* [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
@ 2022-10-12 0:46 osstest service owner
2022-10-12 2:42 ` Henry Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: osstest service owner @ 2022-10-12 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
flight 173498 xen-4.15-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/173498/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
build-amd64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
build-armhf 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
build-i386 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
build-i386-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-raw 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-livepatch 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-migrupgrade 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-pair 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-pvshim 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-shadow 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-shadow 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-vhd 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-raw 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-arm64-arm64-xl 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-coresched-amd64-xl 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-shadow 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-shadow 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
build-amd64-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
build-arm64-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow2 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
build-armhf-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvshim 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-intel 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
build-i386-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-amd 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpu 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-dom0pvh-xl-amd 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-dom0pvh-xl-intel 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit1 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-livepatch 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-pair 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-pygrub 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd11-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd12-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-coresched-i386-xl 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit1 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit2 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-arm64-arm64-xl-seattle 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-arm64-arm64-xl-thunderx 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-arm64-arm64-xl-vhd 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-xl 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
version targeted for testing:
xen 9690bb261d5fa09cb281e1fa124d93db7b84fda5
baseline version:
xen 9acedc3c58c31930737edbe212f2ccf437a0b757
Last test of basis 172547 2022-08-15 14:06:45 Z 57 days
Testing same since 173494 2022-10-11 13:38:08 Z 0 days 2 attempts
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@arm.com>
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>
Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Tamas K Lengyel <tamas.lengyel@intel.com>
Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
jobs:
build-amd64-xsm fail
build-arm64-xsm fail
build-i386-xsm fail
build-amd64-xtf pass
build-amd64 fail
build-arm64 fail
build-armhf fail
build-i386 fail
build-amd64-libvirt blocked
build-arm64-libvirt blocked
build-armhf-libvirt blocked
build-i386-libvirt blocked
build-amd64-prev pass
build-i386-prev pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-arm64-pvops pass
build-armhf-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 blocked
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 blocked
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 blocked
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 blocked
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl blocked
test-amd64-coresched-amd64-xl blocked
test-arm64-arm64-xl blocked
test-armhf-armhf-xl blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl blocked
test-amd64-coresched-i386-xl blocked
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm blocked
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386-xsm blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386-xsm blocked
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm blocked
test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm blocked
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-xsm blocked
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm blocked
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-amd blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd blocked
test-amd64-amd64-dom0pvh-xl-amd blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd11-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd12-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 blocked
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit1 blocked
test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit1 blocked
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 blocked
test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit2 blocked
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 blocked
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict blocked
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-intel blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel blocked
test-amd64-amd64-dom0pvh-xl-intel blocked
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt blocked
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt blocked
test-amd64-i386-libvirt blocked
test-amd64-amd64-livepatch blocked
test-amd64-i386-livepatch blocked
test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade blocked
test-amd64-i386-migrupgrade blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpu blocked
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu blocked
test-amd64-amd64-pair blocked
test-amd64-i386-pair blocked
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair blocked
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvshim blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-pvshim blocked
test-amd64-amd64-pygrub blocked
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow2 blocked
test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-raw blocked
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw blocked
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-raw blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds blocked
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds blocked
test-arm64-arm64-xl-seattle blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-shadow blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-shadow blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-shadow blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-shadow blocked
test-arm64-arm64-xl-thunderx blocked
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd blocked
test-arm64-arm64-xl-vhd blocked
test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-vhd blocked
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org
logs: /home/logs/logs
images: /home/logs/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs
Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
(No revision log; it would be 689 lines long.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
2022-10-12 0:46 [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
@ 2022-10-12 2:42 ` Henry Wang
2022-10-12 6:28 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Henry Wang @ 2022-10-12 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: osstest service owner
Cc: Julien Grall, Jan Beulich, Juergen Gross, xen-devel,
Bertrand Marquis, Andrew Cooper, sstabellini
Hi all,
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
>
> flight 173498 xen-4.15-testing real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/173498/
>
> Regressions :-(
I think these regressions are from the backporting happened yesterday,
see below...
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> build-arm64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
> build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
> build-amd64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
> build-armhf 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
...The arm/arm64 regression is from the backporting of commit:
xen/arm, libxl: Implement XEN_DOMCTL_shadow_op for Arm
The issue is:
In 4.16, commit
2107cc76db3a libxc: split xc_logdirty_control() from xc_shadow_control()
changes the prototype of xc_shadow_control(), and hence the calling of
xc_shadow_control() in 4.13, 4.14 and 4.15 does not match the calling of
xc_shadow_control() in 4.16 and after.
