[PATCH v4] ks7010: enclose non-trivial defines in parentheses

[PATCH v4] ks7010: enclose non-trivial defines in parentheses

[shivang upadhyay]

Checkpatch complains that parentheses are missing:
"Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses".
Fixed that.

Signed-off-by: shivang upadhyay <oroz3x@gmail.com>
---

Previous versions of the patch were rejected due to lack of
discription in patch emails.

 drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.h b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.h
index 39138191a556..c62a494ed6bb 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.h
@@ -498,20 +498,20 @@ struct hostif_mic_failure_request {
 #define TX_RATE_FIXED		5
 
 /* 11b rate */
-#define TX_RATE_1M	(u8)(10 / 5)	/* 11b 11g basic rate */
-#define TX_RATE_2M	(u8)(20 / 5)	/* 11b 11g basic rate */
-#define TX_RATE_5M	(u8)(55 / 5)	/* 11g basic rate */
-#define TX_RATE_11M	(u8)(110 / 5)	/* 11g basic rate */
+#define TX_RATE_1M	((u8)(10 / 5))	/* 11b 11g basic rate */
+#define TX_RATE_2M	((u8)(20 / 5))	/* 11b 11g basic rate */
+#define TX_RATE_5M	((u8)(55 / 5))	/* 11g basic rate */
+#define TX_RATE_11M	((u8)(110 / 5))	/* 11g basic rate */
 
 /* 11g rate */
-#define TX_RATE_6M	(u8)(60 / 5)	/* 11g basic rate */
-#define TX_RATE_12M	(u8)(120 / 5)	/* 11g basic rate */
-#define TX_RATE_24M	(u8)(240 / 5)	/* 11g basic rate */
-#define TX_RATE_9M	(u8)(90 / 5)
-#define TX_RATE_18M	(u8)(180 / 5)
-#define TX_RATE_36M	(u8)(360 / 5)
-#define TX_RATE_48M	(u8)(480 / 5)
-#define TX_RATE_54M	(u8)(540 / 5)
+#define TX_RATE_6M	((u8)(60 / 5))	/* 11g basic rate */
+#define TX_RATE_12M	((u8)(120 / 5))	/* 11g basic rate */
+#define TX_RATE_24M	((u8)(240 / 5))	/* 11g basic rate */
+#define TX_RATE_9M	((u8)(90 / 5))
+#define TX_RATE_18M	((u8)(180 / 5))
+#define TX_RATE_36M	((u8)(360 / 5))
+#define TX_RATE_48M	((u8)(480 / 5))
+#define TX_RATE_54M	((u8)(540 / 5))
 
 static inline bool is_11b_rate(u8 rate)
 {
-- 
2.27.0

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Re: [PATCH v4] ks7010: enclose non-trivial defines in parentheses

[roz]

Hi,

I wanted to check the status on the following patch.
I wanted the result for eudyptula task 10 submission.
It would be great if i can check if the mail is being
processed or rejected. I appologise for any troubles.


On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 6:57 pm, shivang upadhyay <oroz3x@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> 
> Checkpatch complains that parentheses are missing:
> "Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses".
> Fixed that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: shivang upadhyay <oroz3x@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> Previous versions of the patch were rejected due to lack of
> discription in patch emails.
> 
>  drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.h 
> b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.h
> index 39138191a556..c62a494ed6bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.h
> @@ -498,20 +498,20 @@ struct hostif_mic_failure_request {
>  #define TX_RATE_FIXED		5
> 
>  /* 11b rate */
> -#define TX_RATE_1M	(u8)(10 / 5)	/* 11b 11g basic rate */
> -#define TX_RATE_2M	(u8)(20 / 5)	/* 11b 11g basic rate */
> -#define TX_RATE_5M	(u8)(55 / 5)	/* 11g basic rate */
> -#define TX_RATE_11M	(u8)(110 / 5)	/* 11g basic rate */
> +#define TX_RATE_1M	((u8)(10 / 5))	/* 11b 11g basic rate */
> +#define TX_RATE_2M	((u8)(20 / 5))	/* 11b 11g basic rate */
> +#define TX_RATE_5M	((u8)(55 / 5))	/* 11g basic rate */
> +#define TX_RATE_11M	((u8)(110 / 5))	/* 11g basic rate */
> 
>  /* 11g rate */
> -#define TX_RATE_6M	(u8)(60 / 5)	/* 11g basic rate */
> -#define TX_RATE_12M	(u8)(120 / 5)	/* 11g basic rate */
> -#define TX_RATE_24M	(u8)(240 / 5)	/* 11g basic rate */
> -#define TX_RATE_9M	(u8)(90 / 5)
> -#define TX_RATE_18M	(u8)(180 / 5)
> -#define TX_RATE_36M	(u8)(360 / 5)
> -#define TX_RATE_48M	(u8)(480 / 5)
> -#define TX_RATE_54M	(u8)(540 / 5)
> +#define TX_RATE_6M	((u8)(60 / 5))	/* 11g basic rate */
> +#define TX_RATE_12M	((u8)(120 / 5))	/* 11g basic rate */
> +#define TX_RATE_24M	((u8)(240 / 5))	/* 11g basic rate */
> +#define TX_RATE_9M	((u8)(90 / 5))
> +#define TX_RATE_18M	((u8)(180 / 5))
> +#define TX_RATE_36M	((u8)(360 / 5))
> +#define TX_RATE_48M	((u8)(480 / 5))
> +#define TX_RATE_54M	((u8)(540 / 5))
> 
>  static inline bool is_11b_rate(u8 rate)
>  {
> --
> 2.27.0
> 


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Re: [PATCH v4] ks7010: enclose non-trivial defines in parentheses

[Greg KH]

A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post
Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 11:59:34PM +0530, roz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I wanted to check the status on the following patch.
> I wanted the result for eudyptula task 10 submission.

There's no deadlines here, and the first rule of the eudyptula challenge
is that you can not talk about the eudyptula challenge without getting
in trouble :(

> It would be great if i can check if the mail is being
> processed or rejected. I appologise for any troubles.

I rejected it a while ago, you got the email from my patch bot, right?
See here:
	https://lore.kernel.org/r/YCY2FTmycppYXY0O@kroah.com

Why did you resend it if you didn't do what that email said to do?

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel