* [PATCH] Use freeze/thaw/restore PM events for Guest suspend/resume/checkpoint
@ 2011-02-14 16:21 Shriram Rajagopalan
2011-02-14 16:24 ` Shriram Rajagopalan
2011-02-14 19:06 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Shriram Rajagopalan @ 2011-02-14 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Use PM_FREEZE, PM_THAW and PM_RESTORE power events for
suspend/resume functionality, instead of PM_SUSPEND and
PM_RESUME. Use of these pm events also fixes the Xen Guest
hangup when taking checkpoints. When a suspend event is cancelled
(i.e. while taking checkpoints once/continuously), we use PM_THAW
instead of PM_RESUME. PM_RESTORE is used when suspend is not
cancelled. See Documentation/power/devices.txt and linux/pm.h
for more info about freeze, thaw and restore. The sequence of
pm events in a suspend-resume scenario is shown below.
dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_FREEZE);
dpm_suspend_noirq(PMSG_FREEZE);
sysdev_suspend(PMSG_FREEZE);
cancelled = suspend_hypercall()
sysdev_resume();
dpm_resume_noirq(cancelled ? PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE);
dpm_resume_end(cancelled ? PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE);
Signed-off-by: Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@cs.ubc.ca>
---
drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 2 +-
drivers/xen/manage.c | 12 ++++++------
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c | 11 +++++++++--
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.h | 3 ++-
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_frontend.c | 10 ++++++++--
include/xen/xenbus.h | 2 +-
6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
index 3f71199..22c6288 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
@@ -1293,7 +1293,7 @@ static void xennet_disconnect_backend(struct netfront_info *info)
info->rx.sring = NULL;
}
-static int netfront_suspend(struct xenbus_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
+static int netfront_suspend(struct xenbus_device *dev)
{
struct netfront_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
struct hrtimer *timer = &info->smart_poll.timer;
diff --git a/drivers/xen/manage.c b/drivers/xen/manage.c
index 0b50906..98c856b 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/manage.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/manage.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int xen_suspend(void *data)
BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
- err = sysdev_suspend(PMSG_SUSPEND);
+ err = sysdev_suspend(PMSG_FREEZE);
if (err) {
printk(KERN_ERR "xen_suspend: sysdev_suspend failed: %d\n",
err);
@@ -117,16 +117,16 @@ static void do_suspend(void)
}
#endif
- err = dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_SUSPEND);
+ err = dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_FREEZE);
if (err) {
printk(KERN_ERR "xen suspend: dpm_suspend_start %d\n", err);
goto out_thaw;
}
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "suspending xenstore...\n");
+ /* printk(KERN_DEBUG "suspending xenstore...\n"); */
xs_suspend();
- err = dpm_suspend_noirq(PMSG_SUSPEND);
+ err = dpm_suspend_noirq(PMSG_FREEZE);
if (err) {
printk(KERN_ERR "dpm_suspend_noirq failed: %d\n", err);
goto out_resume;
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static void do_suspend(void)
else
err = stop_machine(xen_suspend, &cancelled, cpumask_of(0));
- dpm_resume_noirq(PMSG_RESUME);
+ dpm_resume_noirq(cancelled ? PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE);
if (err) {
printk(KERN_ERR "failed to start xen_suspend: %d\n", err);
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ out_resume:
} else
xs_suspend_cancel();
- dpm_resume_end(PMSG_RESUME);
+ dpm_resume_end(cancelled ? PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE);
/* Make sure timer events get retriggered on all CPUs */
clock_was_set();
diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
index 3a83ba2..b61b9f8 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ void xenbus_dev_changed(const char *node, struct xen_bus_type *bus)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xenbus_dev_changed);
-int xenbus_dev_suspend(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
+int xenbus_dev_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
int err = 0;
struct xenbus_driver *drv;
@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ int xenbus_dev_suspend(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
return 0;
drv = to_xenbus_driver(dev->driver);
if (drv->suspend)
- err = drv->suspend(xdev, state);
+ err = drv->suspend(xdev);
if (err)
printk(KERN_WARNING
"xenbus: suspend %s failed: %i\n", dev_name(dev), err);
@@ -638,6 +638,13 @@ int xenbus_dev_resume(struct device *dev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xenbus_dev_resume);
+int xenbus_dev_cancel(struct device *dev)
+{
+ /* Do nothing */
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xenbus_dev_cancel);
+
/* A flag to determine if xenstored is 'ready' (i.e. has started) */
int xenstored_ready = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.h b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.h
index 0e5fc4c..4019187 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.h
+++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.h
@@ -62,8 +62,9 @@ extern void xenbus_dev_changed(const char *node, struct xen_bus_type *bus);
extern void xenbus_dev_shutdown(struct device *_dev);
-extern int xenbus_dev_suspend(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state);
+extern int xenbus_dev_suspend(struct device *dev);
extern int xenbus_dev_resume(struct device *dev);
+extern int xenbus_dev_cancel(struct device *dev);
extern void xenbus_otherend_changed(struct xenbus_watch *watch,
const char **vec, unsigned int len,
diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_frontend.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_frontend.c
index 5413248..ff32ffb 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_frontend.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_frontend.c
@@ -82,6 +82,13 @@ static struct device_attribute xenbus_frontend_dev_attrs[] = {
__ATTR_NULL
};
+static struct dev_pm_ops xenbus_pm_ops = {
+ .suspend = xenbus_dev_suspend,
+ .resume = xenbus_dev_resume,
+ .freeze = xenbus_dev_suspend,
+ .thaw = xenbus_dev_cancel,
+ .restore = xenbus_dev_resume,
+};
static struct xen_bus_type xenbus_frontend = {
.root = "device",
@@ -98,8 +105,7 @@ static struct xen_bus_type xenbus_frontend = {
.shutdown = xenbus_dev_shutdown,
.dev_attrs= xenbus_frontend_dev_attrs,
- .suspend = xenbus_dev_suspend,
- .resume = xenbus_dev_resume,
+ .pm = &xenbus_pm_ops,
},
};
diff --git a/include/xen/xenbus.h b/include/xen/xenbus.h
index 542ca7c..23e7f25 100644
--- a/include/xen/xenbus.h
+++ b/include/xen/xenbus.h
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ struct xenbus_driver {
void (*otherend_changed)(struct xenbus_device *dev,
enum xenbus_state backend_state);
int (*remove)(struct xenbus_device *dev);
- int (*suspend)(struct xenbus_device *dev, pm_message_t state);
+ int (*suspend)(struct xenbus_device *dev);
int (*resume)(struct xenbus_device *dev);
int (*uevent)(struct xenbus_device *, struct kobj_uevent_env *);
struct device_driver driver;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Use freeze/thaw/restore PM events for Guest suspend/resume/checkpoint
2011-02-14 16:21 [PATCH] Use freeze/thaw/restore PM events for Guest suspend/resume/checkpoint Shriram Rajagopalan
@ 2011-02-14 16:24 ` Shriram Rajagopalan
2011-02-14 19:06 ` Ian Campbell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Shriram Rajagopalan @ 2011-02-14 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@cs.ubc.ca> wrote:
> Use PM_FREEZE, PM_THAW and PM_RESTORE power events for
> suspend/resume functionality, instead of PM_SUSPEND and
> PM_RESUME. Use of these pm events also fixes the Xen Guest
> hangup when taking checkpoints. When a suspend event is cancelled
> (i.e. while taking checkpoints once/continuously), we use PM_THAW
> instead of PM_RESUME. PM_RESTORE is used when suspend is not
> cancelled. See Documentation/power/devices.txt and linux/pm.h
> for more info about freeze, thaw and restore. The sequence of
> pm events in a suspend-resume scenario is shown below.
