From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>,
Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@hartwork.org>,
Git ML <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "git add -u" broken in git 1.7.4?
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:29:23 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTiksXERJ1h2du7Qu27rpKh2=q0GTWix8kSoeC24Y@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vhbcguytf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> I actually do not mind too much myself if all commands that can take
> pathspecs consistently defaulted to "full-tree" pathspec given no
> pathspec. But if we were to go that route, everybody should join their
> voice to defend that decision when outside people say "in 1.8.0 'git grep'
> run from a subdirectory shows matches from all the irrelevant parts of the
> tree; with all the cruft its output is unreadable". I won't be the sole
> champion of such a behaviour when I do not fully believe in it.
That could be one more item for the next git survey (i.e. how do you
want the defaults to be?). Most of people in this list more or less
breath git already and therefore are bias (I think).
Personally "git add -u --full-tree" is good enough to me. It does have
the same problem that git --full-tree has: what *.h in "git grep
--full-tree -- '*.h'" means. But I'm OK with not supporting that case
until we agree on something.
--
Duy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-07 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-06 0:39 "git add -u" broken in git 1.7.4? Sebastian Pipping
2011-02-06 5:13 ` Jeff King
2011-02-06 19:35 ` Sebastian Pipping
2011-02-06 20:48 ` Matthieu Moy
2011-02-06 23:19 ` SZEDER Gábor
2011-02-06 23:49 ` Sebastian Pipping
2011-02-07 5:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-07 5:53 ` Jeff King
2011-02-07 6:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-07 7:29 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy [this message]
2011-02-07 18:34 ` SZEDER Gábor
2011-02-07 19:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-07 19:50 ` Jeff King
2011-02-08 10:05 ` SZEDER Gábor
2011-02-09 21:03 ` Jeff King
2011-02-09 22:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-09 23:46 ` Jeff King
2011-02-10 2:24 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-10 2:31 ` Jeff King
2011-02-10 2:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-10 7:46 ` Johannes Sixt
2011-02-10 8:13 ` Joshua Juran
2011-02-10 18:00 ` Matthieu Moy
2011-02-15 7:04 ` [PATCH] command-list.txt: mark git-archive plumbing Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-15 19:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-16 9:32 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-07 20:57 ` "git add -u" broken in git 1.7.4? Matthieu Moy
2011-02-07 21:02 ` Jeff King
2011-02-07 21:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-08 1:25 ` Eric Raible
2011-02-08 2:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-07 6:48 ` Matthieu Moy
2011-02-07 8:27 ` Michael J Gruber
2011-02-07 11:15 ` SZEDER Gábor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTiksXERJ1h2du7Qu27rpKh2=q0GTWix8kSoeC24Y@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=webmaster@hartwork.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.