All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Cc: tiwai@suse.de, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, broonie@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ASOC: SOF: Intel: hda-codec: move unused label to correct position
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 09:17:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d1480ba-f17d-bc0f-4242-f34584725bcb@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200823034829.GA2636427@ubuntu-n2-xlarge-x86>




> I don't get this patch because there is no moving of a label, it just
> introduces it, where it is actually completely unused in the function as
> far as I can tell in both v5.9-rc1 and next-20200821. When building with
> clang in certain configurations, this introduces the same type of
> warning:
> 
> sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-codec.c:182:1: warning: unused label 'error'
> [-Wunused-label]
> error:
> ^~~~~~
> 1 warning generated.
> 
> It seems like this should be reverted as it does not actually do
> anything.

I must have made a mistake with these cppcheck patches, the patch that 
needed to be fixed is not upstream but in the SOF tree. I will send it 
later today, sorry about the noise.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-24 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-13 17:58 [PATCH 0/5] ASoC: SOF/Intel: fix cppcheck warnings Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/5] ASOC: SOF: Intel: hda-codec: move unused label to correct position Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-23  3:48   ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-08-24 14:17     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2020-08-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-codec: move variable used conditionally Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 3/5] ASoC: Intel: rename shadowed variable for all broadwell boards Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 4/5] ASoC: Intel: bytcht_cx2072x: simplify return handling Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] ASoC: Intel: sof_sdw: clarify operator precedence Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-13 18:45   ` Mark Brown
2020-08-13 19:43     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-13 19:49       ` Mark Brown
2020-08-13 19:57         ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-18 16:54 ` [PATCH 0/5] ASoC: SOF/Intel: fix cppcheck warnings Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9d1480ba-f17d-bc0f-4242-f34584725bcb@linux.intel.com \
    --to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.