Re: [RFC] Low overhead patches for the memory cgroup controller (v2)

* Re: [RFC] Low overhead patches for the memory cgroup controller (v2)
@ 2009-05-15 17:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 41+ messages in thread
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki @ 2009-05-15 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: balbir
  Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki,
	nishimura, lizf, menage, KOSAKI Motohiro

Balbir Singh wrote:
> Feature: Remove the overhead associated with the root cgroup
>
> From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> This patch changes the memory cgroup and removes the overhead associated
> with LRU maintenance of all pages in the root cgroup. As a side-effect, we
> can
> no longer set a memory hard limit in the root cgroup.
>
> A new flag is used to track page_cgroup associated with the root cgroup
> pages. A new flag to track whether the page has been accounted or not
> has been added as well.
>
> Review comments higly appreciated
>
> Tests
>
> 1. Tested with allocate, touch and limit test case for a non-root cgroup
> 2. For the root cgroup tested performance impact with reaim
>
>
> 		+patch		mmtom-08-may-2009
> AIM9		1362.93		1338.17
> Dbase		17457.75	16021.58
> New Dbase	18070.18	16518.54
> Shared		9681.85		8882.11
> Compute		16197.79	15226.13
>
Hmm, at first impression, I can't convice the numbers...
Just avoiding list_add/del makes programs _10%_ faster ?
Could you show changes in cpu cache-miss late if you can ?
(And why Aim9 goes bad ?)
Hmm, page_cgroup_zoneinfo() is accessed anyway, then...per zone counter
is not a problem here..

Could you show your .config and environment ?
When I trunst above numbers, it seems there is more optimization/
prefetch point in usual path

BTW, how the perfomance changes in children(not default) groups ?

> 3. Tested accounting in root cgroup to make sure it looks sane and
> correct.
>
Not sure but swap and shmem case should be checked carefully..

> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
>  include/linux/page_cgroup.h |   10 ++++++++++
>  mm/memcontrol.c             |   29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  mm/page_cgroup.c            |    1 -
>  3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> index 7339c7b..8b85752 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ enum {
>  	PCG_LOCK,  /* page cgroup is locked */
>  	PCG_CACHE, /* charged as cache */
>  	PCG_USED, /* this object is in use. */
> +	PCG_ROOT, /* page belongs to root cgroup */
> +	PCG_ACCT, /* page has been accounted for */
Reading codes, this PCG_ACCT should be PCG_AcctLRU.

>  };
>
>  #define TESTPCGFLAG(uname, lname)			\
> @@ -46,6 +48,14 @@ TESTPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE)
>  TESTPCGFLAG(Used, USED)
>  CLEARPCGFLAG(Used, USED)
>
> +SETPCGFLAG(Root, ROOT)
> +CLEARPCGFLAG(Root, ROOT)
> +TESTPCGFLAG(Root, ROOT)
> +
> +SETPCGFLAG(Acct, ACCT)
> +CLEARPCGFLAG(Acct, ACCT)
> +TESTPCGFLAG(Acct, ACCT)
> +
>  static inline int page_cgroup_nid(struct page_cgroup *pc)
>  {
>  	return page_to_nid(pc->page);
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 9712ef7..18d2819 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>
>  struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys __read_mostly;
>  #define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES	5
> +struct mem_cgroup *root_mem_cgroup __read_mostly;
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP
>  /* Turned on only when memory cgroup is enabled && really_do_swap_account
> = 0 */
> @@ -196,6 +197,10 @@ enum charge_type {
>  #define PCGF_CACHE	(1UL << PCG_CACHE)
>  #define PCGF_USED	(1UL << PCG_USED)
>  #define PCGF_LOCK	(1UL << PCG_LOCK)
> +/* Not used, but added here for completeness */
> +#define PCGF_ROOT	(1UL << PCG_ROOT)
> +#define PCGF_ACCT	(1UL << PCG_ACCT)
> +
>  static const unsigned long
>  pcg_default_flags[NR_CHARGE_TYPE] = {
>  	PCGF_CACHE | PCGF_USED | PCGF_LOCK, /* File Cache */
> @@ -420,7 +425,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page *page, enum
> lru_list lru)
>  		return;
>  	pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
>  	/* can happen while we handle swapcache. */
> -	if (list_empty(&pc->lru) || !pc->mem_cgroup)
> +	if ((!PageCgroupAcct(pc) && list_empty(&pc->lru)) || !pc->mem_cgroup)
>  		return;
>  	/*
>  	 * We don't check PCG_USED bit. It's cleared when the "page" is finally
> @@ -429,6 +434,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_del_lru_list(struct page *page, enum
> lru_list lru)
>  	mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
>  	mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
>  	MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) -= 1;
> +	ClearPageCgroupAcct(pc);
> +	if (PageCgroupRoot(pc))
> +		return;
>  	list_del_init(&pc->lru);
>  	return;
>  }

> @@ -452,8 +460,8 @@ void mem_cgroup_rotate_lru_list(struct page *page,
> enum lru_list lru)
>  	 * For making pc->mem_cgroup visible, insert smp_rmb() here.
>  	 */
>  	smp_rmb();
> -	/* unused page is not rotated. */
> -	if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
> +	/* unused or root page is not rotated. */
> +	if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc) || PageCgroupRoot(pc))
>  		return;
>  	mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
>  	list_move(&pc->lru, &mz->lists[lru]);
> @@ -477,6 +485,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(struct page *page, enum
> lru_list lru)
>
>  	mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
>  	MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, lru) += 1;
> +	SetPageCgroupAcct(pc);
> +	if (PageCgroupRoot(pc))
> +		return;
>  	list_add(&pc->lru, &mz->lists[lru]);
>  }
I think set/clear flag here adds race condtion....because pc->flags is
modfied by
  pc->flags = pcg_dafault_flags[ctype] in commit_charge()
you have to modify above lines to be

  SetPageCgroupCache(pc) or some..
  ...
  SetPageCgroupUsed(pc)

Then, you can use set_bit() without lock_page_cgroup().
(Currently, pc->flags is modified only under lock_page_cgroup(), so,
 non atomic code is used.)

Regards,
-Kame

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 41+ messages in thread