From: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
To: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>,
"helgaas@kernel.org" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"hanjun.guo@linaro.org" <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
"Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com" <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
"okaya@codeaurora.org" <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
"jchandra@broadcom.com" <jchandra@broadcom.com>,
"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"dhdang@apm.com" <dhdang@apm.com>,
"Liviu.Dudau@arm.com" <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
"ddaney@caviumnetworks.com" <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
"jeremy.linton@arm.com" <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 04:24:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a9d2e00-efb4-2607-a410-43af1d3c97c3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EE11001F9E5DDD47B7634E2F8A612F2E1EDAF540@lhreml503-mbs>
On 05/20/2016 04:11 AM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Ard, Jon
Hi Gabriele :)
> In our case (HiSilicon Hip05/Hip06) we are using the Designware IP
> that unfortunately is non-ECAM for the RC config space.
Yea, I know, and I've pinged them already.
> A possible ACPI table solution was discussed already in this thread
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/14/722
>
> where <<Name (_CID, "PNP0C02") // Motherboard reserved resource>>
> is used to specify an Host Controller specific resource.
> It looks to me that this can be an approach that can accommodate
> different vendors/scenarios and Bjorn seemed to be quite ok with
> it.
Yeah, pondering that. We'll chat with a few others about it.
> It comes without saying that for future HW releases we all should
> make an effort to deliver fully ECAM compliant controllers.
Right. Like I said, a number of designs have been fixed already.
> What's your view about this approach?
Will followup over the weekend.
Jon.
--
Computer Architect | Sent from my Fedora powered laptop
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
To: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>,
"helgaas@kernel.org" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"hanjun.guo@linaro.org" <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
"Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com" <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
"okaya@codeaurora.org" <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
"jchandra@broadcom.com" <jchandra@broadcom.com>,
"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"dhdang@apm.com" <dhdang@apm.com>,
"Liviu.Dudau@arm.com" <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
"ddaney@caviumnetworks.com" <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
"jeremy.linton@arm.com" <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com"
<robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com>,
"Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"msalter@redhat.com" <msalter@redhat.com>,
Wangyijing <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
"mw@semihalf.com" <mw@semihalf.com>,
"andrea.gallo@linaro.org" <andrea.gallo@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 04:24:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a9d2e00-efb4-2607-a410-43af1d3c97c3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EE11001F9E5DDD47B7634E2F8A612F2E1EDAF540@lhreml503-mbs>
On 05/20/2016 04:11 AM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Ard, Jon
Hi Gabriele :)
> In our case (HiSilicon Hip05/Hip06) we are using the Designware IP
> that unfortunately is non-ECAM for the RC config space.
Yea, I know, and I've pinged them already.
> A possible ACPI table solution was discussed already in this thread
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/14/722
>
> where <<Name (_CID, "PNP0C02") // Motherboard reserved resource>>
> is used to specify an Host Controller specific resource.
> It looks to me that this can be an approach that can accommodate
> different vendors/scenarios and Bjorn seemed to be quite ok with
> it.
Yeah, pondering that. We'll chat with a few others about it.
> It comes without saying that for future HW releases we all should
> make an effort to deliver fully ECAM compliant controllers.
Right. Like I said, a number of designs have been fixed already.
> What's your view about this approach?
Will followup over the weekend.
Jon.
--
Computer Architect | Sent from my Fedora powered laptop
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
To: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>,
"helgaas@kernel.org" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"hanjun.guo@linaro.org" <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
"Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com" <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
"okaya@codeaurora.org" <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
"jchandra@broadcom.com" <jchandra@broadcom.com>,
"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"dhdang@apm.com" <dhdang@apm.com>,
"Liviu.Dudau@arm.com" <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
"ddaney@caviumnetworks.com" <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
"jeremy.linton@arm.com" <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com"
<robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com>,
"Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"msalter@redhat.com" <msalter@redhat.com>,
Wangyijing <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
"mw@semihalf.com" <mw@semihalf.com>,
"andrea.gallo@linaro.org" <andrea.gallo@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 04:24:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a9d2e00-efb4-2607-a410-43af1d3c97c3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EE11001F9E5DDD47B7634E2F8A612F2E1EDAF540@lhreml503-mbs>
On 05/20/2016 04:11 AM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Ard, Jon
Hi Gabriele :)
> In our case (HiSilicon Hip05/Hip06) we are using the Designware IP
> that unfortunately is non-ECAM for the RC config space.
