All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 00/10] A few bugfix and cleancode patch for bfq
@ 2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kemeng Shi @ 2022-12-16 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack, paolo.valente, tj, josef, axboe
  Cc: cgroups, linux-block, linux-kernel, linfeilong, liuzhiqiang, shikemeng

Hi, this series contain two patches to fix bug in request injection
mechanism and some random cleancode patches.
Thanks!

---
v2:
 -improve git log.
---

Kemeng Shi (10):
  block, bfq: correctly raise inject limit in
    bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection
  block, bfq: remove unsed parameter reason in bfq_bfqq_is_slow
  block, bfq: initialize bfqq->decrease_time_jif correctly
  block, bfq: use helper macro RQ_BFQQ to get bfqq of request
  block, bfq: remove unnecessary dereference to get async_bfqq
  block, bfq: remove redundant bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0 check in
    bfq_add_request
  block, bfq: remove redundant check in bfq_put_cooperator
  block, bfq: remove unnecessary goto tag in bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq
  block, bfq: remove unused bfq_wr_max_time in struct bfq_data
  block, bfq: remove check of bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate which is always
    greater than 0

 block/bfq-iosched.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 block/bfq-iosched.h |  2 --
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

-- 
2.30.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 00/10] A few bugfix and cleancode patch for bfq
@ 2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kemeng Shi @ 2022-12-16 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ, paolo.valente-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A,
	tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A, josef-DigfWCa+lFGyeJad7bwFQA,
	axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw
  Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linfeilong-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA, liuzhiqiang-L7zZNxrQPSE,
	shikemeng-XF6JlduFytWkHkcT6e4Xnw

Hi, this series contain two patches to fix bug in request injection
mechanism and some random cleancode patches.
Thanks!

---
v2:
 -improve git log.
---

Kemeng Shi (10):
  block, bfq: correctly raise inject limit in
    bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection
  block, bfq: remove unsed parameter reason in bfq_bfqq_is_slow
  block, bfq: initialize bfqq->decrease_time_jif correctly
  block, bfq: use helper macro RQ_BFQQ to get bfqq of request
  block, bfq: remove unnecessary dereference to get async_bfqq
  block, bfq: remove redundant bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0 check in
    bfq_add_request
  block, bfq: remove redundant check in bfq_put_cooperator
  block, bfq: remove unnecessary goto tag in bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq
  block, bfq: remove unused bfq_wr_max_time in struct bfq_data
  block, bfq: remove check of bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate which is always
    greater than 0

 block/bfq-iosched.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 block/bfq-iosched.h |  2 --
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

-- 
2.30.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 01/10] block, bfq: correctly raise inject limit in bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection
  2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
  (?)
@ 2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kemeng Shi @ 2022-12-16 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack, paolo.valente, tj, josef, axboe
  Cc: cgroups, linux-block, linux-kernel, linfeilong, liuzhiqiang, shikemeng

Function bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection may temporarily raise inject limit
to one request if current inject_limit is 0 before search of the source
queue for injection. However the search below will reset inject limit to
bfqd->in_service_queue which is zero for raised inject limit. Then the
temporarily raised inject limit never works as expected.
Assigment limit to bfqd->in_service_queue in search is needed as limit
maybe overwriten to min_t(unsigned int, 1, limit) for condition that
a large in-flight request is on non-rotational devices in found queue.
So we need to reset limit to bfqd->in_service_queue for normal case.

Actually, we have already make sure bfqd->rq_in_driver is < limit before
search, then
 -Limit is >= 1 as bfqd->rq_in_driver is >= 0. Then min_t(unsigned int,
1, limit) is always 1. So we can simply check bfqd->rq_in_driver with
1 instead of result of min_t(unsigned int, 1, limit) for larget request in
non-rotational device case to avoid overwritting limit and the bug is gone.
 -For normal case, we have already check bfqd->rq_in_driver is < limit,
so we can return found bfqq unconditionally to remove unncessary check.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index a72304c728fc..1220c41fc767 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -4641,12 +4641,10 @@ bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection(struct bfq_data *bfqd)
 			 */
 			if (blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd->queue) &&
 			    blk_rq_sectors(bfqq->next_rq) >=
-			    BFQQ_SECT_THR_NONROT)
-				limit = min_t(unsigned int, 1, limit);
-			else
-				limit = in_serv_bfqq->inject_limit;
-
-			if (bfqd->rq_in_driver < limit) {
+			    BFQQ_SECT_THR_NONROT &&
+			    bfqd->rq_in_driver >= 1)
+				continue;
+			else {
 				bfqd->rqs_injected = true;
 				return bfqq;
 			}
-- 
2.30.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 02/10] block, bfq: remove unsed parameter reason in bfq_bfqq_is_slow
  2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
  (?)
  (?)
@ 2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kemeng Shi @ 2022-12-16 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack, paolo.valente, tj, josef, axboe
  Cc: cgroups, linux-block, linux-kernel, linfeilong, liuzhiqiang, shikemeng