> build-i386 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
> build-i386-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
> build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
I think the x86 regression is from the backporting of commit:
xen/gnttab: fix gnttab_acquire_resource()
As the error message is:
make[5]: Entering directory '/home/osstest/build.173498.build-amd64/xen/tools/tests/resource'
test-resource.c: In function 'test_gnttab':
test-resource.c:74:19: error: 'gnttab' undeclared (first use in this function)
(void **)&gnttab, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, 0);
^~~~~~
Kind regards,
Henry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
2022-10-12 2:42 ` Henry Wang
@ 2022-10-12 6:28 ` Jan Beulich
2022-10-12 6:34 ` Juergen Gross
2022-10-12 6:42 ` Henry Wang
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2022-10-12 6:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Henry Wang
Cc: Julien Grall, Juergen Gross, xen-devel, Bertrand Marquis,
Andrew Cooper, sstabellini, osstest service owner
On 12.10.2022 04:42, Henry Wang wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Subject: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
>>
>> flight 173498 xen-4.15-testing real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/173498/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>
> I think these regressions are from the backporting happened yesterday,
> see below...
>
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>> build-arm64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>> build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>> build-amd64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>> build-armhf 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>
> ...The arm/arm64 regression is from the backporting of commit:
> xen/arm, libxl: Implement XEN_DOMCTL_shadow_op for Arm
>
> The issue is:
> In 4.16, commit
> 2107cc76db3a libxc: split xc_logdirty_control() from xc_shadow_control()
> changes the prototype of xc_shadow_control(), and hence the calling of
> xc_shadow_control() in 4.13, 4.14 and 4.15 does not match the calling of
> xc_shadow_control() in 4.16 and after.
So did I commit a wrong patch, or were the patches for the older branches
wrong already in xsa.git?
>> build-i386 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>> build-i386-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>> build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>
> I think the x86 regression is from the backporting of commit:
> xen/gnttab: fix gnttab_acquire_resource()
>
> As the error message is:
> make[5]: Entering directory '/home/osstest/build.173498.build-amd64/xen/tools/tests/resource'
> test-resource.c: In function 'test_gnttab':
> test-resource.c:74:19: error: 'gnttab' undeclared (first use in this function)
> (void **)&gnttab, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, 0);
> ^~~~~~
Hmm, I'm pretty sure I did a local build test of tools/ with this in place.
I'm not in the office today, so I won't be able to do anything about it
right away.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
2022-10-12 6:28 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2022-10-12 6:34 ` Juergen Gross
2022-10-12 6:39 ` Jan Beulich
2022-10-12 6:42 ` Henry Wang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Gross @ 2022-10-12 6:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich, Henry Wang
Cc: Julien Grall, xen-devel, Bertrand Marquis, Andrew Cooper,
sstabellini, osstest service owner
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2397 bytes --]
On 12.10.22 08:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.10.2022 04:42, Henry Wang wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> Subject: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
>>>
>>> flight 173498 xen-4.15-testing real [real]
>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/173498/
>>>
>>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> I think these regressions are from the backporting happened yesterday,
>> see below...
>>
>>>
>>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>>> including tests which could not be run:
>>> build-arm64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>> build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>> build-amd64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>> build-armhf 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>
>> ...The arm/arm64 regression is from the backporting of commit:
>> xen/arm, libxl: Implement XEN_DOMCTL_shadow_op for Arm
>>
>> The issue is:
>> In 4.16, commit
>> 2107cc76db3a libxc: split xc_logdirty_control() from xc_shadow_control()
>> changes the prototype of xc_shadow_control(), and hence the calling of
>> xc_shadow_control() in 4.13, 4.14 and 4.15 does not match the calling of
>> xc_shadow_control() in 4.16 and after.
>
> So did I commit a wrong patch, or were the patches for the older branches
> wrong already in xsa.git?
>
>>> build-i386 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>> build-i386-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>> build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>
>> I think the x86 regression is from the backporting of commit:
>> xen/gnttab: fix gnttab_acquire_resource()
>>
>> As the error message is:
>> make[5]: Entering directory '/home/osstest/build.173498.build-amd64/xen/tools/tests/resource'
>> test-resource.c: In function 'test_gnttab':
>> test-resource.c:74:19: error: 'gnttab' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> (void **)&gnttab, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, 0);
>> ^~~~~~
>
> Hmm, I'm pretty sure I did a local build test of tools/ with this in place.