>
> dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_FREEZE);
>
> dpm_suspend_noirq(PMSG_FREEZE);
>
> sysdev_suspend(PMSG_FREEZE);
> cancelled = suspend_hypercall()
> sysdev_resume();
>
> dpm_resume_noirq(cancelled ? PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE);
>
> dpm_resume_end(cancelled ? PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE);
>
> Signed-off-by: Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@cs.ubc.ca>
> ---
> drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 2 +-
> drivers/xen/manage.c | 12 ++++++------
> drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c | 11 +++++++++--
> drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.h | 3 ++-
> drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_frontend.c | 10 ++++++++--
> include/xen/xenbus.h | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> index 3f71199..22c6288 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> @@ -1293,7 +1293,7 @@ static void xennet_disconnect_backend(struct netfront_info *info)
> info->rx.sring = NULL;
> }
>
> -static int netfront_suspend(struct xenbus_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
> +static int netfront_suspend(struct xenbus_device *dev)
> {
> struct netfront_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
> struct hrtimer *timer = &info->smart_poll.timer;
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/manage.c b/drivers/xen/manage.c
> index 0b50906..98c856b 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/manage.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/manage.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int xen_suspend(void *data)
>
> BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
>
> - err = sysdev_suspend(PMSG_SUSPEND);
> + err = sysdev_suspend(PMSG_FREEZE);
> if (err) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "xen_suspend: sysdev_suspend failed: %d\n",
> err);
> @@ -117,16 +117,16 @@ static void do_suspend(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> - err = dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_SUSPEND);
> + err = dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_FREEZE);
> if (err) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "xen suspend: dpm_suspend_start %d\n", err);
> goto out_thaw;
> }
>
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "suspending xenstore...\n");
> + /* printk(KERN_DEBUG "suspending xenstore...\n"); */
> xs_suspend();
>
> - err = dpm_suspend_noirq(PMSG_SUSPEND);
> + err = dpm_suspend_noirq(PMSG_FREEZE);
> if (err) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "dpm_suspend_noirq failed: %d\n", err);
> goto out_resume;
> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static void do_suspend(void)
> else
> err = stop_machine(xen_suspend, &cancelled, cpumask_of(0));
>
> - dpm_resume_noirq(PMSG_RESUME);
> + dpm_resume_noirq(cancelled ? PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE);
>
> if (err) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "failed to start xen_suspend: %d\n", err);
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ out_resume:
> } else
> xs_suspend_cancel();
>
> - dpm_resume_end(PMSG_RESUME);
> + dpm_resume_end(cancelled ? PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE);
>
> /* Make sure timer events get retriggered on all CPUs */
> clock_was_set();
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> index 3a83ba2..b61b9f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ void xenbus_dev_changed(const char *node, struct xen_bus_type *bus)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xenbus_dev_changed);
>
> -int xenbus_dev_suspend(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
> +int xenbus_dev_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> int err = 0;
> struct xenbus_driver *drv;
> @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ int xenbus_dev_suspend(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
> return 0;
> drv = to_xenbus_driver(dev->driver);
> if (drv->suspend)
> - err = drv->suspend(xdev, state);
> + err = drv->suspend(xdev);
> if (err)
> printk(KERN_WARNING
> "xenbus: suspend %s failed: %i\n", dev_name(dev), err);
> @@ -638,6 +638,13 @@ int xenbus_dev_resume(struct device *dev)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xenbus_dev_resume);
>
> +int xenbus_dev_cancel(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + /* Do nothing */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xenbus_dev_cancel);
> +
> /* A flag to determine if xenstored is 'ready' (i.e. has started) */
> int xenstored_ready = 0;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.h b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.h
> index 0e5fc4c..4019187 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.h
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.h
> @@ -62,8 +62,9 @@ extern void xenbus_dev_changed(const char *node, struct xen_bus_type *bus);
>
> extern void xenbus_dev_shutdown(struct device *_dev);
>
> -extern int xenbus_dev_suspend(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state);
> +extern int xenbus_dev_suspend(struct device *dev);
> extern int xenbus_dev_resume(struct device *dev);
> +extern int xenbus_dev_cancel(struct device *dev);
>
> extern void xenbus_otherend_changed(struct xenbus_watch *watch,
> const char **vec, unsigned int len,
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_frontend.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_frontend.c
