All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] BRIDGE: As per 802.1D clause 9.3.4 Added support to prevent processing port's own BPDU (If a loopback condition exists)
@ 2011-03-30 15:33 ` Sasikanth V
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sasikanth V @ 2011-03-30 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shemminger; +Cc: netdev, bridge, Sasikanth V


Signed-off-by: Sasikanth V <sasikanth.v19@gmail.com>
---
 net/bridge/br_private.h   |    1 +
 net/bridge/br_stp.c       |   20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 net/bridge/br_stp_if.c    |    2 ++
 net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c |    1 +
 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
index 387013d..d9f79dd 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
+++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ struct net_bridge_port
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
 	struct netpoll			*np;
 #endif
+	u8                              is_own_bpdu; /*Port recvd its own BPDU*/
 };
 
 #define br_port_exists(dev) (dev->priv_flags & IFF_BRIDGE_PORT)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
index 7370d14..491d9c6 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
@@ -107,6 +107,12 @@ static void br_root_selection(struct net_bridge *br)
 	u16 root_port = 0;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list) {
+		/*Don't consider the Port for root selection
+  		  which rx'd its own bpdu because of loopback
+		  in the bridge
+  		 */
+		if (p->is_own_bpdu)
+			continue;
 		if (br_should_become_root_port(p, root_port))
 			root_port = p->port_no;
 
@@ -278,8 +284,16 @@ static int br_supersedes_port_info(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct br_config_b
 	if (memcmp(&bpdu->bridge_id, &p->br->bridge_id, 8))
 		return 1;
 
-	if (bpdu->port_id <= p->designated_port)
+	if (bpdu->port_id <= p->designated_port) {
+		/*802.1D 9.3.4 Validation of received BPDUs
+ 		 NOTE 1—If the Bridge Identifier and Port Identifier both 
+ 		 match the values that would be transmitted in a Configuration
+		 BPDU, the BPDU is discarded to prevent processing of the Port’s 
+		 own BPDUs;*/
+		if (bpdu->port_id == p->designated_port)
+			p->is_own_bpdu = 1;
 		return 1;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -411,7 +425,7 @@ void br_port_state_selection(struct net_bridge *br)
 			p->config_pending = 0;
 			p->topology_change_ack = 0;
 			br_make_forwarding(p);
-		} else if (br_is_designated_port(p)) {
+		} else if (!p->is_own_bpdu && br_is_designated_port(p)) {
 			del_timer(&p->message_age_timer);
 			br_make_forwarding(p);
 		} else {
@@ -446,6 +460,8 @@ void br_received_config_bpdu(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct br_config_bpdu *b
 	br = p->br;
 	was_root = br_is_root_bridge(br);
 
+	p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
+
 	if (br_supersedes_port_info(p, bpdu)) {
 		br_record_config_information(p, bpdu);
 		br_configuration_update(br);
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
index 5593f5a..fc4ec63 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ void br_init_port(struct net_bridge_port *p)
 	p->state = BR_STATE_BLOCKING;
 	p->topology_change_ack = 0;
 	p->config_pending = 0;
+	p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
 }
 
 /* called under bridge lock */
@@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ void br_stp_disable_port(struct net_bridge_port *p)
 	p->state = BR_STATE_DISABLED;
 	p->topology_change_ack = 0;
 	p->config_pending = 0;
+	p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
 
 	del_timer(&p->message_age_timer);
 	del_timer(&p->forward_delay_timer);
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
index 3e96514..99ea288 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static void br_message_age_timer_expired(unsigned long arg)
 	spin_lock(&br->lock);
 	if (p->state == BR_STATE_DISABLED)
 		goto unlock;
+	p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
 	was_root = br_is_root_bridge(br);
 
 	br_become_designated_port(p);
-- 
1.7.3.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bridge] [PATCH] BRIDGE: As per 802.1D clause 9.3.4 Added support to prevent processing port's own BPDU (If a loopback condition exists)
@ 2011-03-30 15:33 ` Sasikanth V
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sasikanth V @ 2011-03-30 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shemminger; +Cc: netdev, bridge


