[REGRESSION, Radeon-KMS] 2.6.36-rc1 - graphic issues in 0. A.D.

[REGRESSION, Radeon-KMS] 2.6.36-rc1 - graphic issues in 0. A.D.

[trapDoor]

Hello,
Just wanted to let you know about this before bisecting which
hopefully I will be able to start tomorrow. Please take a look at the
screenshots in below links to see the difference with rendering
textures in 0 A.D. alpha1 on kernel 2.6.35.3 and 2.6.36-rc1-git3. [0
A.D. - strategic game, OS clone of Age of Empires; home page:
http://wildfiregames.com/0ad/]

0 A.D. on kernel 2.6.35.3 [good]:
http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/104351852606666221362/0ad?authkey=Gv1sRgCMne0NqXpuzR_gE#5508312214769142226

0 A.D. on kernel 2.6.36-rc1-git3:
http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/104351852606666221362/0ad?authkey=Gv1sRgCMne0NqXpuzR_gE#5508312218519295058

Please note that in both cases only kernel was different. The other
components [including hardware] were in the same versions and had the
same options (like the game itself, xorg-ati drivers, mesa, libdrm
[S3TC disabled], etc.). So it must be kernel then.

-- 
Regards
Tomasz B.

Re: [REGRESSION, Radeon-KMS] 2.6.36-rc1 - graphic issues in 0. A.D.

[Alex Deucher]

On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 3:41 PM, trapDoor <trapdoor6@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> Just wanted to let you know about this before bisecting which
> hopefully I will be able to start tomorrow. Please take a look at the
> screenshots in below links to see the difference with rendering
> textures in 0 A.D. alpha1 on kernel 2.6.35.3 and 2.6.36-rc1-git3. [0
> A.D. - strategic game, OS clone of Age of Empires; home page:
> http://wildfiregames.com/0ad/]
>
> 0 A.D. on kernel 2.6.35.3 [good]:
> http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/104351852606666221362/0ad?authkey=Gv1sRgCMne0NqXpuzR_gE#5508312214769142226
>
> 0 A.D. on kernel 2.6.36-rc1-git3:
> http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/104351852606666221362/0ad?authkey=Gv1sRgCMne0NqXpuzR_gE#5508312218519295058
>
> Please note that in both cases only kernel was different. The other
> components [including hardware] were in the same versions and had the
> same options (like the game itself, xorg-ati drivers, mesa, libdrm
> [S3TC disabled], etc.). So it must be kernel then.

What card?  Anything in your dmesg?

Alex

Re: [REGRESSION, Radeon-KMS] 2.6.36-rc1 - graphic issues in 0. A.D.

[trapDoor]

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 3:41 PM, trapDoor <trapdoor6@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Just wanted to let you know about this before bisecting which
>> hopefully I will be able to start tomorrow. Please take a look at the
>> screenshots in below links to see the difference with rendering
>> textures in 0 A.D. alpha1 on kernel 2.6.35.3 and 2.6.36-rc1-git3. [0
>> A.D. - strategic game, OS clone of Age of Empires; home page:
>> http://wildfiregames.com/0ad/]
>>
>> 0 A.D. on kernel 2.6.35.3 [good]:
>> http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/104351852606666221362/0ad?authkey=Gv1sRgCMne0NqXpuzR_gE#5508312214769142226
>>
>> 0 A.D. on kernel 2.6.36-rc1-git3:
>> http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/104351852606666221362/0ad?authkey=Gv1sRgCMne0NqXpuzR_gE#5508312218519295058
>>
>> Please note that in both cases only kernel was different. The other
>> components [including hardware] were in the same versions and had the
>> same options (like the game itself, xorg-ati drivers, mesa, libdrm
>> [S3TC disabled], etc.). So it must be kernel then.
>
> What card?  Anything in your dmesg?
>
> Alex
>

Hi Alex,
Sorry for lack of details in my first e-mail. I was hoping to send you
the logs together with bisecting results. Unfortunately there are
other issues between 2.6.35-git2 - the last 'good' kernel (which
doesn't include the first drm pull for 2.6.36 window merge) - and
2.6.36-rc1. Due to those issues I can't bisect.