> index 5413248..ff32ffb 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_frontend.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_frontend.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,13 @@ static struct device_attribute xenbus_frontend_dev_attrs[] = {
> __ATTR_NULL
> };
>
> +static struct dev_pm_ops xenbus_pm_ops = {
> + .suspend = xenbus_dev_suspend,
> + .resume = xenbus_dev_resume,
> + .freeze = xenbus_dev_suspend,
> + .thaw = xenbus_dev_cancel,
> + .restore = xenbus_dev_resume,
> +};
>
> static struct xen_bus_type xenbus_frontend = {
> .root = "device",
> @@ -98,8 +105,7 @@ static struct xen_bus_type xenbus_frontend = {
> .shutdown = xenbus_dev_shutdown,
> .dev_attrs= xenbus_frontend_dev_attrs,
>
> - .suspend = xenbus_dev_suspend,
> - .resume = xenbus_dev_resume,
> + .pm = &xenbus_pm_ops,
> },
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/xen/xenbus.h b/include/xen/xenbus.h
> index 542ca7c..23e7f25 100644
> --- a/include/xen/xenbus.h
> +++ b/include/xen/xenbus.h
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ struct xenbus_driver {
> void (*otherend_changed)(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> enum xenbus_state backend_state);
> int (*remove)(struct xenbus_device *dev);
> - int (*suspend)(struct xenbus_device *dev, pm_message_t state);
> + int (*suspend)(struct xenbus_device *dev);
> int (*resume)(struct xenbus_device *dev);
> int (*uevent)(struct xenbus_device *, struct kobj_uevent_env *);
> struct device_driver driver;
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
parts of this patch were based on Kazuhiro Suzuki's initial patch to fix the
same issue. Refer to
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-02/msg00371.html
for further details.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Use freeze/thaw/restore PM events for Guest suspend/resume/checkpoint
2011-02-14 16:21 [PATCH] Use freeze/thaw/restore PM events for Guest suspend/resume/checkpoint Shriram Rajagopalan
2011-02-14 16:24 ` Shriram Rajagopalan
@ 2011-02-14 19:06 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-14 21:47 ` Shriram Rajagopalan
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2011-02-14 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shriram Rajagopalan; +Cc: xen-devel
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 16:21 +0000, Shriram Rajagopalan wrote:
> Use PM_FREEZE, PM_THAW and PM_RESTORE power events for
> suspend/resume functionality, instead of PM_SUSPEND and
> PM_RESUME. Use of these pm events also fixes the Xen Guest
> hangup when taking checkpoints. When a suspend event is cancelled
> (i.e. while taking checkpoints once/continuously), we use PM_THAW
> instead of PM_RESUME. PM_RESTORE is used when suspend is not
> cancelled. See Documentation/power/devices.txt and linux/pm.h
> for more info about freeze, thaw and restore. The sequence of
> pm events in a suspend-resume scenario is shown below.
>
> dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_FREEZE);
>
> dpm_suspend_noirq(PMSG_FREEZE);
>
> sysdev_suspend(PMSG_FREEZE);
> cancelled = suspend_hypercall()
> sysdev_resume();
>
> dpm_resume_noirq(cancelled ? PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE);
>
> dpm_resume_end(cancelled ? PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE);
Thanks.
Which tree/branch is this against?
Can you please at least do the dev_pm_ops as a separate patch to allow
bisectability etc. (generally each patch should be a single logical
change so if the remaineder can be sensibly split too it is worth doing
so).
Did you test regular save/restore as well as cancelled migrations? What
about PVHMV guests?
> +static struct dev_pm_ops xenbus_pm_ops = {
> + .suspend = xenbus_dev_suspend,
> + .resume = xenbus_dev_resume,
> + .freeze = xenbus_dev_suspend,
> + .thaw = xenbus_dev_cancel,
> + .restore = xenbus_dev_resume,
> +};
Perhaps xenbus_dev_thaw?
Are suspend/freeze and resume/restore really the same?
Once we've transitioned to the PMSG_FREEZE way of doing things do we
still need to keep the other hooks around? If not then the other ones
could be renamed as well?
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 16:24 +0000, Shriram Rajagopalan wrote:
> parts of this patch were based on Kazuhiro Suzuki's initial patch to
> fix the same issue. Refer to
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-02/msg00371.html
> for further details.
It's worth mentioning this in the commit message, also please CC
Kazuhiro since he has been working on this too, has a repro scenario
etc.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Use freeze/thaw/restore PM events for Guest suspend/resume/checkpoint
2011-02-14 19:06 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2011-02-14 21:47 ` Shriram Rajagopalan
2011-02-15 9:41 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Shriram Rajagopalan @ 2011-02-14 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell; +Cc: xen-devel
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 16:21 +0000, Shriram Rajagopalan wrote:
>> Use PM_FREEZE, PM_THAW and PM_RESTORE power events for
>> suspend/resume functionality, instead of PM_SUSPEND and
>> PM_RESUME. Use of these pm events also fixes the Xen Guest
>> hangup when taking checkpoints. When a suspend event is cancelled
>> (i.e. while taking checkpoints once/continuously), we use PM_THAW
>> instead of PM_RESUME. PM_RESTORE is used when suspend is not
>> cancelled. See Documentation/power/devices.txt and linux/pm.h
>> for more info about freeze, thaw and restore. The sequence of
>> pm events in a suspend-resume scenario is shown below.
