Re: [PATCH for-7.2 v4 09/11] ppc/pnv: change pnv_phb4_get_pec() to also retrieve chip10->pecs

[Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>]

On 11/08/2022 18:39, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> The function assumes that we're always dealing with a PNV9_CHIP()
> object. This is not the case when the pnv-phb device belongs to a
> powernv10 machine.
> 
> Change pnv_phb4_get_pec() to be able to work with PNV10_CHIP() if
> necessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
> ---


Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>

   Fred


>   hw/ppc/pnv.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> index ec0558ed1c..e6c14fe231 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> @@ -284,17 +284,30 @@ static void pnv_dt_icp(PnvChip *chip, void *fdt, uint32_t pir,
>   static PnvPhb4PecState *pnv_phb4_get_pec(PnvChip *chip, PnvPHB4 *phb,
>                                            Error **errp)
>   {
> -    Pnv9Chip *chip9 = PNV9_CHIP(chip);
> +    PnvPHB *phb_base = phb->phb_base;
> +    PnvPhb4PecState *pecs = NULL;
>       int chip_id = phb->chip_id;
>       int index = phb->phb_id;
>       int i, j;
>   
> +    if (phb_base->version == 4) {
> +        Pnv9Chip *chip9 = PNV9_CHIP(chip);
> +
> +        pecs = chip9->pecs;
> +    } else if (phb_base->version == 5) {
> +        Pnv10Chip *chip10 = PNV10_CHIP(chip);
> +
> +        pecs = chip10->pecs;
> +    } else {
> +        g_assert_not_reached();
> +    }
> +
>       for (i = 0; i < chip->num_pecs; i++) {
>           /*
>            * For each PEC, check the amount of phbs it supports
>            * and see if the given phb4 index matches an index.
>            */
> -        PnvPhb4PecState *pec = &chip9->pecs[i];
> +        PnvPhb4PecState *pec = &pecs[i];
>   
>           for (j = 0; j < pec->num_phbs; j++) {
>               if (index == pnv_phb4_pec_get_phb_id(pec, j)) {