* [GIT PULL] soc: mediatek: updates for v5.6
@ 2020-01-13 10:17 ` Matthias Brugger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Brugger @ 2020-01-13 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: soc, arm-soc
Cc: Matthias Brugger, Mars Cheng,
moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, Bibby Hsieh,
linux-arm-kernel
Hi Olof,
Hi ARnds,
Please have a look on the following patches for mediatek soc drivers for v5.6
I includes the stable branch v5.5-next/cmdq-stable which should also be merged
in the DRM tree. I'm not very familiar with providing a stable tree, although I
double-checked that in the pull request to the DRM tree the commit IDs are the
same, I thought it is worth noting.
Regards,
Matthias
---
The following changes since commit e42617b825f8073569da76dc4510bfa019b1c35a:
Linux 5.5-rc1 (2019-12-08 14:57:55 -0800)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/matthias.bgg/linux.git/
tags/v5.5-next-soc
for you to fetch changes up to 9c26abeb86ce6ab53b6397873bb3f556016c05ba:
Merge branch 'v5.5-next/cmdq-stable' into v5.5-next/soc (2020-01-10 11:00:45
+0100)
----------------------------------------------------------------
cmdq:
- clean ups of unused code and debuggability
- add cmdq_instruction to make the function call interface more readable
- add functions for polling and providing info for the user of cmdq
scpsys:
- add bindings for MT6765
----------------------------------------------------------------
Bibby Hsieh (4):
soc: mediatek: cmdq: remove OR opertaion from err return
soc: mediatek: cmdq: define the instruction struct
soc: mediatek: cmdq: add polling function
soc: mediatek: cmdq: add cmdq_dev_get_client_reg function
Mars Cheng (1):
dt-bindings: mediatek: add MT6765 power dt-bindings
Matthias Brugger (2):
soc: mediatek: cmdq: delete not used define
Merge branch 'v5.5-next/cmdq-stable' into v5.5-next/soc
.../devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/scpsys.txt | 6 +
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c | 149 +++++++++++++++++----
include/dt-bindings/power/mt6765-power.h | 14 ++
include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h | 11 ++
include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h | 53 ++++++++
5 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/mt6765-power.h
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL] soc: mediatek: updates for v5.6 @ 2020-01-13 10:17 ` Matthias Brugger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Matthias Brugger @ 2020-01-13 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: soc, arm-soc Cc: Matthias Brugger, Mars Cheng, moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, Bibby Hsieh, linux-arm-kernel Hi Olof, Hi ARnds, Please have a look on the following patches for mediatek soc drivers for v5.6 I includes the stable branch v5.5-next/cmdq-stable which should also be merged in the DRM tree. I'm not very familiar with providing a stable tree, although I double-checked that in the pull request to the DRM tree the commit IDs are the same, I thought it is worth noting. Regards, Matthias --- The following changes since commit e42617b825f8073569da76dc4510bfa019b1c35a: Linux 5.5-rc1 (2019-12-08 14:57:55 -0800) are available in the Git repository at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/matthias.bgg/linux.git/ tags/v5.5-next-soc for you to fetch changes up to 9c26abeb86ce6ab53b6397873bb3f556016c05ba: Merge branch 'v5.5-next/cmdq-stable' into v5.5-next/soc (2020-01-10 11:00:45 +0100) ---------------------------------------------------------------- cmdq: - clean ups of unused code and debuggability - add cmdq_instruction to make the function call interface more readable - add functions for polling and providing info for the user of cmdq scpsys: - add bindings for MT6765 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bibby Hsieh (4): soc: mediatek: cmdq: remove OR opertaion from err return soc: mediatek: cmdq: define the instruction struct soc: mediatek: cmdq: add polling function soc: mediatek: cmdq: add cmdq_dev_get_client_reg function Mars Cheng (1): dt-bindings: mediatek: add MT6765 power dt-bindings Matthias Brugger (2): soc: mediatek: cmdq: delete not used define Merge branch 'v5.5-next/cmdq-stable' into v5.5-next/soc .../devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/scpsys.txt | 6 + drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c | 149 +++++++++++++++++---- include/dt-bindings/power/mt6765-power.h | 14 ++ include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h | 11 ++ include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h | 53 ++++++++ 5 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/mt6765-power.h _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] soc: mediatek: updates for v5.6 2020-01-13 10:17 ` Matthias Brugger @ 2020-01-17 19:22 ` Olof Johansson -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Olof Johansson @ 2020-01-17 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthias Brugger Cc: SoC Team, arm-soc, Mars Cheng, Bibby Hsieh, moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, linux-arm-kernel Hi, On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:18 AM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Olof, > Hi ARnds, > > Please have a look on the following patches for mediatek soc drivers for v5.6 > > I includes the stable branch v5.5-next/cmdq-stable which should also be merged > in the DRM tree. I'm not very familiar with providing a stable tree, although I > double-checked that in the pull request to the DRM tree the commit IDs are the > same, I thought it is worth noting. I'm