Parameter reason is never used, just remove it.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 1220c41fc767..5a6d9e8c329d 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -4066,8 +4066,7 @@ static void __bfq_bfqq_recalc_budget(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
  * function to evaluate the I/O speed of a process.
  */
 static bool bfq_bfqq_is_slow(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
-				 bool compensate, enum bfqq_expiration reason,
-				 unsigned long *delta_ms)
+				 bool compensate, unsigned long *delta_ms)
 {
 	ktime_t delta_ktime;
 	u32 delta_usecs;
@@ -4263,7 +4262,7 @@ void bfq_bfqq_expire(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
 	/*
 	 * Check whether the process is slow (see bfq_bfqq_is_slow).
 	 */
-	slow = bfq_bfqq_is_slow(bfqd, bfqq, compensate, reason, &delta);
+	slow = bfq_bfqq_is_slow(bfqd, bfqq, compensate, &delta);
 
 	/*
 	 * As above explained, charge slow (typically seeky) and
-- 
2.30.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 03/10] block, bfq: initialize bfqq->decrease_time_jif correctly
@ 2022-12-16 11:12   ` Kemeng Shi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kemeng Shi @ 2022-12-16 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack, paolo.valente, tj, josef, axboe
  Cc: cgroups, linux-block, linux-kernel, linfeilong, liuzhiqiang, shikemeng

Inject limit is updated or reset when time_is_before_eq_jiffies(
decrease_time_jif + several msecs) or think-time state changes.
decrease_time_jif is initialized to 0 and will be set to current jiffies
when inject limit is updated or reset. If the jiffies is slightly greater
than LONG_MAX, time_is_after_eq_jiffies(0) will keep for a long time, so as
time_is_after_eq_jiffies(decrease_time_jif + several msecs). If the
think-time state never chages, then the injection will not work as expected
for long time.

To be more specific:
Function bfq_update_inject_limit maybe triggered when jiffies pasts
decrease_time_jif + msecs_to_jiffies(10) in bfq_add_request by setting
bfqd->wait_dispatch to true.
Function bfq_reset_inject_limit are called in two conditions:
1. jiffies pasts bfqq->decrease_time_jif + msecs_to_jiffies(1000) in
function bfq_add_request.
2. jiffies pasts bfqq->decrease_time_jif + msecs_to_jiffies(100) or
bfq think-time state change from short to long.

Fix this by initializing bfqq->decrease_time_jif to current jiffies
to trigger service injection soon when service injection conditions
are met.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 5a6d9e8c329d..9441fc98961a 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -5491,6 +5491,8 @@ static void bfq_init_bfqq(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
 
 	/* first request is almost certainly seeky */
 	bfqq->seek_history = 1;
+
+	bfqq->decrease_time_jif = jiffies;
 }
 
 static struct bfq_queue **bfq_async_queue_prio(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
-- 
2.30.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 03/10] block, bfq: initialize bfqq->decrease_time_jif correctly
@ 2022-12-16 11:12   ` Kemeng Shi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kemeng Shi @ 2022-12-16 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ, paolo.valente-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A,
	tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A, josef-DigfWCa+lFGyeJad7bwFQA,
	axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw
  Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linfeilong-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA, liuzhiqiang-L7zZNxrQPSE,
	shikemeng-XF6JlduFytWkHkcT6e4Xnw

Inject limit is updated or reset when time_is_before_eq_jiffies(
decrease_time_jif + several msecs) or think-time state changes.
decrease_time_jif is initialized to 0 and will be set to current jiffies
when inject limit is updated or reset. If the jiffies is slightly greater
than LONG_MAX, time_is_after_eq_jiffies(0) will keep for a long time, so as
time_is_after_eq_jiffies(decrease_time_jif + several msecs). If the
think-time state never chages, then the injection will not work as expected
for long time.

To be more specific:
Function bfq_update_inject_limit maybe triggered when jiffies pasts
decrease_time_jif + msecs_to_jiffies(10) in bfq_add_request by setting
bfqd->wait_dispatch to true.
Function bfq_reset_inject_limit are called in two conditions:
1. jiffies pasts bfqq->decrease_time_jif + msecs_to_jiffies(1000) in
function bfq_add_request.
2. jiffies pasts bfqq->decrease_time_jif + msecs_to_jiffies(100) or
bfq think-time state change from short to long.