Signed-off-by: Sasikanth V <sasikanth.v19@gmail.com>
---
 net/bridge/br_private.h   |    1 +
 net/bridge/br_stp.c       |   20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 net/bridge/br_stp_if.c    |    2 ++
 net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c |    1 +
 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
index 387013d..d9f79dd 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
+++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ struct net_bridge_port
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
 	struct netpoll			*np;
 #endif
+	u8                              is_own_bpdu; /*Port recvd its own BPDU*/
 };
 
 #define br_port_exists(dev) (dev->priv_flags & IFF_BRIDGE_PORT)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
index 7370d14..491d9c6 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
@@ -107,6 +107,12 @@ static void br_root_selection(struct net_bridge *br)
 	u16 root_port = 0;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list) {
+		/*Don't consider the Port for root selection
+  		  which rx'd its own bpdu because of loopback
+		  in the bridge
+  		 */
+		if (p->is_own_bpdu)
+			continue;
 		if (br_should_become_root_port(p, root_port))
 			root_port = p->port_no;
 
@@ -278,8 +284,16 @@ static int br_supersedes_port_info(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct br_config_b
 	if (memcmp(&bpdu->bridge_id, &p->br->bridge_id, 8))
 		return 1;
 
-	if (bpdu->port_id <= p->designated_port)
+	if (bpdu->port_id <= p->designated_port) {
+		/*802.1D 9.3.4 Validation of received BPDUs
+ 		 NOTE 1—If the Bridge Identifier and Port Identifier both 
+ 		 match the values that would be transmitted in a Configuration
+		 BPDU, the BPDU is discarded to prevent processing of the Port’s 
+		 own BPDUs;*/
+		if (bpdu->port_id == p->designated_port)
+			p->is_own_bpdu = 1;
 		return 1;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -411,7 +425,7 @@ void br_port_state_selection(struct net_bridge *br)
 			p->config_pending = 0;
 			p->topology_change_ack = 0;
 			br_make_forwarding(p);
-		} else if (br_is_designated_port(p)) {
+		} else if (!p->is_own_bpdu && br_is_designated_port(p)) {
 			del_timer(&p->message_age_timer);
 			br_make_forwarding(p);
 		} else {
@@ -446,6 +460,8 @@ void br_received_config_bpdu(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct br_config_bpdu *b
 	br = p->br;
 	was_root = br_is_root_bridge(br);
 
+	p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
+
 	if (br_supersedes_port_info(p, bpdu)) {
 		br_record_config_information(p, bpdu);
 		br_configuration_update(br);
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
index 5593f5a..fc4ec63 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ void br_init_port(struct net_bridge_port *p)
 	p->state = BR_STATE_BLOCKING;
 	p->topology_change_ack = 0;
 	p->config_pending = 0;
+	p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
 }
 
 /* called under bridge lock */
@@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ void br_stp_disable_port(struct net_bridge_port *p)
 	p->state = BR_STATE_DISABLED;
 	p->topology_change_ack = 0;
 	p->config_pending = 0;
+	p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
 
 	del_timer(&p->message_age_timer);
 	del_timer(&p->forward_delay_timer);
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
index 3e96514..99ea288 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static void br_message_age_timer_expired(unsigned long arg)
 	spin_lock(&br->lock);
 	if (p->state == BR_STATE_DISABLED)
 		goto unlock;
+	p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
 	was_root = br_is_root_bridge(br);
 
 	br_become_designated_port(p);
-- 
1.7.3.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] BRIDGE: As per 802.1D clause 9.3.4 Added support to prevent processing port's own BPDU (If a loopback condition exists)
  2011-03-30 15:33 ` [Bridge] " Sasikanth V
@ 2011-03-30 16:25   ` Stephen Hemminger
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2011-03-30 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sasikanth V; +Cc: shemminger, netdev, bridge