a little confused as to how the dependencies are expected to line up here. Does your non-DRM contents rely on the DRM pieces? If so, you need them to be based on top of that branch to make sure they are bisectable, not merge the DRM branch in on top (since a bisect might land on a commit before the merge). But... I also don't see how there's any actual dependency here? There are a few cleanups, the DRM branch builds without them, and the branch when checked out right before the DRM merge in your pull request, also builds. -Olof _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] soc: mediatek: updates for v5.6 @ 2020-01-17 19:22 ` Olof Johansson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Olof Johansson @ 2020-01-17 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthias Brugger Cc: SoC Team, arm-soc, Mars Cheng, Bibby Hsieh, moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, linux-arm-kernel Hi, On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:18 AM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Olof, > Hi ARnds, > > Please have a look on the following patches for mediatek soc drivers for v5.6 > > I includes the stable branch v5.5-next/cmdq-stable which should also be merged > in the DRM tree. I'm not very familiar with providing a stable tree, although I > double-checked that in the pull request to the DRM tree the commit IDs are the > same, I thought it is worth noting. I'm a little confused as to how the dependencies are expected to line up here. Does your non-DRM contents rely on the DRM pieces? If so, you need them to be based on top of that branch to make sure they are bisectable, not merge the DRM branch in on top (since a bisect might land on a commit before the merge). But... I also don't see how there's any actual dependency here? There are a few cleanups, the DRM branch builds without them, and the branch when checked out right before the DRM merge in your pull request, also builds. -Olof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] soc: mediatek: updates for v5.6 2020-01-17 19:22 ` Olof Johansson @ 2020-01-17 21:52 ` Matthias Brugger -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Matthias Brugger @ 2020-01-17 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Olof Johansson Cc: SoC Team, arm-soc, Mars Cheng, Bibby Hsieh, CK HU, moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, linux-arm-kernel On 17/01/2020 20:22, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:18 AM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Olof, >> Hi ARnds, >> >> Please have a look on the following patches for mediatek soc drivers for v5.6 >> >> I includes the stable branch v5.5-next/cmdq-stable which should also be merged >> in the DRM tree. I'm not very familiar with providing a stable tree, although I >> double-checked that in the pull request to the DRM tree the commit IDs are the >> same, I thought it is worth noting. > > I'm a little confused as to how the dependencies are expected to line up here. > > Does your non-DRM contents rely on the DRM pieces? If so, you need > them to be based on top of that branch to make sure they are > bisectable, not merge the DRM branch in on top (since a bisect might > land on a commit before the merge). No, it's the other way round. DRM relies on the four patches I took from Bibby Hsieh. They are part of v5.5-next/cmdq-stable and this branch was merged into v5.5-next/soc as well as in Ck Hu's DRM branch. My understanding is that Ck Hu sends pull requests to the DRM branch. > > But... I also don't see how there's any actual dependency here? There > are a few cleanups, the DRM branch builds without them, and the branch > when checked out right before the DRM merge in your pull request, also > builds. > The patches add some helper functions like cmdq_dev_get_client_reg on which the DRM branch from Ck Hu depends [1]. Hope that clarifies your questions. Regards, Matthias [1] https://github.com/ckhu-mediatek/linux.git-tags/commits/mediatek-drm-next-5.6 _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] soc: mediatek: updates for v5.6 @ 2020-01-17 21:52 ` Matthias Brugger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Matthias Brugger @ 2020-01-17 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Olof Johansson Cc: SoC Team, arm-soc, Mars Cheng, Bibby Hsieh, CK HU, moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, linux-arm-kernel On 17/01/2020 20:22, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:18 AM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Olof, >> Hi ARnds, >> >> Please have a look on the following patches for mediatek soc drivers for v5.6 >> >> I includes the stable branch v5.5-next/cmdq-stable which should also be merged >> in the DRM tree. I'm not very familiar with providing a stable tree, although I >> double-checked that in the pull request to the DRM tree the commit IDs are the >> same, I thought it is worth noting. > > I'm a little confused as to how the dependencies are expected to line up here. > > Does your non-DRM contents rely on the DRM pieces? If so, you need > them to be based on top of that branch to make sure they are > bisectable, not merge the DRM branch in on top (since a bisect might > land on a commit before the merge). No, it's the other way round. DRM relies on the four patches I took from Bibby Hsieh. They are part of v5.5-next/cmdq-stable and this branch was merged into v5.5-next/soc as well as in Ck Hu's DRM branch. My understanding is that Ck Hu sends pull requests to the DRM branch. > > But... I also don't see how there's any actual dependency here? There > are a few