All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] hide guard page for stacks that grow upwards
@ 2010-08-24 22:03 ` Luck, Tony
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Luck, Tony @ 2010-08-24 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-ia64

pa-risc and ia64 have stacks that grow upwards. Don't
show the guard page on upward growing vma in /proc/$$/maps

Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

---

This looks useful too ... but I can't see where the code is that
made vm_start be PAGE_SIZE lower to begin with. I'd expect to have
to make a matching change to make vm_end PAGE_SIZE higher for the
VM_GROWSUP areas.

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 439fc1f..ef262f6 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static void show_map_vma(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	int flags = vma->vm_flags;
 	unsigned long ino = 0;
 	unsigned long long pgoff = 0;
-	unsigned long start;
+	unsigned long start, end;
 	dev_t dev = 0;
 	int len;
 
@@ -223,12 +223,15 @@ static void show_map_vma(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 
 	/* We don't show the stack guard page in /proc/maps */
 	start = vma->vm_start;
+	end = vma->vm_end;
 	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN)
 		start += PAGE_SIZE;
+	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSUP)
+		end -= PAGE_SIZE;
 
 	seq_printf(m, "%08lx-%08lx %c%c%c%c %08llx %02x:%02x %lu %n",
 			start,
-			vma->vm_end,
+			end,
 			flags & VM_READ ? 'r' : '-',
 			flags & VM_WRITE ? 'w' : '-',
 			flags & VM_EXEC ? 'x' : '-',

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] hide guard page for stacks that grow upwards
@ 2010-08-24 22:03 ` Luck, Tony
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Luck, Tony @ 2010-08-24 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-ia64

pa-risc and ia64 have stacks that grow upwards. Don't
show the guard page on upward growing vma in /proc/$$/maps

Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

---

This looks useful too ... but I can't see where the code is that
made vm_start be PAGE_SIZE lower to begin with. I'd expect to have
to make a matching change to make vm_end PAGE_SIZE higher for the
VM_GROWSUP areas.

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 439fc1f..ef262f6 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static void show_map_vma(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	int flags = vma->vm_flags;
 	unsigned long ino = 0;
 	unsigned long long pgoff = 0;
-	unsigned long start;
+	unsigned long start, end;
 	dev_t dev = 0;
 	int len;
 
@@ -223,12 +223,15 @@ static void show_map_vma(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 
 	/* We don't show the stack guard page in /proc/maps */
 	start = vma->vm_start;
+	end = vma->vm_end;
 	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN)
 		start += PAGE_SIZE;
+	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSUP)
+		end -= PAGE_SIZE;
 
 	seq_printf(m, "%08lx-%08lx %c%c%c%c %08llx %02x:%02x %lu %n",
 			start,
-			vma->vm_end,
+			end,
 			flags & VM_READ ? 'r' : '-',
 			flags & VM_WRITE ? 'w' : '-',
 			flags & VM_EXEC ? 'x' : '-',

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] hide guard page for stacks that grow upwards
  2010-08-24 22:03 ` Luck, Tony
@ 2010-08-24 22:23   ` Linus Torvalds
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-08-24 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Luck, Tony; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-ia64

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Luck, Tony <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:
>
> This looks useful too ... but I can't see where the code is that
> made vm_start be PAGE_SIZE lower to begin with. I'd expect to have
> to make a matching change to make vm_end PAGE_SIZE higher for the
> VM_GROWSUP areas.

That's the fault path - the very check_stack_guard_page() logic itself.

In other words, nowhere do we _explicitly_ make the stack larger by
one page, but nowhere do we explicitly size the stack in the first
place! The stack grows by being populated, and every time a new page
is populated, check_stack_guard_page() will have expanded the stack
vma by one extra page.

                   Linus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] hide guard page for stacks that grow upwards
@ 2010-08-24 22:23   ` Linus Torvalds
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-08-24 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Luck, Tony; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-parisc, linux-ia64

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Luck, Tony <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:
>
> This looks useful too ... but I can't see where the code is that
> made vm_start be PAGE_SIZE lower to begin with. I'd expect to have
> to make a matching change to make vm_end PAGE_SIZE higher for the
> VM_GROWSUP areas.

That's the fault path - the very check_stack_guard_page() logic itself.

In other words, nowhere do we _explicitly_ make the stack larger by
one page, but nowhere do we explicitly size the stack in the first
place! The stack grows by being populated, and every time a new page
is populated, check_stack_guard_page() will have expanded the stack
vma by one extra page.

                   Linus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-24 22:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-24 22:03 [PATCH] hide guard page for stacks that grow upwards Luck, Tony
2010-08-24 22:03 ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-24 22:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-08-24 22:23   ` Linus Torvalds

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.