Yea, I know, and I've pinged them already.
> A possible ACPI table solution was discussed already in this thread
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/14/722
>
> where <<Name (_CID, "PNP0C02") // Motherboard reserved resource>>
> is used to specify an Host Controller specific resource.
> It looks to me that this can be an approach that can accommodate
> different vendors/scenarios and Bjorn seemed to be quite ok with
> it.
Yeah, pondering that. We'll chat with a few others about it.
> It comes without saying that for future HW releases we all should
> make an effort to deliver fully ECAM compliant controllers.
Right. Like I said, a number of designs have been fixed already.
> What's your view about this approach?
Will followup over the weekend.
Jon.
--
Computer Architect | Sent from my Fedora powered laptop
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jcm@redhat.com (Jon Masters)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 04:24:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a9d2e00-efb4-2607-a410-43af1d3c97c3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EE11001F9E5DDD47B7634E2F8A612F2E1EDAF540@lhreml503-mbs>
On 05/20/2016 04:11 AM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Hi Ard, Jon
Hi Gabriele :)
> In our case (HiSilicon Hip05/Hip06) we are using the Designware IP
> that unfortunately is non-ECAM for the RC config space.
Yea, I know, and I've pinged them already.
> A possible ACPI table solution was discussed already in this thread
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/14/722
>
> where <<Name (_CID, "PNP0C02") // Motherboard reserved resource>>
> is used to specify an Host Controller specific resource.
> It looks to me that this can be an approach that can accommodate
> different vendors/scenarios and Bjorn seemed to be quite ok with
> it.
Yeah, pondering that. We'll chat with a few others about it.
> It comes without saying that for future HW releases we all should
> make an effort to deliver fully ECAM compliant controllers.
Right. Like I said, a number of designs have been fixed already.
> What's your view about this approach?
Will followup over the weekend.
Jon.
--
Computer Architect | Sent from my Fedora powered laptop
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-20 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 239+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-10 15:19 [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` [PATCH V7 01/11] PCI: Provide common functions for ECAM mapping Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` [PATCH V7 02/11] PCI: generic, thunder: update to use generic ECAM API Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` [PATCH V7 03/11] pci, of: Move the PCI I/O space management to PCI core code Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 17:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 17:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 17:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 17:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 7:36 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-11 7:36 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-11 7:36 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-11 7:36 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-11 11:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-11 11:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-11 11:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-11 11:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-10 15:19 ` [PATCH V7 04/11] pci: Add new function to unmap IO resources Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-23 8:28 ` Jayachandran C
2016-05-23 8:28 ` Jayachandran C
2016-05-23 8:28 ` Jayachandran C
2016-05-10 15:19 ` [PATCH V7 05/11] acpi, pci: Support IO resources when parsing PCI host bridge resources Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 18:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 18:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 18:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 18:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 7:39 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-11 7:39 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-11 7:39 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-11 7:39 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` [PATCH V7 06/11] pci, acpi: Provide a way to assign bus domain number Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` [PATCH V7 07/11] pci, acpi: Handle ACPI companion assignment Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 18:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 18:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 18:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 18:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 18:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 18:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 18:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 18:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 10:11 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-11 10:11 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-11 10:11 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-11 10:11 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-11 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-11 22:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-11 22:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-11 22:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-11 22:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-12 10:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-12 10:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-12 10:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-12 10:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-12 10:43 ` Jayachandran C
2016-05-12 10:43 ` Jayachandran C
2016-05-12 10:43 ` Jayachandran C
2016-05-12 10:43 ` Jayachandran C
2016-05-12 11:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-12 11:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-12 11:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-12 11:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-13 10:32 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-13 10:32 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-13 10:32 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-13 10:32 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-12 10:50 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-12 10:50 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-12 10:50 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-12 10:50 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-12 12:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-12 12:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-12 12:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-12 12:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-17 3:11 ` Dongdong Liu
2016-05-17 3:11 ` Dongdong Liu
2016-05-17 3:11 ` Dongdong Liu
2016-05-17 13:44 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-17 13:44 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` [PATCH V7 08/11] pci, acpi: Support for ACPI based generic PCI host controller Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 17:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 17:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 17:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 17:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 18:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 18:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 18:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-10 18:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-13 11:25 ` Jayachandran C
2016-05-13 11:25 ` Jayachandran C
2016-05-13 11:25 ` Jayachandran C
2016-05-13 11:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-13 11:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-13 11:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-13 11:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-13 11:42 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-13 11:42 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-13 11:42 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-13 11:42 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-14 9:07 ` Jayachandran C