For example:
1) First I tried to narrow the problem down to the closest affected
kernel snapshot. So I marked 2.6.35-git2 as good and I was expecting
that 2.6.35-git3 will be a bad one (as -git3 is the first snapshot
that includes drm patches from the first drm pull). But on -git3 0
A.D. even fails to start.

2) Then I was hoping to do bisecting between 2.6.35-git11 and
2.6.35-git12 (-git12 is the first snapshot that includes patches from
the second drm pull). But these both snapshots won't even compile for
me. It stops suddenly at the second stage of making modules without
giving any errors (despite kernel debugging enabled in .config). I
remember I had this problem for a while, AFAIR since around
2.6.35-git5 to -git15 - between these I couldn't compile any snapshot
I had tried.

It's very likely that the issue I wanted to bisect is related to one
of or both drm pulls . So doing bisect between e.g. these kernels:
2.6.35-git16 (which includes both drm pulls; assuming it's the first
snapshot since -git5 I could compile) and 2.6.36-rc1 would be
pointless - they both will be bad.


------------
Now, this is my card:

Asus ATI Radeon HD3650 Silent 512MB
some glxinfo details:
	OpenGL vendor string: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
	OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R600 (RV635 9598) 20090101  TCL DRI2
	OpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 7.9-devel
	OpenGL shading language version string: 1.20


------------
About the logs. It happens that 0 A.D. does produce really huge logs.
Running the game just for about 10 SECONDS (counting after chosen map
has been loaded) relulted in these:

On a 'good' kernel 2.6.35.3
	60K	./Xorg.0.log
	48K	./dmesg
	27M	./kern.log
	27M	./syslog
	27M	./messages
	81M	[total]

on a bad kernel 2.6.36-rc1
	60K	./Xorg.0.log
	52K	./dmesg
	21M	./kern.log
	21M	./syslog
	21M	./messages
	63M	[total]

There's no mistake above: 3 logs had been blown up to over 20M during
only the little time when the game was running.
How I did it: deleted all those logs completely, re-booted from the
'good' kernel, run the game and stopped. Then archived the logs,
deleted again and repeated the same on the 'bad' kernel.

So it looks like 99,999% of all lines in: kern.log, messages in syslog
were produced on both kernels when 0 A.D. was running. Before I first
time run it, I had never seen kern.log and messages in /var/log at
all, and syslog was never bigger than around 1,5M (with logs collected
from several boots and during a couple of days). Running 0 A.D. for a
couple of minutes results in about 1G for each of those 3 logs.

After compressing, the archive files are relatively small:
	2.0M	./2.6.35.3_0ad-logs.tar.bz2
	680K	./2.6.35.3_0ad-logs.tar.lzma

	1.6M	./2.6.36-rc1-00159-g36423a5_0ad-logs.tar.bz2
	748K	./2.6.36-rc1-00159-g36423a5_0ad-logs.tar.lzma [yes, somehow this
came up bigger than 2.6.35.3(...).lzma]


Do you mind if I send the .lzma's to you (unless you prefer .bz2)? I
won't cc LKML or anyone of course, they will be sent only to you.
Please let me know.


-- 
Regards
Tomasz B.

Re: [REGRESSION, Radeon-KMS] 2.6.36-rc1 - graphic issues in 0. A.D.

[Alex Deucher]