Fix this by initializing bfqq->decrease_time_jif to current jiffies
to trigger service injection soon when service injection conditions
are met.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng-XF6JlduFytWkHkcT6e4Xnw@public.gmane.org>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 5a6d9e8c329d..9441fc98961a 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -5491,6 +5491,8 @@ static void bfq_init_bfqq(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
 
 	/* first request is almost certainly seeky */
 	bfqq->seek_history = 1;
+
+	bfqq->decrease_time_jif = jiffies;
 }
 
 static struct bfq_queue **bfq_async_queue_prio(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
-- 
2.30.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 04/10] block, bfq: use helper macro RQ_BFQQ to get bfqq of request
  2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kemeng Shi @ 2022-12-16 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack, paolo.valente, tj, josef, axboe
  Cc: cgroups, linux-block, linux-kernel, linfeilong, liuzhiqiang, shikemeng

Use helper macro RQ_BFQQ to get bfqq of request.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 9441fc98961a..c3c4c83ee95f 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -6683,14 +6683,14 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq)
 		return NULL;
 
 	/*
-	 * Assuming that elv.priv[1] is set only if everything is set
+	 * Assuming that RQ_BFQQ(rq) is set only if everything is set
 	 * for this rq. This holds true, because this function is
 	 * invoked only for insertion or merging, and, after such
 	 * events, a request cannot be manipulated any longer before
 	 * being removed from bfq.
 	 */
-	if (rq->elv.priv[1])
-		return rq->elv.priv[1];
+	if (RQ_BFQQ(rq))
+		return RQ_BFQQ(rq);
 
 	bic = icq_to_bic(rq->elv.icq);
 
-- 
2.30.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 05/10] block, bfq: remove unnecessary dereference to get async_bfqq
  2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kemeng Shi @ 2022-12-16 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack, paolo.valente, tj, josef, axboe
  Cc: cgroups, linux-block, linux-kernel, linfeilong, liuzhiqiang, shikemeng

The async_bfqq is assigned with bfqq->bic->bfqq[0], use it directly.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index c3c4c83ee95f..ebcafe3c4c3b 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -4835,7 +4835,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_select_queue(struct bfq_data *bfqd)
 		    icq_to_bic(async_bfqq->next_rq->elv.icq) == bfqq->bic &&
 		    bfq_serv_to_charge(async_bfqq->next_rq, async_bfqq) <=
 		    bfq_bfqq_budget_left(async_bfqq))
-			bfqq = bfqq->bic->bfqq[0];
+			bfqq = async_bfqq;
 		else if (bfqq->waker_bfqq &&
 			   bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq->waker_bfqq) &&
 			   bfqq->waker_bfqq->next_rq &&
-- 
2.30.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 06/10] block, bfq: remove redundant bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0 check in bfq_add_request
  2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kemeng Shi @ 2022-12-16 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack, paolo.valente, tj, josef, axboe
  Cc: cgroups, linux-block, linux-kernel, linfeilong, liuzhiqiang, shikemeng

The bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0 check is along with previous
"bfqd->rq_in_driver == 0 ||" check, so no need to re-check
bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index ebcafe3c4c3b..7c91d16dbf6f 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -2204,8 +2204,7 @@ static void bfq_add_request(struct request *rq)
 		 */
 		if (bfqq == bfqd->in_service_queue &&
 		    (bfqd->rq_in_driver == 0 ||
-		     (bfqq->last_serv_time_ns > 0 &&
-		      bfqd->rqs_injected && bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0)) &&
+		     (bfqq->last_serv_time_ns > 0 && bfqd->rqs_injected)) &&
 		    time_is_before_eq_jiffies(bfqq->decrease_time_jif +
 					      msecs_to_jiffies(10))) {
 			bfqd->last_empty_occupied_ns = ktime_get_ns();
-- 
2.30.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 07/10] block, bfq: remove redundant check in bfq_put_cooperator
  2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kemeng Shi @ 2022-12-16 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack, paolo.valente, tj, josef, axboe
  Cc: cgroups, linux-block, linux-kernel, linfeilong, liuzhiqiang, shikemeng

We have already avoided a circular list in bfq_setup_merge (see comments
in bfq_setup_merge() for details), so bfq_queue will not appear in it's
new_bfqq list. Just remove this check.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 7c91d16dbf6f..89995815dbae 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -5273,8 +5273,6 @@ void bfq_put_cooperator(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
 	 */
 	__bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq;
 	while (__bfqq) {
-		if (__bfqq == bfqq)
-			break;
 		next = __bfqq->new_bfqq;
 		bfq_put_queue(__bfqq);
 		__bfqq = next;
-- 
2.30.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 08/10] block, bfq: remove unnecessary goto tag in bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq
  2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kemeng Shi @ 2022-12-16 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack, paolo.valente, tj, josef, axboe
  Cc: cgroups, linux-block, linux-kernel, linfeilong, liuzhiqiang, shikemeng