>>
>> dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_FREEZE);
>>
>> dpm_suspend_noirq(PMSG_FREEZE);
>>
>> sysdev_suspend(PMSG_FREEZE);
>> cancelled = suspend_hypercall()
>> sysdev_resume();
>>
>> dpm_resume_noirq(cancelled ? PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE);
>>
>> dpm_resume_end(cancelled ? PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE);
>
> Thanks.
>
> Which tree/branch is this against?
>
Oh I thought that info be present in the git indices
"index 5413248..ff32ffb 100644" .
Its against my local git branch (which tracks xen/stable-2.6.32.x and
is uptodate).
Sorry, I am still a bit of git newbie.
> Can you please at least do the dev_pm_ops as a separate patch to allow
> bisectability etc. (generally each patch should be a single logical
> change so if the remaineder can be sensibly split too it is worth doing
> so).
>
ok
> Did you test regular save/restore as well as cancelled migrations? What
> about PVHMV guests?
>
>> +static struct dev_pm_ops xenbus_pm_ops = {
>> + .suspend = xenbus_dev_suspend,
>> + .resume = xenbus_dev_resume,
>> + .freeze = xenbus_dev_suspend,
>> + .thaw = xenbus_dev_cancel,
>> + .restore = xenbus_dev_resume,
>> +};
>
> Perhaps xenbus_dev_thaw?
>
> Are suspend/freeze and resume/restore really the same?
>
Semantically they are not. From the documentation in pm.h,
suspend/resume events deal with change in sleep states. Devices
are quiesced on suspend and might go to lower power mode.
(==> xm suspend/resume ?)
freeze/thaw/restore are used for hibernation.
freeze:save state to memory before hibernation, quiesce device but
do not change power state.
thaw: undo changes made by freeze, if hibernation fails.
restore: restore device state from hibernation image
(==> xm save/restore/checkpoint)
I looked at xen frontend drivers (blkfront, netfront, etc). They only use
the resume handler to teardown and re-establishe contact with backend.
So, in our case, suspend/freeze and resume/restore are basically same.
suspend-cancel is a thaw event.
> Once we've transitioned to the PMSG_FREEZE way of doing things do we
> still need to keep the other hooks around? If not then the other ones
> could be renamed as well?
>
If your question is whether we can change
static struct dev_pm_ops xenbus_pm_ops = {
.suspend = xenbus_dev_suspend,
.resume = xenbus_dev_resume,
.freeze = xenbus_dev_suspend,
.thaw = xenbus_dev_cancel,
.restore = xenbus_dev_resume,
};
to just
static struct dev_pm_ops xenbus_pm_ops = {
.freeze = xenbus_dev_freeze,
.thaw = xenbus_dev_thaw,
.restore = xenbus_dev_restore,
};
then the answer is no, AFAICS, from the code in drivers/base/power/main.c
(pm_op function).
> On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 16:24 +0000, Shriram Rajagopalan wrote:
>> parts of this patch were based on Kazuhiro Suzuki's initial patch to
>> fix the same issue. Refer to
>> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-02/msg00371.html
>> for further details.
>
> It's worth mentioning this in the commit message, also please CC
> Kazuhiro since he has been working on this too, has a repro scenario
> etc.
will do.
>
> Ian.
>
>
shriram
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Use freeze/thaw/restore PM events for Guest suspend/resume/checkpoint
2011-02-14 21:47 ` Shriram Rajagopalan
@ 2011-02-15 9:41 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2011-02-15 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rshriram; +Cc: xen-devel
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 21:47 +0000, Shriram Rajagopalan wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 16:21 +0000, Shriram Rajagopalan wrote:
> >> Use PM_FREEZE, PM_THAW and PM_RESTORE power events for
> >> suspend/resume functionality, instead of PM_SUSPEND and
> >> PM_RESUME. Use of these pm events also fixes the Xen Guest
> >> hangup when taking checkpoints. When a suspend event is cancelled
> >> (i.e. while taking checkpoints once/continuously), we use PM_THAW
> >> instead of PM_RESUME. PM_RESTORE is used when suspend is not
> >> cancelled. See Documentation/power/devices.txt and linux/pm.h
> >> for more info about freeze, thaw and restore. The sequence of
> >> pm events in a suspend-resume scenario is shown below.