On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:03:36 +0530
Sasikanth V <sasikanth.v19@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Signed-off-by: Sasikanth V <sasikanth.v19@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_private.h   |    1 +
>  net/bridge/br_stp.c       |   20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  net/bridge/br_stp_if.c    |    2 ++
>  net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c |    1 +
>  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> index 387013d..d9f79dd 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ struct net_bridge_port
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
>  	struct netpoll			*np;
>  #endif
> +	u8                              is_own_bpdu; /*Port recvd its own BPDU*/
>  };
>  
>  #define br_port_exists(dev) (dev->priv_flags & IFF_BRIDGE_PORT)
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> index 7370d14..491d9c6 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> @@ -107,6 +107,12 @@ static void br_root_selection(struct net_bridge *br)
>  	u16 root_port = 0;
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list) {
> +		/*Don't consider the Port for root selection
> +  		  which rx'd its own bpdu because of loopback
> +		  in the bridge
> +  		 */
> +		if (p->is_own_bpdu)
> +			continue;
>  		if (br_should_become_root_port(p, root_port))
>  			root_port = p->port_no;
>  
> @@ -278,8 +284,16 @@ static int br_supersedes_port_info(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct br_config_b
>  	if (memcmp(&bpdu->bridge_id, &p->br->bridge_id, 8))
>  		return 1;
>  
> -	if (bpdu->port_id <= p->designated_port)
> +	if (bpdu->port_id <= p->designated_port) {
> +		/*802.1D 9.3.4 Validation of received BPDUs
> + 		 NOTE 1—If the Bridge Identifier and Port Identifier both 
> + 		 match the values that would be transmitted in a Configuration
> +		 BPDU, the BPDU is discarded to prevent processing of the Port’s 
> +		 own BPDUs;*/
> +		if (bpdu->port_id == p->designated_port)
> +			p->is_own_bpdu = 1;
>  		return 1;
> +	}
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -411,7 +425,7 @@ void br_port_state_selection(struct net_bridge *br)
>  			p->config_pending = 0;
>  			p->topology_change_ack = 0;
>  			br_make_forwarding(p);
> -		} else if (br_is_designated_port(p)) {
> +		} else if (!p->is_own_bpdu && br_is_designated_port(p)) {
>  			del_timer(&p->message_age_timer);
>  			br_make_forwarding(p);
>  		} else {
> @@ -446,6 +460,8 @@ void br_received_config_bpdu(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct br_config_bpdu *b
>  	br = p->br;
>  	was_root = br_is_root_bridge(br);
>  
> +	p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
> +
>  	if (br_supersedes_port_info(p, bpdu)) {
>  		br_record_config_information(p, bpdu);
>  		br_configuration_update(br);
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> index 5593f5a..fc4ec63 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ void br_init_port(struct net_bridge_port *p)
>  	p->state = BR_STATE_BLOCKING;
>  	p->topology_change_ack = 0;
>  	p->config_pending = 0;
> +	p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
>  }
>  
>  /* called under bridge lock */
> @@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ void br_stp_disable_port(struct net_bridge_port *p)
>  	p->state = BR_STATE_DISABLED;
>  	p->topology_change_ack = 0;
>  	p->config_pending = 0;
> +	p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
>  
>  	del_timer(&p->message_age_timer);
>  	del_timer(&p->forward_delay_timer);
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
> index 3e96514..99ea288 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static void br_message_age_timer_expired(unsigned long arg)
>  	spin_lock(&br->lock);
>  	if (p->state == BR_STATE_DISABLED)
>  		goto unlock;
> +	p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
>  	was_root = br_is_root_bridge(br);
>  
>  	br_become_designated_port(p);


The idea is valid, but putting state variable per port is an
ugly way to solve it.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bridge] [PATCH] BRIDGE: As per 802.1D clause 9.3.4 Added support to prevent processing port's own BPDU (If a loopback condition exists)
@ 2011-03-30 16:25   ` Stephen Hemminger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2011-03-30 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sasikanth V; +Cc: netdev, bridge