We jump to tag only for returning current rq. Return directly to
remove this tag.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 89995815dbae..195cdc6be087 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -4965,7 +4965,7 @@ static struct request *bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
 	bfq_dispatch_remove(bfqd->queue, rq);
 
 	if (bfqq != bfqd->in_service_queue)
-		goto return_rq;
+		return rq;
 
 	/*
 	 * If weight raising has to terminate for bfqq, then next
@@ -4985,12 +4985,9 @@ static struct request *bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
 	 * belongs to CLASS_IDLE and other queues are waiting for
 	 * service.
 	 */
-	if (!(bfq_tot_busy_queues(bfqd) > 1 && bfq_class_idle(bfqq)))
-		goto return_rq;
+	if ((bfq_tot_busy_queues(bfqd) > 1 && bfq_class_idle(bfqq)))
+		bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd, bfqq, false, BFQQE_BUDGET_EXHAUSTED);
 
-	bfq_bfqq_expire(bfqd, bfqq, false, BFQQE_BUDGET_EXHAUSTED);
-
-return_rq:
 	return rq;
 }
 
-- 
2.30.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 09/10] block, bfq: remove unused bfq_wr_max_time in struct bfq_data
  2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kemeng Shi @ 2022-12-16 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack, paolo.valente, tj, josef, axboe
  Cc: cgroups, linux-block, linux-kernel, linfeilong, liuzhiqiang, shikemeng

bfqd->bfq_wr_max_time is set to 0 in bfq_init_queue and is never changed.
It is only used in bfq_wr_duration when bfq_wr_max_time > 0 which never
meets, so bfqd->bfq_wr_max_time is not used actually. Just remove it.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 4 ----
 block/bfq-iosched.h | 2 --
 2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 195cdc6be087..91bc68fba72d 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -1068,9 +1068,6 @@ static unsigned int bfq_wr_duration(struct bfq_data *bfqd)
 {
 	u64 dur;
 
-	if (bfqd->bfq_wr_max_time > 0)
-		return bfqd->bfq_wr_max_time;
-
 	dur = bfqd->rate_dur_prod;
 	do_div(dur, bfqd->peak_rate);
 
@@ -7079,7 +7076,6 @@ static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e)
 	 */
 	bfqd->bfq_wr_coeff = 30;
 	bfqd->bfq_wr_rt_max_time = msecs_to_jiffies(300);
-	bfqd->bfq_wr_max_time = 0;
 	bfqd->bfq_wr_min_idle_time = msecs_to_jiffies(2000);
 	bfqd->bfq_wr_min_inter_arr_async = msecs_to_jiffies(500);
 	bfqd->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate = 7000; /*
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h
index 9fa89577322d..0b1a5438046a 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.h
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h
@@ -719,8 +719,6 @@ struct bfq_data {
 	 * is multiplied.
 	 */
 	unsigned int bfq_wr_coeff;
-	/* maximum duration of a weight-raising period (jiffies) */
-	unsigned int bfq_wr_max_time;
 
 	/* Maximum weight-raising duration for soft real-time processes */
 	unsigned int bfq_wr_rt_max_time;
-- 
2.30.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 10/10] block, bfq: remove check of bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate which is always greater than 0
  2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kemeng Shi @ 2022-12-16 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack, paolo.valente, tj, josef, axboe
  Cc: cgroups, linux-block, linux-kernel, linfeilong, liuzhiqiang, shikemeng

bfqd->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate is assigned with 7000 in bfq_init_queue and
never changed. So we can remove bfqd->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate > 0 check
which is always true.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 91bc68fba72d..00cdd42ac02a 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -1788,8 +1788,7 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
 	 *   to control its weight explicitly)
 	 */
 	in_burst = bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq);
-	soft_rt = bfqd->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate > 0 &&
-		!BFQQ_TOTALLY_SEEKY(bfqq) &&
+	soft_rt = !BFQQ_TOTALLY_SEEKY(bfqq) &&
 		!in_burst &&
 		time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq->soft_rt_next_start) &&
 		bfqq->dispatched == 0 &&
@@ -4284,8 +4283,7 @@ void bfq_bfqq_expire(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
 	if (bfqd->low_latency && bfqq->wr_coeff == 1)
 		bfqq->last_wr_start_finish = jiffies;
 