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:00 PM, trapDoor <trapdoor6@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 3:41 PM, trapDoor <trapdoor6@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> Just wanted to let you know about this before bisecting which
>>> hopefully I will be able to start tomorrow. Please take a look at the
>>> screenshots in below links to see the difference with rendering
>>> textures in 0 A.D. alpha1 on kernel 2.6.35.3 and 2.6.36-rc1-git3. [0
>>> A.D. - strategic game, OS clone of Age of Empires; home page:
>>> http://wildfiregames.com/0ad/]
>>>
>>> 0 A.D. on kernel 2.6.35.3 [good]:
>>> http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/104351852606666221362/0ad?authkey=Gv1sRgCMne0NqXpuzR_gE#5508312214769142226
>>>
>>> 0 A.D. on kernel 2.6.36-rc1-git3:
>>> http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/104351852606666221362/0ad?authkey=Gv1sRgCMne0NqXpuzR_gE#5508312218519295058
>>>
>>> Please note that in both cases only kernel was different. The other
>>> components [including hardware] were in the same versions and had the
>>> same options (like the game itself, xorg-ati drivers, mesa, libdrm
>>> [S3TC disabled], etc.). So it must be kernel then.
>>
>> What card?  Anything in your dmesg?
>>
>> Alex
>>
>
> Hi Alex,
> Sorry for lack of details in my first e-mail. I was hoping to send you
> the logs together with bisecting results. Unfortunately there are
> other issues between 2.6.35-git2 - the last 'good' kernel (which
> doesn't include the first drm pull for 2.6.36 window merge) - and
> 2.6.36-rc1. Due to those issues I can't bisect.
>
> For example:
> 1) First I tried to narrow the problem down to the closest affected
> kernel snapshot. So I marked 2.6.35-git2 as good and I was expecting
> that 2.6.35-git3 will be a bad one (as -git3 is the first snapshot
> that includes drm patches from the first drm pull). But on -git3 0
> A.D. even fails to start.
>
> 2) Then I was hoping to do bisecting between 2.6.35-git11 and
> 2.6.35-git12 (-git12 is the first snapshot that includes patches from
> the second drm pull). But these both snapshots won't even compile for
> me. It stops suddenly at the second stage of making modules without
> giving any errors (despite kernel debugging enabled in .config). I
> remember I had this problem for a while, AFAIR since around
> 2.6.35-git5 to -git15 - between these I couldn't compile any snapshot
> I had tried.
>
> It's very likely that the issue I wanted to bisect is related to one
> of or both drm pulls . So doing bisect between e.g. these kernels:
> 2.6.35-git16 (which includes both drm pulls; assuming it's the first
> snapshot since -git5 I could compile) and 2.6.36-rc1 would be
> pointless - they both will be bad.
>
>
> ------------
> Now, this is my card:
>
> Asus ATI Radeon HD3650 Silent 512MB
> some glxinfo details:
>        OpenGL vendor string: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
>        OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R600 (RV635 9598) 20090101  TCL DRI2
>        OpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 7.9-devel
>        OpenGL shading language version string: 1.20
>
>
> ------------
> About the logs. It happens that 0 A.D. does produce really huge logs.
> Running the game just for about 10 SECONDS (counting after chosen map
> has been loaded) relulted in these:
>
> On a 'good' kernel 2.6.35.3
>        60K     ./Xorg.0.log
>        48K     ./dmesg
>        27M     ./kern.log
>        27M     ./syslog
>        27M     ./messages
>        81M     [total]
>
> on a bad kernel 2.6.36-rc1
>        60K     ./Xorg.0.log
>        52K     ./dmesg
>        21M     ./kern.log
>        21M     ./syslog
>        21M     ./messages
>        63M     [total]
>
> There's no mistake above: 3 logs had been blown up to over 20M during
> only the little time when the game was running.
> How I did it: deleted all those logs completely, re-booted from the
> 'good' kernel, run the game and stopped. Then archived the logs,
> deleted again and repeated the same on the 'bad' kernel.
>
> So it looks like 99,999% of all lines in: kern.log, messages in syslog
> were produced on both kernels when 0 A.D. was running. Before I first
> time run it, I had never seen kern.log and messages in /var/log at
> all, and syslog was never bigger than around 1,5M (with logs collected
> from several boots and during a couple of days). Running 0 A.D. for a
> couple of minutes results in about 1G for each of those 3 logs.
>
> After compressing, the archive files are relatively small:
>        2.0M    ./2.6.35.3_0ad-logs.tar.bz2
>        680K    ./2.6.35.3_0ad-logs.tar.lzma
>
>        1.6M    ./2.6.36-rc1-00159-g36423a5_0ad-logs.tar.bz2
>        748K    ./2.6.36-rc1-00159-g36423a5_0ad-logs.tar.lzma [yes, somehow this
> came up bigger than 2.6.35.3(...).lzma]
>
>
> Do you mind if I send the .lzma's to you (unless you prefer .bz2)? I
> won't cc LKML or anyone of course, they will be sent only to you.
> Please let me know.

I don't really need the whole files, likely it's just a few messages
repeated.  Go ahead and send me the files and I'll take a look.

Alex