On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:03:36 +0530
Sasikanth V <sasikanth.v19@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Signed-off-by: Sasikanth V <sasikanth.v19@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_private.h   |    1 +
>  net/bridge/br_stp.c       |   20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  net/bridge/br_stp_if.c    |    2 ++
>  net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c |    1 +
>  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> index 387013d..d9f79dd 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ struct net_bridge_port
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
>  	struct netpoll			*np;
>  #endif
> +	u8                              is_own_bpdu; /*Port recvd its own BPDU*/
>  };
>  
>  #define br_port_exists(dev) (dev->priv_flags & IFF_BRIDGE_PORT)
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> index 7370d14..491d9c6 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> @@ -107,6 +107,12 @@ static void br_root_selection(struct net_bridge *br)
>  	u16 root_port = 0;
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list) {
> +		/*Don't consider the Port for root selection
> +  		  which rx'd its own bpdu because of loopback
> +		  in the bridge
> +  		 */
> +		if (p->is_own_bpdu)
> +			continue;
>  		if (br_should_become_root_port(p, root_port))
>  			root_port = p->port_no;
>  
> @@ -278,8 +284,16 @@ static int br_supersedes_port_info(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct br_config_b
>  	if (memcmp(&bpdu->bridge_id, &p->br->bridge_id, 8))
>  		return 1;
>  
> -	if (bpdu->port_id <= p->designated_port)
> +	if (bpdu->port_id <= p->designated_port) {
> +		/*802.1D 9.3.4 Validation of received BPDUs
> + 		 NOTE 1—If the Bridge Identifier and Port Identifier both 
> + 		 match the values that would be transmitted in a Configuration
> +		 BPDU, the BPDU is discarded to prevent processing of the Port’s 
> +		 own BPDUs;*/
> +		if (bpdu->port_id == p->designated_port)
> +			p->is_own_bpdu = 1;
>  		return 1;
> +	}
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -411,7 +425,7 @@ void br_port_state_selection(struct net_bridge *br)
>  			p->config_pending = 0;
>  			p->topology_change_ack = 0;
>  			br_make_forwarding(p);
> -		} else if (br_is_designated_port(p)) {
> +		} else if (!p->is_own_bpdu && br_is_designated_port(p)) {
>  			del_timer(&p->message_age_timer);
>  			br_make_forwarding(p);
>  		} else {
> @@ -446,6 +460,8 @@ void br_received_config_bpdu(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct br_config_bpdu *b
>  	br = p->br;
>  	was_root = br_is_root_bridge(br);
>  
> +	p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
> +
>  	if (br_supersedes_port_info(p, bpdu)) {
>  		br_record_config_information(p, bpdu);
>  		br_configuration_update(br);
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> index 5593f5a..fc4ec63 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ void br_init_port(struct net_bridge_port *p)
>  	p->state = BR_STATE_BLOCKING;
>  	p->topology_change_ack = 0;
>  	p->config_pending = 0;
> +	p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
>  }
>  
>  /* called under bridge lock */
> @@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ void br_stp_disable_port(struct net_bridge_port *p)
>  	p->state = BR_STATE_DISABLED;
>  	p->topology_change_ack = 0;
>  	p->config_pending = 0;
> +	p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
>  
>  	del_timer(&p->message_age_timer);
>  	del_timer(&p->forward_delay_timer);
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
> index 3e96514..99ea288 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static void br_message_age_timer_expired(unsigned long arg)
>  	spin_lock(&br->lock);
>  	if (p->state == BR_STATE_DISABLED)
>  		goto unlock;
> +	p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
>  	was_root = br_is_root_bridge(br);
>  
>  	br_become_designated_port(p);


The idea is valid, but putting state variable per port is an
ugly way to solve it.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] BRIDGE: As per 802.1D clause 9.3.4 Added support to prevent processing port's own BPDU (If a loopback condition exists)
  2011-03-30 16:25   ` [Bridge] " Stephen Hemminger
@ 2011-03-30 19:26     ` Sasikanth V
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sasikanth V @ 2011-03-30 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: netdev, bridge