> I'm not in the office today, so I won't be able to do anything about it
> right away.
Maybe you didn't build tools/tests?
I can send a fix.
Juergen
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3149 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
2022-10-12 6:34 ` Juergen Gross
@ 2022-10-12 6:39 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2022-10-12 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juergen Gross
Cc: Julien Grall, xen-devel, Bertrand Marquis, Andrew Cooper,
sstabellini, osstest service owner, Henry Wang
On 12.10.2022 08:34, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 12.10.22 08:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 12.10.2022 04:42, Henry Wang wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> Subject: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
>>>>
>>>> flight 173498 xen-4.15-testing real [real]
>>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/173498/
>>>>
>>>> Regressions :-(
>>>
>>> I think these regressions are from the backporting happened yesterday,
>>> see below...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>>>> including tests which could not be run:
>>>> build-arm64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>>> build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>>> build-amd64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>>> build-armhf 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>>
>>> ...The arm/arm64 regression is from the backporting of commit:
>>> xen/arm, libxl: Implement XEN_DOMCTL_shadow_op for Arm
>>>
>>> The issue is:
>>> In 4.16, commit
>>> 2107cc76db3a libxc: split xc_logdirty_control() from xc_shadow_control()
>>> changes the prototype of xc_shadow_control(), and hence the calling of
>>> xc_shadow_control() in 4.13, 4.14 and 4.15 does not match the calling of
>>> xc_shadow_control() in 4.16 and after.
>>
>> So did I commit a wrong patch, or were the patches for the older branches
>> wrong already in xsa.git?
>>
>>>> build-i386 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>>> build-i386-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>>> build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>>
>>> I think the x86 regression is from the backporting of commit:
>>> xen/gnttab: fix gnttab_acquire_resource()
>>>
>>> As the error message is:
>>> make[5]: Entering directory '/home/osstest/build.173498.build-amd64/xen/tools/tests/resource'
>>> test-resource.c: In function 'test_gnttab':
>>> test-resource.c:74:19: error: 'gnttab' undeclared (first use in this function)
>>> (void **)&gnttab, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, 0);
>>> ^~~~~~
>>
>> Hmm, I'm pretty sure I did a local build test of tools/ with this in place.
>> I'm not in the office today, so I won't be able to do anything about it
>> right away.
>
> Maybe you didn't build tools/tests?
I'd need to check, but yes, that's the suspicion.
> I can send a fix.
That would be great, thanks.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
2022-10-12 6:28 ` Jan Beulich
2022-10-12 6:34 ` Juergen Gross
@ 2022-10-12 6:42 ` Henry Wang
2022-10-12 6:48 ` Jan Beulich
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Henry Wang @ 2022-10-12 6:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich
Cc: Julien Grall, Juergen Gross, xen-devel, Bertrand Marquis,
Andrew Cooper, sstabellini, osstest service owner
Hi Jan,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> Subject: Re: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
>
> On 12.10.2022 04:42, Henry Wang wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> Subject: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
> >>
> >> flight 173498 xen-4.15-testing real [real]
> >> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/173498/
> >>
> >> Regressions :-(
> >
> > I think these regressions are from the backporting happened yesterday,
> > see below...
> >
> >>
> >> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> >> including tests which could not be run:
> >> build-arm64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
> >> build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
> >> build-amd64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
> >> build-armhf 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
> >
> > ...The arm/arm64 regression is from the backporting of commit:
> > xen/arm, libxl: Implement XEN_DOMCTL_shadow_op for Arm
> >
> > The issue is:
> > In 4.16, commit
> > 2107cc76db3a libxc: split xc_logdirty_control() from xc_shadow_control()
> > changes the prototype of xc_shadow_control(), and hence the calling of
> > xc_shadow_control() in 4.13, 4.14 and 4.15 does not match the calling of
> > xc_shadow_control() in 4.16 and after.
>
> So did I commit a wrong patch, or were the patches for the older branches
> wrong already in xsa.git?
I think the latter. For this commit I think the patch for master branch was picked
for the 4.13-4.15 backporting, without noticing the xc_shadow_control()
prototype change in 4.16.
