* [meta-security][PATCH 1/2] smack: Add new package
@ 2016-10-26 15:00 Armin Kuster
2016-10-26 15:00 ` [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] smack kernel: add smack kernel config fragments Armin Kuster
2016-10-28 2:29 ` [meta-security][PATCH 1/2] smack: Add new package Khem Raj
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Armin Kuster @ 2016-10-26 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akuster808, yocto
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
---
recipes-security/smack/files/run-ptest | 3 ++
.../smack/files/smack_generator_make_fixup.patch | 18 ++++++++++
recipes-security/smack/smack_1.3.0.bb | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 recipes-security/smack/files/run-ptest
create mode 100644 recipes-security/smack/files/smack_generator_make_fixup.patch
create mode 100644 recipes-security/smack/smack_1.3.0.bb
diff --git a/recipes-security/smack/files/run-ptest b/recipes-security/smack/files/run-ptest
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..049a9b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-security/smack/files/run-ptest
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+./tests/make_policies.bash ./tests/generator
+./tests/make_policies.bash ./tests/generator labels
diff --git a/recipes-security/smack/files/smack_generator_make_fixup.patch b/recipes-security/smack/files/smack_generator_make_fixup.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8bafc5e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-security/smack/files/smack_generator_make_fixup.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Upstream-Status: Pending
+
+Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
+
+
+Index: git/tests/Makefile
+===================================================================
+--- git.orig/tests/Makefile
++++ git/tests/Makefile
+@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ clean:
+ rm -rf ./out ./generator
+
+ generator: generator.c
+- gcc -Wall -O3 generator.c -o ./generator
++ ${CC} generator.c -o ./generator
+
+ policies: ./generator ./make_policies.bash
+ ./make_policies.bash ./generator
diff --git a/recipes-security/smack/smack_1.3.0.bb b/recipes-security/smack/smack_1.3.0.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..46d305e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-security/smack/smack_1.3.0.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+DESCRIPTION = "Selection of tools for developers working with Smack"
+HOMEPAGE = "https://github.com/smack-team/smack"
+SECTION = "Security/Access Control"
+LICENSE = "LGPL-2.1"
+
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=4fbd65380cdd255951079008b364516c"
+
+SRCREV = "478f68d182c5070f510482194d3e097b11c21907"
+SRC_URI = " \
+ git://github.com/smack-team/smack.git;branch=v1.3.x \
+ file://smack_generator_make_fixup.patch \
+ file://run-ptest"
+
+PV = "1.3.0+git${SRCPV}"
+
+inherit autotools pkgconfig systemd ptest
+
+S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
+
+PACKAGECONFIG ??= ""
+PACKAGECONG += "${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'systemd', 'systemd', '', d)}"
+
+PACKAGECONFIG[systemd] = "--with-systemdsystemunitdir=DIR"
+PACKAGECONFIG[systemd] = "--with-systemdsystemunitdir=${systemd_system_unitdir}, --without-systemdsystemunitdir, systemd"
+
+do_compile_append () {
+ oe_runmake -C ${S}/tests generator
+}
+
+do_install_ptest () {
+ install -d ${D}${PTEST_PATH}/tests
+ install ${S}/tests/generator ${D}/${PTEST_PATH}/tests
+ install ${S}/tests/generate-rules.sh ${D}${PTEST_PATH}/tests
+ install ${S}/tests/make_policies.bash ${D}${PTEST_PATH}/tests
+}
+
+FILES_${PN}-ptest += "generator"
+
+RDEPENDS_${PN} += "coreutils"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}-ptest += "make bash bc"
+
+BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] smack kernel: add smack kernel config fragments
2016-10-26 15:00 [meta-security][PATCH 1/2] smack: Add new package Armin Kuster
@ 2016-10-26 15:00 ` Armin Kuster
2016-10-27 7:22 ` Patrick Ohly
2016-10-28 2:29 ` [meta-security][PATCH 1/2] smack: Add new package Khem Raj
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Armin Kuster @ 2016-10-26 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akuster808, yocto
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
---
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack-default-lsm.cfg | 2 ++
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack.cfg | 8 ++++++++
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_4.8.bbappend | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack-default-lsm.cfg
create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack.cfg
diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack-default-lsm.cfg b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack-default-lsm.cfg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b5c4845
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack-default-lsm.cfg
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY="smack"
+CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK=y
diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack.cfg b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack.cfg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..62f465a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack.cfg
