All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@gmail.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Progress on Ath9k HT support on Adhoc mode
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:41:30 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikaokWvmeFrR4LvfTLXwYvHDegUhEA+4KKDTaBY@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinyxa6kBTHL4HsUrjLgx3UipfnqBR1kirTicyzG@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Baldomero Coll <baldo.ath9k@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm also testing the patch Alex and Benoit have released for the community.
> After configuring my IBSS network, the station dump command shows this [1].
> As you can see, although the IBSS network has been created in HT mode, one
> link doesn't seem to support MCS rates.
> I would like to know if it is possible to force the MCS scheme. I don't know
> why the "NL80211_TXRATE_MCS" parameter is not defined in the bitrates.c
> (iw), or what I have to do to enable it.

I don't think we can force a particular MCS rate in the station side,
we have rate control algorithms to determine the rate.

>
> I also wonder what rate control mechanism is been used in HT mode (minstrel
> HT?), and whether such mechanism switches to non HT rates when the channel
> quality is bad.
>
> I have been using wireshark to capture data transmissions between 2 PCs
> configured in IBSS HT mode. What I see in the radiotap header is that no HT
> information is available (protocol, data rate). Do you know how the HT
> information can be added to the ratiotap header?

If you are using wireshark, you need to take the latest bleeding edge
that has MCS rate support and also you need latest wireless-testing
that contains MCS rate update to radiotap.

>
> Thanks for your help
> Baldo
>
>
> [1]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> sudo iw dev wlan0 station dump
> Station xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx (on wlan0)
> ??? inactive time:??? 8392 ms
> ??? rx bytes:??? 2476336
> ??? rx packets:??? 2149
> ??? tx bytes:??? 433552
> ??? tx packets:??? 1228
> ??? tx retries:??? 564
> ??? tx failed:??? 0
> ??? signal:? ??? -27 dBm
> ??? signal avg:??? -28 dBm
> ??? tx bitrate:??? 270.0 MBit/s MCS 14 40Mhz short GI
> Station xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx (on wlan0)
> ??? inactive time:??? 200 ms
> ??? rx bytes:??? 27577
> ??? rx packets:??? 434
> ??? tx bytes:??? 803
> ??? tx packets:??? 8
> ??? tx retries:??? 2
> ??? tx failed:??? 0
> ??? signal:? ??? -26 dBm
> ??? signal avg:??? -26 dBm
> ??? tx bitrate:??? 6.5 MBit/s MCS 0
> Station xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx (on wlan0)
> ??? inactive time:??? 96 ms
> ??? rx bytes:??? 692528
> ??? rx packets:??? 18938
> ??? tx bytes:??? 2979324
> ??? tx packets:??? 2001
> ??? tx retries:??? 3340
> ??? tx failed:??? 0
> ??? signal:? ??? -33 dBm
> ??? signal avg:??? -33 dBm
> ??? tx bitrate:??? 54.0 MBit/s
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ath9k-devel mailing list
> ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org
> https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-10 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-10 12:04 [ath9k-devel] Progress on Ath9k HT support on Adhoc mode Baldomero Coll
2011-02-10 14:11 ` Mohammed Shafi [this message]
2011-02-10 16:45   ` Baldomero Coll
2011-02-11 10:24     ` Mohammed Shafi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-22 10:13 Baldomero Coll
2011-03-10  8:41 Baldomero Coll
2011-02-18 18:49 Baldomero Coll
2011-03-07 21:49 ` Xianghua Xiao
2011-03-08  5:25 ` Mohammed Shafi
2011-02-15  9:05 Baldomero Coll
2011-02-15  9:10 ` Sagar Bijwe
2011-02-16  0:10   ` Peizhao Hu
2011-02-16 12:16 ` Mohammed Shafi
2011-02-16 14:47   ` Baldomero Coll
2011-02-16 16:46     ` Brian Prodoehl
2011-02-17  9:05       ` Baldomero Coll
2011-02-16 17:03     ` Adrian Chadd
2011-02-17  9:27       ` Baldomero Coll
2011-02-17 16:11         ` Adrian Chadd
2011-02-08 16:00 le thanh son
2010-12-03  5:30 Peizhao Hu
2010-12-03  6:51 ` Mohammed Shafi
2010-12-09 12:36 ` Alexander Simon
2010-12-09 18:55   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-12-22  8:25   ` Robert Chan
2010-12-29  6:10     ` Robert Chan
2010-12-29 20:20       ` Brian Prodoehl
2010-12-29  6:10     ` Robert Chan
2010-12-29  6:32       ` Mohammed Shafi
2010-12-29  6:52         ` Jouni Malinen
2010-12-29  7:00           ` Mohammed Shafi
2010-12-29  7:21           ` Robert Chan
2010-12-29  8:30             ` Jouni Malinen
2011-01-19 13:42     ` Alexander Simon
2011-02-04  3:04       ` Peizhao Hu
2011-02-04  5:27         ` Mohammed Shafi
2011-02-08  3:38           ` Peizhao Hu
2011-02-10 14:07             ` Mohammed Shafi
2011-01-28  8:58 ` bcoll

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTikaokWvmeFrR4LvfTLXwYvHDegUhEA+4KKDTaBY@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=shafi.wireless@gmail.com \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.