-	if (bfqd->low_latency && bfqd->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate > 0 &&
-	    RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq->sort_list)) {
+	if (bfqd->low_latency && RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq->sort_list)) {
 		/*
 		 * If we get here, and there are no outstanding
 		 * requests, then the request pattern is isochronous
-- 
2.30.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] A few bugfix and cleancode patch for bfq
@ 2022-12-27  7:26   ` Kemeng Shi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kemeng Shi @ 2022-12-27  7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack, paolo.valente, tj, josef, axboe; +Cc: cgroups, linux-block, linux-kernel

Friendly ping...

on 12/16/2022 7:12 PM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> Hi, this series contain two patches to fix bug in request injection
> mechanism and some random cleancode patches.
> Thanks!
> 
> ---
> v2:
>  -improve git log.
> ---
> 
> Kemeng Shi (10):
>   block, bfq: correctly raise inject limit in
>     bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection
>   block, bfq: remove unsed parameter reason in bfq_bfqq_is_slow
>   block, bfq: initialize bfqq->decrease_time_jif correctly
>   block, bfq: use helper macro RQ_BFQQ to get bfqq of request
>   block, bfq: remove unnecessary dereference to get async_bfqq
>   block, bfq: remove redundant bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0 check in
>     bfq_add_request
>   block, bfq: remove redundant check in bfq_put_cooperator
>   block, bfq: remove unnecessary goto tag in bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq
>   block, bfq: remove unused bfq_wr_max_time in struct bfq_data
>   block, bfq: remove check of bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate which is always
>     greater than 0
> 
>  block/bfq-iosched.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>  block/bfq-iosched.h |  2 --
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Best wishes
Kemeng Shi


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] A few bugfix and cleancode patch for bfq
@ 2022-12-27  7:26   ` Kemeng Shi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Kemeng Shi @ 2022-12-27  7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ, paolo.valente-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A,
	tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A, josef-DigfWCa+lFGyeJad7bwFQA,
	axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw
  Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA

Friendly ping...

on 12/16/2022 7:12 PM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> Hi, this series contain two patches to fix bug in request injection
> mechanism and some random cleancode patches.
> Thanks!
> 
> ---
> v2:
>  -improve git log.
> ---
> 
> Kemeng Shi (10):
>   block, bfq: correctly raise inject limit in
>     bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection
>   block, bfq: remove unsed parameter reason in bfq_bfqq_is_slow
>   block, bfq: initialize bfqq->decrease_time_jif correctly
>   block, bfq: use helper macro RQ_BFQQ to get bfqq of request
>   block, bfq: remove unnecessary dereference to get async_bfqq
>   block, bfq: remove redundant bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0 check in
>     bfq_add_request
>   block, bfq: remove redundant check in bfq_put_cooperator
>   block, bfq: remove unnecessary goto tag in bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq
>   block, bfq: remove unused bfq_wr_max_time in struct bfq_data
>   block, bfq: remove check of bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate which is always
>     greater than 0
> 
>  block/bfq-iosched.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>  block/bfq-iosched.h |  2 --
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Best wishes
Kemeng Shi


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-12-27  7:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-12-16 11:12 [PATCH v2 00/10] A few bugfix and cleancode patch for bfq Kemeng Shi
2022-12-16 11:12 ` Kemeng Shi
2022-12-16 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] block, bfq: correctly raise inject limit in bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection Kemeng Shi
2022-12-16 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] block, bfq: remove unsed parameter reason in bfq_bfqq_is_slow Kemeng Shi
2022-12-16 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] block, bfq: initialize bfqq->decrease_time_jif correctly Kemeng Shi
2022-12-16 11:12   ` Kemeng Shi
2022-12-16 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] block, bfq: use helper macro RQ_BFQQ to get bfqq of request Kemeng Shi
2022-12-16 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] block, bfq: remove unnecessary dereference to get async_bfqq Kemeng Shi
2022-12-16 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] block, bfq: remove redundant bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0 check in bfq_add_request Kemeng Shi
2022-12-16 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] block, bfq: remove redundant check in bfq_put_cooperator Kemeng Shi
2022-12-16 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] block, bfq: remove unnecessary goto tag in bfq_dispatch_rq_from_bfqq Kemeng Shi
2022-12-16 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] block, bfq: remove unused bfq_wr_max_time in struct bfq_data Kemeng Shi
2022-12-16 11:12 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] block, bfq: remove check of bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate which is always greater than 0 Kemeng Shi
2022-12-27  7:26 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] A few bugfix and cleancode patch for bfq Kemeng Shi
2022-12-27  7:26   ` Kemeng Shi

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.