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+CONFIG_IP_NF_SECURITY=m
+CONFIG_IP6_NF_SECURITY=m
+CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y
+CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY=y
+CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY=y
+CONFIG_SECURITY=y
+CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK=y
+CONFIG_TMPFS_XATTR=y
diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_4.8.bbappend b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_4.8.bbappend
index 0e6960e..048e8fd 100644
--- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_4.8.bbappend
+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_4.8.bbappend
@@ -5,3 +5,8 @@ SRC_URI += "\
${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'tpm', ' file://tpm.cfg', '', d)} \
${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'tpm', ' file://tpm.scc', '', d)} \
"
+
+SRC_URI += "\
+ ${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'smack', ' file://smack.cfg', '', d)} \
+ ${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'smack', ' file://smack-default-lsm.cfg', '', d)} \
+"
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] smack kernel: add smack kernel config fragments
2016-10-26 15:00 ` [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] smack kernel: add smack kernel config fragments Armin Kuster
@ 2016-10-27 7:22 ` Patrick Ohly
2016-10-28 2:32 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Ohly @ 2016-10-27 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Armin Kuster; +Cc: yocto
On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 08:00 -0700, Armin Kuster wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
> ---
> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack-default-lsm.cfg | 2 ++
> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack.cfg | 8 ++++++++
> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_4.8.bbappend | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack-default-lsm.cfg
> create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack.cfg
>
> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack-default-lsm.cfg b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack-default-lsm.cfg
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b5c4845
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack-default-lsm.cfg
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY="smack"
> +CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK=y
> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack.cfg b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack.cfg
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..62f465a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack.cfg
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +CONFIG_IP_NF_SECURITY=m
> +CONFIG_IP6_NF_SECURITY=m
> +CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y
> +CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY=y
> +CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY=y
> +CONFIG_SECURITY=y
> +CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK=y
> +CONFIG_TMPFS_XATTR=y
Were these two files perhaps copied from
https://github.com/01org/meta-intel-iot-security/tree/master/meta-security-smack/recipes-kernel/linux/linux ?
Just wondering, they look, hmm, very familiar ;-)
Can you say a bit more about your plans regarding Smack support in
meta-security? A recipe for the userspace tool and the kernel config is
a start, but for a fully functional Smack-enabled image, the rootfs also
needs to be set up a bit differently.
I can imagine that it would be worthwhile to take more of the things
done in meta-intel-iot-security and then deprecate that layer.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-security][PATCH 1/2] smack: Add new package
2016-10-26 15:00 [meta-security][PATCH 1/2] smack: Add new package Armin Kuster
2016-10-26 15:00 ` [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] smack kernel: add smack kernel config fragments Armin Kuster
@ 2016-10-28 2:29 ` Khem Raj
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2016-10-28 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Armin Kuster; +Cc: yocto
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3816 bytes --]
> On Oct 26, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
> ---
> recipes-security/smack/files/run-ptest | 3 ++
> .../smack/files/smack_generator_make_fixup.patch | 18 ++++++++++
> recipes-security/smack/smack_1.3.0.bb | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 recipes-security/smack/files/run-ptest
> create mode 100644 recipes-security/smack/files/smack_generator_make_fixup.patch
> create mode 100644 recipes-security/smack/smack_1.3.0.bb
>
> diff --git a/recipes-security/smack/files/run-ptest b/recipes-security/smack/files/run-ptest
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..049a9b4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/recipes-security/smack/files/run-ptest
> @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +./tests/make_policies.bash ./tests/generator
> +./tests/make_policies.bash ./tests/generator labels