> >>
> >> dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_FREEZE);
> >>
> >> dpm_suspend_noirq(PMSG_FREEZE);
> >>
> >> sysdev_suspend(PMSG_FREEZE);
> >> cancelled = suspend_hypercall()
> >> sysdev_resume();
> >>
> >> dpm_resume_noirq(cancelled ? PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE);
> >>
> >> dpm_resume_end(cancelled ? PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE);
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Which tree/branch is this against?
> >
> Oh I thought that info be present in the git indices
> "index 5413248..ff32ffb 100644" .
I think those are the indices of the actual versions of the file, rather
than the tree->commit->branch which contains them. I'm sure you could
map up that chain but suspect it'd be a rather brute force affair.
> Its against my local git branch (which tracks xen/stable-2.6.32.x and
> is uptodate).
In general we'd prefer to get this sort of thing fixed in the mainline
kernel (e.g. Linus' tree) first and then consider backports to the
stable branch as necessary.
> Sorry, I am still a bit of git newbie.
No problem.
> > Can you please at least do the dev_pm_ops as a separate patch to
> > allow bisectability etc. (generally each patch should be a single
> > logical change so if the remaineder can be sensibly split too it is
> > worth doing so).
> ok
You can probably take Kazuhiro's first patch verbatim for this bit? If
you save the mail to a file you can apply it with "git am < foo.mail"
and git will preserve authorship attribution etc and this will persist
through "git format-patch" and "git send-email" etc.
> > Did you test regular save/restore as well as cancelled migrations? What
> > about PVHMV guests?
> >
> >> +static struct dev_pm_ops xenbus_pm_ops = {
> >> + .suspend = xenbus_dev_suspend,
> >> + .resume = xenbus_dev_resume,
> >> + .freeze = xenbus_dev_suspend,
> >> + .thaw = xenbus_dev_cancel,
> >> + .restore = xenbus_dev_resume,
> >> +};
> >
> > Perhaps xenbus_dev_thaw?
> >
> > Are suspend/freeze and resume/restore really the same?
> >
> Semantically they are not. From the documentation in pm.h,
[...]
> So, in our case, suspend/freeze and resume/restore are basically same.
> suspend-cancel is a thaw event.
OK.
> > Once we've transitioned to the PMSG_FREEZE way of doing things do we
> > still need to keep the other hooks around? If not then the other ones
> > could be renamed as well?
> >
> If your question is whether we can change
> static struct dev_pm_ops xenbus_pm_ops = {
> .suspend = xenbus_dev_suspend,
> .resume = xenbus_dev_resume,
> .freeze = xenbus_dev_suspend,
> .thaw = xenbus_dev_cancel,
> .restore = xenbus_dev_resume,
> };
> to just
> static struct dev_pm_ops xenbus_pm_ops = {
> .freeze = xenbus_dev_freeze,
> .thaw = xenbus_dev_thaw,
> .restore = xenbus_dev_restore,
> };
>
> then the answer is no, AFAICS, from the code in drivers/base/power/main.c
> (pm_op function).
Looking at pm_op it doesn't appear to be an error to not implement one
or more hooks. For example we currently don't implement freeze/thaw and
that is currently ok because we don't initiate that sort of suspend.
Currently drivers/xen/manage.c hangs the suspend code off
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP, I wonder if it shouldn't be CONFIG_SUSPEND already and
become CONFIG_HIBERNATE with your change?
I also wonder if shutdown_handler shouldn't check it is actually going
to be able to perform the suspend _before_ acknowledging the suspend
request, but that is outside the scope of this patch.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-15 9:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-14 16:21 [PATCH] Use freeze/thaw/restore PM events for Guest suspend/resume/checkpoint Shriram Rajagopalan
2011-02-14 16:24 ` Shriram Rajagopalan
2011-02-14 19:06 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-14 21:47 ` Shriram Rajagopalan
2011-02-15 9:41 ` Ian Campbell
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.