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4952 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:03:36 +0530
> Sasikanth V <sasikanth.v19@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sasikanth V <sasikanth.v19@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  net/bridge/br_private.h   |    1 +
> >  net/bridge/br_stp.c       |   20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> >  net/bridge/br_stp_if.c    |    2 ++
> >  net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c |    1 +
> >  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> > index 387013d..d9f79dd 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> > @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ struct net_bridge_port
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> >       struct netpoll                  *np;
> >  #endif
> > +     u8                              is_own_bpdu; /*Port recvd its own
> BPDU*/
> >  };
> >
> >  #define br_port_exists(dev) (dev->priv_flags & IFF_BRIDGE_PORT)
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> > index 7370d14..491d9c6 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> > @@ -107,6 +107,12 @@ static void br_root_selection(struct net_bridge *br)
> >       u16 root_port = 0;
> >
> >       list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list) {
> > +             /*Don't consider the Port for root selection
> > +               which rx'd its own bpdu because of loopback
> > +               in the bridge
> > +              */
> > +             if (p->is_own_bpdu)
> > +                     continue;
> >               if (br_should_become_root_port(p, root_port))
> >                       root_port = p->port_no;
> >
> > @@ -278,8 +284,16 @@ static int br_supersedes_port_info(struct
> net_bridge_port *p, struct br_config_b
> >       if (memcmp(&bpdu->bridge_id, &p->br->bridge_id, 8))
> >               return 1;
> >
> > -     if (bpdu->port_id <= p->designated_port)
> > +     if (bpdu->port_id <= p->designated_port) {
> > +             /*802.1D 9.3.4 Validation of received BPDUs
> > +              NOTE 1—If the Bridge Identifier and Port Identifier both
> > +              match the values that would be transmitted in a
> Configuration
> > +              BPDU, the BPDU is discarded to prevent processing of the
> Port’s
> > +              own BPDUs;*/
> > +             if (bpdu->port_id == p->designated_port)
> > +                     p->is_own_bpdu = 1;
> >               return 1;
> > +     }
> >
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -411,7 +425,7 @@ void br_port_state_selection(struct net_bridge *br)
> >                       p->config_pending = 0;
> >                       p->topology_change_ack = 0;
> >                       br_make_forwarding(p);
> > -             } else if (br_is_designated_port(p)) {
> > +             } else if (!p->is_own_bpdu && br_is_designated_port(p)) {
> >                       del_timer(&p->message_age_timer);
> >                       br_make_forwarding(p);
> >               } else {
> > @@ -446,6 +460,8 @@ void br_received_config_bpdu(struct net_bridge_port
> *p, struct br_config_bpdu *b
> >       br = p->br;
> >       was_root = br_is_root_bridge(br);
> >
> > +     p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
> > +
> >       if (br_supersedes_port_info(p, bpdu)) {
> >               br_record_config_information(p, bpdu);
> >               br_configuration_update(br);
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> > index 5593f5a..fc4ec63 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ void br_init_port(struct net_bridge_port *p)
> >       p->state = BR_STATE_BLOCKING;
> >       p->topology_change_ack = 0;
> >       p->config_pending = 0;
> > +     p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
> >  }
> >
> >  /* called under bridge lock */
> > @@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ void br_stp_disable_port(struct net_bridge_port *p)
> >       p->state = BR_STATE_DISABLED;
> >       p->topology_change_ack = 0;
> >       p->config_pending = 0;
> > +     p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
> >
> >       del_timer(&p->message_age_timer);
> >       del_timer(&p->forward_delay_timer);
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
> > index 3e96514..99ea288 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
> > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static void br_message_age_timer_expired(unsigned long
> arg)
> >       spin_lock(&br->lock);
> >       if (p->state == BR_STATE_DISABLED)
> >               goto unlock;
> > +     p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
> >       was_root = br_is_root_bridge(br);
> >
> >       br_become_designated_port(p);
>
>
> The idea is valid, but putting state variable per port is an
> ugly way to solve it.
>

  Stephen, Thanks for looking at the patch. Will resend you the patch
without the per port state variable.
  Thanks (in my previous mail i missed out CC bridge and netdev group)

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 6061 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bridge] [PATCH] BRIDGE: As per 802.1D clause 9.3.4 Added support to prevent processing port's own BPDU (If a loopback condition exists)
@ 2011-03-30 19:26     ` Sasikanth V
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sasikanth V @ 2011-03-30 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: netdev, bridge