> diff --git a/recipes-security/smack/files/smack_generator_make_fixup.patch b/recipes-security/smack/files/smack_generator_make_fixup.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8bafc5e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/recipes-security/smack/files/smack_generator_make_fixup.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +Upstream-Status: Pending
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
> +
> +
> +Index: git/tests/Makefile
> +===================================================================
> +--- git.orig/tests/Makefile
> ++++ git/tests/Makefile
> +@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ clean:
> + rm -rf ./out ./generator
> +
> + generator: generator.c
> +- gcc -Wall -O3 generator.c -o ./generator
> ++ ${CC} generator.c -o ./generator
This should be ${CC} ${LDFLAGS} since you are doing compiling and linking in single step
otherwise we may end up with hash-style problems
> +
> + policies: ./generator ./make_policies.bash
> + ./make_policies.bash ./generator
> diff --git a/recipes-security/smack/smack_1.3.0.bb b/recipes-security/smack/smack_1.3.0.bb
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..46d305e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/recipes-security/smack/smack_1.3.0.bb
> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> +DESCRIPTION = "Selection of tools for developers working with Smack"
> +HOMEPAGE = "https://github.com/smack-team/smack"
> +SECTION = "Security/Access Control"
> +LICENSE = "LGPL-2.1"
> +
> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=4fbd65380cdd255951079008b364516c"
> +
> +SRCREV = "478f68d182c5070f510482194d3e097b11c21907"
> +SRC_URI = " \
> + git://github.com/smack-team/smack.git;branch=v1.3.x \
> + file://smack_generator_make_fixup.patch \
> + file://run-ptest"
> +
> +PV = "1.3.0+git${SRCPV}"
> +
> +inherit autotools pkgconfig systemd ptest
> +
> +S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
> +
> +PACKAGECONFIG ??= ""
> +PACKAGECONG += "${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'systemd', 'systemd', '', d)}”
^^^^
is this a typo ? and may be it should be _append not +=
> +
> +PACKAGECONFIG[systemd] = "--with-systemdsystemunitdir=DIR"
> +PACKAGECONFIG[systemd] = "--with-systemdsystemunitdir=${systemd_system_unitdir}, --without-systemdsystemunitdir, systemd"
> +
> +do_compile_append () {
> + oe_runmake -C ${S}/tests generator
> +}
> +
> +do_install_ptest () {
> + install -d ${D}${PTEST_PATH}/tests
> + install ${S}/tests/generator ${D}/${PTEST_PATH}/tests
> + install ${S}/tests/generate-rules.sh ${D}${PTEST_PATH}/tests
> + install ${S}/tests/make_policies.bash ${D}${PTEST_PATH}/tests
> +}
> +
> +FILES_${PN}-ptest += "generator"
> +
> +RDEPENDS_${PN} += "coreutils"
> +RDEPENDS_${PN}-ptest += "make bash bc"
> +
> +BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] smack kernel: add smack kernel config fragments
2016-10-27 7:22 ` Patrick Ohly
@ 2016-10-28 2:32 ` Khem Raj
2016-10-28 11:20 ` Patrick Ohly
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2016-10-28 2:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick Ohly; +Cc: yocto
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2640 bytes --]
> On Oct 27, 2016, at 12:22 AM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 08:00 -0700, Armin Kuster wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack-default-lsm.cfg | 2 ++
>> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack.cfg | 8 ++++++++
>> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_4.8.bbappend | 5 +++++
>> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack-default-lsm.cfg
>> create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack.cfg
>>
>> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack-default-lsm.cfg b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack-default-lsm.cfg
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..b5c4845
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack-default-lsm.cfg
>> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
>> +CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY="smack"
>> +CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK=y
>> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack.cfg b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack.cfg
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..62f465a
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-4.8/smack.cfg
>> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
>> +CONFIG_IP_NF_SECURITY=m
>> +CONFIG_IP6_NF_SECURITY=m
>> +CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y
>> +CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY=y
>> +CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY=y
>> +CONFIG_SECURITY=y
>> +CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK=y
>> +CONFIG_TMPFS_XATTR=y
>
> Were these two files perhaps copied from
> https://github.com/01org/meta-intel-iot-security/tree/master/meta-security-smack/recipes-kernel/linux/linux ?
>
> Just wondering, they look, hmm, very familiar ;-)
>
> Can you say a bit more about your plans regarding Smack support in
> meta-security? A recipe for the userspace tool and the kernel config is
> a start, but for a fully functional Smack-enabled image, the rootfs also
> needs to be set up a bit differently.
