All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Vadym Kochan <vkochan@marvell.com>,
	Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@marvell.com>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
	Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 05/10] net: switchdev: pass flags and mask to both {PRE_,}BRIDGE_FLAGS attributes
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:10:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a1efd0d-9930-cbc7-5450-ffb47a0034e4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210212151600.3357121-6-olteanv@gmail.com>



On 2/12/2021 7:15 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> 
> This switchdev attribute offers a counterproductive API for a driver
> writer, because although br_switchdev_set_port_flag gets passed a
> "flags" and a "mask", those are passed piecemeal to the driver, so while
> the PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS listener knows what changed because it has the
> "mask", the BRIDGE_FLAGS listener doesn't, because it only has the final
> value. But certain drivers can offload only certain combinations of
> settings, like for example they cannot change unicast flooding
> independently of multicast flooding - they must be both on or both off.
> The way the information is passed to switchdev makes drivers not
> expressive enough, and unable to reject this request ahead of time, in
> the PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS notifier, so they are forced to reject it during
> the deferred BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute, where the rejection is currently
> ignored.
> 
> This patch also changes drivers to make use of the "mask" field for edge
> detection when possible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Vadym Kochan <vkochan@marvell.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
	Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@marvell.com>,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>,
	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v5 net-next 05/10] net: switchdev: pass flags and mask to both {PRE_, }BRIDGE_FLAGS attributes
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:10:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a1efd0d-9930-cbc7-5450-ffb47a0034e4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210212151600.3357121-6-olteanv@gmail.com>



On 2/12/2021 7:15 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> 
> This switchdev attribute offers a counterproductive API for a driver
> writer, because although br_switchdev_set_port_flag gets passed a
> "flags" and a "mask", those are passed piecemeal to the driver, so while
> the PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS listener knows what changed because it has the
> "mask", the BRIDGE_FLAGS listener doesn't, because it only has the final
> value. But certain drivers can offload only certain combinations of
> settings, like for example they cannot change unicast flooding
> independently of multicast flooding - they must be both on or both off.
> The way the information is passed to switchdev makes drivers not
> expressive enough, and unable to reject this request ahead of time, in
> the PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS notifier, so they are forced to reject it during
> the deferred BRIDGE_FLAGS attribute, where the rejection is currently
> ignored.
> 
> This patch also changes drivers to make use of the "mask" field for edge
> detection when possible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-12 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-12 15:15 [PATCH v5 net-next 00/10] Cleanup in brport flags switchdev offload for DSA Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:15 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 01/10] net: switchdev: propagate extack to port attributes Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:15   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 16:00   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2021-02-12 16:00     ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2021-02-12 17:03   ` Grygorii Strashko
2021-02-12 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 02/10] net: bridge: offload all port flags at once in br_setport Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:15   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:57   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2021-02-12 15:57     ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2021-02-12 18:05   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-02-12 18:05     ` [Bridge] " Florian Fainelli
2021-02-12 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 03/10] net: bridge: don't print in br_switchdev_set_port_flag Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:15   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:59   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2021-02-12 15:59     ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2021-02-12 18:07   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-02-12 18:07     ` [Bridge] " Florian Fainelli
2021-02-12 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 04/10] net: dsa: configure better brport flags when ports leave the bridge Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:15   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 05/10] net: switchdev: pass flags and mask to both {PRE_,}BRIDGE_FLAGS attributes Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:15   ` [Bridge] [PATCH v5 net-next 05/10] net: switchdev: pass flags and mask to both {PRE_, }BRIDGE_FLAGS attributes Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 17:06   ` [PATCH v5 net-next 05/10] net: switchdev: pass flags and mask to both {PRE_,}BRIDGE_FLAGS attributes Grygorii Strashko
2021-02-12 18:10   ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2021-02-12 18:10     ` [Bridge] [PATCH v5 net-next 05/10] net: switchdev: pass flags and mask to both {PRE_, }BRIDGE_FLAGS attributes Florian Fainelli
2021-02-12 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 06/10] net: dsa: act as passthrough for bridge port flags Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:15   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 18:19   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-02-12 18:19     ` [Bridge] " Florian Fainelli
2021-02-12 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 07/10] net: dsa: felix: restore multicast flood to CPU when NPI tagger reinitializes Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:15   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 18:12   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-02-12 18:12     ` [Bridge] " Florian Fainelli
2021-02-12 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 08/10] net: mscc: ocelot: use separate flooding PGID for broadcast Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:15   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 09/10] net: mscc: ocelot: offload bridge port flags to device Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:15   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:16 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 10/10] net: dsa: sja1105: " Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-12 15:16   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-13  1:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 00/10] Cleanup in brport flags switchdev offload for DSA patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-02-13  1:20   ` [Bridge] " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a1efd0d-9930-cbc7-5450-ffb47a0034e4@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
    --cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tchornyi@marvell.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --cc=vkochan@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.