From: Dante Cinco <dantecinco@gmail.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, andrew.thomas@oracle.com,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com, chris.mason@oracle.com
Subject: Re: swiotlb=force in Konrad's xen-pcifront-0.8.2 pvops domU kernel with PCI passthrough
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:52:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimOYLdDnFDxNFpDi9Syp5ZdDy_CdDvgHrjuW+yR@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CE6AF75.1050205@goop.org>
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> On 11/18/2010 11:35 AM, Dante Cinco wrote:
>> I mentioned earlier in an previous post to this thread that I'm able
>> to apply Dulloor's xenoprofile patch to the dom0 kernel but not the
>> domU kernel. So I can't do active-domain profiling but I'm able to do
>> passive-domain profiling but I don't know how reliable the results are
>> since it shows pvclock_clocksource_read as the top consumer of CPU
>> cycles at 28%.
>
> Is rdtsc emulation on? (I forget what the incantation is for that now.)
How do I check if rdtsc emulation is on? Does 'xm debug-keys s' do it?
(XEN) *** Serial input -> Xen (type 'CTRL-a' three times to switch
input to DOM0)
(XEN) TSC marked as reliable, warp = 0 (count=2)
(XEN) dom1: mode=0,ofs=0xca6f68770,khz=2666017,inc=1
(XEN) No domains have emulated TSC
I'm using xen-unstable-4.1 (22388:87f248de5230).
- Dante
>
> J
>
>> CPU: Intel Architectural Perfmon, speed 2665.98 MHz (estimated)
>> Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Clock cycles when not halted) with a
>> unit mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 100000
>> samples % image name app name symbol name
>> 918089 27.9310
>> vmlinux-2.6.36-rc7-pvops-kpcif-08-2-domu-5.11.dcinco-debug
>> domain1-kernel pvclock_clocksource_read
>> 217811 6.6265 domain1-modules domain1-modules
>> /domain1-modules
>> 188327 5.7295 vmlinux-2.6.32.25-pvops-stable-dom0-5.7.dcinco-debug
>> vmlinux-2.6.32.25-pvops-stable-dom0-5.7.dcinco-debug
>> mutex_spin_on_owner
>> 186684 5.6795
>> vmlinux-2.6.36-rc7-pvops-kpcif-08-2-domu-5.11.dcinco-debug
>> domain1-kernel __xen_spin_lock
>> 149514 4.5487
>> vmlinux-2.6.36-rc7-pvops-kpcif-08-2-domu-5.11.dcinco-debug
>> domain1-kernel __write_lock_failed
>> 123278 3.7505
>> vmlinux-2.6.36-rc7-pvops-kpcif-08-2-domu-5.11.dcinco-debug
>> domain1-kernel __kernel_text_address
>> 122906 3.7392
>> vmlinux-2.6.36-rc7-pvops-kpcif-08-2-domu-5.11.dcinco-debug
>> domain1-kernel xen_spin_unlock
>> 90903 2.7655
>> vmlinux-2.6.36-rc7-pvops-kpcif-08-2-domu-5.11.dcinco-debug
>> domain1-kernel __spin_time_accum
>> 85880 2.6127
>> vmlinux-2.6.36-rc7-pvops-kpcif-08-2-domu-5.11.dcinco-debug
>> domain1-kernel __module_address
>> 75223 2.2885
>> vmlinux-2.6.36-rc7-pvops-kpcif-08-2-domu-5.11.dcinco-debug
>> domain1-kernel print_context_stack
>> 66778 2.0316
>> vmlinux-2.6.36-rc7-pvops-kpcif-08-2-domu-5.11.dcinco-debug
>> domain1-kernel __module_text_address
>> 57389 1.7459
>> vmlinux-2.6.36-rc7-pvops-kpcif-08-2-domu-5.11.dcinco-debug
>> domain1-kernel is_module_text_address
>> 47282 1.4385 xen-syms-4.1-unstable domain1-xen
>> syscall_enter
>> 47219 1.4365
>> vmlinux-2.6.36-rc7-pvops-kpcif-08-2-domu-5.11.dcinco-debug
>> domain1-kernel prio_tree_insert
>> 46495 1.4145 vmlinux-2.6.32.25-pvops-stable-dom0-5.7.dcinco-debug
>> vmlinux-2.6.32.25-pvops-stable-dom0-5.7.dcinco-debug
>> pvclock_clocksource_read
>> 44501 1.3539
>> vmlinux-2.6.36-rc7-pvops-kpcif-08-2-domu-5.11.dcinco-debug
>> domain1-kernel prio_tree_left
>> 32482 0.9882
>> vmlinux-2.6.36-rc7-pvops-kpcif-08-2-domu-5.11.dcinco-debug
>> domain1-kernel native_read_tsc
>>
>> I ran oprofile (0.9.5 with xenoprofile patch) for 20 seconds while the
>> I/Os were running. Here's the command I used:
>>
>> opcontrol --start --xen=/boot/xen-syms-4.1-unstable
>> --vmlinux=/boot/vmlinux-2.6.32.25-pvops-stable-dom0-5.7.dcinco-debug
>> --passive-domains=1
>> --passive-images=/boot/vmlinux-2.6.36-rc7-pvops-kpcif-08-2-domu-5.11.dcinco-debug
>>
>> I had to remove dom0_max_vcpus=1 (but kept dom0_vcpus_pin=true) in the
>> Xen command line. Otherwise, oprofile only gives the samples from
>> CPU0.
>>
>> I'm going to try perf next.
>>
>> - Dante
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-19 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-11 1:16 swiotlb=force in Konrad's xen-pcifront-0.8.2 pvops domU kernel with PCI passthrough Dante Cinco
2010-11-11 16:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-11-11 18:31 ` Dante Cinco
2010-11-11 19:03 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-11-11 19:42 ` Lin, Ray
2010-11-12 15:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-11-12 16:20 ` Lin, Ray
2010-11-12 16:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-11-12 19:38 ` Lin, Ray
2010-11-12 22:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-11-12 22:57 ` Lin, Ray
2010-11-16 17:07 ` Dante Cinco
2010-11-16 18:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-11-16 19:43 ` Dante Cinco
2010-11-16 20:15 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-11-18 1:09 ` Dante Cinco
2010-11-18 17:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-11-18 17:28 ` Chris Mason
2010-11-18 17:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-18 18:43 ` Dante Cinco
2010-11-18 18:52 ` Lin, Ray
2010-11-18 19:35 ` Dante Cinco
2010-11-18 21:20 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-11-18 21:39 ` Lin, Ray
2010-11-19 0:20 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-11-19 1:38 ` Dante Cinco
2010-11-19 17:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-11-19 17:52 ` Dante Cinco [this message]
2010-11-19 17:58 ` Keir Fraser
2010-11-19 22:36 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-11-20 0:13 ` Dante Cinco
2010-11-19 17:55 ` Lin, Ray
2010-11-12 18:29 ` Dante Cinco
2010-11-11 22:32 ` Dante Cinco
2010-11-12 1:02 ` Dante Cinco
2010-11-12 16:58 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTimOYLdDnFDxNFpDi9Syp5ZdDy_CdDvgHrjuW+yR@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dantecinco@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.thomas@oracle.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.