Did I miss any other patches or RFCs that need to be reviewed?

Did I miss any other patches or RFCs that need to be reviewed?

[Hans Verkuil]

Hi all,

I think I've finally finished reviewing all the pending patches.

Are there any that I've missed? Or are there other postings that need my
attention?

Please let me know, otherwise I assume that I'm (finally!) up to date.

Regards,

	Hans

-- 
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom

RE: Did I miss any other patches or RFCs that need to be reviewed?

[Karicheri, Muralidharan]

Hans,

Thanks for your review. I will get back to you if I need more
information on your comments.

You have reviewed the following patches in this series...
1,7,8,10

Following are part of this series which requires review as well.

[PATCH 2/10 - v2] ccdc hw device header file for vpfe capture
[PATCH 3/10 - v2] dm355 ccdc module for vpfe capture driver
[PATCH 4/10 - v2] dm644x ccdc module for vpfe capture driver
[PATCH 5/10 - v2] ccdc types used across ccdc modules for vpfe capture driver

(not much to review in the below patch )

PATCH 6/10 - v2] Makefile and config files for vpfe capture driver 

regards,

Murali Karicheri
Software Design Engineer
Texas Instruments Inc.
Germantown, MD 20874
email: m-karicheri2@ti.com

>-----Original Message-----
>From: davinci-linux-open-source-bounces+m-
>karicheri2=ti.com@linux.davincidsp.com [mailto:davinci-linux-open-source-
>bounces+m-karicheri2=ti.com@linux.davincidsp.com] On Behalf Of Hans Verkuil
>Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 10:37 AM
>To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
>Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com; linux-
>omap@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Did I miss any other patches or RFCs that need to be reviewed?
>
>Hi all,
>
>I think I've finally finished reviewing all the pending patches.
>
>Are there any that I've missed? Or are there other postings that need my
>attention?
>
>Please let me know, otherwise I assume that I'm (finally!) up to date.
>
>Regards,
>
>	Hans
>
>--
>Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom
>
>_______________________________________________
>Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
>Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
>http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Re: Did I miss any other patches or RFCs that need to be reviewed?

[Hans Verkuil]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 2218 bytes --]

On Monday 15 June 2009 18:24:53 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
> Hans,
> 
> Thanks for your review. I will get back to you if I need more
> information on your comments.
> 
> You have reviewed the following patches in this series...
> 1,7,8,10

Those were the only ones I had any comments on. So I'm happy with the
others.

Regards,

	Hans

> 
> Following are part of this series which requires review as well.
> 
> [PATCH 2/10 - v2] ccdc hw device header file for vpfe capture
> [PATCH 3/10 - v2] dm355 ccdc module for vpfe capture driver
> [PATCH 4/10 - v2] dm644x ccdc module for vpfe capture driver
> [PATCH 5/10 - v2] ccdc types used across ccdc modules for vpfe capture driver
> 
> (not much to review in the below patch )
> 
> PATCH 6/10 - v2] Makefile and config files for vpfe capture driver 
> 
> regards,
> 
> Murali Karicheri
> Software Design Engineer
> Texas Instruments Inc.
> Germantown, MD 20874
> email: m-karicheri2@ti.com
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: davinci-linux-open-source-bounces+m-
> >karicheri2=ti.com@linux.davincidsp.com [mailto:davinci-linux-open-source-
> >bounces+m-karicheri2=ti.com@linux.davincidsp.com] On Behalf Of Hans Verkuil
> >Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 10:37 AM
> >To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> >Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com; linux-
> >omap@vger.kernel.org
> >Subject: Did I miss any other patches or RFCs that need to be reviewed?
> >
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I think I've finally finished reviewing all the pending patches.
> >
> >Are there any that I've missed? Or are there other postings that need my
> >attention?
> >
> >Please let me know, otherwise I assume that I'm (finally!) up to date.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >	Hans
> >
> >--
> >Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
> >Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
> >http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
> ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þg‰¯âžØ^n‡r¡ö¦zË\x1aëh™¨è­Ú&£ûàz¿äz¹Þ—ú+€Ê+zf£¢·hšˆ§~†­†Ûiÿÿïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x0fæj:+v‰¨þ)ߣøm
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom

Re: Did I miss any other patches or RFCs that need to be reviewed?

[Hans Verkuil]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8, Size: 2491 bytes --]

On Monday 15 June 2009 18:24:53 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
> Hans,
> 
> Thanks for your review. I will get back to you if I need more
> information on your comments.
> 
> You have reviewed the following patches in this series...
> 1,7,8,10

Those were the only ones I had any comments on. So I'm happy with the
others.

Regards,

	Hans

> 
> Following are part of this series which requires review as well.
> 
> [PATCH 2/10 - v2] ccdc hw device header file for vpfe capture
> [PATCH 3/10 - v2] dm355 ccdc module for vpfe capture driver
> [PATCH 4/10 - v2] dm644x ccdc module for vpfe capture driver
> [PATCH 5/10 - v2] ccdc types used across ccdc modules for vpfe capture driver
> 
> (not much to review in the below patch )
> 
> PATCH 6/10 - v2] Makefile and config files for vpfe capture driver 
> 
> regards,
> 
> Murali Karicheri
> Software Design Engineer
> Texas Instruments Inc.
> Germantown, MD 20874
> email: m-karicheri2@ti.com
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: davinci-linux-open-source-bounces+m-
> >karicheri2=ti.com@linux.davincidsp.com [mailto:davinci-linux-open-source-
> >bounces+m-karicheri2=ti.com@linux.davincidsp.com] On Behalf Of Hans Verkuil
> >Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 10:37 AM
> >To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> >Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com; linux-
> >omap@vger.kernel.org
> >Subject: Did I miss any other patches or RFCs that need to be reviewed?
> >
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I think I've finally finished reviewing all the pending patches.
> >
> >Are there any that I've missed? Or are there other postings that need my
> >attention?
> >
> >Please let me know, otherwise I assume that I'm (finally!) up to date.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >	Hans
> >
> >--
> >Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
> >Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
> >http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
> ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þg‰¯âžØ^n‡r¡ö¦zË\x1aëh™¨è­Ú&£ûàz¿äz¹Þ—ú+€Ê+zf£¢·hšˆ§~†­†Ûiÿÿïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x0fæj:+v‰¨þ)ߣøm
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

RE: Did I miss any other patches or RFCs that need to be reviewed?