cleanups, the DRM branch builds without them, and the branch > when checked out right before the DRM merge in your pull request, also > builds. > The patches add some helper functions like cmdq_dev_get_client_reg on which the DRM branch from Ck Hu depends [1]. Hope that clarifies your questions. Regards, Matthias [1] https://github.com/ckhu-mediatek/linux.git-tags/commits/mediatek-drm-next-5.6 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] soc: mediatek: updates for v5.6 2020-01-17 21:52 ` Matthias Brugger @ 2020-01-20 19:25 ` Olof Johansson -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Olof Johansson @ 2020-01-20 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthias Brugger Cc: SoC Team, arm-soc, Mars Cheng, Bibby Hsieh, CK HU, moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, linux-arm-kernel On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1:52 PM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 17/01/2020 20:22, Olof Johansson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:18 AM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Olof, > >> Hi ARnds, > >> > >> Please have a look on the following patches for mediatek soc drivers for v5.6 > >> > >> I includes the stable branch v5.5-next/cmdq-stable which should also be merged > >> in the DRM tree. I'm not very familiar with providing a stable tree, although I > >> double-checked that in the pull request to the DRM tree the commit IDs are the > >> same, I thought it is worth noting. > > > > I'm a little confused as to how the dependencies are expected to line up here. > > > > Does your non-DRM contents rely on the DRM pieces? If so, you need > > them to be based on top of that branch to make sure they are > > bisectable, not merge the DRM branch in on top (since a bisect might > > land on a commit before the merge). > > No, it's the other way round. DRM relies on the four patches I took from Bibby > Hsieh. They are part of v5.5-next/cmdq-stable and this branch was merged into > v5.5-next/soc as well as in Ck Hu's DRM branch. My understanding is that Ck Hu > sends pull requests to the DRM branch. Ah, ok -- in that case there's no need to bring in the DRM branch to your contents here, they'll merge them at their end. It doesn't do any harm (besides adding dependencies that aren't strictly needed), but we usually avoid doing it. > > But... I also don't see how there's any actual dependency here? There > > are a few cleanups, the DRM branch builds without them, and the branch > > when checked out right before the DRM merge in your pull request, also > > builds. > > > > The patches add some helper functions like cmdq_dev_get_client_reg on which the > DRM branch from Ck Hu depends [1]. > > Hope that clarifies your questions. Yeah, ok -- merging. -Olof _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] soc: mediatek: updates for v5.6 @ 2020-01-20 19:25 ` Olof Johansson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Olof Johansson @ 2020-01-20 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthias Brugger Cc: SoC Team, arm-soc, Mars Cheng, Bibby Hsieh, CK HU, moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, linux-arm-kernel On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1:52 PM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 17/01/2020 20:22, Olof Johansson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:18 AM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Olof, > >> Hi ARnds, > >> > >> Please have a look on the following patches for mediatek soc drivers for v5.6 > >> > >> I includes the stable branch v5.5-next/cmdq-stable which should also be merged > >> in the DRM tree. I'm not very familiar with providing a stable tree, although I > >> double-checked that in the pull request to the DRM tree the commit IDs are the > >> same, I thought it is worth noting. > > > > I'm a little confused as to how the dependencies are expected to line up here. > > > > Does your non-DRM contents rely on the DRM pieces? If so, you need > > them to be based on top of that branch to make sure they are > > bisectable, not merge the DRM branch in on top (since a bisect might > > land on a commit before the merge). > > No, it's the other way round. DRM relies on the four patches I took from Bibby > Hsieh. They are part of v5.5-next/cmdq-stable and this branch was merged into > v5.5-next/soc as well as in Ck Hu's DRM branch. My understanding is that Ck Hu > sends pull requests to the DRM branch. Ah, ok -- in that case there's no need to bring in the DRM branch to your contents here, they'll merge them at their end. It doesn't do any harm (besides adding dependencies that aren't strictly needed), but we usually avoid doing it. > > But... I also don't see how there's any actual dependency here? There > > are a few cleanups, the DRM branch builds without them, and the branch > > when checked out right before the DRM merge in your pull request, also > > builds. > > > > The patches add some helper functions like cmdq_dev_get_client_reg on which the > DRM branch from Ck Hu depends [1]. > > Hope that clarifies your questions. Yeah, ok -- merging. -Olof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-20 19:25 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-01-13 10:17 [GIT PULL] soc: mediatek: updates for v5.6 Matthias Brugger 2020-01-13 10:17 ` Matthias Brugger 2020-01-17 19:22 ` Olof Johansson 2020-01-17 19:22 ` Olof Johansson 2020-01-17 21:52 ` Matthias Brugger 2020-01-17 21:52 ` Matthias Brugger 2020-01-20 19:25 ` Olof Johansson 2020-01-20 19:25 ` Olof Johansson
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.