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4952 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:03:36 +0530
> Sasikanth V <sasikanth.v19@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sasikanth V <sasikanth.v19@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  net/bridge/br_private.h   |    1 +
> >  net/bridge/br_stp.c       |   20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> >  net/bridge/br_stp_if.c    |    2 ++
> >  net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c |    1 +
> >  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> > index 387013d..d9f79dd 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> > @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ struct net_bridge_port
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> >       struct netpoll                  *np;
> >  #endif
> > +     u8                              is_own_bpdu; /*Port recvd its own
> BPDU*/
> >  };
> >
> >  #define br_port_exists(dev) (dev->priv_flags & IFF_BRIDGE_PORT)
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> > index 7370d14..491d9c6 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> > @@ -107,6 +107,12 @@ static void br_root_selection(struct net_bridge *br)
> >       u16 root_port = 0;
> >
> >       list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list) {
> > +             /*Don't consider the Port for root selection
> > +               which rx'd its own bpdu because of loopback
> > +               in the bridge
> > +              */
> > +             if (p->is_own_bpdu)
> > +                     continue;
> >               if (br_should_become_root_port(p, root_port))
> >                       root_port = p->port_no;
> >
> > @@ -278,8 +284,16 @@ static int br_supersedes_port_info(struct
> net_bridge_port *p, struct br_config_b
> >       if (memcmp(&bpdu->bridge_id, &p->br->bridge_id, 8))
> >               return 1;
> >
> > -     if (bpdu->port_id <= p->designated_port)
> > +     if (bpdu->port_id <= p->designated_port) {
> > +             /*802.1D 9.3.4 Validation of received BPDUs
> > +              NOTE 1—If the Bridge Identifier and Port Identifier both
> > +              match the values that would be transmitted in a
> Configuration
> > +              BPDU, the BPDU is discarded to prevent processing of the
> Port’s
> > +              own BPDUs;*/
> > +             if (bpdu->port_id == p->designated_port)
> > +                     p->is_own_bpdu = 1;
> >               return 1;
> > +     }
> >
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -411,7 +425,7 @@ void br_port_state_selection(struct net_bridge *br)
> >                       p->config_pending = 0;
> >                       p->topology_change_ack = 0;
> >                       br_make_forwarding(p);
> > -             } else if (br_is_designated_port(p)) {
> > +             } else if (!p->is_own_bpdu && br_is_designated_port(p)) {
> >                       del_timer(&p->message_age_timer);
> >                       br_make_forwarding(p);
> >               } else {
> > @@ -446,6 +460,8 @@ void br_received_config_bpdu(struct net_bridge_port
> *p, struct br_config_bpdu *b
> >       br = p->br;
> >       was_root = br_is_root_bridge(br);
> >
> > +     p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
> > +
> >       if (br_supersedes_port_info(p, bpdu)) {
> >               br_record_config_information(p, bpdu);
> >               br_configuration_update(br);
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> > index 5593f5a..fc4ec63 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ void br_init_port(struct net_bridge_port *p)
> >       p->state = BR_STATE_BLOCKING;
> >       p->topology_change_ack = 0;
> >       p->config_pending = 0;
> > +     p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
> >  }
> >
> >  /* called under bridge lock */
> > @@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ void br_stp_disable_port(struct net_bridge_port *p)
> >       p->state = BR_STATE_DISABLED;
> >       p->topology_change_ack = 0;
> >       p->config_pending = 0;
> > +     p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
> >
> >       del_timer(&p->message_age_timer);
> >       del_timer(&p->forward_delay_timer);
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
> > index 3e96514..99ea288 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c
> > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static void br_message_age_timer_expired(unsigned long
> arg)
> >       spin_lock(&br->lock);
> >       if (p->state == BR_STATE_DISABLED)
> >               goto unlock;
> > +     p->is_own_bpdu = 0;
> >       was_root = br_is_root_bridge(br);
> >
> >       br_become_designated_port(p);
>
>
> The idea is valid, but putting state variable per port is an
> ugly way to solve it.
>

  Stephen, Thanks for looking at the patch. Will resend you the patch
without the per port state variable.
  Thanks (in my previous mail i missed out CC bridge and netdev group)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6061 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-30 19:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-30 15:33 [PATCH] BRIDGE: As per 802.1D clause 9.3.4 Added support to prevent processing port's own BPDU (If a loopback condition exists) Sasikanth V
2011-03-30 15:33 ` [Bridge] " Sasikanth V
2011-03-30 16:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-30 16:25   ` [Bridge] " Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-30 19:26   ` Sasikanth V
2011-03-30 19:26     ` [Bridge] " Sasikanth V

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.