[Karicheri, Muralidharan]

Hans,

That is great!

Once I change the code based on the comments, do you think there is a chance to get the driver to be merged to 2.6.31 (If so, how soon should I be ready with the next version, v3 of the patch) or do we need to wait until 2.6.32?

Regards,
Murali Karicheri
Software Design Engineer
Texas Instruments Inc.
Germantown, MD 20874
Phone : 301-515-3736
email: m-karicheri2@ti.com

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverkuil@xs4all.nl]
>Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 1:56 PM
>To: Karicheri, Muralidharan
>Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; davinci-linux-open-
>source@linux.davincidsp.com; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: Did I miss any other patches or RFCs that need to be reviewed?
>
>On Monday 15 June 2009 18:24:53 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
>> Hans,
>>
>> Thanks for your review. I will get back to you if I need more
>> information on your comments.
>>
>> You have reviewed the following patches in this series...
>> 1,7,8,10
>
>Those were the only ones I had any comments on. So I'm happy with the
>others.
>
>Regards,
>
>	Hans
>
>>
>> Following are part of this series which requires review as well.
>>
>> [PATCH 2/10 - v2] ccdc hw device header file for vpfe capture
>> [PATCH 3/10 - v2] dm355 ccdc module for vpfe capture driver
>> [PATCH 4/10 - v2] dm644x ccdc module for vpfe capture driver
>> [PATCH 5/10 - v2] ccdc types used across ccdc modules for vpfe capture
>driver
>>
>> (not much to review in the below patch )
>>
>> PATCH 6/10 - v2] Makefile and config files for vpfe capture driver
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Murali Karicheri
>> Software Design Engineer
>> Texas Instruments Inc.
>> Germantown, MD 20874
>> email: m-karicheri2@ti.com
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: davinci-linux-open-source-bounces+m-
>> >karicheri2=ti.com@linux.davincidsp.com [mailto:davinci-linux-open-
>source-
>> >bounces+m-karicheri2=ti.com@linux.davincidsp.com] On Behalf Of Hans
>Verkuil
>> >Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 10:37 AM
>> >To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
>> >Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com; linux-
>> >omap@vger.kernel.org
>> >Subject: Did I miss any other patches or RFCs that need to be reviewed?
>> >
>> >Hi all,
>> >
>> >I think I've finally finished reviewing all the pending patches.
>> >
>> >Are there any that I've missed? Or are there other postings that need my
>> >attention?
>> >
>> >Please let me know, otherwise I assume that I'm (finally!) up to date.
>> >
>> >Regards,
>> >
>> >	Hans
>> >
>> >--
>> >Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
>> >Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
>> >http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
>>
>���{.n�+�������+%�����ݶ\x17��w��{.n�+����{��g�����^n�r���z�\x1a��h����&���z��z�ޗ�
>+��+zf���h���~����i��������z_�\x0f�j:+v���)ߣ�m
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom

Re: Did I miss any other patches or RFCs that need to be reviewed?

[Hans Verkuil]

On Monday 15 June 2009 20:44:15 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
> Hans,
>
> That is great!
>
> Once I change the code based on the comments, do you think there is a
> chance to get the driver to be merged to 2.6.31 (If so, how soon should I
> be ready with the next version, v3 of the patch) or do we need to wait
> until 2.6.32?

If you want to have a chance to get this in 2.6.31 then you have to be 
quick, and even then I can't guarantee anything. It will depend on Mauro to 
a large extent. The 2.6.31 merge window is now open but will close in 1-2 
weeks. After that it depends on Mauro whether he will allow it to be 
merged.

It's a pretty tight schedule, I'm afraid.

Regards,

	Hans

-- 
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom

RE: Did I miss any other patches or RFCs that need to be reviewed?

[Karicheri, Muralidharan]

Hans,

I will do my best to push v3 of this patch this week.

Murali Karicheri
Software Design Engineer
Texas Instruments Inc.
Germantown, MD 20874
Phone : 301-515-3736
email: m-karicheri2@ti.com

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverkuil@xs4all.nl]
>Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 5:46 PM
>To: Karicheri, Muralidharan
>Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; davinci-linux-open-
>source@linux.davincidsp.com; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: Did I miss any other patches or RFCs that need to be reviewed?
>
>On Monday 15 June 2009 20:44:15 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
>> Hans,
>>
>> That is great!
>>
>> Once I change the code based on the comments, do you think there is a
>> chance to get the driver to be merged to 2.6.31 (If so, how soon should I
>> be ready with the next version, v3 of the patch) or do we need to wait
>> until 2.6.32?
>
>If you want to have a chance to get this in 2.6.31 then you have to be
>quick, and even then I can't guarantee anything. It will depend on Mauro to
>a large extent. The 2.6.31 merge window is now open but will close in 1-2
>weeks. After that it depends on Mauro whether he will allow it to be
>merged.
>
>It's a pretty tight schedule, I'm afraid.
>
>Regards,
>
>	Hans
>
>--
>Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom