From: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>
To: Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@au.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp <lkp@lists.01.org>, 0day robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] Re: Unreliable will-it-scale context_switch1 test on 0day bot
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:28:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b8bb76e-5349-acff-117a-fb2b3192c4cb@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201019152410.GA14293@intel.com>
On 10/19/2020 11:24 PM, Philip Li wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 09:27:32AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I pointed out an issue with the will-it-scale context_switch1 test run by the 0day bot on
>> October 7, 2020, and got no reply.
> Thanks Mathieu for the feedback, we had added it to the TODO list but sorry for
> not reply in time.
>
> Zhengjun, can you help follow up this mail thread?
>
I have replied in the origin mail.
>>
>> Until this issue is solved, the results of those tests are basically pure noise when run on
>> SMT hardware:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1183082664.11002.1602082242482.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com/
>>
>> Who is maintaining those tests and the 0day bot ?
> will-it-scale itself is from community at https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale
> and we will look for the support if we don't have quick solution. 0day bot basically wraps
> the test and analyze the result to find which commit leads to change.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mathieu
>>
>> --
>> Mathieu Desnoyers
>> EfficiOS Inc.
>> http://www.efficios.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> LKP mailing list -- lkp@lists.01.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to lkp-leave@lists.01.org
> _______________________________________________
> LKP mailing list -- lkp@lists.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to lkp-leave@lists.01.org
>
--
Zhengjun Xing
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-20 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-19 13:27 Unreliable will-it-scale context_switch1 test on 0day bot Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-10-19 15:24 ` [LKP] " Philip Li
2020-10-20 3:28 ` Xing Zhengjun [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b8bb76e-5349-acff-117a-fb2b3192c4cb@linux.intel.com \
--to=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anton@au.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=philip.li@intel.com \
--cc=zhengjun.xing@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.