, uint64_t end) "SKIPPING region_del 0x%"PRIx64" - 0x%"PRIx64
 vfio_listener_region_del(uint64_t start, uint64_t end) "region_del 0x%"PRIx64" - 0x%"PRIx64
-- 
2.26.3

Re: [PATCH 2/2] hw/vfio/common: Silence ram device offset alignment error traces

[Stefan Berger]

On 1/13/22 05:37, Eric Auger wrote:
> Failing to DMA MAP a ram_device should not cause an error message.
> This is currently happening with the TPM CRB command region and
> this is causing confusion.
>
> We may want to keep the trace for debug purpose though.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>

Tested-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>


>
> ---
>
> I am not totally clear why we do not fail on the non RAM device case
> though.
> ---
>   hw/vfio/common.c     | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>   hw/vfio/trace-events |  1 +
>   2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
> index 080046e3f5..9caa560b07 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/common.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
> @@ -884,7 +884,20 @@ static void vfio_listener_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
>       if (unlikely((section->offset_within_address_space &
>                     ~qemu_real_host_page_mask) !=
>                    (section->offset_within_region & ~qemu_real_host_page_mask))) {
> -        error_report("%s received unaligned region", __func__);
> +        if (memory_region_is_ram_device(section->mr)) { /* just debug purpose */
> +            trace_vfio_listener_region_add_bad_offset_alignment(
> +                memory_region_name(section->mr),
> +                section->offset_within_address_space,
> +                section->offset_within_region, qemu_real_host_page_size);
> +        } else { /* error case we don't want to be fatal */
> +            error_report("%s received unaligned region %s iova=0x%"PRIx64
> +                         " offset_within_region=0x%"PRIx64
> +                         " qemu_real_host_page_mask=0x%"PRIx64,
> +                         __func__, memory_region_name(section->mr),
> +                         section->offset_within_address_space,
> +                         section->offset_within_region,
> +                         qemu_real_host_page_mask);
> +        }
>           return;
>       }
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/trace-events b/hw/vfio/trace-events
> index 0ef1b5f4a6..ccd9d7610d 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/trace-events
> +++ b/hw/vfio/trace-events
> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ vfio_listener_region_add_skip(uint64_t start, uint64_t end) "SKIPPING region_add
>   vfio_spapr_group_attach(int groupfd, int tablefd) "Attached groupfd %d to liobn fd %d"
>   vfio_listener_region_add_iommu(uint64_t start, uint64_t end) "region_add [iommu] 0x%"PRIx64" - 0x%"PRIx64
>   vfio_listener_region_add_ram(uint64_t iova_start, uint64_t iova_end, void *vaddr) "region_add [ram] 0x%"PRIx64" - 0x%"PRIx64" [%p]"
> +vfio_listener_region_add_bad_offset_alignment(const char *name, uint64_t iova, uint64_t offset_within_region, uint64_t page_size) "Region \"%s\" @0x%"PRIx64", offset_within_region=0x%"PRIx64", qemu_real_host_page_mask=0x%"PRIx64 " cannot be mapped for DMA"
>   vfio_listener_region_add_no_dma_map(const char *name, uint64_t iova, uint64_t size, uint64_t page_size) "Region \"%s\" 0x%"PRIx64" size=0x%"PRIx64" is not aligned to 0x%"PRIx64" and cannot be mapped for DMA"
>   vfio_listener_region_del_skip(uint64_t start, uint64_t end) "SKIPPING region_del 0x%"PRIx64" - 0x%"PRIx64
>   vfio_listener_region_del(uint64_t start, uint64_t end) "region_del 0x%"PRIx64" - 0x%"PRIx64