2016-05-14 9:07 ` Jayachandran C
2016-05-14 9:07 ` Jayachandran C
2016-05-23 11:34 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-23 11:34 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-23 11:34 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-19 16:56 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-05-19 16:56 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-05-10 15:19 ` [PATCH V7 09/11] arm64, pci, acpi: ACPI support for legacy IRQs parsing and consolidation with DT code Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:19 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:20 ` [PATCH V7 10/11] arm64, pci, acpi: Provide ACPI-specific prerequisites for PCI bus enumeration Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:20 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:20 ` [PATCH V7 11/11] arm64, pci, acpi: Start using ACPI based PCI host controller driver for ARM64 Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-10 15:20 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-11 10:41 ` [PATCH V7 00/11] Support for generic ACPI based PCI host controller Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-11 10:41 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-11 10:41 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-11 10:41 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-11 11:08 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-11 11:08 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-11 11:08 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-11 11:08 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-11 12:53 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-11 12:53 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-11 12:53 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-11 12:53 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-20 4:41 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-20 4:41 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-20 4:41 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-20 7:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-05-20 7:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-05-20 7:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-05-20 7:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-05-20 8:01 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-20 8:01 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-20 8:01 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-20 8:01 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-20 8:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-05-20 8:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-05-20 8:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-05-20 8:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-05-20 8:40 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-20 8:40 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-20 8:40 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-20 8:40 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-20 9:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-05-20 9:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-05-20 9:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-05-20 9:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-05-23 10:56 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-23 10:56 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-23 10:56 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-23 10:56 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-23 15:16 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-23 15:16 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-23 15:16 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-23 15:16 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-23 23:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-23 23:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-23 23:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-23 23:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-24 1:11 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 1:11 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 1:11 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 1:11 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 1:48 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 1:48 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 1:48 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 1:48 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 14:33 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-24 14:33 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-24 14:33 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-24 14:33 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-24 7:23 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-24 7:23 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-24 7:23 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-24 7:23 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-24 14:38 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 14:38 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 14:38 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 14:38 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 17:24 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-24 17:24 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-24 17:24 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-24 17:24 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-05-24 17:35 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 17:35 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 17:35 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 17:35 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 19:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-24 19:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-24 19:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-24 19:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-26 9:58 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-26 9:58 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-26 9:58 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-26 9:58 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-25 6:31 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-25 6:31 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-25 6:31 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-25 6:31 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-24 4:20 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 4:20 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 4:20 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-24 4:20 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-20 8:11 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-20 8:11 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-20 8:11 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-20 8:11 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-05-20 8:24 ` Jon Masters [this message]
2016-05-20 8:24 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-20 8:24 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-20 8:24 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-13 2:55 ` Duc Dang
2016-05-13 2:55 ` Duc Dang
2016-05-13 2:55 ` Duc Dang
2016-05-19 18:18 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-05-19 18:18 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-05-20 7:46 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-20 7:46 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-20 7:46 ` Jon Masters
2016-05-23 11:25 ` Dongdong Liu
2016-05-23 11:25 ` Dongdong Liu
2016-05-23 11:25 ` Dongdong Liu
2016-05-23 15:36 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-05-23 15:36 ` Sinan Kaya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9a9d2e00-efb4-2607-a410-43af1d3c97c3@redhat.com \
--to=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=dhdang@apm.com \
--cc=gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jchandra@broadcom.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tn@semihalf.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.