I can send a fix for this. If we don't want to backport the
"libxc: split xc_logdirty_control() from xc_shadow_control()"
Kind regards,
Henry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
2022-10-12 6:42 ` Henry Wang
@ 2022-10-12 6:48 ` Jan Beulich
2022-10-12 6:49 ` Henry Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2022-10-12 6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Henry Wang, Anthony Perard
Cc: Julien Grall, Juergen Gross, xen-devel, Bertrand Marquis,
Andrew Cooper, sstabellini, osstest service owner
On 12.10.2022 08:42, Henry Wang wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>> Subject: Re: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
>>
>> On 12.10.2022 04:42, Henry Wang wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> Subject: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
>>>>
>>>> flight 173498 xen-4.15-testing real [real]
>>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/173498/
>>>>
>>>> Regressions :-(
>>>
>>> I think these regressions are from the backporting happened yesterday,
>>> see below...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>>>> including tests which could not be run:
>>>> build-arm64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>>> build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>>> build-amd64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>>> build-armhf 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
>>>
>>> ...The arm/arm64 regression is from the backporting of commit:
>>> xen/arm, libxl: Implement XEN_DOMCTL_shadow_op for Arm
>>>
>>> The issue is:
>>> In 4.16, commit
>>> 2107cc76db3a libxc: split xc_logdirty_control() from xc_shadow_control()
>>> changes the prototype of xc_shadow_control(), and hence the calling of
>>> xc_shadow_control() in 4.13, 4.14 and 4.15 does not match the calling of
>>> xc_shadow_control() in 4.16 and after.
>>
>> So did I commit a wrong patch, or were the patches for the older branches
>> wrong already in xsa.git?
>
> I think the latter. For this commit I think the patch for master branch was picked
> for the 4.13-4.15 backporting, without noticing the xc_shadow_control()
> prototype change in 4.16.
>
> I can send a fix for this. If we don't want to backport the
> "libxc: split xc_logdirty_control() from xc_shadow_control()"
I don't think we should backport that extra change, but Anthony would have
the final say.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
2022-10-12 6:48 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2022-10-12 6:49 ` Henry Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Henry Wang @ 2022-10-12 6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich, Anthony Perard
Cc: Julien Grall, Juergen Gross, xen-devel, Bertrand Marquis,
Andrew Cooper, sstabellini, osstest service owner
Hi Jan,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> Subject: Re: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
>
> On 12.10.2022 08:42, Henry Wang wrote:
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
> >>
> >> On 12.10.2022 04:42, Henry Wang wrote:
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> Subject: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
> >>>>
> >>>> flight 173498 xen-4.15-testing real [real]
> >>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/173498/
> >>>>
> >>>> Regressions :-(
> >>>
> >>> I think these regressions are from the backporting happened yesterday,
> >>> see below...
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> >>>> including tests which could not be run:
> >>>> build-arm64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
> >>>> build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
> >>>> build-amd64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
> >>>> build-armhf 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 172547
> >>>
> >>> ...The arm/arm64 regression is from the backporting of commit:
> >>> xen/arm, libxl: Implement XEN_DOMCTL_shadow_op for Arm
> >>>
> >>> The issue is:
> >>> In 4.16, commit
> >>> 2107cc76db3a libxc: split xc_logdirty_control() from xc_shadow_control()
> >>> changes the prototype of xc_shadow_control(), and hence the calling of
> >>> xc_shadow_control() in 4.13, 4.14 and 4.15 does not match the calling of
> >>> xc_shadow_control() in 4.16 and after.
> >>
> >> So did I commit a wrong patch, or were the patches for the older branches
> >> wrong already in xsa.git?
> >
> > I think the latter. For this commit I think the patch for master branch was
> picked
> > for the 4.13-4.15 backporting, without noticing the xc_shadow_control()
> > prototype change in 4.16.
> >
> > I can send a fix for this. If we don't want to backport the
> > "libxc: split xc_logdirty_control() from xc_shadow_control()"
>
> I don't think we should backport that extra change, but Anthony would have
> the final say.
Then I will try to prepare a fix.
Kind regards,
Henry
>
> Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-10-12 6:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-10-12 0:46 [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2022-10-12 2:42 ` Henry Wang
2022-10-12 6:28 ` Jan Beulich
2022-10-12 6:34 ` Juergen Gross
2022-10-12 6:39 ` Jan Beulich
2022-10-12 6:42 ` Henry Wang
2022-10-12 6:48 ` Jan Beulich
2022-10-12 6:49 ` Henry Wang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.