FWIW meta-security seems to be right place for smack related infra.
>
> I can imagine that it would be worthwhile to take more of the things
> done in meta-intel-iot-security and then deprecate that layer.
>
> --
> Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
>
> The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
> I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
> represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
> on behalf of Intel on this matter.
>
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] smack kernel: add smack kernel config fragments
2016-10-28 2:32 ` Khem Raj
@ 2016-10-28 11:20 ` Patrick Ohly
2016-10-28 15:41 ` akuster808
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Ohly @ 2016-10-28 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj; +Cc: yocto
On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 19:32 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Oct 27, 2016, at 12:22 AM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com> wrote:
> > Can you say a bit more about your plans regarding Smack support in
> > meta-security? A recipe for the userspace tool and the kernel config is
> > a start, but for a fully functional Smack-enabled image, the rootfs also
> > needs to be set up a bit differently.
>
> FWIW meta-security seems to be right place for smack related infra.
I don't disagree :-) But it would be good to know more about the rest of
the infrastructure before adding (or reviewing) bits and pieces that by
themselves don't do much.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] smack kernel: add smack kernel config fragments
2016-10-28 11:20 ` Patrick Ohly
@ 2016-10-28 15:41 ` akuster808
2016-10-28 17:54 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: akuster808 @ 2016-10-28 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick Ohly, Khem Raj; +Cc: yocto
On 10/28/2016 04:20 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 19:32 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Oct 27, 2016, at 12:22 AM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com> wrote:
>>> Can you say a bit more about your plans regarding Smack support in
>>> meta-security? A recipe for the userspace tool and the kernel config is
>>> a start, but for a fully functional Smack-enabled image, the rootfs also
>>> needs to be set up a bit differently.
>> FWIW meta-security seems to be right place for smack related infra.
> I don't disagree :-) But it would be good to know more about the rest of
> the infrastructure before adding (or reviewing) bits and pieces that by
> themselves don't do much.
I start of with basic support and refine over time. Your statement can
apply for many components within meta-secuirty. I recently started
adding test images. Providing configurations or solutions for a niche
area is outside the scope for this general layer, IMHO. I could be
convinced otherwise. I tend not to wait for 100% solution before
sending out bits for review.
thanks for your input.
Regards,
Armin
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] smack kernel: add smack kernel config fragments
2016-10-28 15:41 ` akuster808
@ 2016-10-28 17:54 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2016-10-28 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akuster808; +Cc: yocto
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1360 bytes --]
> On Oct 28, 2016, at 8:41 AM, akuster808 <akuster808@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/28/2016 04:20 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
>> On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 19:32 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>> On Oct 27, 2016, at 12:22 AM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> Can you say a bit more about your plans regarding Smack support in
>>>> meta-security? A recipe for the userspace tool and the kernel config is
>>>> a start, but for a fully functional Smack-enabled image, the rootfs also
>>>> needs to be set up a bit differently.
>>> FWIW meta-security seems to be right place for smack related infra.
>> I don't disagree :-) But it would be good to know more about the rest of
>> the infrastructure before adding (or reviewing) bits and pieces that by
>> themselves don't do much.
> I start of with basic support and refine over time. Your statement can apply for many components within meta-secuirty. I recently started adding test images. Providing configurations or solutions for a niche area is outside the scope for this general layer, IMHO. I could be convinced otherwise. I tend not to wait for 100% solution before sending out bits for review.
its a good start. If you have some more patches on the way to complete
the solution, that would be good to share.
>
> thanks for your input.
>
> Regards,
> Armin
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-28 17:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-10-26 15:00 [meta-security][PATCH 1/2] smack: Add new package Armin Kuster
2016-10-26 15:00 ` [meta-security][PATCH 2/2] smack kernel: add smack kernel config fragments Armin Kuster
2016-10-27 7:22 ` Patrick Ohly
2016-10-28 2:32 ` Khem Raj
2016-10-28 11:20 ` Patrick Ohly
2016-10-28 15:41 ` akuster808
2016-10-28 17:54 ` Khem Raj
2016-10-28 2:29 ` [meta-security][PATCH 1/2] smack: Add new package Khem Raj
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.